Rue

The fact that Dawkins contends that "God" does not exist has nothing to do with this thread. This thread was to comment on the killing of innocent Jews and specific individuals have hijacked it to avoid discussing that. You should no why they have hijacked it and deflect. Now I put it right back on track. Again a mass shooting this time 12 students and a Sheriff. Again the common denominator will be a white man, in his late twenties to early thirties with feelings of inferiority, lack of control of his life and tries to compensate for his feelings of impotency in society by shooting off a gun (phallic extension) to violate innocent people. Its an attempt to regain control, power, might. Its the product of a mind in a body that is conflicted and has bought into a me against the world, us against them, cognitive process. It is, but your comments do not discuss how the mass shooting is an expression of anti-Semitism or for that matter how anti-Semitism and extremism fuels such shootings. Your words evidence deliberate deflection from the topic and the latest drivel from you: "Goyem to the left Goyem to the right. Oh the Jewmanity ... ". Your words and their ignorance speak for themselves. Is that your idea of humour? Wit? Sarcasm? Jewmanity? You can't go a sentence without slipping in to your contemptuous tone about Jews.

It has nothing to do with the thread. The second ignorant comment has everything to do with your role on this thread.

Deal with the fact it has nothing to do with the thread.

As you wrote yours I was writing the same thing. I of course agree with your comments.

Great question. I like to call myself extreme moderate and a blue liberal red tory smack in the middle classic Edmund Burke conservative which I believe allows for compassion for the poor in its system. So you ask a rhetorical question I think all moderate conservatives wrestle with yes. However that same question applies to liberals/leftists. They are equally as beholden to special moneyed interests. Who in politics is not? I mean whether you call yourself Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservatative, even NDP how are you not beholden. The NDP's beholden moneyed interest that controls them are unions. The Liberals have a long list of parasites I mean moneyed interests starting with well where to you want to start, Bombardier? Morneau-Sheppell?

Yes. Concede. Sorry I misunderstood these words: "...was the creation of one of Hitler's Nazi goons. " Stand corrected. I misread it to mean Hitler. I give you a shaddup in my face. Taken. Yes now back to Trump. Not sure why anyone would support him you included whether they are left, right, Jew, gentile, woman, man, gay straight, fat, skinny, short, tall. Is he more of an ally to Israel than Obama, of course, anyone would be. Nicki Haley was great in the UN but he fired her. He fired his most credible foreign policy advisor when he got rid of her. I also think his firing of Jeff Sessions just continues his narcissistic childish displays...that and that idiot tantrum with the CNN reported Acosta. Each day he lowers the POTUS to a toilet.

I stand corrected thanks. 6 years, not 4. Sorry. On the above you may be dead on I concede but I do think there is a rump of core of anti Trump Republicans still loyal to McCain and Bush that are not going anywhere and may feel embolded now. Certainly I must also concede to what you point out.

