Rue

Do you speak for everyone? LOL. Oh Eye, Taxme, Marcus, Husdon Jones is it at al, did you hear that? LOL THAT WAS FUNNY.

Sure, the same people you call Palestinian. Go on try figure that one out. Might take some time.

Bingo there it is. The double standard from the very person demonstrating contempt for the beliefs of others.

Of course YOU don't. That attitude where you expect people to agree with you but in the next breath show contempt for anyone you disagree with evidences manifestation of elitist narcissistic unilateral pronouncements by you and shows contempt for anyone or thing that won't serve you.

If you mean anti American you bet. If you mean prejudice against Jews for believing they have a right to be Israeli and live in a Jewish state you bet. If the shoe fits why deny it...If you would like though I can call you any name you want. The point is your words define you on this forum not me.

Open rallies screaming for Israel to be wiped out attract wonderful people and it unifies leftists and neo Nazis. What a bloody joke.

Hey if the shoe fits made wars it..in his mouth evidently.

Well now look whose true agenda is out in the open. What a pathetic passive aggressive aside.

The Kingdom of Eretz Israel existed prior to 1946. If you want to ignore that and pretend it poof just appeared in 1949 it won't change history.

No one has been eradicated. PROVIDE the proof of eradication. It is irresponsible accusations such as that one that render your comments a joke. Further you clearly do not understand Palestinians only called themselves that in 1967 and more to the point the majority of people on the West Bank in 1946 were not born there but came there from other Muslim states. Why let history get in your way.

Its naïve to think we will or can take action. Canada talks. It offers words. We have no other method to deal with human rights violations outside our nation. Sending troops to certain countries or aiding Kurds, are isolated feel good missions. I am not saying they aren't beneficial but I am saying they are exceptions to the rule and very problematic to engage in due to the limitations of our armed forces. The same leftists who want us to engage in human rights enforcement don't want us to use our military to do so. They think we can prance into countruies and wear quaint costumes and dance and prance for the cameras and lecture others how to behave. The reality is human rights are a collective rights concept created by affluent Westerners feeling guilty about their own affluence. These concepts are therefore ineffective and unrealistic and the product of sheltered, soft, guilt ridden individuals living in bubbles of reality far removed from the arena of conflict. The bloody reality of enforcing human rights and the use of a gun, a drone aircraft, a well aimed missile is not for human rights activists brought up to believe everyone thinks and smells like they do. Tell me how do you think human rights activists deal with corrupt governments? Well they report their activities in bulletins and reports. Then what? Human rights activism? What does it mean-feel good words or actual concrete immediate action that may even entail engaging in using a weapon? You know what it means... it means the nightmare forced on Romeo Dallaires when he and his troops were told to stand down and simply watch as in front of their very eyes thousands were murdered because the UN said they were not allowed to enforce human rights. The cold reality Is we criticize human rights activism at times because it is a farse. It demonizes legitimate military trying to enforce it and places terrorists on the same moral plane as legitimate military. It provides feel good babble exercises for guilt ridden Western politicians and sheltered feel good liberals who call terrorists freedom fighters. In Gaza I watched terror cells recruit children. It wasn't about reacting to oppression or the US or even Israel. It was about drug dealing. It was about selling drugs and prostitution and using the cover of hating Israel to get this done. It had to do about killing Palestinians who chose to go into Israel to work and live peacefully with Israelis because when they did that they undermined the terrorist power base and need to depend on them. Read the naïve crap on this board about how terrorism is simply some quaint freedon revolt against Yankee imperialists. I saw the PA in action on the West Bank. Some were actually idealistic but they left because they were the first targeted for death by their own organization for not terrorizing. I know I worked with such people-their crime? They wanted to set up grass roots projects where Palestinians and Israelis worked together on the same water irrigation, electricity, sewage and garbage recycling projects,. Had grass roots cooperation come to fruition with mutually beneficial interests, it would have made terrorists unecessary. It would have meant peace. Then what would people like Arafat have done? How could he justify his iron clad rule and corruption let alone existence? Terrorism comes from people in the alleged oppressed classes taking advantage of the breakdown to consolidate their own power at the expense of their fellow citizens. It uses the cover of freedom and external enemy scapegoats to create itself. Many Human rights activists don't get that. They live in sheltered environments brought up with quaint romantic notions like oppressor and down trodden and are blind to the fact that the worst oppressors come from within the very same society not someone outside that society.. Sure some human rights activists mean well. They give needles to drug addicts so they can get a clean injection but they don't deal with what happens when the needles are discarded and used again or the state of addicts in between shots. Their vision is selective to ease their conscience not deal with the continuing broader ugliness. I never met a human rights activist who gives out the needles sticking around to give mouth to mouth to some foaming over dosed bulgy eyed twitching lice infested individuals, they expect the paramedics and firefighters or nurses or doctors to do that. Refugees? Yah I have been in some camps. Tell me...where are all the Muslim country human rights activists sponsorsing them to come to Muslim nations? You have any idea why Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, Lebanon , Bahrain, the UAE, Kuwait, never allowed and will never Palestinians citizenship? How is it Germany took in 3 million Muslim refugees and the Arab League of Nations instead chose to imprison Palestinians in refugee camps rather than take them in? Ever hear a human rights activist ask Arab League nations why they never took in Palestinians or help finance the camps they imprisoned them into? Human rights has been compromised by political partisanship and bias. That is why it is criticized. The UN has a Human Rights council full of nations violating basic human rights but pointing the finger at Israel or the US but never themselves and their own track records of injustice. .

