CdnFox
-
Posts
27,047 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
283
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CdnFox
-
-
14 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:
Wab is a real man.
Frankly i've seen your posts on the trans threads and i'm not sure you're qualified to assess that.
QuoteIn his 20s, he was wayward, with a bad alcohol addiction.
Assaults, DUIs, writing bad cheques...
Then he changed. He went to AA, got a black belt in Jiu Jitsu, and is a hero to the working class.
Well joking aside good for him. But a crap man who made himself a little better is still not as good as man who knew to be good all his life.
As much as a redemption arc is always good entertainment it doesn't make someone better than someone who was strong enough to be good all along.
QuoteConservatives like PP would literally urinate his pants, if Wab looked at him the wrong way.
You mean he'd pee on him
Possibly
Wab will never be PP quality and he's aware of that. Which is fine, as i said it's laudable enough that he pulled himself up out of the gutter to at least a modicum of decency (as far as we know). But PP has improved himself just as much, he just didn't wait till he was in the gutter to do it so now he's on another level.
-
4 minutes ago, eyeball said:
He's the same, more interested in his own power than anything else. Just another run of mill right winger. Just like Justin.
Prove it. Show me where you see that. So far he's been the opposite of justin.
You just say random crap that pops into your head to make yourself feel better about your trash choice in voting for the left in the past don't you
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Moonbox said:
I'm sure that's what you make yourself believe, but your biggest weakness is that you're so utterly convinced of whatever chicken-brained thoughts pop into your head that your hot takes are not just clueless, but also very specific. A quick citation is all it takes to blow you out, and the debate's over before it began.
How strange that you've never done it then
And the only times you ever provide cites. which is rare enough, they wind up working against you. You do 1 second google searches and grab headlines you think support you but the articles acutally don't. We've all seen it a couple dozen times with you.
And again, it's pretty obvious that you know i'm right and you're completely butt hurt. You'll notice that it's not me nnign around the forum chasing you to randomly jump into threads all the time to beg for attention and try to convince you that i really WAS right all the time honest please please agree! LOLOLOL
You are so damaged it isn't funny and your weird obsession with me just proves the point.
-
4 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:
It’s their best line of defence. If he pursues this tariffs madness and starts a protracted economic war with Canada then the election becomes a different matter entirely.
I agree that it's just about their best line of defense. But it's not a very good one and it's not much of a game changer. They have already been a number of polls asking people who they think is the best to stand up to trump and poilievre comes ahead pretty much all the time by a fair margin over Justin, and she won't be doing any better than Justin because she's literally the one who negotiated for Justin.
But I get that it's just about the only thing she could run on with any real chance of gaining traction
-
1 minute ago, eyeball said:
Now I'm saying you're both so far out to lunch it's not funny.
Says the guy who claimed that making mp's wear body cams 24/7 would solve corruption in gov't
LOLOLOL
And said it's harper's fault that justin breaks the law
LOL sure kid
-
17 hours ago, Aristides said:
FFS, get over Trudeau and start thinking of your country, he is just another PM and will be gone in a couple of months.
I'm certain you would have said that about Hitler back in the days and rolled your eyes that people weren't ready to vote Nazi again now that he was gone, but the fact is people aren't going to forget like that and he was not just another prime minister. He was easily the most destructive prime minister in our history. We will be living with his misdeeds for a couple of generations and everybody needs to remember exactly what he and his liberals did to us. Never again
-
17 hours ago, herbie said:
Uhh that sounds like a democrat voter who wrote that
-
21 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:
Tragic.
Yeah - how are you going to get a job NOW if it's all about merit?
LOL
Go watch that move 'am i racist'. You need an education.
-
16 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:
If PP wants to bring us together he will have to change his tune so much.
Will he? In what way?
when the truckers were mad he said that canadian leaders should listen to them even if they didn't wind up agreeing.
He's said the provinces should be left to be in charge of provincial responsibilities and not be unterfered with, which is a major source of division.
He's said he wants to focus on opportunity for everyone and economic matters to bring prosperity rather than divisive social issues like justin did.
And so far hes refrained from calling canadians wastes of space, bigots and misogynists and intolerable just for having a different opinion.
All of which is what divided us under justin.
So how exactly is he not better than what we've got?
