-
Posts
15,094 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
51
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by User
-
Why wouldn’t I have enough money?
-
Interesting take, figuring I have worked with plenty of Canadians who pay a crap ton in taxes and complain how the return is crap. This thread was created to complain about how long an MRI takes and your response is so what.
-
How are you even a real person? In one thread you are talking about how we will have to cut entitlement spending because of the national debt and here you are saying we can afford universal healthcare…
-
First, Iran closed the Strait. Why do you cover for them? Second, you continue to push a dishonest take on what a "bribe" is or that this is how politics works across the board. There is nothing "heavily regulated" or public, about people donating to a PAC or doing so through a non-profit anonymously. Hence, why you are a partisan hack. Like almost every discussion, you ran away from that discussion before, just to come back and mindlessly repeat the same BS. Somehow you think this is not buying access... "— Among them were Roger Altman, the co-founder of the investment banking firm Evercore. Altman gave the maximum $5,600 to Biden directly in 2020, and FEC records show he kicked in $200,000 toward the pro-Biden super PAC Unite the Country. He cut a $185,000 check for another pro-Biden super PAC, and gave $91,000 to a joint fundraising committee between the Biden campaign and DNC." https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-influence/2022/12/02/which-biden-donors-scored-invites-to-the-state-dinner-00071982 Third, Trump never pressured anyone to falsify vote counts; that is your dishonest partisan hack spin. Fourth, "bogus lawsuits" is the name of the game... they are only bogus until they are not. Also, I never said anything about supporting them all or how that all played out like it did. Fifth, Trump never tried to "steal" an election and if the legal challenges he made played out lawfully there was nothing fake about it. Which is exactly why those "fake" electors are not in prison because if you read the fine print, the vast majority of them signed off on, it explicitly said as much. Only something like 2 groups didn't have that explicit language and that didn't change their motives or the plan. Sixth, any obstruction of the J6 vote Trump pursued was an entirely lawful mechanism to do so. As stupid and contrived as it was. Seventh, you ran away and pushed so many lies about Al Gore... his attempts to twist and contort the law were just as legal and lawful as anything Trump was trying to do. He lost. He lost the recounts. His only hope was getting some kind of hand recount where the counters interpreted people's votes because they were too stupid to push a hole through a piece of paper, or maybe not... who knows, not Al Gore's job to try to interpret them selectively. Eighth, You sit on here bragging about and cheering on Europe and Canada doing away with the US... now you cry about wanting the US to keep troops in Germany? Why doesn't Canada send 5,000 troops there? I guess that is because you want Putin to win?! Why Does Canada support Putin? I am perfectly fine pulling troops out of Europe because you are all a bunch of free loaders off NATO that have been shirking your duties for decades and now cheer on and brag about closing air space and taking petty passive actions to oppose America. You don't get to have it both ways, where you beg and cry for our military support and then turn your backs on us and act petty because you don't like what we are doing.
-
Why wouldn’t I be able to afford it?
-
You do pay, in taxes. Typical big government leftist, and why I oppose government health care. Snobs like you are like: SHUT UP AND WAIT 6 MONTHS OR PI$$ OFF.
-
Which part of science is most important to you?
User replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
No, that was not your only claim: "1 Gender studies, gender is a social construct, the complete opposite of Objective, " Gender is not a social construct. "roles" are a social construct and the folks pushing the trans madness want to conflate these things so they can pretend some dude who thinks he is a woman, is a woman, and we should all go along with calling him one too. That is what the trans madness folks claim now, so they can reconcile calling some dude a woman. It completely falls apart as soon as you ask them to define what a woman is. So, can you define what a woman is in any meaningful way? That is objective. Sex is objective. And up until about 5 minutes ago for all of human history sex/gender were objective. -
You continue to be one of the most outrageously partisan hacks on this forum. Spirit has been bleeding money for years now. He woke up this morning, stubbed his toe, and cursed Trump for making him do it.
-
So, you were only talking about 2 specific COVID vaccines that are off the market when you said we know they cause blood clots? Are the rest cool? You admit these were very rare conditions either way? You should be more specific next time. Also, only 1 I know of was specifically limited and paused over these concerns, never fully stopped, the market demand brought much newer variations of the vaccines in the end.
-
We do? Says who? What study? What is the nature of the risk - e.g. how many face this risk per million?
-
That may have been someone's motivations, as absurd as it would have been... what does that have to do with me? With this discussion? Your narrative seems to be the exact opposite: that no matter how many lives were saved, if the vaccine harmed one person, it was bad. No?
-
Who is this we? I never said one thing about if it saves just one life. Once again, you have to resort to making up crap to argue against.
-
No, I was just pointing out your duplicity in that you tout all these one-off stories of victims to attack the COVID vaccination while you ignore the cancer victim of the very doctor you tout. If you are just fine with him harming someone and then getting off with some secret deal... that is on you, I am just pointing out what you are doing.
-
And yours took a secret deal when he messed up.
-
No, I asked you why this matters so much to you in the context of this discussion. What is your point?
-
What is the importance of the resolution here? Do you care about "the resolution" with every other major medical organization, Fauci, etc... after COVID that you sit here still railing against even though "the resolution" is that they are all still going along in their professions?
-
Reached an agreement to dismiss… Why are you defending a man accused like this of reaching secret agreements to dismiss the charges?
-
DOJ Suppressed Christians' Rights
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
They refused to years ago on here when we pointed this out to them with Mark Houck. Some of them, even after, cheered it on. Then they have the nerve to sit here upset about the Trump DOJ. -
DOJ Suppressed Christians' Rights
User replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
It was literally linked in the first post. -
Same old stupid partisan BS. You only care about debt and deficit spending as long as you can use them for cheap political rhetoric. It is you @BeaverFever and others who ignored the spending and defended it or lied about it when Biden and the Democrats were spending trillions. As I have continued to point out, this is an issue with the establishment from both parties not caring and then leftists like you not caring. The only ones who really care are a minority of Republicans, who are Conservatives. They never have enough power or sway to make a real difference and when they do have enough to leverage a shut down, folks like you and the media scream about the shut down and attack them.