The Palestinian cause was incited and exploited by Nazis over their mutual hatred of Jews but with due respect not created by Hitler It was a direct result of the British and French using divide and conquer techniques between Jews and Muslims, Muslims and Muslims, Muslims and Christians and Jews and their need to control and create puppet colonies. The seeds of civil turmoil already existed. Then the British and French created colonial borders forcing competing groups who hated one another to the same nations to create a recipe of instability to justify their continued presence. Had the French not lied to Prince Faisal to get him to rip up his agreement with Weitzman, Israel would have existed as a Switzerland type nation in a Muslim Middle East and the two would have been allies with no need of British or French interference. The French assured that agreement was ripped up by lying to Faisal so they could get him to rip up the agreement which he did only to find himself then arrested by the French so they could thhen create the states of Syria and Lebanon. The British then played Faisal by appointing his two sons as Kings of two colony states, Iraq and Jordan and then a third colony state, Saudi Arabia for the rest of his family. So its far too simple to blame only Hitler for the Palestinian cause as you call it and Churchill in his memoirs is quote frank and candid in his role in creating a flood of Muslims into Palestine to deliberately make it impossible for Jews to create a state and triggering Palestinian Muslims being displaced by outside Muslims something today's Palestinian leaders have convenient amnesia about. Yes its true Arafat is part of a phenomena fanned by Hitler, but the Arab League was a bunch of British and French colonial puppet states. Then the Soviets got involved, as well as Nasser's Egypt, Saudi Arabia and post Shah Iran in financing terror not to mention Turkey, Britain, France, China, the EU and US all who have involved themselves in the region competing for their own best interests and exasperating matters.. Absolutely no doubt the Mufti of Jerusalem was a Nazi crony and supporter and was financed by them but he was what he was long before he made an ally of Hitler. To be accurate the "Palestinian cause" originates from and is a mutated form of the hatred of extremist Muslims towards Jews which dates back thousands of years and is related to the Muslim religious notion of dhimmitude, i.e., that non Muslims, i.e., Jews can not own land or have a nation. Not all Palestinians were pro Nazi. Palestinian Muslims fought side by side Jewish Palestinians in the British Palestinian army against Hitler. As well specific Jordanians who technically were born in Palestine before the British arbitrarily called 80% of Palestine Jordan, donated land for Jewish settlers and supported Israel and died because of it. Beduin Palestinians and Druze who are as Palestinian as anyone, have died as loyal soldiers in the IDF. I point that out because you have people on this board who want Palestinians to hate Israelis and use that as another platform to hate Jews and Muslims. I don't want to buy into that. I don't think blaming Britain, France, Nazi Germany, anyone at this point, is helpful. It simply leads to divisive opinions. I say what I do out of respect for you not because of anything else. I actually believe Abbas is in fact an anti semite and Nazi apologist and holocaust denier but I do not believe everyone in the Palestinian Authority agrees with him. It is tempting to think most do certainly when one can go on the internet today and listen to his continued diatribes against not just Israel but Jews but we focus too much on Abbas, Hamas, Hezbollah. I say the IDF has their number and don't need my help but where I can help or we all can is cultivating peaceful alliances. I have no reason as a Zionist not to reach out to Palestinians and denounce terror if they choose it at the same time embrace a peaceful state next door if they choose that. I want no part of stereotyping all Muslims, Christians or Jews of the Middle East as evil. I was taught as a Zionist they all have ties to the Middle East as do Druze, Beduins, Berbers, Kurds/ I respect the traditions of all of them. Its extremist fundamentalism within any of these people including myself, I would reject and fight. Why do I say all that? Because its directly related to what is now going down in the US-divisive hateful dialogue. Hell man-look at what has happened with this "us against them" dialogue in the US. Yes Obama engaged in it. Boges is right. Obama engaged in divisive language that called on division between different Americans. Then Trump came in as a response to it from the other side. I have to agree with Boges. They are both interconnected, like two sides of the coin so to speak. We all heard the divisive dialogue calling on fear and hatred of Americans towards other Americans let alone a bogy man called a caravan. For God's sakes, Trump is appealing to people's fears. Since when is an American so directionless and devoid of spiritual value they have to be afraid of their fellow citizens let alone a bunch of poor migrants? What the hell has happened? Surely this is no way to build a country but is way to destroy it. The preliminary info coming back shows the vast majority of women and minorities (non-whites) turned out in record numbers to vote Democrat. The House of Representatives is elected by proportional representation and that is why its now Democrat. On the other hand the Senate is similar to how we elect MP's. Each state is guaranteed 2 no matter what their size of population. So its easier for the party of power to remain powerful in the Senate when its President in the same party becomes unpopular. I think as Boges said, Trump knew he would guarantee a Senate win with the Kavano Supreme Court fiasco. It turned that man into a victim as opposed to exposing him as a victimizer and certain Democratic Senators lost their seats as a result of that. The Democrats walked into that. The only positive thing I can say is this. Hopefully certain Republican Senators now that they are in office for the next 4 years including 2 years after the next election, will now feel striong enough not to be bullied by Trump. If Trump is to be contained, Republicans in the Senate need to call him out. Mitt Romney is right now the de facto leader of the anti Trump Republicans taking over from Senator McCain. How successful he is at bringing together moderate Republicans to challenge Trump extremism remains to be seen but people should remember there are people in the Republican party that do not agree with Trump's divisive dialogue even though they may agree with some economic or foreign policies.

Now you continue to fan his words. Do you think hijacking this thread to engage in bigoted references and acknowledge them makes them credible or your responses credible. If you two really are this hung up on Jews and their converting to Islam start a religious thread and knock yourselves out.

