CdnFox
-
Posts
16,470 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
165
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CdnFox
-
-
1 minute ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:
I remind you that the poster did not reference the SCC.
Why would they need to? I don't reference the SCC when i refer to first nations people as 'first nations'. I don't reference the supreme court or the human rights councils when i use someone's preferred gender.
Why would you NEED to reference a court to use accepted terms? Odd thing to say really.
-
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/doctors-retirement-capital-gains-1.7181885
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is rejecting a call from some doctors for his government to reconsider its planned capital gains tax hike.
The doctors warn that the tax change could undermine efforts to recruit and retain physicians in Canada and threaten the stability of the health-care system.
Canada is facing a severe doctor shortage. An estimated 6.5 million Canadians are going without access to primary care as family physicians retire en masse and medical schools struggle to recruit new residents to replace them.
Driving doctors out of canada - that's probably a winning election strategy. 🙄
It's like he's not even pretending to be on Canada's side any more.
-
1
-
-
The time will come. I could see Leslyn lewis being a serious contender with another decade of experience and mellowing. There are others who could have or might yet.
But these things have to happen organically. You don't "need a female leader". That's just dumb. What you need is great choices and eventually some of those great choices will be women. We may not have a Margret Thatcher on deck at the moment but we will.
And when we do i think that canadians will be very open to that.
-
22 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:
This is a very sexist remark. Shame on you and the board which allows you to be here to spread anti feminism and make chauvinistic comment. This is how you view women? You only see that part not the rest of 99%. SHAME ON YOU.
You offended half the population of Canada and half the population of the world.
Sorry kiddo but yours is the sexist remark. We don't call them 'women' any more, they're people with vaginas.
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/supreme-court-decision-say-word-woman-is-confusing-unfortunate
How very insensitive of you. You should be ashamed.
-
1
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, herbie said:
Canada going downhill in every major category?
You are safer in every way,
False. Crime is up, violent crime including random attacks is WAY up, health care is down.. You are in MORE danger in every way.
Quote
you have more freedom,You have far less freedom. The state now censors things like the internet, you can be arrested and charged for your opinion far easier than before, and the gov't established it has the right to force you to take medicine you don't want and if you complain they evoke the emergency act and seize your bank account.
Quoteyou have more choices,
You have far less choices. Gov't regulation and interference has reduced your options in many areas, and not to mention that they are going to remove your choices for things like cars in the near future.
Quoteyou are wealthier than you were anytime in history.
Canadians have fallen from about 7 to about 24 world wide in wealth and quality of life and it's still falling.
QuoteIf you insist on viewing everything in a negative light, you may easily convince yourself things are getting worse when they're not.
If you insist on lying to yourself that everything is fine when it's not, then nothing ever gets fixed and you wind up at the very bottom.
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, Aristides said:
Tax dollars go to government, not banks. Banks actually pay taxes.
Amusing side note is that other than other banks, the biggest owners of banks are mutual funds and pension funds. Which means those profits banks make are not going to some big fat guy with a top had and bicycle moustache smoking a stogie, they're going to average people's retirements.
-
19 minutes ago, Goddess said:
Post after post after post, of nothing but whining, accusing others of whining. 🙄
With no data, no information, no effort. Hatred for the sake of hatred. That's the left these days.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:
Awww....sniff sniff
So what you're imagining sniffing people's butts now?
QuoteResorting to insulting my Wife..
Wow. So... she really isn't putting out. Sorry to hear that dude, must be tough.
-
If Justin Trudeau was hoping that this budget would give him a bump in the poles, he has utterly failed. If anything the tories have picked up some ground and are pulling at an all-time high. Meanwhile it's pretty obvious that the majority of Canadians who are paying attention hate the budget.
https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/tories-hold-steady-19-point-lead-over-liberals
https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/tories-hold-steady-19-point-lead-over-liberals
A huge percent in the latest poll said they would never vote liberal: When asked which party they would never consider voting for in the next election, almost a third said Liberals (32%). That is a very large hunk of the population who is effectively completely lost to you as a party. Usually you see it around somewhere like 25%. Obviously for every party there's going to be a certain percentage of people who will never vote for you, but the liberals have turned off so many people that it becomes exceptionally hard to win.
