Yakuda

Political prisoners should be released. Filthy leftists raped the justice system to prosecutor people.

Sure. He did it before and can do it again.

So youre saying transfreakism is bullshit?

Because you have no clue what Christian nationalist means. You've been programmed. Not i didn't mean they and show me where the founders meant they No

Yes they called it the creator. There is no confusion. You're confused thats not the same at all.

Word salad that means nothing. Well the D of I makes the claim we are endowed by the creator with certain inalienable rights. A lot of this hinges on the extent of our understanding of the words "endowed" and "inalienable". The D of I goes into to say that govts are therefore instituted among men to secure those rights. Now again you especially have to understand what "inalienable " means to grasp what's happening there. It goes on that govts derive their "just" powers from the consent of the governed not the other way around. It goes on, and whenever any form of govt becomes destructive to securing those rights it is the right of the people to alter, abolish and institute a new govt.

Yes so? Yes you can. The thief on the cross proves that. Again so? Works are not sufficient but they are necessary. Yes but that is not all. AGAIN works are not sufficient but are necessary. Conversely faith is not sufficient but it is necessary. The Bible shows as much. Faith alone is a heresy. Incorrect. What your describing there is the sin of presumption. I love when people think they can game the system on God. See the thief on the cross as I mentioned earlier is different then what you're describing here. The thief one then ross wasn't seeking forgiveness he.wss reminding the other thief that mocked Jesus that they were getting their just punishment while Jesus was not. The thief want presuming he was saved it was granted to him. To think you can sin and just ask forgiveness after is the sin of presumption. That won't help you.

Define "Christian nationalist".

The poster or the info?

I was watching a video the other day and they were talking about men who say they are women and competing in women's sports. Specifically they were talking about the swimmer Thompson. It's lea if I'm not mistaken. So I got to thinking that this person was a man but is now supposedly a woman competing against women but why? If genitals don't determine gender and gender is a social construct and women can compete with men, why didn't this Thompson person just keep competing with the same people he/she was competing against before realizing he/she was a woman? Why did he/she go to compete against women?

Prove it.

There is hope for you then. Good for you

Good points. I'm a Christian you're a heretic.

Again appealing to Lorraine butthead doesnt make you looks good. Matt 16:18 is clear except to a heretic. FYI you waste your time copying and pasting volumes of nonsense. I don't read it. You obviously cannot as you like but I've told you a thousand times volume doesn't equal accuracy. This is how I know you don't listen to Jesus. I've told you something a thousand times and you ignore it so Jesus saying something once you sure as hell won't listen to. He tells you three times we eat my flesh and drink my blood and you refuse to listen. You have been deceived but you think you're enlightened. Thats REAL blindness.

Oh yes here we go with the same old drivel. It is a works based religion. Sola fide is unbiblical unless you can show otherwise.

The Bible sure does. You ignore it. Not my problem

If you thinks it's a plagiarized fairy tale then go away. The fact is Jesus' words are clear believe and be baptized and you will be saved. Period. You have to ignore him to say baptism isnt necessary for baptism.

You do appeal to non biblical sources. The primacy of Peter is well established.

I've explained that to you but you don't listen. Jesus can do with his mercy as he wishes. He CLEARLY says believe and be baptized. You don't listen to Jesus so you surely won't listen to me.

No not in the least but I can read and I take Jesus at his word when he says, "Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved; whoever does not believe will be condemned." Mark 16:16 Yet I have Christians tell me baptism isnt necessary for salvation. No they don't if they did there wouldn't be that many.

Look a sola scriputa Christian appealing to non biblical sources

My minds not closed it's alert to perversions of scripture and heresy. Show me where sola fide exists in scripture.

No there is one interpretation. What others think do doesn't change that. People are free to makes choices. If they weren't youd complain God doesn't allow them to be free. I am right. You may not agree it's God but someone or something bigger and outside all this had to exist prior since what is exists. You did. No the evidence exist that nothing creates itself yet here is it.

No it just is. Someone or something had to exist outside what we know in order to create what is. Nothing creates itself except that which had to exist the create what is.

God is he isn't created