The enemy. Now you use this forum and this thread on the death of Jews to call the entire nation of Islam an enemy. One thing is consistent with your hatred, you hate a lot of people. I will repeat it. The entire Muslim world is not an enemy. Specific individuals whose interpretation of Islam justifies their use of terrorism are and they are as much an enemy of Muslims as they are non Muslims. You can't see that. Your labelling can not distinguish people within groups you identify. This is the same failed cognitive processing as the mass shooter of the Jews in Pittsburgh and you demonstrate it and demonstrate hatred is consistent in that it lumps all people of a perceived category into one negative object to hate. If nothing else your continued dialogue illustrates profoundly the anatomy of cognitive profile of a mass killer of innocent people. I also say it again to expunge your hatred, after the killings in Pittsburgh the Muslim community of Pittsburgh were one of the first groups to reach out to the Jewish community as we have been when they have been attacked. For that matter so have Christian groups. As much as you would love to use the word enemy, Muslims, Jews, are not the enemy-if anything your words evidence you are an enemy of people.

Look at your words . Your words join along with Taxme in an attempt to change the topic from who was shot and why to a dialogue that tries to label peoples' identity and you do not have the insight to understand the implications of such dialogue. One does not eradicate hatred or anti Semitism. What they can do are to expose your words or the words of Taxme or anyone else when in a discussion about the death of Jews, they can't acknowledge that this was an attack on Jews for simply being Jews which is what your role on this thread has been to date.

Your attempt to revive the concept that Jews are responsible for the murder of Christ on this thread speaks for itself. It has nothing to do with the topic and everything to do with you trying to rationalize your hatred of Jews. You want to start a thread in the religious section blaming all Jews for killing Jesus go ahead. Wind yourself up.

1. You made it about you with these words you stated: "F'n perfect definition of IRONY !!!!! I've only been saying that directly to YOU for a few years now. " 2. Your rationalization that you defend Taxme because I "came after that person hard" means what? He came on a post about Jews being killed in a synagogue and made the comments he did then denied he has uttered comments on this forum identifying with anti semites and the Grand Wizard of the KKK but also admitting the statements I produced where he did identify with them is true. Your defence of him speaks loudly as to your agenda to defend him because you feel like you he is unfairly called out for his views on Jews. You constantly redirect conversation to you as a person and then complain when you are called out on the words you write. Instead of denying what you write and what your agenda is admit it and stop denying what you stand for and what you write or the words you initiate to draw the attention to you. Respond to the thread topic not yourself in your responses. Stop posing as someone who is being a martyr and whose words are being ignored. You are not. I am done on that. I just wanted to clarify your denial of your use of the personal to initiate the last response I gave you. That denial is what you do. As quick as you write something you deny it.

You make every post about you and that is pathetic. Between you and Taxme you beg for people to pay attention to you. You have been called out and exposed by me in past posts for dialogue that engaged in anti semitic references to Jews and since then you have been in a snit intervening on every thread I respond to trying to draw attention to the fact you think I victimized you by calling out your extremist dialogue. Now you pose again, patronizing and talking down as if you are a martyr put on a cross by me whose preachings have been scorned. Get over your Messiah-martyr complex, your sense of victimhood, your constant need to draw threads to you. Deal with the issues. This is my last comment on that matter. If you want to constantly pose as a rejected martyr let someone else deal with your narcissism. Just once resist the urge to make a thread about you and your martyrdom. The fact that you came on this thread to defend Taxme's words and positions speaks loudly as to your positions and agenda.

Seriously Dog in American politics no one in either party is encouraging illegal migration. The rhetoric making Dems anti immigrant is no more accurate than calling Republicans anti immigrant. Those are extremist generalizations thrust on both sides by the extremist black and white all or nothing rhetoric being thrown out by extremists on both sides. There are no shortage of racist Democrats and not all Republicans are anti immigrant. This divisive stereotyping is exactly the racist manipulation Hitler and Mussolini engaged in to rally their popularity at gatherings. In the long run it destroys by melt down. Positive visions are not easy It seems for politicians to raise these days. That is the problem. We need non extremist dialogue that doesn't stereotype what people think. Instead of assuming people's opinions we should be asking what they are. Say what you will but there is too much labelling.