I do not and have never on this forum or any forum ignored or fail to criticize the nation of Saudi Arabia being along with Iran the two leading financiers of world terror. I have written many responses criticizing the duplicity of Saudi Arabian foreign policy and how it tries to pay off terrorists from attacking it. I have openly challenged the Obama regime, Turkey and Morsi when he was leader of Egypt forming a Muslim Brotherhood alliance that along with Saudi Arabia crated and financed ISIS. I have openly challenged Saudi Arabia's treatment of women, gays, indentured workers it brings in from other nations. I have openly challenged US policies that supported Gaddafi, Nasser, Samoza, Pinochet, Hussein, Morsi and other leaders. I openly challenged the Bush regime for using a private army with financial ties to Dick Chaney, Donald Rumsfeld, and their Haliburton connection which spawned this use. That is the difference between us. If you want to find a post where I support Saudi Arabia please share. As for my support of the US, like most genuine friends of the US I am not afraid to criticize its policies. I am not afraid of the US and having disagreements openly with Bush-Chaney. I don't think she fears me exercising my freedom of speech as Eye would suggest. As for your bias and selectivity, your attempt to deflect from is weak. Why not wear your badge of leftist selectivity with honour rather than run from it? Me? I openly state I support the US as the largest democracy on the planet and being crucial to the existence of all democratic nations and keeping us safe from terrorism. No I do not like Trump, do I did not like Obama, yes I criticize many US policies on trade. So? Lol.

Why does your depiction blame the Yemen civil war on the US and ignore the role of Saudi Arabia and Iran? Why does your depiction ignore the role of Yemenite Shiites and Sunnis who have been at war with each other long before the US was created? Why does your depiction ignore the role Russia and China play in enabling Yemeni Shiites to be financed by Iran to engage in war against Sunni Yemenites? Why do you never acknowledge both sides of a conflict and like Eye try spew out pat anti American, blame it on the US answers? Here let me answer that... because you are a bigot and find being prejudice acceptable as long as you engage in it and no one else.

