betsy

I suggest you read this response from Rosa Brooks and feel shame at the depths to which you have sunk. 

http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/02/06/and-then-the-breitbart-lynch-mob-came-for-me-bannon-trolls-trump/

Okay, I realize asking you to read and understand the whole article might be asking too much. I'll explain it.

In her article, she was asking a hypothetical where, if the president, say, decided this morning to (my example) bomb Nordstroms, would the military go along with that (unacceptable) or would they have a coup (previously unthinkable)? It was a valid question based on the hypothetical possibility that the president is "loony", as you yourself describe him. Then the breitbartians tried to twist those words into her calling for a coup, because they knew minions like you wouldn't have actually read the article. Feel played again?

Bubber, all your rant and explanations are irrelevant.

I wasn't addressing you personally when I posted the following posts after yours.  You have a twisted interpretation of a "coup" (despite giving you the definition of it)....and I found you dishonest in your attempt to rebutt.....so I stopped discussing with you. 

  What's on my mind was a generalized opinion that touched on many things, which include mayors that would defy the ban and provide illegal sanctuaries.  The article was just a sample of what can be seditious - depending on how someone would interpret it.