User

I was not talking to you. I have already made my position throughout this thread. You jumping in at the end to fling poo around and acting like you are making some kind of point... is not proving anything. Of course you would say this, rather than actually engage based on facts.

Narrator: He screamed into the void...

What is this "Gawd of creation" you are pontificating about here?

No, not a "select" few. Those who choose this relationship. It is yours if you want it. You reject it. So why are you here complaining about not getting to go to a place you don't want to go to? The definition of delusion is having a false belief despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary. Robert Pirsig's commentary here is ignorant.

No, it is not. "Objectively excellent" is entirely dependent on the details here. Lets say the potential here for 195 participants is to achieve a score of 0-100 with 100 being perfect. If none of the 195 got over a 40, it is not objectively excellent being 7th place in only getting to just below 40% of perfection and performing poorly with everyone else overall.

The exact words do not say that everyone born in America is an American citizen. Period.

Narrator: He screamed into the void again.

Feel free to review the discussion and highlight any part you continue to have issues with. No, not every time. Most of the time you run away from discussions and the many times I have repeatedly pointed out your factual errors.

It should be no surprise that for as dishonest as folks here will be here I will be calling it out.

Narrator: He screamed into the void...

You are the only one twisting yourself in pretzels to support and defend Hamas.

Potential flaw? No, you were using it as an example to oppose anything, and as you say here, that is clearly your position. It is not just the laws either... but policy. You are clearly obfuscating here to support dudes pretending to be women going into women spaces. Lets prove that out, just be blunt here, be clear and I will even avoid loaded language: Are you OK with trans women going into women's spaces? Yes or No? Do you care at all how much that impacts women? Yes or No? Are you just fine seeing a trans woman up on the podium in 1st place, preventing a woman from winning and having that spot? It is not my problem to deal with some girl who surgically altered herself to the point she looks like a man. That is her problem to deal with and explain to people as to why she is trying to use the ladies room or not. The folks in that category are going to be an even smaller subset of the dudes who clearly look like dudes trying to look like a lady. Can you at least agree that is wrong for a dude who clearly looks like a dude trying to look like a woman using women spaces? If all you are going to do is offer a baseless assertion that is obviously wrong, all I have to do is point out it is wrong. Once again, just a factual observation, not just me saying it. Once again... if YOU want to make it personal for yourself, that is on you. YOU trying to make it personal for me has nothing to do with anything. My being upset or not has nothing to do with anything. It is just you trying to cast negative emotions on me when not only are those irrelevant, you have no clue.

Once again, not all trans folks can afford perfect amounts of surgery and effort to appear to be something they are not... you are hyper focused on the extreme example here and ignoring that there are many dudes who clearly look like dudes just pretending to be women. No, it is just a statement of fact. You can pretend to be something you are not, but you can't change your gender. This is not a disagreement about people choosing to appear to be something they are not or having mental issues believing it... It is about how you and others expect and support society, then conforming to their cosplay or illness, and wanting to impose dudes into women's private spaces or taking away their fair competition. OK... so what? Talk about yourself all you want, trying to make this personal about me doesn't have anything to do with the discussion. You really don't care... which is why you are in almost all of these discussions. You are involving yourself right now.

Not pretending anything. What do you mean by "OK" here? Yeah, you do. You throw around baseless assertions about bribes. You falsely claimed Trump was taking the plane with him. Nope. Cryptocurrency has been going on for some time now, you might as well complain about how everyone in Congress is making money off the stock market. Good luck with that.

Well, beyond the fact that there is nothing new about that... Israel is not going to allow Hamas to control food distribution anymore. I realize this upsets you because you are rooting for them, but Hamas uses food distribution to remain in power and keep control. So you think rape is kind of OK? Let me know what percentage you support that.

No, you didn't. You dictated what you think the school should do with vague, obfuscating language on gender instead of addressing the subject and question. You can't change your gender. You being OK with it is not the point being discussed. It is not a problem for me at all, it is simply an observation of fact and my being honest about it. You are choosing to once again try to make a discussion personal with me instead of simply sticking to the subject. Yes, "some people" being the girls and women who are losing their place in competition and losing their privacy and norms, having to see some dude in their locker rooms and bathrooms...

So you don’t know the most obvious issue here? A dude thinking he is a woman is a mental issue. Being dangerous isn’t the only reason we protect women’s privacy and spaces in society.

And by gender based… you mean, a dude who thinks he is a woman actually is considered one when it comes to being gender based? You didn’t really answer my question. At all. You said you didn’t support the federal government being involved… so again, what level do you support being involved?

You made a dumb assertion it wasn’t political. I explained how it is.

What worse? You won’t explain.

When it is politicians supporting it with taxpayer money and laws... yes, it is very much political.

Yes, it is. This thread was on Israel/Gaza war and our particular discussion on your usual sleazy wording supporting the Hamas terrorists and excusing their rape, murder, torture, hostage taking. Support for what resistance? Yet again... your Weasel words.

I missed the context here with this particular person. We both know the most obvious issue here are that most trans women clearly look like dudes pretending to be or dressed up to be women. So... why do you want some dude with a beard and a dress on, with clear mental issues thinking he is something he isn't, going into the women's restroom?

OK. So if your position is on what level of government can't interfere here, what level is it that you support enforcing laws against dudes pretending to be women going into women's spaces? How about at the Collegiate or High School level? Do you support those organizations enforcing rules against dudes pretending to be women going into women's spaces like locker rooms and restrooms?

OK great. What does this have to do with anything here or what I said?