In regards to your first comment-all countries have foreign policies that reflect whether their best interests conflict with or complement with other countries' interests. Your comment the US interferes with other democracies because it is afraid of people is simplistic and silly. If the US and all other nations interfere as you refer to it, it is most likely because of reasons tied to protecting US financial interests. This is the same thing with all other nations. Your depiction infers the US is the only one that does this. Countries try control political decisions in other countries. They can do so through their government or privately. They use all kinds of methods from legitimate negotiation and trade deals to bribery and war. What is your point? The entire world has operated like this for thousands of years and you depict it as some evil American conspiracy caused by ALL Americans being afraid of people being free. Tell me in your analysis do you ever discuss whether the Russian or Chinese government fear their own people let alone their colony nations speaking freely? How about Iran? Have you discussed why it finances terrorism globally and internally , precisely because it does not want people to speak or think freely ? Do you think Turkey and Iran give a flying phack about the freedom of their own citizens let alone Kurds? How about Assad? You think he is afraid of democracy? You seem selective in what you notice and which countries you demonize. Even if Americans are responsible for their government's actions does that give you the right to assign moral blame to all of them? You came on this forum and said it is unfair to blame all Muslims for the actions of Muslim terrorists. Now using your analogy if all Americans are morally to blame for US foreign policy, then should we blame all Muslims for the policies of Muslim terrorists? How about you finish that sentence. Making a blanket statement that terrorism is simply to get rid of American government interference is illogical. Chechnyan terrorists are engaged against Russia not the US. Kurd Terrorists are engaged against the current Turkish and Iranian regimes as are legitimate Kurds. Turkey and Iran engage in state genocide and terrorism against Kurds and that has nothing to do with the US. Hezbollah terrorism against Lebanese citizens or Syrian citizens has nothing to do with the US and everything to do with it fearing Sunni Muslims or Christians. Sudan terrorizes Southern Sudan attacking its Christians and engaging in s state terrorism against them. That is not a reaction to Amerian interference-Cina controls its economy. The Muslim terrorist attaks on Christian Nigerians by Boca Raton is not in response to US interference. There are thousands of terror cells attacking innocent civilians for many complex reasons some dating back thousands of years and are a continuation of violence that arose long before the US was created For you to try provide a simplistic formula describing terrorism as a response to US interference is illogical not to mention simplistic to the extreme. Your reference to all Americans being responsible for their foreign policy is an attempt to stereotype all Americans with negative traits. It is the reasoning process of a bigot. Using your reasoning every leftist thinks like you and Is therefore morally culpable for your thoughts. Lol let's round you all up then and ship you to a democracy that does not fear the US, i.e., the People's Democratic Republic of North Korea.

If Palestine is being eradicated why does its population continue to grow at the rate it does?

Eyeball not even Hamas or the PA use the shrinking map when they troll on political forums now due to their being completely exposed as false. Come on make an effort to read what you disseminate.

1. Governments distrust other governments. That is not specific to the US government neither is terrorism caused solely by a reaction to US foreign policy. 2. Your comments also fail to differentiate between Americans and specific American government foreign policy. 3. It's no surprise you engage in such simplistic attempts to blame Americans for terrorism. 4. Terrorism is not a phenomena caused by people simply to rid themselves of Americans fear of freedom. Get out of mama's basement and find out why.

That means what? Do you mean the freedom to terrorize? Who you of course not. You mean the US the entire country lives to rob people of their right to be just like you. Uh yah.

The immigration classes do need to be revisited and in particular the investor class yes Argus. I myself want to scrap the refugee process and instead re-focus the money on humanitarian support in refugee camps and bring refugees in sponsored by charities but not the government. I also think we have to be realistic in better matching immigration to those with transferable skills to Canada.

Interesting I write something to Taxme and you claim you can't follow because of the spelling and grammar which of course is your passive aggressive way of defending his positions which I never doubted you support. Then you write the above disjointed babble after pointing the finger at my sarcasm? Ah hah. Now you speak for Canada...You clearly have a narcissistic affectation that illustrates you can't conceive anyone does not have your opinions. Who the phack do you speak for when you say Canadians are embarrassed about what our Armed Forces did in Afghanistan? I for one thank them. They did something your little bubble of a privileged world can't grasp. You have no clue why they were their and how it's the pricevpaid so you can be so damn narcissistic and self possessed in your comments. Yah I know you can't understand. It's the spelling.

What fantasy world do you live in stating Switzerland doesn't involve itself in global bankster made wars? It is the world's largest global banker financing wars. Man you need a shake.

Gosh I also am having a hard time following your grammar. Who is we? Who is they?

The Swiss have never fought a war because they safeguard the financing of wars. Their nation lives off the interest from stolen money and hiding stolen money and using that money to finance war. That is why they are no role model. No one threw any Jew in your face. Relax there are no flying Jews heading to your nostrils. Ease up on the bacon, it sounds like it's getting to you.

One can not hear if they do not first learn not to listen to words and instead welcome the silence. Wind, the sound of water moving, birds chanting, give hints, but you have to eventually even tune them out to get to the silence required to hear and when you do it does not come in words it comes in visions that transcend any words. Since when is a word needed to explain the colour of blood or the smell of rotting flesh or the sounds of maggots moving through flesh? Words are just sounds tongues can generate. Language on the other had conveys lessons of understanding and so requires no one system of sound to be imparted. Don't confuse Babel with the voice of paradox. The combined totality of all sounds is silence. Fractal theory proved that.

Sheer silence.