I think that Justin has been facing a lot of pressure to either get the poll numbers up or either step down or call an election before things get worse. I think he thought this budget would give him a bump and maybe they could go to the polls based on that. But he has severely misread the room. And he is quickly running out of road. I suspect this puts an end to the idea of a spring election, which means he's got a fall election or next spring and then that's it, it gets decided for him.
-
2
-
-
17 hours ago, Aristides said:
Mortgage interest on a primary residence is tax deductible in the US but they pay capital gains unless they buy another principle residence of equal or greater value. Perhaps we should be doing that to help first time buyers.
It's a good idea and it would have some benefits - but probably not the ones you hope.
It is impossible to help 'first time buyers' by making it easier for them to afford a home. The market ALWAYS will seek to drive prices up to the maximum amount people are willing to spend or the maximum amount people are able to afford.
If you increase the amount people are willing to spend or can afford then prices go up as well. The biggest example of this is in the very late 60's when women got the right to include their income in mortgage stress tests with banks. But we saw it with the 'RRSP' first time buyer thing as well, etc.
If you want to help first time buyers there's ways to do it but that's not really it.
Having said that - i really do believe it would be a good idea.
-
14 hours ago, herbie said:
No it isn't it's to get you to start a business and sell it for half the tax, not wait for someone else to give you a job.
The vast vast vast vast majority of capital gains tax in canada does not involve selling a business you started. So... care to explain that?
It's not about starting and selling a business.
QuoteAnd of course if the Tories did exactly the same thing, you'd be on here bellowing what a fiscally responsible move it was.
Nobody anywhere would say it's fiscally responsible.
And the conservatives would be the first in line to castrate the conservative leader who did it.
Remember - we're not like you. When our leaders do something bad we don't shut up and go along like you. We wipe that leader out. And if necessary we wipe out the whole party and rebuild. We've done it numerous times federally and provincially.
I get that YOU would defend a bad action just to protect your leader. But we dont'.
-
4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
Man, talk about having fantasies LOL
The photo calling you all losers is your idea of sexual fantasies???
No, you're oddly specific description of men jerking each other off in a hot tub is
Your stories pretending your ass porn is me and drooling over it also is
You're so sexually repressed that you don't even realize it. Normal people don't talk that way. And they don't post ass porn. Like - that's VERY unusual.
SO i take it the wife doesn't put out AND you've got repressed homosexual urges. That DOES explain why you're always so angry and confused.
-
17 hours ago, Moonbox said:
That's not what's being debated, donkey. Nobody, anywhere, ever argued that population density doesn't help spread viruses, which in turns leads to more deaths. Once again, you're just debating yourself.
The point of contention is that the USA's horrendously bad COVID performance wasn't because of population density. There are 185 countries in the world with higher population densities than the US, but only 13 that did worse with COVID. 🙃
Obviously, other factors were at play...
Oh look - moonbox is back to lying about what he's been arguing and posting memes. LOL
You said it wasn't relevant - i showed that it was relevant. Now you come up with yet another fake argument.
I've proven density is a major factor. I've proven that the us has vastly more high density cities than we do. And i've proven those cities racked up huge death tolls early on which permanently affect the numbers.
And you've proven.... nothing. Not a thing. No data, no research, nothing. For all you whine about how i don't provide evidence. i've provided a tonne and you've given zero.
Sorry kiddo.
When all you have is memes and shaking your fists at clouds you've pretty much admitted you're wrong.
-
3 hours ago, eyeball said:
There are two competing visions for the future of human civilization, one bright democratic and hopeful and the other is bleak black and despicable. Putin and some of the other worst elements of humanity's 'right-wing represents the latter.
I also have to admit to a little sense of vindictiveness in the face of many right wingers that are willing to say meh to Putin.
In the face of all the bullshit you lickspittles have shovelled about lefties and our love for dictatorships...all I can say is you richly deserve what might be coming.
If it is coming I live in hope you people suffer a depth of regret that informs the future of just how badly on the wrong side of history you were.
The pain that's coming is on you people.
dude, you're a socialist. Putin is the face of your political beliefs. Thats what socialism looks like.
-
3 hours ago, herbie said:
We could always go back to before Capital Gains.,
100% of profits are taxable income. So if you bought a property for $50,000, built a cottage on it and sold it for $300K and didn't keep receipts, you'd add $250K to your income and get taxed on the total amount.
I suppose we could go back to slavery too but.. some bad ideas are best left in the past
To be honest though, the time you're talking about never really existed. During periods of Canadian and American history where it seemed like tax rates were higher, there were always loopholes that allowed you to exclude huge amounts of the income.
