Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    22,966

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    237

 Content Type 

Posts posted by CdnFox

  2. It's time for a serious discussion about the future of America

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    28 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    I’m sorry, but… abso-f*cking-lutely not.

    LOL - oh look the american is going to tell the british columbian if we have water or not :) 

    29 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    In the first place, that very same river - the Columbia River - already flows into the United States.

    If we let it. We use a lot of the water from it already before it gets near the border and you guys get what we don't use.  That's why there is a treaty, to guarantee how much we'll allow to flow over the border and under what terms. BC could use that water for its own irrigation needs, for more dams which makes the flow lower for periods of time, etc etc. 

    31 minutes ago, Rebound said:

     only a total, utter, absolutely unhinged møron thinks you do it by turning a faucet in one single day

    No, it's just his usual exaggerations. Trump does that, everyone knows it, get over it. 

    32 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    Trump simply is not suitable for the job 

    Trump already did the job and things went well.  not "the best ever in history" as he says, that's an exaggeration. But he had a solid run and it was in the top 50 percent of presidencies 

  3. Truth and Reconciliation

    in Federal Politics in Canada

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Perspektiv said:

    Out of touch with reality, per usual. 🤡

     

    Sure kid  :) 

    Isn't your account supposed to be deleted by now?  I recall you insisting you were going to do that after you deleted all your posts on that thread where you looked stupid and then swore you'd make me pay and then said you were gone as soon as greg could delete your account? 

    Good heavens! Don't tell me you were completely full of sh*t!?!? I'm shocked! :) 

    • Haha 1

  4. Harris refuses to help flood victims

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    37 minutes ago, robosmith said:

    FEMA money taken for immigration enforcement: What you need to know

    The real story:

    🤮

    So the real story is that Donald funded immigration enforcement and  you don't like it.  

    So that doesn't change the fact that Harris spent MORE money helping mexicans but refuses to spend more money helping flood victims,.

    FURTHER - the democrats knew about this one time funding transfer FIVE YEARS AGO -  and claimed it was so terrible YET DID NOTHING IN 5 YEARS TO ADDRESS IT?!?!?

     MAYBE - that's because at the time when trump took the 160 million fema had a total of TWENTY SEVEN BILLION and their people said that they were funded well and it wasn't a big deal

    While $155 million is a lot of money to pull out of any federal agency, FEMA’s disaster relief fund had a balance of nearly $27 billion as of July 31.

    Fact check: Does Trump’s reallocation of FEMA funds take money from Puerto Rico disaster aid? | CNN Politics

     

    So the real story is Kamala is leaving those people without the funds they need at this point,  and that you're a liar. 

    • Like 1

  11. It's time for a serious discussion about the future of America

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

    I think the main problem with that is some tricky wording in NAFTA. It says something like "Once we put a price on it, it's all for sale".  

     well there's a specific treaty for the columbia river between the us and canada called (perhaps not surprisingly) the columbia river treaty, and it details how many gallons of water or whatever canada will allow to flow and it was updated not that long ago. It does have provisions for future negotiations but i doubt bc will be interested in committing to a lot of additional water, and there's serious problems with diverting things stateside that oregon and washington wont' be happy about. 

    I mean - not impossible but  "Mechanically" possible if they wanted to. And the last study on the feasability was 30 years ago so they might have some better ways now. Some big water pipeline or something

    • Like 1

  12. CA Sues Hospital for Refusing Abortion

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

     

    6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
    Quote

    Or, failing that, terminate the pregnancy. Problem solved. 

    So use birth control and stop killing 3rd trimester babies.

    He doesn't seem to realize he is proposing solving his problems with murder :) 

    At the end of the day at some point the fetus becomes a human being with rights attached. You can't make the argument that they make effectively unless you address that because otherwise it's murder. And they just don't seem to be willing to address that

    3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

    Happens next to never without medical cause. You're tilting at windmills. 

     

    Then you won't mind a law saying that it never happens without medical cause.

    They keep coming back with this circular argument,

    it almost never happens so we don't need to worry about it it's no big deal,

    well then why can't we make it never happen,

    oh well we want to be able to have it happen...

    • Like 1
    • Downvote 1

  13. A normal policy-focused debate highlighted Trump's weakness and low quality

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    4 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

    There was a bipartisan bill that proposed the toughest border legislation ever. Trump told Republicans to kill it because he didn't think he could win if the problem was solved. He is not a patriot and neither are the people who support him.

    It wasn't even remotely kind of close to the toughest border legislation ever. It was a crap Bill and most republicans were aware of it.

    Again you have to lie to try and make your point. And worse now you're lying and sounding like trump at the same time. " It was the best most amazing bill ever in the history of bills and everybody told me how they couldnt' believe how amazing it was".  

    It was crap.  And not only that it included a ukraine spending provisions that trump didn't like either

    Now if you were serious .... why would to tie your border bill in with funding for the ukraine? Why wouldn't you separate those?

