impartialobserver

Words are subjective though. A certain someone on here is so bent on defending Butker that he can't read it objectively and see it for what it is.

They do not need 15,000 rockets in order to attack. They could have a far smaller number and still feel that it was worth pursuing. Again, this conflict is never going to end as long as the state of israel exists in its current state and the Palestinians think that they are the rightful masters of the same land.

My point is that these claims exist... clear enough? or do I need to wrap it up in partisan rhetoric in order for you to understand simple English.

Lets be clear. He is allowed to have and express those views. A certain someone on here playing stupid and claiming that Butker was not espousing a view that a woman's place is in the home is simply disingenuous. His message is pretty clear.

He claims that Butker is not making any suggestions or prescriptive messages.. The giveaway is the section about diabolical lies. The only reason that you include this is to say, that someone is very wrong and that he, Butker, has a better way.. which he lays out.

this is not raw data.. these are subjective articles. It shows that you do not possess the ability to look up data and draw your own conclusions

My best guess is that there will be a cease-fire by the end of summer. For a few months.. relative peace. And then by late 2024.. there will be a major terrorist attack by Hamas and this debate will start over. Same people saying the same things.

You are obfuscating. He is not simply stating objective facts like the capital of Saskatchewan. I know that you can't interpret things. You do not word things like he does to simply state objective facts and you take it or leave it. How do I know? Look below... you do not say that if you do not care and therefore want to suggest/encourage something. You should not play stupid so often. It is unbecoming of you. "I want to speak directly to you briefly because I think it is you, the women, who have had the most diabolical lies told to you. "

You are one sad, sad creature. In the days, weeks, months after the last two elections.. the internet has been abuzz with claims of voter fraud, conspiracy theories. You know about these but it does not fit your narrative.

Not everything is explicit... if you do not know that.. there is no hope for you. Wife, mother, vocation.. a person of adequate intelligence would think, "he likes that their vocation is wife/mother/stay at home... which precludes her from having a full time job or career. Can't be too places at once.. no spinning that one.

Welcome to the modern world... no matter who wins or by how much, the other will claim that it was rigged. This is how it is and will be for quite awhile.

Honest... more humor. Wife, mother. vocation... put those three together and even a 1st grader can draw the correct conclusion. Your bias stops you from seeing pretty much anything.. let me guess, 3^3 = 27 is not true according to you if someone that does not agree with you says it?

At least you can be funny.

"For the ladies present today, congratulations on an amazing accomplishment. You should be proud of all that you have achieved to this point in your young lives. I want to speak directly to you briefly because I think it is you, the women, who have had the most diabolical lies told to you. How many of you are sitting here now about to cross this stage and are thinking about all the promotions and titles you are going to get in your career? Some of you may go on to lead successful careers in the world, but I would venture to guess that the majority of you are most excited about your marriage and the children you will bring into this world. I can tell you that my beautiful wife, Isabelle, would be the first to say that her life truly started when she began living her vocation as a wife and as a mother. I'm on the stage today and able to be the man I am because I have a wife who leans into her vocation." While not explicitly.. anyone with basic reading comprehension can see through it. Your bias precludes you from intrepreting this, I know. I know that you can't own up to this.

That being said... it is no coincidence that modern rock bands go out of their way to play in Vancouver, Toronto, and Halifax. Not all do but being someone that tracks this.. once a group has risen up a bit, those 3 always show up on the list of tour dates. Pearl Jam just did two sold out dates in Vancouver

And I read a complete transcript of the interview... another fail on your part.

alas, it will never cease. I attack you, you attack me.. should be even. But no one pays attention to the first instance, we only care about your retaliatory measure. So then I have to attack again.. and so we go on into perpetuity.

He is allowed to have these views and to express them. And I am allowed to disagree and pay no further attention to what he has to say.

Depending on the random point in time that one chooses, each side could say that the other attacked them and so has a grievance. In the end.. One side or the other has to get over it or cease to exist in order for the perpetual conflict to stop.

The problem with the U6 is that it relies on the subjective opinion of a survey respondent. To deem that they are unemployed or underemployed for "economic reasons" is so subjective. When the U3 rate backs up their argument.. they use it. When it does not, well then it is garbage.

rest assured.. this debate will never cease just as the conflict will never cease. As long as the Palestinians exist and the state of Israel exists.. they will fight over who gets to be the master of the given land.

However, that is not how it will unfold. Person X makes inflammatory comment, they called out on it, and now they claim that they are being oppressed and ganged up on. They knew the lay of the land and still proceeded. It is not society's problem that they chose to say something unpopular and do not like the response.

When folks are dissatisfied with who is president or just politics in general.. their complaining is predictable 1. inflation 2. unemployment rate is deceiving. The jobs are not "good jobs" 3. not enough repetitive, effort-based manufacturing jobs in their region. A region could add 500 jobs but they are customer service, retail, restaurant, or warehousing but that is not "true job growth" unless it is manufacturing.

this is not raw data. Failed. You producing a secondary result not the raw/primary data. I know that you do not know the difference.

off topic. I asked you to prove what you say.. and as the typical gutless internet forum poster... you go off into the weeds. If your "evidence" is so untouchable, you would be able to answer my simple questions with no delay. This stall tactic ^^^ shows that you do not know the answer and can't own up to it.