I am not sure the Democrats chose to become anything let alone the party of immigrants. It would appear that they have been set up and turned into that because by Trump grabbing the extreme anti immigrant position it forces them into that appearance if they say anything to the contrary of Trump's extreme statements. I think calling Democrats the party of immigrants is a false label by Trump. Any politician has immigrants in their constituency. They can't afford to look intolerant for that reason alone and they know it. The ones that sound tough usually believe they have insufficient no's of minorities to lose their elections. That might be a dangerous thing to assume this mid term round. We shall see how mobilized the extreme haters and liberal do gooders are, they might make a difference. Still its the mushy middle who no one understands who are always the wild card. If that mush middle has grown tired of Trump it will show. If they are too apathetic and feel their vote makes no difference, it will show as well. Low turn outs favour the incumbents. Its a shame American politicians do not discuss guns, the environment, education, the economy. Instead they've allowed themselves to be hijacked and reduced to listening to Trump screaming over a caravan of imagined invaders that must be destroyed. What a way to appeal for votes. Quite sad what the US has been reduced to by Trump and his dialogue of narcissistic fractured syntax and delusional self promotion. Trump hasn't only managed to label all Democrats as pro immigrant sympathizers but any Republican who disagrees with him as a dirty no good loser as well. When Ryan ran away from confronting Trump he showed his cowardice. The only Republican still fighting Trump in public right now is Mitt Romney who will win as Senator in Utah easily. People wrote Romney off in the Republican Party due to his Mormonism. It alienated the Christian evangelical wing of the party who were a powerful force at the time he ran. In retrospect he has to look a hell of a lot better than Trump. Hell any Republican candidate would other than Ted Cruz. The Republican party is truly fractured. It limps along in paralysis fearing a confrontation with Trump. Its the same fear that enabled Trump to grab the leadership of their party in the first place. Nothing Trump enunciates is very Republican. In fact he is quite the opposite. Trump believes in the cult of power, Republicans might have had a bit of that with Reagan but not as much. Other than John F. Kennedy, American Presidents since the 60's have been very bland, plain spoken. Clinton and Carter as well as Bush Jr did the folksy routine but Obama since Kennedy was the only genuine orator and even he toned down in his speeches depending on the audience. Trump is the first screamer hater. Nixon was a hater but did it passively and not out in the open. LBJ bullied and screamed but behind closed doors. Trump is this loud eruption of methane gas from his buttocks that won't stop. He could fuel the planet for centuries if someone harnessed all that gas,

Must agree and support your words. Trump engages in very hateful rhetoric that for me is very much like Hitler and Mussolini in style if not substance at times, it is absurd to call him a Jew hater. On one level he probably does,, on another level h e does not. People like him in one sense hate everyone sooner or later. They have a twisted narcissistic personality disorder that makes them believe anyone who disagrees with them as the enemy. It would be fascinating to do a comprehensive psychiatric diagnosis on him and see who he actually hates. For all we know he doesn't hate immigrants at all personally but is a sociopath who throws the first available vulnerable group under the bus. isn't it interesting he married two immigrants and has a daughter who converted to Judaism. Its interesting for sure. If he was as much of a bigot as some think I don't think he would have shook that dictator of Korea's hand as he did and suck up to him like that. Certainly he is a complex study of conflicts acted out through his mouth. The moment Trudeau entered extremist Mosques during election time to pander for votes and appointed a Muslim extremist terrorist supporter as his Middle East advisor he signalled where his bread was buttered. He signalled Muslims in Canada that he will suck up to the extremists in their community believing they will produce more votes for him. His pandering to the refugee crisis fools no one. As he poses as a welcoming mat for illegal Nigerians his Immigration Ministry as I speak circulates a refugee decision from Immigration and Refugee Board Membr Lois Figg on its site telling Board Members to follow it and reject Nigerian refugee applicants. He plays to his audience posing as open in his speeches while excluding in invisible policies the public is not aware of unless they look. Trudeau is a cynic manipulating ethnic groups as bad as I have seen. Sure all politicians have done it, but never with such blatant two faced posing. He sheds tears for aboriginals and then in a meeting with them talks down to them like children scolding them for thinking he would listen to more than ten minutes. What a joke Tell you what. The alienation and madness across the world, I don't blame it on Trump or Trudeau no, but they sureas hell play their part in mirroring the values of the day. There is a pendelum that has swung from Nazi era to the extreme opposite of the Nazi era that jas turned into a kind of Stalinism which is just as bad. On either end there has been totalitarianism. The Me Too Movement now uses all the same tactics when hunting for sex abusers as McCarthy once did when hunting for Commies The target changes but the same primal rage in gangs running after the target with torches remains the same. Frankenstein mutates in shape but he's always on the run.

Now let's see. I reproduced your words and specifically those that show you tell people you follow the opinions of David Duke the former Grand Wizard of the KKKt and the forum should all learn from him and you now what.... deny you are a KKK supporter? Lol. Go it. You also stated and I quote: "And I stand by everything I said above." Then do just that. You might also want to heed your own words above. However this thread is not about you. Its about discussing what motivates people to kill others in houses of worship and think you do well in demonstrating the thought processes that lead to extremist ideologies and hatred as the above words demonstrate-and that remains the only point-your opinions, not you as a person.

