PolyNewbie

If they act like NAZI's (military commissions act, torture, aggressive wars, "New World Order") and act like NAZi's (google earth "32 40'34.08" N 117 09'27.53" W") they must be ...NAZI's !!

John Kerry on wtc7 see linked video in article. His understanding is that the "wall" was brought down by controlled demolition to prevent damage to adjacent buildings.

I can't say for sure but I think its because they are NAZI's. Have you heard of Operation Paper Clip. Have you thought about the Military Comissions Act, Patriot Act, the ridiculous propoganda ? There is not an awful lot that the neocons do not share in common with the NAZI's.

Of course. You just keep saying crap like that but you have seen my refenerences on money creation and structural engineers - you can't discredit them in any way - you just say "taken out of context". You could probably keep repeating "the moon is made of cheese, the moon is made of cheese" but it doesn't mean anything.

Yes, one regular person to 8 - 12 of theirs the lay person is chosen by them. Have you ever made a complaint to a professional society ? Have you taken their courses on ethics ?

I took a very small sip from a Burger King coffee around that time - a very small sip and it burned me. I didn't sue but I did think the temperature of their coffee was irresponsible and could imagine how someone might take a boggir sip and seriously burn themselves.

There is a naval base in San Diego. If you look at it from the air you see the buildings shaped exactly like a swastika. I'll be getting the co ordinates today for Google map. The base was built in the 60's. The bankers fought both sides of world war 2 and continued to fund Hitler even after the war started. I know you are not educated because you don't know how money is created but somehow thing your imagination must be correct because you went to school to be an accountant and you have it all figured out even though you haven't read anything anywhere that tells you the private banks work like credit unions you seem to think that must be the case. That is exactly the opposite of being educated. Riverwinds scientific statements are exactly the opposite of those that would come from an educated person. So, yes, I think you are fools because you pretend to know something.

So all those presidents and exonomists were wrong in that video Money As Debt ? The Galbraith quote that says a handful of men run the USA was taken out of context and you would know because.....you read the book ? When I produce structural engineering stuff statements on 911 they too are somehow taken out of context where before I had them I was wrong because "no structural engineer agreed with your theories". You are just guessing on your ideas about money creation. Do you still think the government creates all the money ? Where do you get your knowledge about banking ? ... the same place Riverwind gets his knowledge about engineering ? The world works very differently than you imnaginations and I have posted the books and references to prove that over and over again. Still you both use your imaginations as the ultimate reference source.

Almost half the people in Canadian court end up representing themselves. I have been able to hold my own and then some with any lawyer I get in an arguement with. I pick arguements with them to expose the perversion of their profession. The English brought over lawyers with their bankers and corrupted the USA shortly after it was formed. Too many laws and a complex legal system only work to serve the elite and the law profession. You have training as an accountant. Don't mistake that for an education. Common law is the law for the people. Geoffery, you regularly have no clue about what you are talking about. You are an accountant and you didn't even know how money was created until you got on this group and read my posts and argued against me on that too. My above arguement is not strange, its a common arguement against the legal profession. The problem we have today is that the population is largely dumbed down due to lack of a formal education or any education at all for that matter in professional training.

I fully grasp your point. You compared doctors to lawyers and seem to worship professionals. Professionals are people that have a monopoly on service and are governed by secret societies. Even Platos Republic says secret societies exist to take something away from everyone else. Professionals are there to serve themselves, not you.

Lawyering isn't doctoring. Doctors work irregular hours, expose themselves to danger (viruses, crazy people) and write stuff down for you to take with you after a visit (perscriptions). The level of responsibility in doctoring is very high, the level of professional responsibility with lawyering is almost non existent. Lawyers always have time, doctors sometimes have to act immediately. In some places lawyering is the lowest of the professions - much less regarded than engineering or medecine. I would never trust a Canadian Lawyer to represent me. Training and education of the argueing sides should be irrelevant. Only the truth in the context of the law matters. The Canadian legal profession perverts the truth and prevents it from getting into court - this is how you get paid the big bucks. Lawyer Client priviledge is the center of this perversion and is there to protect criminals that can afford regular legal advise regarding their illegal activities. Lawyers allow their colleagues to openly & publically commit crimes that would put any of us in jail for many years. You only have to read about the money laundering in mainstream to understand this. Its almost impossible to prosecute a lawyer for committing a crimes even if those crimes are admitted to in front of reliable witnesses and in public. The profession is a cesspool of corruption and rot. We don't need lawyers. Jury's need to hear two sides with a mediator that manages the debate. The jury should be king, the judge should be nothing more than a mediator there to stop sides from throwing things at each other. Any reasonably well educated or intelligent person could be hired by either defendant when emotions run high or they do not have the analytical ability to present their case in a relevant context. Itellectual property law is a scam and its laws are there to protect the drug companies and super rich tech firms. Its beyond the price point that regular entrepeneurs can afford. A patent is only worth while if you can afford to defend it. Intellectual property laws are how Montesanto is destroying private farms and how MS destroyed small software companies.