-
17 hours ago, eyeball said:
He's profoundly misinformed to the point of being delusion and putatively rational politicians like Poilievre should be profoundly ashamed of themselves for encouraging him and millions like him.
This abundance of misinformed people is what's made it so easy for putative AGW activists like Trudeau, Carney and other cowardly so-called lefties to put on a good show of concern and conviction but with little to no courage when it comes to action.
If this is what passes for much of the common sense Poilievre is tapping into it stands as clear evidence of how decades of dedicated denial has been an absolutely smashing success. Good job, you must all be so proud of yourselves.
So what you're saying is he's right in this case and you're butt hurt about it
-
19 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
I had a cat like that.
When it was 40 below he'd howl at the front door to go out, turn his nose up at the cold air, go howl at the back door as if it was gonna be summer there, turn his nose up again, and go back to howl at the front door.
Still, I'm not saying my cat is as dumb as a leftist. That would be terribly rude.
The difference is the leftie does exactly the same thing, but somehow it's trump's fault
-
1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:
Wab Kinew is my hero, not Justin.
Wab is just first nations justin. So same diff.
-
2 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:
Freeland sees NAFTA as the least worst policy to run on. Most people see her record as strong there. How this plays out in the next federal election is entirely dependent on Trump. If he goes completely mad with the tariffs and Danielle Smith succeeds in dividing west from east then we could have a genuine contest on our hands.
It wasn't though. She lost ground. They tried to pass it off at the time as oh well what more could anyone do against trump but if that record gets dug up and plastered all over the media the truth of it won't look good for her.
And trump doesn't like her and has made that clear.
-
4 hours ago, Army Guy said:
wins what exactly the leadership to a failed party that will have to be rebuilt from the ground up...and he wins all that for a mere 350,000 k...what a deal....
I don't think he'll stay around if he doesn't win. I think basically the liberals have told him that if he runs and loses he's free to leave and they will cover some if not all of his expenses and if he wins great. I don't think he has the slightest intention of sticking around to rebuild the party at all.
Reminds me of that ignatief slogan conservatives had: Just visiting.
QuoteCourts just decided that Justin proroguing parliament is invalid...we will have to see what happens on monday, which could see a non confidence vote, and an election way sooner than we thought....Carneys rope just got a whole lot shorter....
I think jaggey probably just peed a little
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
One could easily make the case that Accoster was a rude, belligerent, dishonest and unscrupulous weasel who completely lacked the decorum, integrity and class to walk into a room that the president was in, but can you imagine the ballyhoo that would come from the leftist cult if CNN was banished from the WH?
We don't need to imagine we can remember it. It was a massive kerfuffle with the left saying that it was basically the end of times
Wait and see what it's like when it's the other way around. They will cry to the heavens
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:
WOMP....WOMP...
At least you tried. More than we can say for your hero Justin who hasn't managed to do anything
-
32 minutes ago, herbie said:
Oh FFS if Trump actually wanted to help US consumers, he'd reverse the decision and restart Keystone XL. That would do more for Alberta than anything else, and further play into our dependence on the USA. The guy's a typical US Corporate thinker, can't see beyond the next fiscal quarter. Rather tries for the Gulf War of economic wars, wants to shock and awe us.
But he's too damn stupid and it wouldn't play well into his bullshit line that their trade deficit is a subsidy of Canada.
You should tell him. I'm sure he will listen to your financial advice. After all, you ARE the man who tripled the value of his home with a credit card 🙄🙄😆
-
18 minutes ago, herbie said:
So you've been duped to believe.
BTW we don't watch those, we get real Kommunist news like CBC, BBC, and all those lackey private companies that wouldn't make billions delivering 'news' that was biased bullshit.They only make billions by delivering bias news. That's the problem.
But as long as they're delivering bias news that you like communists like yourself are happy to see them paid off by the government. We'll see what happens if that gets reversed. When the CBC is trashed and only right of Center Canadian news sources are promoted by the government I suspect you'll suddenly sing a different tune
-
1 hour ago, eyeball said:
Anthropogenic climate change is definitely why we have a carbon tax -
History has proven you wrong. The carbon tax has failed to have any effect on anthropogenic climate change or any other form of climate change.
