Rue

Don't deflect. I answered directly your comment as to how people can question what is going on until they hear the discussion on racism. Spare me the pathetic deflection. Also no one forces you or anyone else to stretch their attention span. Save it.

When someone picks their nose whether they do it with a finger, knife, toothpick, cue tip, their friend's finger, I don't care -it still produces snot. The rest was pretty much the same as the first sentence so let me leave it at the word snot.

If you are waiting for the government to tell you "things" you need to get a life. You might also want to get up off your naïve buttocks and do your own searching for answers. Waiting for the government to explain to you things is no different then having a schizophrenic do the same. You are sadly mistaken if you think you can find out anything unless you share the same delusions or medication which no doubt you do when it comes to Eye or Justin.

Two days pot is league and you are reduced to some sort of stoned jargon. Get back to me when the buzz is off. Or buzz off. Or whatever. I think you might try answer in Ojibiwa. It would be easier to understand,

Please. You engage when you selectively feel like it. Save it Saint Michael of the Hardner. Regards, Rue of the Ruins

. Does your liberal guilt have no limits? Gads such a Saint.

Start another thread whether that is truly a Sanatic hand gesture or him simply drying nails after a manicure. As for this thread with all due respect, its about whether we should spend time and taxpayer money for a bunch of snot nosed self proclaimed experts to discuss racism. In regards to Satanism I know Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan personally. They both have had my spawn. Its too late to save humanity from us. We shapeshift everywhere dude. Why just last week people mistook me for a large lizard. Now the legalization of pot. I will for sure be mistaken as an alligator. I look like Ted Cruz....green and jello like.

Sorry I echoed your comment.

Then lead by example Saint Michael. You just engaged in the same thing you accuse others of. But hey why point that out.

People who claim to be experts on racism means what exactly> How does someone with some academic degree or a presumption in their mind they are experts, become an expert on racism? The very notion is idiotic. Racism? All the isms are what exactly? They are part of life we are all aware of and have to deal with. Since when do we need to have some individuals who claim to be experts tell us the isms exist. Did you need to be told that? You think its a good idea that people who know what they are talking about need to be consulted? Really? Who decides they know what they are talking about and why because you think its a good idea, others who do not are denying racism exists as you suggested? I don't deny isms exist but I sure as hell do not need some pretentious elitist snot nosed academics lecturing me on it and getting paid for that exercise. Can you give this Jew a break. I never met anyone at anytime who had anything remotely related to a good idea talk to me let alone consult with me over anti-Semitism and the last thing I want is some pretentious liberal leftist telling me because I am a Zionist I am a racist or presume to tell me what it feels like or what should be done about anti-semites. Actions not words. I have a Prime Minister and a government that created a holocaust memorial and didn't even have the decency to put a plague on it or say in the opening speech 6 million Jews died. Ooops it slipped their mind. Save your experts, and taxpayers money telling me what they think they know. In fact I am now telling them directly through you SHADDUP. Save your lectures. Its a bunch of bullshit make work for Liberals. Its classic Trudeau trendy leftism. Can you get real. A bunch of elitist, sheltered snot nosed academics telling me what discrimination is-is a crock. It does nothing and has done nothing for me as a minority and I am an expert on what it feels like to read anti-Semitic crap on this board disguised by leftists as anti Zionism. Save it. Been there done that. No talk from a bunch of snot noses will get me in a specific golf course nor do I want to play golf. Don't use my minority status and the fact people do not like me as an excuse, a pretense, a cover, for elitist leftists to pander for ethnic votes and verbally masterbate. No matter who has been charged no Jew has been given affirmative action in our favour nor have we asked for it. We have survived the way every minority has in this country, by over-coming on an individual level that which we found to be an obstacle. The only thing to come out of ISM talks is affirmative action which simply changes who is being discriminated against. Thanks but we Jews are the target of discrimination by lefitist and rightist extremists equally. Y'all look the same and sound the same. Come on my lawn, I will be prepared. I certainly don't need some snot face to tell me how to deal with Taxme or Marcus on this forum thank you. I will handle it. Shalom, and then some. Any time you want a bagel and lox ask. In my house you are welcome and respected. I need no liberal to tell me that.

Short answer, at this time human rights activists have declared any attempt to contain population growth a human rights violation. Bottom line, planned parenthood let alone population control is shrouded in references to illuminati conspiracies of the hidden elite trying to consolidate their control, by wiping out unruly savages they do not need as slaves. Me I am only too glad to cooperate. I am rotting as we speak and will feed myself to the vultures soon enough.

It comes down to how to spend collected tax dollars. We all know that. We also know it's about making priorities in public policies as to what we spend that money on. Then it becomes a discussion as to what money currently being spent should be instead spent on social services for vets. For starters the 10 million given Kadr. Obviously the question will come down to priorities as to where to spend tax dollars. You want to find wasted money, I think it will take far longer to explain than any attention span exhibited by leftists on this forum can handle. You geniuses can't handle too many sentences.

Again you make salient arguments Arg and I edited my response while you wrote yours anticipating additional issues. Bottom line, if two consenting adults are not reproducing, and their decision is not based on violence, exploitation, it may not be a concern for the state, and become a moral decision to be decided between individuals privately. As I stated I am loath to use the state to define sexuality nor do I consider myself a role model of chastity and righteousness. I sleep with dogs.

