Rue

Lol look out Casper has a tag team with Taxme. Bad Jew! Bad Jew stop challenging us! Ahahah. You are a hoot. Who lights the cross on my lawn, you? Tax? Boo. Oh get back here and pick up your matches.

Your first sentence attempts to deflect away from the fact I have only challenged you no one else. I specifically call you out asa neo Nazi KKK supporter, no one else. You have admitted as such on this board in the past and so I challenge your bigotry. Next, the reference to me as "people like you", do you mean people with large penises....I think you have me confused with Ron Jeremy..The other Jew. Just saying.

Ms BC. May I say our media is concerned about your mid terms because we are getting an influx of individuals from the US crossing our borders illegally. I appreciate they are tanned and do not speak English, but surely we should tone down the rhetoric which is only fueling chaos. I mean really dear do you have enough soldiers for all of the Mexican and Canadian borders? Who will be left to invade Venezuela?

I edited the spelling error. When you revert to pointing out spelling errors I get it. Wuttzah matta Uncle Sam you run out of gas? Build another pipeline to Canada.

Yes. Accurate criticism of Israeli state policies without making hateful comments about all Jews is not anti semitism. Criticism of Israeli state policies that slurs Israelis for existing as Israeli or having a Jewish identity is hateful and could be anti semitic depending on the words or context or reference. It would be nice if you examine your own words and ask are they consistent. Do you hold yourself to the same standards you expect others to follow..all I ask is you understand Israel is Jewish no differently than Muslim countries are Muslim or Britain is Anglican. You not I have a problem with Israel having a Jewish identity but you don't have a problem with Middle East states having Muslim identities. You use different standards based on discriminatory subjective biases no different than neo Nazis. There is no difference to me between you and Taxme. You pics from the left and he from the right, at the same target.

In regards to your first comment, no he is not bt you enable the tactic of justifying anti semitic remarks by denying Jews do not have the same right to a collective national identity as Muslims and Christians do. In regards to your second comment you ignore the fact the Muslims Obama targetted were targetted for their terrorist acts. Are you saying a terrorist who is a Muslim is not singled out for his terrorism only his being a Muslim? Interesting how that works with you. One can not according to you target a terrorist who is a Muslim without being anti Muslim but what can be anti Zionist but not anti - Jewish. Nice to see how consistent you are with how you apply your concepts. In regards to your pronouncement Democrats are not to the left I am sure Bernie Saunders would agree with you. In regards to your last sentence I agree and I find he engages in the playbook of Hitler, or to be specific the propaganda game crafted by Josef Goebels,Hitler's propaganda Czar and also used by Putin. Trump and Putin are two peas in pod.

I strongly agree with the above comments.

I respectfully disagree with the last paragraph and strongly agree with the first two. I would contend he has used couched words to rally bigots. He uses the exact tactic of Hitler and that is defining scapegoats and calling on people to vote based on a shared hatred of those scapegoats. That is clear, it's open, and he's been called out on it by Republicans like Mitt Romney in the US but unfortunately not enough of them. I believe Trump is a hateful man using rhetoric to incite rage. To ignore that in his speeches is pointless. You think a man who says barbed wire is a wonderful thing when seen going up and used properly is not using terms Jewish people recoil from ? What next a speech on how to use cyanide responsibly? Trump is inciting hatred to get voters out. He does not appeal with positive visions. He uses negative fear mongering. His sole platform is to hate immigrants and blame crime and anything bad on immigrants, Democrats, the press, China, Canadian dairy farmers, and whoever else is the target of the day on his Twitter. He is a classic hate monger. That said I find no difference between him and trendy leftists. They use the same tactics and stereotyping. He is not a positive role model. He is to politics what crude porn is to film making.

Oh look who has joined the innocent victim bandwagon.

I think you project your own sexual fantasy with Sarah Huckabee. I also think if you want to talk such theories understand who Mrs. Trump is and how she makes Donald's hair that yellow colour.

I would say you may be right but I think the more probable theory isTrump is constipated.

Its called size. I know you don't get that what you being so big.

He's American. They have difficulty with basic concepts such as Pearl Harbour, Japan, Nazi Germany. Don't expect too much. He thinks John Wayne was a heterosexual as well.