You failed. And now you want to continue the failure and even have more failure because of your woke ideology. You ignore the science and try and claim anyone who opposes you is some sort of denier.
This is why the left is falling out of favor everywhere
I don't agree with @blackbird On all that much but he's absolutely correct here and you're not looking terribly bright for claiming otherwise
20 minutes ago, herbie said:Canada’s best response to Donald Trump’s aggression? Socialism
Just so we're not overwhelmed by the corporate bullshit parading as "solutions".
Socialists claim that socialism is the solution for everything whenever there's a problem. They are universally wrong.
Although I will confess that if you have enough socialism half the people starve and the other half are reduced to abject poverty and that is bound to reduce emissions at some point
-
1 hour ago, eyeball said:
Is there an official policy document that specifically says the tax is an excuse?
Yes.
-
1 hour ago, eyeball said:
I get angry when you constantly make me look bad.
I understand. That's why you like to misquote me. You don't seem to like the reverse tho
But i guess you think it beats actually trying to defend your indefensible positions.
-
1 hour ago, Radiorum said:
But you haven't.
But i have. WIth cites included.
And saying "I will run again" is announcing his candidacy. He would formalize that later but that's literally what it means.
And he made that announcement in 2020 LONG BEFORE THE INVESTIGATIONS as i already demonstrated with citations.
Your own quotes show the investigations started WELL AFTER he announced he would seek to run again.
So you're lying. Big surprise.
And this is why we can't trust anything that comes from the left. I provided you with explicit quotes from him saying I will run again that were made in 2020 and you're trying to pretend that an investigation in 2022 somehow came before that.
And we're supposed to believe that evidence provided by the left is beyond any reproach or question 🙄 You can't even be honest here for 5 seconds.
And the decision to proceed with charges was made as soon as he officially announced what he had already stated was his intent. The timing is crystal clear, as soon as he couldn't back out and was fully committed they fully committed to pressing charges. The investigation happened after he announced that he was looking to run again.
So it's hard to look at it as not being a political move on the part of the democrats. Despite your lies the timing absolutely indicates that it was based on his intention to run not on actual prosecution of a criminal.
Now we're supposed to believe that a report from a man who was hired to find him guilty is accurate because it says "I bet I could have found him guilty" . Yeah, no bias there at all.
If trump had actually done something illegal it could have put charges in place 2021, certainly by 2022. Instead they waited till 2023 to bring the actual charges and didn't even begin that process until after he had announced he would be running formally and officially.
You see the time line. "I MAY RUN" .... start investigation just in case. "I"M DEFINITELY RUNNING HERE"S MY PAPERS". - formal charges and we'll set the dates of the trial to completely interfere with his fundraising and run up to the next election.
Democrats always try and lie their way out of simple truths. And that's why they were punished at the last election in the states and why the left wing is going to be punished in the next elections in Canada. You people cannot tell the truth to save your life
-
At Alberta university, more proof we're watching DEI die in real time | National Post
Meta, the world’s largest social network, just decoupled from “diversity, equity, inclusion.” At the University of Alberta, president Bill Flanagan also shut down DEI at his institution. “It’s about excluding, or highlighting what divides us, rather than what unites us,” is how he described DEI’s effects to me on a Zoom chat a few days before Meta’s announcement.
After months of consultation with faculty, staff and students, Bill launched the new year with a bold announcement: The U of A is replacing its spin on DEI with a new mandate focused on building access, community and belonging.Exactly. Get another example of another woke policy that people have realized does far more harm than it could possibly do good. Good riddance to bad rubbish -
2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:
2. You don't have to be right beside Trudeau to report on his government. What a strange idea.
It's not a strange idea at all. In fact it's been to court already in Canada.
Remember when Justin Trudeau tried to exclude the rebel and claim it wasn't a legitimate news organization? And they took the government to court and won?
If you allow one media source then you have to allow all media sources. If your claim is that you don't have to actually be in the same room with a politician to ask questions then nobody should be in the room.
Only a woke left-wing dictatorial type would suggest that somehow it was strange to think that excluding some news sources while allowing others would be a fair and reasonable practice in a democracy. That is absolutely asinine and you should be embarrassed for suggesting it
-
1
-
1
-
At University of Alberta, more proof we're watching DEI die in real time
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
Exactly. They can stick to hiring qualified and talented white people