User

Narrator: He screamed into the void again.

Feel free to review the discussion and highlight any part you continue to have issues with. No, not every time. Most of the time you run away from discussions and the many times I have repeatedly pointed out your factual errors.

It should be no surprise that for as dishonest as folks here will be here I will be calling it out.

Narrator: He screamed into the void...

You are the only one twisting yourself in pretzels to support and defend Hamas.

Potential flaw? No, you were using it as an example to oppose anything, and as you say here, that is clearly your position. It is not just the laws either... but policy. You are clearly obfuscating here to support dudes pretending to be women going into women spaces. Lets prove that out, just be blunt here, be clear and I will even avoid loaded language: Are you OK with trans women going into women's spaces? Yes or No? Do you care at all how much that impacts women? Yes or No? Are you just fine seeing a trans woman up on the podium in 1st place, preventing a woman from winning and having that spot? It is not my problem to deal with some girl who surgically altered herself to the point she looks like a man. That is her problem to deal with and explain to people as to why she is trying to use the ladies room or not. The folks in that category are going to be an even smaller subset of the dudes who clearly look like dudes trying to look like a lady. Can you at least agree that is wrong for a dude who clearly looks like a dude trying to look like a woman using women spaces? If all you are going to do is offer a baseless assertion that is obviously wrong, all I have to do is point out it is wrong. Once again, just a factual observation, not just me saying it. Once again... if YOU want to make it personal for yourself, that is on you. YOU trying to make it personal for me has nothing to do with anything. My being upset or not has nothing to do with anything. It is just you trying to cast negative emotions on me when not only are those irrelevant, you have no clue.

Once again, not all trans folks can afford perfect amounts of surgery and effort to appear to be something they are not... you are hyper focused on the extreme example here and ignoring that there are many dudes who clearly look like dudes just pretending to be women. No, it is just a statement of fact. You can pretend to be something you are not, but you can't change your gender. This is not a disagreement about people choosing to appear to be something they are not or having mental issues believing it... It is about how you and others expect and support society, then conforming to their cosplay or illness, and wanting to impose dudes into women's private spaces or taking away their fair competition. OK... so what? Talk about yourself all you want, trying to make this personal about me doesn't have anything to do with the discussion. You really don't care... which is why you are in almost all of these discussions. You are involving yourself right now.

Not pretending anything. What do you mean by "OK" here? Yeah, you do. You throw around baseless assertions about bribes. You falsely claimed Trump was taking the plane with him. Nope. Cryptocurrency has been going on for some time now, you might as well complain about how everyone in Congress is making money off the stock market. Good luck with that.

Well, beyond the fact that there is nothing new about that... Israel is not going to allow Hamas to control food distribution anymore. I realize this upsets you because you are rooting for them, but Hamas uses food distribution to remain in power and keep control. So you think rape is kind of OK? Let me know what percentage you support that.

No, you didn't. You dictated what you think the school should do with vague, obfuscating language on gender instead of addressing the subject and question. You can't change your gender. You being OK with it is not the point being discussed. It is not a problem for me at all, it is simply an observation of fact and my being honest about it. You are choosing to once again try to make a discussion personal with me instead of simply sticking to the subject. Yes, "some people" being the girls and women who are losing their place in competition and losing their privacy and norms, having to see some dude in their locker rooms and bathrooms...

So you don’t know the most obvious issue here? A dude thinking he is a woman is a mental issue. Being dangerous isn’t the only reason we protect women’s privacy and spaces in society.

And by gender based… you mean, a dude who thinks he is a woman actually is considered one when it comes to being gender based? You didn’t really answer my question. At all. You said you didn’t support the federal government being involved… so again, what level do you support being involved?

You made a dumb assertion it wasn’t political. I explained how it is.

What worse? You won’t explain.

When it is politicians supporting it with taxpayer money and laws... yes, it is very much political.

Yes, it is. This thread was on Israel/Gaza war and our particular discussion on your usual sleazy wording supporting the Hamas terrorists and excusing their rape, murder, torture, hostage taking. Support for what resistance? Yet again... your Weasel words.

I missed the context here with this particular person. We both know the most obvious issue here are that most trans women clearly look like dudes pretending to be or dressed up to be women. So... why do you want some dude with a beard and a dress on, with clear mental issues thinking he is something he isn't, going into the women's restroom?

OK. So if your position is on what level of government can't interfere here, what level is it that you support enforcing laws against dudes pretending to be women going into women's spaces? How about at the Collegiate or High School level? Do you support those organizations enforcing rules against dudes pretending to be women going into women's spaces like locker rooms and restrooms?

OK great. What does this have to do with anything here or what I said?

Once again, just pointing out a fact here and refuting something not true said buy Robo. If you cared about "ethical standards" here, then you would do more to show that with your own posting standards.

Like I said, you have a problem with facts...

I am not trying to do anything. It is just a fact. I know you have a lot of problems with those from our past discussions. So what "him" are you talking about selling access? Not the President here. So what is your point? Like I said, I guess he should have taken up finger painting instead.

OK... and? The point I was refuting was that Trump was somehow planning to go on flying around in this after his term. No, they are not bribes. You guys continue to abuse the definition of this word.

Nope. This is where you ignore me or run away like you always do. Trump tried to tamp down some of the opposition by saying he wouldn’t fly around in the gifted Boeing 747 when his term ends. Instead, he said, the $400 million plane would be donated to a future presidential library, similar to how the Boeing 707 used by President Ronald Reagan was decommissioned and put on display as a museum piece. https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-qatar-air-force-one-2ef13d87b71185bde547abe6840b098c The amount of anything has nothing to do with it being a bribe or not.

What bribes? Everyone sells access. This is a common campaign thing. What is your point?