Well you are accurate. Walls started to be built in Obama's regime. Trump did not start the building of them, Obama did. I am not sure if any wall is going to work. They dig under when they can't go over the top. I also think geographically building the wall is tatamount to what China once did. It has to end at the ocean. Sadly the only thing that is going to stop mass migration is mutually beneficial political policies-easier said than implemented. Some people claim the caravan is being funded by Russia, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, as a way to destabilize the US. I do find the timing of the carvan very coincidental to the mid term elections. Too coincidental. Some people feel a showdown coming in Venezuela and Nicaragua i.e., civil wars. Could the leaders of these countries be pulling the Castro stunt of emptying their poliical opponents? What if instead of calling themselves poor migrants, these migrants called themselves victims of communism? What would Trump say?

Don't bother. Its just a sign of respect to you and others who embrace the issues. Its also my attempt at explaining to Casper once again I have questioned specific words and references he has used as anti semitic. He as a person I do not call an anti semite. His words at times certainly. I try to clearly now dettach he person from the issues. It takes time. Lol. Long winded yes.

I think I feel the same way. Has he even enunciated a policy? Some say to date he has not. I am hard pressed to find one.

I appreciate this thread and all others should not be used as a platform to engage in personal attacks. Its hard sometimes not to get sucked into them but I would be remiss without addressing specific words, not persons. Onn this thread a particular individual came on and chose to take a topic about the shooting of innocent Jews as a platform to say Jews create victims too. I would suggest that was doneas a classic example of inversion, i.e., turning the target of violence into the creator of violence. I would suggest these device of inversion was designed to deflect from the actual target of attack and blame Jews collectively for the attack in a weak effort to say Jews deserved the atack since they victimize others. I was told by that person he is not a white supremacist and does not support the KKK and he asked me to show him the words evidencing that. I feel that is inappropriate and another effort to deflect from the actual topic to the individual's ego and inability to dettach his ego from the issues he discusses but I think it important to take just a few words from this individual that date back to when he first began writing on this board, to show the anatomy of bigotry or hatred. I would contend the words show that the actual target of the hateful remarks is cloaked with a reference to something other than the actual target so as to veil the reference or make the attack on its actual target seem politically respectable. I would suggest the words I will now list show how the blurring of lines between hateful references to Jews by phrasing them or couching them, or masking them as criticism of Israeli policies, in fact is a very common cause of anti-semitic attacks including one on the synagogue in Pittsburgh. By using a reference to the word Zionist or Israel instead of Jew, the attacker can enable and legitimize the attak not as hateful or bigoted, but as innocent criticism. In fact the attacker then ca go so far as to portray himself as the victim if his words are questioned. I believe as part of the profile of a hater, is a bully, someone who act out hating others and resenting them, but in fact is deeply afraid of them and fears they might ight back or defend themselves and so I would suggest to you such bullies or haters only attack when they are sure the odds are completely in their favour, i.e., their targets they believe can not defend themselves. Now take a look for yourself in a few months time span how the target of attack switches from Zionist to Jew, and then people who do not look the same as the attacker who initiates references to himself as white and openly states he supports the views of anti-semites including David Duke the former leader Grand Wizard of of the KKK and referred to himself as a white nationalist and today brands himself as a patriotic conervative. I would suggest the re-branding is part of the individual's fear of being called out and having is true targets and views identified and brought out in the open. I have deliberately not brought up the person's name because I only want to focus on the words. As for the exercise of blurring Zionists and Jews and Zionists with mass killers and white supremacists, I say this susinctly. Zionism does not define Jews as a race, a superior people, a beter people. It did not define government as being run by one person and a military authority or allegiance to specific religious beliefs. Zionism redefined Jews as a collective people in need of a state to protect them from extinction. It viewed the state as an agent to offer refuge and protection in reaction to Christian and Muslim staes whose states were not seperated from their religious beliefs, and used their religions through their state organs as the source of thought to justify discrimination and oppression an ultimately the