sharkman

They don't need stem cells anymore. They have found that the umbilical cord has excellent potential. Good for Bushie.

Don't think I said that. I said they don't have the money. If they did have the money, I'd want them to actually spend it on research rather than manufacturing consent. I'm saying it.

Ah yes, conspiracy theories abound, chick.

I don't know that they have the money. They might be compelled to it (especially for something like Pierre Borque where you can buy your story headlines and favourable coverage) but I think their money would be better spent on a research department and a full-time pollster. No, no, of course. The Liberals are not capable of anything untoward. The perfect party.

You have no such perogative. You lack intellectual integrity, thinking you can say one thing and then contradict yourself as you please. Glad to see you're getting a few yucks out of it. Ha ha ha.

His recent book was full of similar nonsense and now this. He's so desperate to make up for his term of disaster and the North Korea treaty fiasco, but by attacking the current administration, which former presidents never do, he is only sullying what's left of his own reputation.

I would like to submit this for the consideration of the open minded. Today, Drea expresses her bigotry for religion. Yet just YESTERDAY she said this: Now today she is bigotted again. She suggests she likes a title, so here's one we all can call her: Hypocrite.

Work hard nothing. If a backbencher tory had done what May has done, there would be an outcry from the left on this forum. But since it's not the Tories, the lefties shrug their shoulders.

Some would say you are preachy Drea, and your gospel is what you expound upon whenever you are speaking against religion, which usually is quite often.

These silly comments amount to trolling for reaction, there is no proof, just the wild eyed feelings of conspiracy theorists. Not that there's anything wrong with that...

Which killing?

They should come up with one for forum discussions. Dancer, do you not have a DL? How can you survive?!

Alexandra, good find. How ironic that the prisoners were begging to go with the American captors than stay in a prison now run by Iraqi guards. Will the left screech about the worse treatment they are receiving? Will anyone on this forum care now that it's the Iraqis who are doing it? Stay tuned...

Very revealing posts Rue. All of this information is readily available, and yet most of the Western press ignore it and continue with their anti-Israel screeching, much like what some do here. It is sickening to think that, by and large, the Western media have an agenda that includes Israel give up more and more land even after Palestine has demonstrated what kind of peace they give for land. They don't want peace, they want Israel, one piece at a time. Edit: by the way, don't expect response from figleaf, he just got a 30 day ban for his ladies of Mapleleaf challenge thread.

Actually gays demand approval from specifically those who don't approve. That's why their agenda is to be protected on a level with endangered species. That way if anyone even looks at them crosseyed while they're strutting in a gay parade they can claim some form of hate crime, and get the ACLU or some gay equivalent to sue.

Wth is that supposed to mean? That sounds sick coming from a so called Canadian. These two 'so-called' Canadians are more than likely little old women living in tiny little apartments with a cat or two. Somewhere in their Trudeau past they absorbed the 'I hate America' policy of his decade. These two little old ladies probably took offense at the manner in which Trudeau was smacked down by the then president, Lyndon Johnson ( I think), and from there any peoples or countries associated with or friends of America were open season for their bitterness and animosity. This could be an explanation for their obsession with the jews, Israel and the Americans or maybe it is simply that they need to give each other a daily jolt of gossip and rumor by dredging up and posting on a message board whatever old and nebulous articles found on-line re either or both of their only topics. Or, Maybe they just don't have a cat or two! ` Yes, with their 24/7 bigotry, your theory sounds about right. Oh, and methinks they are both unmarried. I just get that vibe for some reason.

Ever hear of Martha Stewart? How about Paris Hilton? Mind you these two were ramrodded by bitter petty judges who couldn't resist the temptation to stick it to the rich (wo)man. Whether Black gets off or not has nothing to do with justice.

It's true, it's pretty hard to know what goes on in someone elses head for sure. (Let me preface this next remark by saying I'm not specifically referring to figleaf). But when a poster dogmatically posts anti Israel tirades, and defends the Iranian president, defending also anyone who attacks or bombs Israel, you know there are unbalanced attitudes at the least, and possibly racist attitudes under the surface. I understand jbg's frustration, and there are some here who do bait on this topic which is disappointing since the majority of us post in good faith.

Hey Cat, how many posts did you make without addressing the topic? And then you tell scriblett to adress the topic. It's sooo easy to point out your hypocrisy and other crap, you really should at least try. LOL!

Fear? it seems the 'west' is more full of fear. Envy? well that would have to imply, something to be envious of? what would that be? our freedom? well we have less and less of that all the time, spying, wiretapping, no-fly lists, cameras everywhere to take our pictures, in Britian that includes people to shout at you. our 'moral superiority'? hilarious our 'christian ways'? more hilarity well I am not getting the envy...................... Glad to see you're getting a few yucks. Man, it's kind of simple. They are envious of our wealth and power.

They would have given away far too much to Arafat. Barak was wrong, the PLO never wanted peace, they wanted Israel a piece at a time, as history has shown.

Maybe you can tell me how that refers to a personal attack on you? Are you in the PMO? Are you in the Tory hierarchy? Are you responsible for the policy in any way? My reference was to Tory behaviour which was again re-inforced by the widow who had to confront Harper this week for ignoring her for two years. I don't see how I insulted family's of soldiers. The Tories did that all on their own. Oh, you commit personal attacks whenever you feel like it pal. Michael Bluth's a stalker, I made some wildly inaccurate predictions (or that's how you've put it) and now Jbg. I notice they are all to the right of you. I also notice you've got some kind of fetish with this forum. It's rather tedious to be bumping into your damn posts every time I'm looking around. All you do is put a left spin on whatever thread you are in again and again. At least try a little variety.

Yeah, I heard about this in the evening news, beyond bizzare.

Figleaf, in all honesty I didn't think you would find one thing wrong with her rude obnoxious comments. I don't know why you spent so much time on refuting the asshole comment when I plainly stated in my post I realized she didn't specifically call me one... You can disagree with someone without associating what they believe in with Nazis, assholes, racists, and hypocrites as Buff regularly does. Actually you usually do as well, you must be turning over a new leaf or something. If only the cat would do the same.

Back atcha, you just described some of your own posts W.