     

    The us's best bill to control the borders was remain.  And biden killed that. 

  15. Breaking: Jack Smith's fuller 2020 election case against Trump is publicly released

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    52 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    I saw the debate. And, again; the Proud Boys heard him say that and they made t-shirts. So you again lose credibility.

    Why would you tell a violent domestic terror group to “stand by”?

    Why would you praise a violent domestic terror group for burning down cities? 

    Biden lauds 2020 BLM riots as 'historic movement for justice' during Monday speech

    Biden lauds 2020 BLM riots as 'historic movement for justice' during Monday speech (nbcmontana.com)

    As to why politicians do that kind of thing, it's mostly to appeal to a base and seem supportive. 

    Trump said to the proud boys "don't do anything'.   He said it in a way that appealed to him.  Biden said "good job" to people who caused 4 billion in damages.  I think 'Do nothing" is probably better than "thanks for burning those cities down"

  16. It's time for a serious discussion about the future of America

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

    With proper editing, you can even make it look like robo told the truth.

    38 minutes ago, Rebound said:

    I know how to use a video editor. 
     

    Thing is… Trump says utterly deranged things. Last week, he said that California can solve their drought problem by having Canada turn a gigantic faucet. He’s literally an imbecile.  

     

    Yeah, that's not actually deranged. We have the water. There has been talk going back to the early 80s about supplying water to america and California from British Columbia and it was seriously looked at to divert the water from the columbia river which is what i'm assuming he's talking about and it is doable.  That is not in any way shape or form derranged.  We have a stunning amount of water in bc,  and there is the columbia river. 

    I don't think we'd be interested in doing that.  We would have to sign a treaty and giving up columbia river water has potential problems for us and our own water management in the future. We need it for dams and for our own increasing irrigation issues.  Also it would impact washington state a great deal and oregon.

    There are other water bodies which could be tapped but it would cost a lot of money. 

    So is it easy and simple? No, it's not. There would be a price to pay.  But is it deranged?  no actually, it's not. Is it likely? No, we probably wouldn't agree. But we COULD, and it COULD be done. 

     

  18. It's time for a serious discussion about the future of America

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

    Except one was a real quote and one was not.

    Except one may do it once in a blue moon and the other does it every time she's away from a teleprompter ;)

    The left ability to accuse others of what they themselves do constantly is one of their defining traits. Biden was senile and had Parkinson's, and the moment he was gone after screaming to the High Heavens that it was untrue the democrats immediately tried to sell the idea that trump is senile.

    Harris does amazing and psychotic word salads all the time. Trump is disjointed once as he's trying to form his thoughts without a use of a teleprompter or any other device and the dems try and sell the idea that he's the one who does word salad. Which is just childish

     

  19. It's time for a serious discussion about the future of America

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Yakuda said:

    This is a serious topic that will require each of us to consider the moment in which we exist, in context to the past and how the future is a thing yet to be in our present. It comes in the morning but that is not today and the future of our country is in the hands of those who experience the afternoon as tomorrow. Therefore we have to turn the page and agree to work together to work together to address this issue...and to work together as we continue to work, operating from the new norms, rules and agreements that we will work on this together. We got to take this stuff seriously, as seriously as you are because you have been forced to have taken this stuff seriously. It is time for us to do what we have been doing. And that time is every day.

    4 years of that. Can you imagine living with 4 years of that?

  20. CA Sues Hospital for Refusing Abortion

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

    Are you still crying little spazz?

    Awww muffin :)  it's cute when you try to deflect your own anger and resentment like that  :) 

     

    Quote

    Yeah that's a retarded argument where you're tying a philosophical concept like "humanity" to an automatic biological process, no different than the bogus "fetal heartbeat" argument. Might as well say "the humanity fairy comes and waves it's wand and gives them human rights."

    LOL - i never said anything about 'Humanity" .  I said that's when someone becomes a human being rather than a bunch of cells and human rights attach. 

    Human beings are real things. You've probably met one at some point :) 

    And human rights are real things, fairly well described in law and precedent. 

    Neither are philosophical arguments :)   

    Hell kid that wasn't even grade one level.  Cope harder. 

    Quote

    You argued our brains "define us as being a human being." But you're not actually talking about the higher functions that are unique to humans.

    Exactly.  I see you're trying to bring it back to this "consciousness' thing which i've pointed out numerous times has nothing to do with being alive. 

    When a human's brain turns on and begins to regulate bodily functions, that is a reasonable point to say the person 'becomes alive' as a human being.  The end or complete cessation of the brain is already considered death. SO why wouldn't the same definition work for life ?

     

    Quote

    Nobody in their right mind would think "the brain's ability to regulate bodily functions" is the thing that defines us as human. It just defines as a higher order mammal.