holocaust. Zionism was a political reaction to being powerless in a state whose religion was expressed through the state as being hostile to the existence of Jews as a people. I would suggest in the words below, they evidence the antipathy for Israel is in fact the questioning of why Jews should be able to form a protective collective through a state to assure our survival. I would suggest that antipathy fuels a necessary attack on all Jews if we not define ourselves in a specific way. I also wish to make it crystal clear, the fact that we are the source of a continuous existential attack from extremists including extremist Muslims does not mean all extremists hate us or that all Muslims or anyone else hates us and that we are attacked for choosing our identity the same way gays are for having their collective identity or other nationalities or religious oor perceived social groups are and so the solution entails us all joining together to respect our choice of identities. Attempts to suggest we are victims for saying we are targets of attack is bullshit. We are not victims. Zionism is the exercise of not being a victim-it is the positive existential respose to those who want us to be their victims. In that sense I say it again, if we as Jews can not find a way to reach out to peaceful Muslims and Christians and form alliances, so that we all can live in peace, we have not yet finalized our identity as Jews under the Zionist ideology. Zionist ideology envisioned peaceful coexistence not war with anyone. It envisions mutual respect and dignity. Until that is achieved it is not complete. So this is why I believe openly that we need to find a way to find a solution so Palestinians can live next to Israel peacefully just as we need to find new ways to find a way to live with one another of different groups. I just don't see Trump doing that. I think Teddy Roosevlet, FDR, Truman, Eisenhower, JFK, MLK, RFK had visions for that but since the kiling of the Kennedy brothers and MLK I think the US has been void of vision makers. As for Canada, we haven't really had one. With the exception of aboriginal people vision makers and visions of identity are not particularly expressed in our common psyche. We tend to avoid collective references and gravitate to expressions differently rather than collectively. We haven't yet gone to a level of defining a collecive identity (with the exception of our aboriginals who define their collective identity as a collective of collectives all inter-connected in a holistic definition that is both collective and individualistic at the sae time-something the rest of us have not yet grasped...probably due to our entrenched material beliefs that make us hard to see abstract holistic concepts. April 2, 2016 – Israel War Crimes Try listening to Brother Nathaniel on Youtube. This is where I can safely say that I get all of my information about that wonderful democratic country called Israel. April 7, 2016 – Canadians Fear Trump Big Time ..the media should shut up about what Trump may have said about women or minorities. I get sick and tired of hearing from the media about the plight of women and minorities all the time. April 13, 2016 – Israel War Crimes I share the views of politically incorrect people. The people who listen to and read and get the other side of the story. Those patriots are the real hero's of this country. Not the PC people who constantly attack them because they don't like what they have to say or have written. Those PC people who are on a mission to destroy this country's heritage, culture and traditions, and replace this country with the rest of the world and their problems. May 31, 2016 - The Three Issues Everyone Is Warning The white man and woman's tax dollars down the drain in trying to help them out. They don't appreciate anything the white man/woman does for them. They take us for suckers because they know that they can. Just shout racism, and the white politicians run like the politically correct cowards that they are. August 6, 2018 – Canadians Fear Trump Big Time Indeed there was something wrong in the beginning where America drew the most immigrants from Britain and Europe and Canada did not. And we do see today that America is sizzling and Canada is fast becoming un-sizzled. LOL. June 4, 2016 – Zionism’s Influence Over Western Politics The only country that one cannot seem to be able to criticize is Israel or Judaism, and out come the trolls. Hey, you never know. June 7 2016 – Zionism’s Influence Over Western Politics Are you able to dispute what is being said about Jewish conspiracies on the internet? Can you show us that it is all just antisemitism nonsense? June 30 – 2016 -Zionism’s Influence Over Western Politics That is it? I am being anti-semitic? What a comeback. Nice to see that you cannot come back with anything better than that. You just reinforced what I have been saying all along, and that is that jews cannot take any criticism about who or what they say or do. When one does they are labeled anti-semitic and attacked as people like Paul Fromm, Doug Christie or Doug Collins have found out. Well that is just to darn bad for you. Sob-sob. Ezra is no different to any other jew. I have never heard him once ever criticize Israel or zionism. But then if he did, his program called The Rebel would be quickly