With modern technology a population base so large isn't required to meet their needs- Uncle Steve wants to make automated killing machines so they don't even need soldiers. The only possible thing that can happen with a population so big is that they wake up to how the empire and the banks operate and somehow rebel having the elites end up behind bars. I'd really like to hear how paying billions in interest from taxes to the IMF & private bankers is benefitting us. You keep saying you have explained it but you haven't. I can understand you wanting to stick to throwing around insults rather than engaging in a serious discussion.

The fact that the real economy is being destroyed may be one indication- manufactering ability is being exported. The national debt is growing to a point where taxation will soon not be able to pay the interest - which is the method that the IMF uses to destroy all countries. I'm not the forst one to come up with that - in fact many people believe it - I could give book names but what would be the point. ScottSA is only capable of insult, not thought.

Thats obvious. On a slight change of topic I have been listening to Lyndon LaRouche and his economic ideas make a lot of sense to me. It seems to me that our current fascist regimes want nothing more than total destruction of our economy. I would like to hear the reasoning for LaRouche being a fascist and the current North American regimes (the IMF) not being fascist.

A charter of rights is not a constitution. The politicians & judges are free to take any of those rights we have away anytime which means they are really privilidges. The constitution of the United States has rights.

Thats what I am thinking - can't afford school nurses and have all the wars I guess. I think I would have called the parents rather than the cops. If the parents were not home I would have called the hospital.

They are all the same and just puppets for the international bankers. It makes absolutely no difference who is elected. "The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes."-- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court. "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries"--David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

The legal profession is hard to peg in absolute terms so as soon as you start argueing legalities you will lose to a lawyer. There is something legally wrong with any arguement I'm sure - which is what is really wrong. We need common law and to throw all them law books and half the lawyers into a bottomless pit. The other half of lawyers should be shot if they go anywhere near a common law proceeding. Lawyer Client priviledge is to protect wealthy clients and it all slips downhill from there.

This is a Canadian forum !!!

PrisonPlanet & Muchrakker are looking for people to write articles B_Cat.

Exactly. But he can't say "the bankers" because that is a carefully guarded secret.

Spend your efforts clarifying the evidence on 911 not attacking me. I don't need your advice and if I need it I will ask for it. They reply with foolishess and idiotic science. It cloggs up a debate if you don't deal with it.

Its all obvious from videos such as 911Mysteries. There is double think. Maybe you are seeing double as well. I saw the explosions roll down the height of the building in the case of wtc1 & wtc2, what did you see?

I didn't say that. Standard Oil did. It became the biggest economy because of natural resources and a free people, not because of greedy bankers. Greedy bankers slowed it down and used it in their own interest.

They didn't need oil, the Brits came in and took over and grabbed the oil. Now they need it because they are westernized. You really need tio learn about the non globvalist corporate version of economics. I have read lots on both. To understand economics you need to read Krehms work and to watch The Money Masters or Money As Debt. The economics you learn in school is dictated by the banks and globalists. Its doesn't even make sense really. My eco prof warned us at the start of class about this stuff not reflecting reality but he had to teach it anyways. How can you know about economics without knowing how a dollar comes into existence ? - which they don't teach you. If you learn baout the banks you will see the control they have. They created hippy culture, womens rights, rock and roll, all the wars, everything. They created all the money and lent it to us at face value. 100 % of income tax in USA goes straight to the banks in return for created pieces of paper with numbers on it.