Five of swords

It would benefit all of my people...that would be the whole point

Dude, I had to inform YOU that they had a planned economy. You kept saying it was 'market socialism', which it was not. It was full socialism. Now you think you can teach me stuff? Lol

I mean in the sense they believed it was a responsibility of government to provide necessary resources and opportunities to all of its citizens

Well...fascists were socialist

Trump never said that. Jesus never said that. Jesus wasn't an immigrant. Bunch of falsehoods here.

Whatever destroys the usa is good.

What a pointless question, lol

Suits me

Lol...so you understand why it would be in my interest to have power...

It does me no good to know that other people are successful and managed to kill a lot of people. I am not impressed. I will just take my own side for better or for worse, because that is the honorable thing to do.

Law only applies to subjects. To a sovereign, law is irrelevant. As Carl Schmitt pointed out, the sovereign decides the exceptions. So you can nuse all you like about ehat is written in some book somewhere. Power just means some people get shot.

The British empire died by 'winning' world War 2, which it also started. It is silly to speak of the British empire today as if it has any relevance. The British empire should only be viewed as a relic of history and a cautionary tale to not make the same mistakes that the British empire did. I.e....fighting hitler.

Israel has been dispossessing, marginalizing, and indeed attempting genocide against palestinians by making gaza and the west bank unlivable. I see nothing wrong with or surprising about militant resistance to that situation. It is interesting to me that it is somehow ASSUMED that Canadians (and indeed all 'western countries') should side with Israel in this conflict. It would be more 'normal' for Canadians to be indifferent about a conflict between people halfway around the world. But The fact Canadians are expected to side with Israel suggests to me that jews simply have too much power in canada.

So it's OK that they are Asian, you just don't think poor people should be Canadian. OK, then you are nothing like Hitler. I meant it as a compliment, though.

So you are saying that asians are not Canadian? Gosh, I thought you were dead, Hitler.

If somebody else is deciding whether you are committing a 'crime' or not, then you are not sovereign. There can be no such thing as 'war crimes' because wars only occur between sovereign states and only sovereign states decide what is a crime. This may seem like mere semantics to you, but I think people are confusing themselves with the language they use. It seems clear that there are many cases of states pretending to be sovereign when they are not...and the term 'wag the dog' seems to be appropriate quite a lot when studying recent history of politics. Just say you don't like Israel. I guess you would protest 'I like what Israel is I just don't like what it is doing'...well that is what Israel is...if we assume it is sovereign.

Well I take that as a compliment so thankyou

I don't think that is actually him

The guy who wrote the article, duh? He's saying some Canadians aren't psychopaths, in fact we loved the usa when they nuked a Japanese city and fireombed dresden etc. I'm not seeing how that supports his claim

I have no idea and still do not care what a racist statement is. But it is a logical fallacy to say all generalizations are false...in fact that statement refutes itself. A claim is also not true or false depending on whether it is biased...Indeed the motivation for a claim is irrelevant to whether it is true.

How would you know whether a racist statement is true?

How is that any different from non native children?

Well I don't care one bit what is racist. I personally prefer to focus on what is true.

So he isn't a psycho because he celebrates killing millions of germans?

Well no, I am not on drugs. Are you?