labelled and attacked as being anti-semitic. Some whiney zionist group in Canada would see to that. They just go on and on. June 30, 2016 – Zionism’s Influence Over Western Politics Oh look, some body said something not so nice about jews or Israel. Boo-hoo. July 4, 2016 – Zionism’s Influence Over Western Politics So, what is wrong with being a "white nationalist"? And it looks like we are not alone. There are black nationalists, proud gays/lesbians, proud muslims, proud Native Indians, proud Jews and gawd only knows who else is proud of who they are. So then, I guess that we can pretty much put all of those groups into the same "swastika-wearing heil Hitler" dumbo brigades catagory as well, uhmm? I must admit that people like yourself always give me a good laugh. I can bet that if any of those groups came out here and said the same thing I said, you would clam up tight like a clam shell. Your true colors are starting to show. July 23, 2016 – Israel War Crimes Part 2 It's not the ordinary Jew that is disliked, it is the zionist Jew that nobody has anything good to say about. The average Jew is being led down the garden path as they say like the gentiles are. July 29, 2016 – Israel War Crimes Part 2 I just don't get it as to why Jews get all upset over anyone saying anything negative about Israel, especially if it is true. August 1, 2016 – Israel War Crimes Part 2 Fourth: No, please don't change your name to an Anglo sounding name. Please. Just stay as you are and keep your Jewish sounding name. I don't want to make it appear as though you and I may be related. That would be a sad day indeed for me. August 5, 2016 – Israel War Crimes Part 2 I also read on the internet that the Holocaust as told for decades was a bit of an hoax. Hey, you never know. Doug Collins once called it the Holohoax. Even Norman Finklestein wrote a book called "The Holocaust Industry". Interesting, eh? And he is Jewish. Uhmm. August 21, 2016 – Israel War Crimes Part 2 Now post some anti-Israel demonstrations and editorials not just the pro-Israel ones. The Zionist cancer is everywhere. But you know that, right? And maybe you can tell me as to why some European countries have laws where no one is allowed to criticize or question the Holocaust. And if they do, they will end up in the gulag. One can question or deny any historical event and no one need fear retaliation from the government. The Holocaust is the only exception. Over to you.  August 28, 2016 – The Origin of the Conflict Against the Jews of Israel Zionism crying again, and trying to gain sympathy as usual. There has been many countries through out history where we have seen in the past many countries kicking the Jews out. Did they just kick the Jews out because they just didn't like their looks or was there a good reason for that to happen? Oct. 2, 2016 – Israel War Crimes Part 2 You should listen to Brother Nathaniel, David Duke and James Edwards for a change. You might learn something like I have. Oct. 3, 2016 – Israel War Crimes Part 2 C'mon, not every body is stupid, don't you know. Thanks to people like David Duke, James Edwards and Brother Nathaniel, the truth has been set free. Oct. 6, 2016 – Israel War Crimes The Jews are lucky that they own America as Shimon Peres said in the Knesset many years ago. Oct. 6, 2016- Israel War Crimes North America can be included in there also in always being more concerned about Jews than their own people. Politicians know who butters their bread. Oct. 8, 2016 – Our New Syrian Refugee Immigrants Canada needs to remain Canada, and not become and start to look like the rest of the world. Works for me. Oct. 12, 2016 – Syrian Refugee Immigrants It's interesting as to why most of the worlds refugees are being dumped on Caucasian countries like those in Europe and North America. I see a conspiracy going on here Oct. 16, 2016 – New Syrian Refugee Immigrants Harper doesn't make up the rules for Canada or Canadians. The globalist elite do that. Harper is just there to carry out the programs and the agendas for the ruling globalist elite Dec. 12 2016 – Syrian Refugee Immigrants You are the one that keeps kidding himself by constantly listening to the western phony and fake lying media and politicians, and too the elite puppet masters that pull their strings. You obviously only want too listen too and get one side of the story. You don't like RT then go to Global Research website then. Try them out for a change. Dec.12, 2016 – Syrian Refugee Immigrants James Edwards of the Political Cesspool website is one of my favorites. He is another politically incorrect person that is enjoyable to listen too Jan.15, 2017- Syrian Refugee Immigrants The white British people came from Britain to North America to get away from the oppression of the ruling monarchy elite rule and tyranny. It's not only Jews and non-whites that lived under oppression and wanted to escape from it. I guess it would probably be safe to say that the British were once refugees also Jan.16, 2017 – Syrian Refugee Immigrants I like how you said that Roosevelt stood up for your people? Jews I would assume, right? So, why then do you have a problem with me standing up for my gentile Caucasian people? You call me a white supremacist all the time for doing so. There is something wrong with this picture that you have painted here.