The idea behind capital gains is to attract people to investing in certain things which benefit our society. If you put money in a business then the business grows, more people are employed, there's more corporate tax to pay for services, etc etc. If you just treat it like income then people might as well put their money in a bank account and earn simple interest, and that really benefits nobody.
By the way, you know who is going to get hurt the most? You think it's rich people, but it's really going to be the income trusts that provide for the Pensions of school teachers and civil servants. They actually hold the most stock in Canada. But yeah, it's about time someone taught those rich school teachers a lesson and that they paid their fair share gosh darn it.
-
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
Godless, westconman, confux, and a few others are so obsessed with themselves and still cannot get out of the loser column.
They have to stroke each other by writhing in old covid news and useless studies and stats.
They get in the jello wresting pool and jerk each other off and around. 1.3K posts to admire each others 1diocy.
Some of us really truly don't give a shit about you obsession and it just pisses them off more and more every time we post. We post only to wind them up and...it works so good and is so easy and so much fun. LOL
Oh look - ass porn guy is having sexual fanatsies again
Does your wife not put out or something? OR are you seriously repressing homosexual curiosity? It's like every second post here is a weird homosexual fantasy that you think is insulting but is just kind of creepy
-
33 minutes ago, Moonbox said:
It must be hard to have spent the last several years angrily shouting at people, whilst getting laughed at.
Gets easier when the research proves you were right all along i would imagine
QuoteI have the intelligence to understand that the scientific and medical consensus is worth more than the bitter ranting of buffoons doing their own research on Facebook etc.
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAHA!!!!! Dude you don't have the intelligence to keep your opinion straight for a whole post without flip flopping
As has been well demonstrated over a few threads now, most of what the 'anti vaxxers' said was correct. There are serious dangers with the vaccines which for a pretty wide range of people grossly outweighs the risk of covid. Lockdowns DID tend to do more harm than good. The virus WAS most likely developed in a lab. Masks did very little to help.
All the stuff the 'crazy people' were saying turned out to be accurate
So. How's it feel having people laugh at you? LOL!!
-
1 hour ago, Goddess said:
ExF and Moonie always remind me of those annoying kids who run around screaming and yelling and knocking shit over: "Everyone pay attention to Meeeeeeee!" while adults are trying to have a conversation.
LOL yeah
Well, exflyer just gets mad when you point out he's wrong and flails around but the problem with Moonie is that he prides himself on being (what he believes is) smart, and he always comes up looking a little stupid when we 'fight'.
That leads him to try to pick fights all the time and because he's more focused on 'the fight' rather than good arguments he tends ot paint himself into a corer pretty fast.
47 minutes ago, Moonbox said:Do you need to speak to the manager, Karen?
It's always a good laugh to see you pretending you're the adult here. 😆
Uh oh - Hissy fit time
-
1 hour ago, Moonbox said:
You're posting figures from the first two months of the pandemic, from the ground-zero states. Using updated numbers, this chart loses all validity.
Sigh. No it doesn't. you're just not very bright. The charts show clearly the difference between a very densely populated area and less densely populated. It explains why the states had a higher death rate. AND - in case you weren't paying attention - those numbers didn't go away later, the us started off much higher than us so of course it remained much higher even if it got closer over time. Do i need to explain math to you again?
QuoteThe Red States (even the sparsely populated ones) did a great job catching up to NY, NJ and CT, and in many cases surpassed them! Shout out to the Bubbas!
Cite. Once again you provide no data. You never do. And when you do it usually proves ME right so i guess i understand why you're reluctant
1 hour ago, Moonbox said:Yes, it was a factor. It was one factor, among many.
ROFLMAO - once again you flip flop mid post
It was a major factor. I already said it wasn't the only one. But it was a very major factor. They got off to a bad start in major metros and due to their high population density they racked up an impressive kill ratio.
When there was no 'wave' then the us was about the same as everyone else. When they had a 'wave' their high population density areas tended to do VERY badly and they spiked much higher in deaths than other places.
You and eyeball were wrong - you lied - you still havent' posted any numbers or hard data and you're still a complete loser
-
1 minute ago, Deluge said:
And they keep pushing the boundaries.
I mean, my God, how far do we let these lunatics go before we actually do something as a citizenry?