Your planet. Your sense of self-entitlement never ceases to diminish. That reminds me why people should not be allowed to be breast fed for too a long time period let alone into their adult years. They either become leftists or Italian film directors. Ciao.

Finally I will deport myself to Tonga.

I would suggest a Convention For The treatment of Terrorists which sends them to an international tribunal hearing to determine if they are terrorists. Then they would be detained in an international prison until their sentence is served. The hearings would take place where the prison is. I would suggest a site where escape would be problematic. I think all terrorists should be tried and convicted and then detained by a neutral international tribunal process and incarceration system independent of national/state or political bias. I would also specifically address child terrorists in this law.

I would deport all persons entering Canada from the US illegally back to the US. I would not take in convicted criminals as refugees and instead have a humanitarian ground hearing when they only can stay if they face death or torture on return. If they qualified to stay then they only get a conditional permanent residency. If in Canada they commit a crime they are stripped of their conditional permanent residency status and detained in prison until the end of their sentence. The law will require they must make an effort to learn and pass an English or French test or do not qualify for conditional permanent residenc and they must learn a vocational skill needed in Canada and work or they lose thus status as well.. If they are a sex criminals, violent offenders, or murderers and/or escaping capital punishment they only get protection on a limited basis to live in a controlled isolated community while in Canada up until conditions are safe to return to their country or a minimum of 15 years at which time they can obtain qualified permanent residency status. As for the Charter Of Rights the provinces and feds can agree to use the not withstanding clause to allow such provisions so that no humanitarian convict entry is entitled to charter protection on the grounds the safety of the nation is of a higher priority ( this also enables then use of the peace order and good government concept in a new way). While I am at it, no convicts should be allowed to vote and if outside prison for the remainder of their sentences or as a condition for early release or as an alternative to prison they wear tracking devices that if removed doubles their sentence and forces them to serve it back in prison with no possibility of early release.

I think the current regular immigrationsystem needs some updates yes but pretty much already does what Argus has suggested. In regards to the refugee process I would scrap it entirely and instead focus aid on food, water, clothing, shelter, medical, vocational training support at refugee camps and concentrate on taking on a limited no. of rprivately sponsored refugees from the refugee camps per year who pass language and psychological tests and are first given basic vocational training for jobs identified in Canada they will be asked to do.

Betsy referred to refugee claimant. If the refugee claimant is not yet a Canadian citizen becausevthey have not yet been found to be a refugee then your answer does not apply. In fact the second part of the refugee definition has been interpreted to mean if you are convicted of a crime in another country that is not a crime in Canada or exposes you to a longer sentence in jail in that other country, or capital punishment in that other country, you are entitled to refugee protection in Canada. That is why Betsy asked her question. Zippity zap over your head. Conviction for a serious non political crime used to be an exclusion from applying for refugee protection now it is not necessarily and criminal fugitives not yet charged, or charged but not yet convicted or have been convicted are not automatically excluded from seeking refugee protection. Show the sentence or potential sentence is stricter than in Canada or we do not have an equivalent criminal law, and you can come to Canada and apply as a refugee and get citizenship status in this matter and therefore avoid deportation to the country of the alleged offence. If you are a Canadian citizen overseas who commits a crime overseas our foreign ministry asks to have you serve the sentence in Canada if possible. Of course if you are a Canadian citizen engaged in terrorism overseas, we take you back and pay you 10 million and who knows might send you to a Trudeau re-education camp where you can learn all the words to Oh Canada and join this political forum and call yourself James Bay Smith or Fraser Valley Watson or Rocky Mountains White or Winnie Peg, Marla Maple or Bud Worm.

Progressives mistake who the Queen of Canada is.