Let's bring it back to the topic a bit. I think the shooting in Pittsbugh is indicative of a larger problem in the US which is also transpiring in Canada and Europe. I think in the case of the US its exasperated by how easy it is to get a weapon. The common psychiatric or psychological profile of mass killers is that: 1-they feel powerless 2-not appreciated 3-externalize the qualities in themselves they do not like or the conflicts in themselves they can not resolve and externalize them by projecting those qualities on others they think are a threat to them in some way 4-they try cleanse their feelings of powerlessness, not being appreciated, feeling unfairly treated, etc. by projecting them on to an external group called a scapegoat and then attacking that scapegoat-the attack and destruction of the scapegoat acts out the literal excising of the evil from themselves. When you examine the profile of mass killers whether they attack Christians in a church, Muslims in a Mosque, Jews in a Temple, Women in a university, gays in a bar, they all have these repeating elements above. The gun serves as their expression of potency-the shooting and killing is taking back control by extinguishing those things the shooter feels he is not in control of. Remarkably the overwhelming majority of mass killers are men suggesting a tie in to bio-chemical reference to levels of testosterone a male hormone. That said, I would contend Trump is a politician who rose to power using rhetoric that incites peoples fears and in particular these fears: 1-fear of failure (make America great again) 2-fear of weakness ( idolization of Putin, Kim of Korea, belittling and insulting people) 3- fear of difference ( Mexicans, immigrants, Middle Easterners, the press, anyone who disagrees with Trump) 4-fear of the future ( a future without Trump in control must mean crime). Fear is the strongest of human emotions and the easiest to incite and control to influence how people will then behave and react. Combine fear with crowds( crowds are a powerful agent that triggerthe frontal lobe to act in unison with others in the crowd and lower inhibitions that would otherwise restrain anger) and you have the ideal mob mentality that appeals to hateful messages. All politicians use crowds and fears to exploit and rile to some extent. Its much easier to be a politician engaging in fear mongering (pointing out what is wrong and what could go wrong) as Trump does then being a politician like Martin Luther King or Bobby Kennedy or Ghandi. We live in a time where the planet has shrunk because of advanced travel by plane and where borders are collapsing due to migrant movement and conflicts brought on by climate changes causing draught, desertification, flooding, increased competition for natural resources. A politician like Trump came to power much like Mussolini or Hitler did. They start as a fringe group exploiting the feelings of anxiety of their time, lack of jobs, uncertain times, confusing moral messages-and such politicians appeal by referring to us against them themes and role playing themselves as saviours. Putin, Trump, are no different than Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Sadam Hussein, Gamal Nasser, Gustav Pinochet, Napoleon, Alexander, Attila the Hun, in the sense of appealing to the masses through references to might and power via feelings of patriotism and loyalty to them as individuals. Trump like the others I mentioned create cult followings. They cultivate personal groupies and a cult of adoration for them as people. Loyalty is to the leader, not the state. Thus Trump can reject all the classic state symbols that call for being accountable to ALL people. In his state, its a partial state, not the United States, but the State of Trump and if you do not care to live in the State of Trump within the United States, you are not legitimate and a source of hatred to target. That to me is the best way I can explain why I think his method of communications and vision of politics has divided the country and fuels unstable people who feel that way to take control and act out their version of the Trump male they think he is telling them to be. Hitler had a cult of power by being able to cultivate groupies around him to carry out his orders through fear and accusations if you did not agree with him, you were an enemy of the state which was synomous with an enemy of Hitler. There was no German state unless it was something to do with Hitler. I think the person who shot the Jewish people in the synagogue was yet another male feeling marginalized and weak and who struck out to express the manhood he felt he could not otherwise achieve in the US. That said and to be fair, Trump is not the first American politician to fan the flames of patriotism to get a vote. Chauvenism, the expression of patriotism through military might is at the essence of American society. To understand the US is to understand its collective psyche was determined by the use of a gun and militias, the use of firing a gun to get control of not just land, but power over others. The destiny of the US as a society and its relation to the gun as an expression of that collective identity is deeply fused and I don't think anyone right now has the ability through rhetorical appeal to challenge Americans to drop the gun. As for the divisions and fear of difference, we see it in every country across the word not just the US. Its part of our primal pack behaviour and disrusting those outside our pack. The more we evolve the more we continue to be controlled as we always have been, by alpha-make apes. So I would not go so far as to simply blame Trump. I think he reflects the collective US psychosis, but I don't think he started it or will end it. I also think Trump's ego is so large its made debating any of his policies impossible. The moment you challenge him, he necesarily responds with a personal insult, escalarting personal responses back, not that much different then what goes on sometimes on this political forum.

Well stated. The barbed wire statement was two days ago. Look I have to be clear. I do not immediately hate all policies of Trump. I don't know many. I really liked Nicki Haley in the UN I rthought she was amazing and badly needed and sad when she left. My concerns with Trump I will try explain in my next post to you and others like you on the forum because you are owed a better explanation from me then one that might appear unfounded.

O.k. skookum but all that did was make me wanna hug you. On a cheerier note, the last few days has brought out unified responses articulated by Christians and Muslims and others to Jewish people and it means a lot. It's sad we need tragedies to make us come together. It is a he'll of a way to achieve equality.