User

What conflict? How is it “theirs?”

Do you not know how the internet works?

Entirely blameless... for what?

So, your idea of "ethics" is to let the baby die too?

Like what?

I can: or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States

I do.

No, it doesn't. I swear, do you ever care about the facts? Ever?

What is what? I was not talking to you here. The other person quoted someone making an ignorant comment about "delusion," and I pointed out the definition of delusion to show how ignorant it was.

Well... you are quoting the wrong law for starters. That is the one proposed to protect children from the trans madness, not the one discussed related to punishing parents for daring to disagree with the trans madness being applied to their own children.

Or... just hide from facts like you do...

Basically, no one here bothered to read the actual case here at all.

What are they? If you have an argument to make, lets see it.

Well, let me know when you want to be specific about the bullshit you claimed I have.

Bullshit is what you spread here.

Is that what is meant by jurisdiction? You are conflating being subject to local laws while you are there with being subject to its jurisdiction. You are ultimately still a citizen of another country. If it is a matter of being subject to jurisdiction making you a citizen... why don't we say merely stepping one foot into America and BOOM, now you are a citizen too! Don't even have to be born here.

Except, I actually explained why and you ignored that part. Here you go again: "The definition of delusion is having a false belief despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary. Robert Pirsig's commentary here is ignorant. " Not what I asked.

What about so-called illegal Jewish settlements? I have addressed this garbage from you before.

Let me know when you have more than vague generalizations to offer.

I was not talking to you. I have already made my position throughout this thread. You jumping in at the end to fling poo around and acting like you are making some kind of point... is not proving anything. Of course you would say this, rather than actually engage based on facts.

Narrator: He screamed into the void...

What is this "Gawd of creation" you are pontificating about here?

No, not a "select" few. Those who choose this relationship. It is yours if you want it. You reject it. So why are you here complaining about not getting to go to a place you don't want to go to? The definition of delusion is having a false belief despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary. Robert Pirsig's commentary here is ignorant.

No, it is not. "Objectively excellent" is entirely dependent on the details here. Lets say the potential here for 195 participants is to achieve a score of 0-100 with 100 being perfect. If none of the 195 got over a 40, it is not objectively excellent being 7th place in only getting to just below 40% of perfection and performing poorly with everyone else overall.

The exact words do not say that everyone born in America is an American citizen. Period.