Real Christians if we can use that word died in camps refusing to conform to Hitler or for hiding Jews, etc.and this is why righteous non Jews are revered in Israel and in holocaust lessons we Jews are taught. Isn't it sad we Christians and Jews and Muslims are killed while praying and idiots try deny the blood and sorrow is not the same. This is why I was upset Trudeau's comment about the Mosque killings missed that issue and chose to use it as a political message to pander to Muslims for votes. Yet the same Trudeau who felt it necessary to single out Islamophobia after that attack deliberately omitted any reference to anti semitism at holocaust memorial services and the holocaust memorial unveiling. Sorry his platitudes mean nothing to me. They feel insincere and exploitative and opportunistic. I never felt that way with Harper. I thought he was consistent. In fact this current Trudeau is the first PM in my life-time I see as a danger i the sense of igniting hatred and resentment in the way he panders to ethnic division in the name of tolerance. I particularly find his references and inferences about Catholics, Jews and Christians he does not agree with as worrisome. I find hisvtring to claim to be a feminist and gay friendly whole embracing fundamentalist Islamic beliefs inconsistent. Hevwwent off on anti abortion Christians while embracing anti abortion Muslim fundamentalists. He is not consistent. I believe women should have the final say on their bodies but I won't attack a person for being Christian if they disagree as Trudeau did. The inconsistency in who he singles out for concern speaks loudly. Me I say the blood of anyone, Muslim, Christian, Jew, killed while praying is an attack on the entire human species and in their messages politicians must acknowledge the victims, the Islamophobia or anti-semitism, but then not stop but go on to link the attack to a failure that threatens all of us. We need leaders whose words move on from references of they or them to we or us, if we are to learn and overcome this crap. Sorry I do not see Trump or Trudeau having sufficient intelligence to grasp that when they speak. Trump singles out minorities to hate to get votes, Trudeau singles out minorities he tries to give selective treatment to, to get votes. They are on opposite spectrums of the same bigoted divisive dialogue in my opinion. I appreciate your words.

For the sake of brevity and faciility I have no'd you comments so I can respond to them. I appreciate responding tobyoy gives you some legitimacy but I believe silence condones your comments. In regards to 1 your patronizing tone and suggestion the KKK are victimized no differently than Jews speaks for itself. Do tell me the last time you were shot at or massacred when you were praying. Get back to me on that. Brilliant analogy. This need to portray yourself and now the KKK as victims of hatred summarizes the totality of your insights as to human behaviour. Thanks for sharing. 2-No one on this post or any other post has stated or argued the death of Muslims in a Mosque, Christians in a church of Jews in a synagogue is different, only you. You have created a false slur and allegation Jews are using the death of Jews to claim are blood is more red than the blood of Christians or Muslims. The device you engage in making that false allegation is designed to incite hatred against Jews and suggest we deserve it. It's a device of revitalization that has been used to down p,at the holocaust, pogroms, attacks on Jews trying to turn all hate attacks into an imagined contest as to who is the real victim justvasvyou try twist this tragedy to suggest the KKK are victims. Again your attempt to pit targets of hatred against one another to deflect from thecagentbof hatred speaks loudly as does it again evidence your lack of insight as to what causes hatred and why you spew your hatred towards Jews in your reply. By the way putting the word Zionist before the word Jew is hilarious. Did you think it would make your rant respectful when your slurs are not limited to Zionist Jews? In fact you could not do a better job showcasing how anti-semites like you think you can couch the anti semitism and make it acceptable by using the word Zionist. 3-you started your third anti Jewish rant slurring all Jews. Oops you forgot to be consistent and place Zionist before the word Jew when you made your classic bigoted slur assigning a negative stereotype against all Jews. The rest of your rant is not worthy of a response other than to say you engage in classic slurring claiming you know how all Jews think and feel by trying to pose yourself as a German victim of Jews. How pathetic. Then again you pose as a Russian as well in another of your enlightened responses. 4- The last response has nothing to do with the issue or topic you claim to respond to and evidences false assumptions about what Jews believe and claim based on your projected subjective assumptions of Jews. Hey you are a victim of Jews. Got it. Hey man go goose step. Express yourself.

Your narcissism and need to constantly refer to whether people like you is at the point of absurdity. Stop posing as a victim for being a neo Nazi have the balls to wear your colours and stop whining. You spew hate you get it back honey buns. As for your insight as to anti -semitism in Russia it's non existent. You have no knowledge of Russian or Jewish history and it shows in every one of your statements. Putin is not the cause or origin of anti semitism in Russia.

The two of you never fail to try use such tragedies to justify your hatred.

You are not Russian, you don't live in Russia and you make idiotic statements ignoring the thousands of people arrested and murdered when they disagree with Putin. He sends hit men into Britain not once but twice and you cheer him on like some giggly groupie. Good for you. You call him a pussy cat because you think he's a fascist like you. Ironically he would kill you before me and you can't understand that. Whether you like Putin is not the issue.