    Nobody said it did - what i said was our brains define us as human and when they turn on and start to work is when we can be thought of as a human. :)   I did not say the regulation of body functions is what makes us human.  :) 

    You really really really do suck at this.  :) 

     

    Quote

    I feel compelled to point out that not only are you a spazz and pretty dumb, you're a terrible writer. 

    I feel compelled to point out that Not only are you a salty little b*tch Who lashes out and flails every time he loses an argument but you're also fairly transparent and feeble

    The brain turning off is when we consider a person dead. The brain turning on would therefore likely be a perfectly good definition of when the person is alive. 

    Feel free to continue to flail though it's always amusing to watch

  21. The Leftard Cultist Talking Point of the Century

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    28 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

    Because I knew it would trigger you. And it did. You're my puppet, dancing for my amusement.

    What we're talking about was you butting into someone else's conversation and making such a spectacular hash of an attempted gotcha that you're scrambling to save what little dignity you have left, but it's too late. 

    I'm dodging any questions, you're just very dumb.

    lol are you still gonna go with this even after it was obvious to everyone but you, the dumbest man alive, that I was challenging WestCanMan's entire premise?

    It didn't trigger me :) ,   I know you well enough to know it's your way of lashing out when you've lost, so it's just amusing. :)

     And like i say, it's fun every now and then to smash a bully in the face and watch them cry ;) 

    And i love that you're now blaming your stupidity of me 'butting in'.  :)   "I D HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WIITH IT ALL TOO IF IT WEREN"T FOR YOU MEDDLING KIDS!!"  LOLOL - you owe me a scoobie snack  ;) 

    And you're dodging questions because i'm dumb. Yeah that makes sense ;) 

    Kid -  you may have WANTED to challenge @WestCanMan 's  premise, but you've already lost that one pretty badly and your dodging of the question and insane wailing and crying while you avoid answering is all the proof necessary to show you believe you've lost that one. 

    The democrats wanted to try to hold trujmp responsible for jan6 based on some comparatively tame rhetoric.  

    THis is worse and probably inspired two attampts on a former president's and current nominee's life. 

    If trump wins, i hope he launches an investigation and the perpetrators of this hate speech are investigated and tried for their crimes. 

    • Like 1

  24. The Leftard Cultist Talking Point of the Century

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

    You're having a total meltdown lmao.

    Thanks for the clarification. Now that that's settled and we've established you're talking about some general comments, let's get back to the original point which is you completely failing to grasp a conditional statement and can't read.

    LOL ohhh noooes - black dog is SOOO upset and triggered for being wrong he gave me a little red down arroww!!!!!!!!!!!

    And still got that parrot thing going on i see :) 

    ROFLMAO!!  jeez kid you might as well wear a sign that says i made you cry :)

    And still pretending you don't know what we're talking about  :)

    So now you pretend your inability to answer a question and efforts to dodge it are ... dun dun duuuuuuunnnn....  my fault :)   How shocking.

    So obviously you agree biden's and the democrats speech with regards to trump being hilter etc  is a call to violence. 

    So why shouldn't Biden be investigated and charged for that?

  25. CA Sues Hospital for Refusing Abortion

    in Federal Politics in the United States

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

    Blah blah blah your only 'sperging out because you've been losing arguments left right and centre here of late.

    No, were talking about consciousness.

    Aw look who's the parrot now. What a spaz.

    Except I never change your actual words because they're stupid enough on their own. Sorry spaz boy, you lose again.

    These are just lies you tell yourself. No one else believes them, but they're lies all the same.

    And now, we're entering the projection stage of your inevitable meltdown/surrender.  Like clockwork.

    Oh look - you're butt hurt because someone did to you what you did to them ;)  How very shocking. 

    And of course you freak out about it.   Hey kid - you change my quotes i'll change yours.  You leave mine alone i'll leave yours alone. But like every bully ever you go after someone and get punched in the nose and cry "NOOOOO FAAAAAAAIIIIRRR".  :)  LOL - what a loser 

    End of the day all you've got is your crying and b*tching left. 

    SO.  Setting aside your salty tears and lies...... 

    No.' We we talking about rights. My argument was that human rights attach to a fetus when the brain starts to work andthat's when they can be considered to be a human being.  Consciousness is irrelevant as  i pointed out. Remember? You freaked out when i pointed that out. Did a big hissy fit about how you never said it and now you're back saying it :) 

    And of course you can't kill a human, they have human rights. 

    You have yet to even try to refute it. you claimed that if that were true any higher life that had a brain would be at the same level of  a human.  Nope, they're not a human nor do they have human rights etc etc. 

    You've tried to twist it, you try to make it about 'consciousness'  etc and tried to deny what you said but at the end of the day i'm right and you've not been able to refute it. 

    And kid....  nobody's buying your whole "projection" sctick. Everyone on this forum knows that denial, melt downs and sad little sexual fantasy thingies are what you're all about and i've mentioned it many times. 

    Again - you've achieved the intellectual level of a parrot and think somehow that's a good look 

×
×
  • Create New...