PolyNewbie

How about telling us everything FTA ? Is this the only promise you make or are there other secret promises ? Are you a representative of the crown ?

You would never be able to understand how banks operate. What you say is fundamentally true, but explain the advantage of government creating money vs private banker created money. You will say that if governments are allowed to create money inflation will result and I will call you a fool again and explain why. So go ahead..

Preventing this is not the real purpose of gun control. The gov wants to destroy the constitution and invoke a world government witha serveillence society like in Orwells 1984. This way you can be completely controlled and used as they wish. You affectively become a tool. Many users of this forum are nothing more than tools, but a tool doesn't realize he is a tool and thats the problem. Stupid people will continually blame the "stupid politicians" for everything that is happening. The Tavistock institute and CFR are not stupid, they just want you to think your politicans are that way you can sit around, do nothing, and in this case wait for Billary to save us. Billary will steal another few trillion dollars, start more wars and no one will notice the trend. Maybe everyone will be chipped and all guns taken away and cameras will be everywhere and then it will be too late. Protestors will be arrested and the sycophant fascists will be reporting them and laughing about it just like they do now.

A few years ago I had hyperthyroisim but it wasn't diagnosed right away. I thought I was going crazy so I went and had it checked and answered 1500 questions for three different computer based sanity checks. I'm about as sane as people can be. I'm far more sane than over 90 % of the population. Other psycs have said this when I was younger and went in to see them over family problems. I have had the same view of the US government sinced the 70's when I learned about the Kennedy assassination from a made for TV documentary. It made it obvious that criminals ran the country and many other examples have backed my viewpoints on this ever since. I thought 911 was an inside job after the second plane hit the towers, and was sure of it when I saw the first tower collapse. I'd never heard of Alex Jones and didn't know about the huge and growing conspiracy theorist movement online.

Luckily you are not in power - you would have 30 % of the population locked up. They already have the prisons built.

Thats is the views of this journalist. My opinion is that the jews are being used by another power as scapegoats.

Discovery channle also says 911 wasn't an inside job. I'll trust the navy bomb expert and the congressional testimony over a propoganda outlet for the Pentagon. I stopped watching Discovery after the fact that they are the Pentagon became obvious. I stopped reading PM for the same reason - used to buy the odd issue. Now you don't see it on newstands.

Good for Morris. Now if ScottSA would only do the same thing...

Its so obvious eh.

wtc7 collapse had all the characteristics of a controlled demolition and had no characteristics that did not show controlled demolition except that there were a few small fires and comparatively small structural damage.

Many more than 22 dead. Multiple signatures of black op. Order out of KAOS. New gun legislation already prepared and ready for this. Just like Columbine. Give your guns to the government. They will protect you. Big Brother loves you.

I'm sure FOX or CNN will straighten everything out in the end.

There is not much difference between a space rocket and a missile except on has a manned capsule and is much bigger. You shouldn't try and hang onto weak and stupid arguements like this.

I don't know of anyone one this forum that says this is a Zionist agenda. I guess you just have to make things up like that to support your arguement.

Thats why when you ask if we can work togather my answer is a definitive NO.

I'm not one to tattle, but I think ScottSA should be removed from this forum. He is obviously a psyc - op officer. No one could be this stupid for real and still be able to type. He is here to use nonsense and stupidity to generate frustration IMO.

"'Even in the Iran-Iraq war, our archeological sites, our history and theirs were respected', said a near tearful archeologist in 1991, referring to the indiscrimate destruction from the air, of humanity's history and utter disregard for civilian life, throwing to the winds, then as now, every international convention and treaty on the rules of war. It also happens to be an Zionist trait to destroy the ancient, the beautiful, the very historic soul of a nation and people, America's indivisible ally. Israeli Defense Force personnel and others, certainly came in with the US and British troops. Who else did? And remember the bomb which went off under a bridge in Iran's neighboring province to Basra? 'This bomb has a British accent', said an Iranian government spokesman. Maybe or may be not, but 'stuff happens', throughout the region - to quote Rumsfeld after the invasion's looting and decimation - that was not happening before 9th April 2003. British Forces (some of whom were caught in Arab dress with a carload of explosives last year, who were arrested and for whom the British demolished a police station to rescue) are due to hand over Kerbala to Iraqis later this month. They had to hand it back after invading it in 1915 too. " Global Research / Felicity Arbuthnot

