User

Yeah... except it is not anywhere close to that obvious. It is more like that picture of stick figures and you are sitting here saying: "Look, OMG, when everyone is dressed in black on a white background, they die!" or "Look, OMG, those hardwood floors caused the wallpaper to fall off!"

Well, based on how you leftists define what a woman is, you were likely shacked up with some young ladyboy from Thailand. You can't even figure out something well-known and easily researchable that Natural Gas plants use underground storage... Hell, even after it was shown to you, you had to lie and act like it was only some kind of fringe French thing! LOL, what a pathetic, ignorant, lying, cowardly loser you are.

It can't be arbitrarily confiscated. Stop playing dumb for once in your life. Then why are you here commenting on anything? Clown.

LOL, making progress? LOL

If these were Conservatives violently attacking LEO, surrounding a federal facility, and laying siege to it, the mainstream media would be parked out there with vans filming it all 24/7, interviewing the officers every night, showing how they were harmed, and the left would have the entire Airborne Infantry Division mobilized, parachuting in to put a stop to it. Just look at what they did after J6. They mobilized something like 30,000 National Guard troops to deploy to WDC just to be sure there were not any other crazy Conservatives that might show up to conquer them as Biden assumed office. They had them there for 5 months.

We are ignoring it? Are you not one of the leftists on here ignorantly cheering on China every other day of the week?

Once again, you have to make up crap to argue against I have not said. I have repeatedly said here that I opposed the COVID vaccine mandate. Yet you still keep arguing as if I supported that. Will you ever stop with this dishonesty?

Notice that you still haven't addressed the core question: how do we determine that a person with a severe psychiatric illness is competent to make an irreversible decision to die? Your example assumes the answer. You describe someone with forty years of schizophrenia, psychosis, paranoia, hallucinations, and a poor quality of life, then conclude that because they have repeatedly expressed a wish to die, we should honor it. But the whole debate is whether that wish is itself a symptom of the illness, or a competent and autonomous decision despite the illness. With a terminal cancer patient, the disease doesn't typically impair their ability to evaluate reality. With severe mental illness, assessing decision-making capacity is much harder because the illness can directly affect judgment, perception, hopelessness, and self-worth. So where is the line? How do you distinguish between a rational desire to die and a desire that is being driven by the very condition that qualifies someone for MAID? That's the question I don't think you've answered.

Sure... you already forgot your nonsense about the Polio vaccine? You forget this little gem? "About what......5000 children? Tragic yes, every child death is tragic. But that was the problem vaccines were going to solve. Over 70 shots per year now, given to newborn babies. To prevent 5000 deaths. More children die from other causes per year." So, what vaccines do you support then? What vaccinations have you gotten? You listed the whole chart of childhood vaccines to question them, these were generalized comments against vaccines in general you made recently: "You can take your seatbelt off when you're not driving. You can never un-vaccinate yourself." "Do you expect to go through life never getting any disease? Is that the goal here? Do you know how many children died of childhood diseases before vaccines? Here's a chart for you (US CDC data):" That was before you proceeded to push the surface level deep ignorant talking points from the anti-vax crowd against Polio vaccine. So, please tell me again, how you are not anti-vax?

LOL, sure... the last couple of pages show otherwise. So, now you go back to the beginning. OK, once again, I already showed you how the government warned people about the risks. Then you cried that it was the media who didn't... then I showed you they did. Every step of the way, I have responded to your BS with actual facts. I challenge your assertions, ask you to back up your meaningless subjective drivel, and you run like a coward. This was the post where I showed you the government website as well as an official government statement early on: Then, after you cried about it not being the media, here is the post where I showed you a quote from the media:

Well, you leftists certainly want not only not to kill careers, but seem hell-bent on actually killing people too. That is nothing to be proud of.

Well, if you believe their non-sense, they do think ICE is out killing people every day, just gunning them down for no reason, and that ICE is going to the polls to steal the election!!!!

It’s the same circular assertion you ignorant clown: You: people will need to move because of AGW. Me: Why would they need to? You: AGW

The point was you keep changing your assertion. So… pathological liar then? You are the one who ignored most of the last post I made. Then you call me a coward?

More of your non-answers. You just spew BS. As opposed to your cowardly tactics to just run away? Never admit your ignorance? Double down and lie?

Why would “all” the others leave? Why would “all” the others perish? Humans are not hunter gatherers anymore living in caves going out to forage berries and lizards to eat. Why are you so ignorant?

And yet he operates in the bounds of the law every day.

Humans are not all the other species. It isn’t going to get too hot to live there. This is your stupid argument to make. You said “need” and you can’t back it up. Like usual. You assert stupid ignorant shit.

Not an issue of understanding. You have offered nothing to explain why you think they (humans) will need to leave.

There is no distinction. There is only you trying to both blame Trump for being directly responsible and then balk when asked to provide any evidence he was directly involved. Right in the open? Yet you can't provide any evidence to show that Trump demanded that Colbert be fired or that the FCC withhold the merger. The point is that you would have us believe some conspiratorial BS you can't provide any evidence for over the most obvious explanation. CBS clearly said they were canceling the show because of this. See, watch, this is called evidence and backing up your claims, you should try it sometime: CBS will end "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" and retire "The Late Show" franchise in May 2026, the company announced Thursday, calling it "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night." CBS called Colbert irreplaceable and said the show's ending was "not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount," CBS' parent company. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-late-show-stephen-colbert-end-may-2026/ Where did Trump or the FCC openly threaten Paramount/CBS that if they did not fire Colbert there would be no merger? As one of the forums most deranged Trump haters, you have yet to link this to Trump in any credible way.

So... again, the question was "need" I love the weather in San Diego. I do need to move there.

Ah yes... anyone that plays you leftists will attack, threaten their lives, and try to ruin them... and then you turn around and mock that no one is playing.

LOL, now you use the word "indicated!" In the same breath, you say you are not jumping around. OMG Do you even realize what you are doing, or is it really just pathological? What evidence did "they" have that showed it was more than it was that they then misled the public? No, as I have pointed out repeatedly now, this was the first shit thing you said, that you have run away from admitting you were wrong about: "Obviously this is somewhat Canada specific, but I think a big part of the problem was that the government was unwilling to admit that there was a possible risk in any meaningful way" You respond, you do not actually directly answer. Calling me names and acting like the petulant child you are doesn't change the facts. You were the one who came here to cry and spread lies. I am calling you out.

No, you just jump all over the place from one assertion to the next. When I challenge and question you, then you do crap like this. LOL, you have certainly avoided the question a lot. Speaking of being a coward... here you are acting like one.

Why would they need to go anywhere?