I suppose it might be wise to pipe up before kids are actually having anal sex in class. At least till they're out of elementary
The problem is that we tend these days to tell them when they can't do a specific thing or not rather than telling them what we expect of them precisely in the first place.
Parents let their kids run around and if they do something wrong they'll say "oh honey, don't do THAT", but they won't sit them down and say "you're going to school. Here's what we expect, you will pay attention, you will arrive on time, you will be prepared and you will be respectful of the teachers and other kids".
Of course they're going to push the boundaries.
And then they grow up to be leftie loonies who keep pushing the boundaries. And because there's no concensus on what represents polite behaviour the country tends to struggle.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Goddess said:
That's the million dollar question.
We don't know.
What that means for future generation's fertility, time will tell. But it's likely not good.
Hey - maybe it'll turn out to be one of those really positive and wonderful hidden medical side effects, because that happens! Like maybe the next generation of babies will be born with super powers.
- how the left hopes this works.
-
3 hours ago, Deluge said:
The woke mind virus has made its way into America's school system.
This was from a year ago, and apparently it's still going on.
Florida schools move to ban ‘furries’ items to curb ‘barking and meowing’
https://nypost.com/2023/05/12/fla-district-moves-to-ban-furry-items-to-curb-barking-and-meowing/
"A tense Brevard County School Board meeting turned feral this week after members raised concerns"
LOL - i see what they did there
So anyway - the fact that this is enough of a problem that it requires special rules is just insane. I was raised (as were my friends) to pay attention in class or pay the price. Screwing around like that and 'mewing' and grunting at each other like animals in class would not have been tolerated WITHOUT any extra rules by the teachers OR the parents.
What a world we've come to that this is actually a problem.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Rebound said:
Oh, the hand-wringing! Someone doing something disgusting is bothersome to you?
ROFLMAO - what a freaking hypocrite you are
QuoteAre you an expert at telling us what is disgusting?
Yep.
QuoteIs sex with a porn star while your wife is pregnant disgusting enough for you?
Sorry are you talking about clinton or trump? Oh - sorry clinton was the rapist who paid the hush money, trump was the porn star who got paid. Hard to keep them straight some times.
Both are far less disgusting than litearally inviting people to kill your political rivals. Murder is worse than adultry. Glad i was here to sort that out for you.
QuoteHow about parading around in public with your pregnant mistress while you're still married? Disgusting enough?
Compared to trying to get a political rival killed? It's not even close.
QuoteEvading the draft and making fun of a war hero because his fighter jet was shot down in combat? Disgusting enough?
Compared to calling half of the US "Deporable' people? Not really. And certainly not compared to murder.
Look - even for your teeny tiny little tribally obsessed brain you HAVE to realize that this is over a line.
WHataboutism does NOT change that. This is horribly wrong - like, BEYOND wrong. Get a grip.
-
7 minutes ago, Moonbox said:
That's from April 30, 2020, you absolute clown.
And? Do you think any of those dead people got better since then?
It very clearly shows the impact of population density. And it mentions what experts thought about that and why it was a factor.
I've posted data AFTER covid. I've now posted data DURING covid.
Sigh. The only clown here is you kiddo. You're so stunningly desperate that no matter how much proof is given to you (and you provide none yourself)
lI'm sure if you go look around the interenet hard enough you can find an opinion piece somewhere that says it's because "REPUBLICANS" or aliens or whatever you want but the data suggests one of the bigger issues was population density.
Here - This is the top 150 cities for population density - and our cities population densities. Our top cities don't even reach the lowest of the 150 us ones.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_population_density
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_population_centres_in_Canada
You're an !diot.
Canada going downhill in every major category
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
See what i mean about lefties thinking that refusing to address real issues somehow fixes them?
That made no sense. Learn English.
So everyone can afford a home? So nobody felt pressured to take the vax and nobody got fired for refusing? etcetc
You lie and pretend that there's no issues instead of fixing them. It's what lefties do.
Yeah. You mean if we point out that your socialist bullcrap has lead to problems you freak out and demand that we 'pay no attention to the man behind the curtain".
Which is why our country is in such bad shape. So instead, we're going to get rid of you losers and hire someone who admits their are issues and fixes them.
Meanwhile you'll lose your shit over the hyper critical issue of where transgender people are allowed to pee.
Sorry kiddo - people have come to recognize you and your kind as lying sacks o crap and are fleeing the left by the truckload. Lying and sticking your head in the sand is NOT an answer to lifes problems