Thats why another term for a rocket is a "missile" and Saturn 5 was a missile. Really I hope you are not being paid for this with tax dollars.

who... you ? wtc7 was a controlled demolition. It has all six characteristics of controlled demolitions. There was no characteristic of this collapse that didn't make it look exactly like a conventional controlled demolition. Things like this don't happen by accident. The collapse of wtc7 proves 911 was an inside job beyond any reasonable doubt. The doubts about 911 being an inside job raised on this thread are consistently shown to be foolish reasons for doubt. The science is completely wrong in every case and its easily shown to be wrong. Characteristics Of Controlled Demolition:Physics Professor - The three buildings collapsed in their own footprints and did not topple over. This bears the characteristics of controlled demolition. The central columns were pulverized and the buildings fell in on themselves. Why would Muslim fanatics go to the lengths of wiring the largest complex of buildings in the world with explosives when a topple collapse would have caused more damage to lower Manhattan and killed more people? - Horizontal puffs of smoke or 'squibs' can be seen popping out floors as the collapse engulfs floor by floor of the buildings. Again, this is a phenomenon atypical of controlled demolition. - Molten metal found in the basement of the WTC suggests that the commonly used explosive thermite may be responsible for the collapse. Jones said that buildings not destroyed by explosives would have insufficient directed energy to produce the large quantities of melted melted that was discovered. The molten steel was found five days after the collapse, on Sept. 16, when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) used an Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) to locate and measure the site’s hot spots. - It requires temperatures of at least 5,000 fahrenheit to melt steel. Diesel jet fuel does not reach these temperatures and the fires in the buildings were short lived. Firefighter tape recordings prove that only small pockets of fire were still burning in the buildings seconds before their collapse. - Building 7 was not hit by a plane and yet it collapsed in 6.6 seconds, which is .6 seconds quicker than it would take an object dropped from the roof of the building to hit the floor. This violates fundamental laws of physics, unless the building was brought down by explosives. - Buildings that collapse without the aid of explosives produce large piles of in-tact concrete and do not turn to dust as they are falling, as was witnessed on 9/11.

I think the term "conspiracy theory" applied to non corporate media / presstitute supported ideas or conspiracies when the word is used on this forum in a negative way. If FOX put on a special showing the evidence around 911 being an inside job it would become perfectly acceptable to debate it here.

Thats just Riverwind making scientific statements and me correcting him mostly. I don't know why he keeps cramming things up with that crap.

You don't need any kind of scientific background to see that the collapse of wtc7 looks identical to any number of controlled demolitions of buildings you can find on the web. In fact it is a text book example - wtc7 goes down more perfectly than any other controlled demolition that you will ever find videos for. No building has ever collapsed like this except for a handful that had a very specific fault due to incomplete bracing while under construction or incorrect construction. You don't need to be a molecular biologist to tell a tree from a rock.

Yes you are. Anyone that looks at the collapse of wtc7 and then still insists that the building came down like that as result of fires and structural damage is. There is a good reason why mainstream only showed that collapse on the first day of 911 and didn't air it again. The collapse of wtc7 makes the case for 911 being an inside job obvious to anyone. There is also a good reason why people like Philip Zelikow was involved in presenting 911 to the public, why qualified investigators were restricted from doing the investigation, why members of NYPD & NYFD were gagged and why people like Stephen Jones & Kevin Ryan were fired. When this many people with these qualifications step up to raise suspicion about the official version something mus be wrong. link When the collapse of wtc7 still hasn't been explained then something is wrong. 911Truth is growing after 5 years.

An annonymous pilot on a news group isn't the same thing as the more experienced and numerous pilots stating their names on Pilots For 911 Truth. PilotsFor911Truth.org Riverwind says he is an engineer and I have shown that this is obviously not the truth using his own statements regarding scientific fact. Again, I think the Pentagon should get a refund for whatever they have been paying you.

These guys that supposedy took over four airliners were not experienced pilots. I know from playing on flight simulators that wind makes what you would think of as easy things a lot more difficult than you would think. But anyway...should we believe that 911 Pilots For Trth are working for Usama ?