I just read this. The logic is sound if the only issue was children being born deformed but its not. Further using your argument does it mean paedophilia should be legal as long as no one gets pregnant? The incest relationship is not just about making genetically defective children but also creating a plethora of complex negative psychological, emotional and physical health issues other than defective children.. Do you really think someone who has sex with his mother or sister could be healthy and have a positive life? I have been one on one with incest victims in court. Their stories and the impact on them led me to learn the damage done via incest can be multi-generational, contagious and is very rarely consensual or between people of equal capacity and power. I am loath to morally judge behaviour but I draw the line with paedophilia, incest, sexual assault and yes I believe laws dealing with sexual behaviour must set limitations. I do have a Freudian bias as to this issue as well. I follow Freud's conclusions as to the need to limit, i.e. repress certain sexual desires if society is to evolve past basic primate behaviour. I also believe that while sex has a purpose to procreate life, in the case of humans, it may also have a pleasure function. I don't believe either issue should be used as sole criteria for defining social morale and laws but form part of a wider criteria of considerations.

Betsy on this one put aside all the partisan pro Trump crap. Had this candidate been picked by the Democrats you would be the first to scream bloody murder over his competency. Partisanship colours how people consider their candidates and it makes them willing to be blind to common sense and decency. This man is a Yale graduate. Its all about his connections. If he did not have those connections he would have never been considered. He is part of the very elitist establishment Trump claims he is draining the swamp of. Let's be very clear. He demonstrated anger, lack of impulse control and said things during the hearing that exhibit precisely the kind of demeanour that does NOT belong on any bench let alone the highest court of the land in the US. He failed to control himself and carry himself with decency, tact and diplomacy. There are no excuses. In fact Kavanough showed he exact same character flaws, psychological issues and lack of morality Trump does-he's a photocopy of Trump. Trump is a narcissist and will surround himself as a result with people who reflect his own perceived behaviour. Trump went out and found an ignorant, foul mouthed bully. Gee what a surprise. Then you had the US President doing what he does, standing up in front of a partisan crowd of trained monkeys belittling and ridiculing the witness no different then he once did with a disabled journalist. Trump is a pathetic excuse of a bully using his position to insult, abuse and divide.. You had the US President, a man who brags about copping a feel and who treats his own wife like a piece of garbage for the whole public to see defending this man and portraying him as a victim. If that is the kind of Christian values you would champion so be it. For heaven's sake Betsy, no one with any basic sense of decency would defend Trump or this Kavanough after what went down. You want this man marrying your daughter? Really? This is what it comes down to that you will apologize and look the other way on such people? Let's get back to basic values of courtesy, respect, tolerance, gentility. Or do you want to keep going with this primal behaviour? Just as Trump can't get any lower, he does. Ridiculing a witness? Why would someone, anyone, let alone a President engage in such slovenly behaviour. Someone needed to take Trump outside and break his nose years ago when he first pulled this crap. I grew up with plenty of Trumps. Nothing a broken nose wouldn't have fixed. You are defending privileged snot faced bastards.

Why are you being logical and engaging in common sense? Stop it! I mean you could become contagious and then Lord knows what could happen-peace, tolerance, level headed thinking. Good God stop!

I doubt he offends anyone at this point. He does however provide a very strong argument why incest should remain illegal. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/07/cousin-marriage-can-reduce-i-q-a-lot/#.W7yNR4-cFpk https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC392897/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608001608

This reminds me of the good old days with Radio Moscow broadcasting on shortwave. Workers of the world unite and defeat the imperialist colonialist anti revolutionary reactionary elitist bourgoise! That one was funny...posing Trump as a champion of the proletariat. Hah. Donald defender of the workers. Damn that is funny. Leonid, Nikita, Josef, Niky and now Comrade Donald. Got it. Would you get over Paul Henderson already!

I have never whined to you or any "American". Repeating your words, I don't give a damn if you want to worship a pathetic compromised Putin dupe. Knock yourself out. Also I hope the 3.5% increased access for selling skim milk in Canada gives you joy as well.

We is you. Don't expand yourself into a universe. I agree you don't see a lot of things. The UN speech Trump gave is right out of Stalin's foreign policy and repeated by Kruschev, Brezhnev, Andropov, Putin and their new sphincter Donny Boy.

Interesting but everything you said above is word for word the same doctrine Putin has been spewing long before Donald showed up. In fact your last sentence comes from words Putin used to defend going into Syria, Georgia and Ukraine. Listen the use of Trump as your sphincter muscle doesn't fool me. I know the smell of Putinskyite methane anywhere. It's all those rotted potatoes. Come on comrade Trump as your vehicle to present Putinities? Really boychik trying to kiss people when you got all those cold sores just makes no sense. Ah you guys are something revising cold war tactics. Later Boris. Tell Natasha she put on weight and needs electrolysis.

Here let me help but Please sit you sound easily aroused and confused. Trump is a compromised dupe for Putin precisely because of how dumb as nails as he is. Go on now take a breath.

1. You response provides an excellent example of why incest should remain illegal. 2.Trudeau's father was part of a legal process carried out by many people that decriminalize a person for being gay. It has nothing to do with when gay men or gay women choose to have sex or how often. Sodomy which is what you were probably referring to by the way, used to be illegal for heterosexuals as well as homosexuals. 3.Trudeau was bisexual and never denied he was. Everyone in Quebec was well aware of this. If you need an up to date list of gays and lesbians which it sounds like you do go to: www.wheredotheyputit.html.com. Finally when you start a sentence with the words " it is believed" it does not make your opinion any more valid by distancing it's origins from you. Regards, Dr. Rue, proctologist to the stars

..and this is due to Trump...come on BC for someone who suggests Canada over-emphasizes his significance you surec as hell do give him credit for issues he has no clue about. He has nothing to do with the details being worked out and never did. He is a loud distraction that if anything has undermined the US negotiators. The things you are suggesting are as a result of him being a rude belligerent ignoramus are hilarious.

I say it again. Your entire platform is from a Putin handbook. Thanks but you blew it big time with trying to pose Trump as up against the illuminati. Save it Boris. Your words come right out of a disinformation primer for first year officers.