CdnFox
-
Posts
26,832 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
282
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CdnFox
-
-
3 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:
Conservatives were planning to stop home mail delivery.
They were doing no such thing. Nor would they, Canada Post is a separate organization, it's like CBC. The conservatives can't tell the CBC what to broadcast and they can't tell Canada Post what to do And you have to be 17 different kinds of dumb to think that anybody is going to cancel mail service all together
QuoteConservatives actually raised retirement age (and OAS) to 67 from 65. So stop lying.
I literally said that was the only thing you mentioned that they were going to do. So you are the liar here
QuoteConservative did cut back on government spending in 2013 and 50,000 government workers were laid off so stop lying.
Bullshit.
QuoteLiberals brought in child daycare ($10 per day), dental programs and all benefited the poor.
Hasn't really so far, and those children are going to be paying the costs of the extra money they borrowed well into their retirement. You liberals seem to think that debt is going to magically vanish Into The Ether and never play a role in our lives. That debt is going to be an anchor on the chain of an entire generation of Canadians moving forward just as the previous Trudeau's was during the '80s and the periods of stagflation then
QuoteThe only mistake Liberals made was to increase immigration levels to stupid number and mostly from third world countries and hence overwhelmed our health and education system and government services and THIS WAS AN UNFORGIVABLE MISTAKE and they must pay a price for that by being kicked out of government but I am hoping a minority conservative government not to cut and burn.
They also borrowed more money than every other government before them combined. You don't think that was a mistake?
They also changed the laws to Require all criminals who are captured to be released on bail immediately even if they have multiple violent convictions and this has been directly resulting in numerous deaths and rapes and violence and the police chiefs of several provinces have begged them to make changes and they haven't. Not a mistake in your books?
Our international trade relationships are now worse off and we do less trade per capita than we used to because of his screw-ups. Now that the US is threatening us we desperately wish we had more trade with other countries and he reduced it. Not a screw up?
And could it be possible that you are stupid enough to think that the liberals who are still in power aren't exactly the same? They voted for every single thing he did for 10 years
You are literally saying what they did was unforgivable and then forgiving them hoping that they'll be back in in 2 years. You're a hypocrite
QuoteThe cut and burn policies of the conservatives will only hurt the most in need. As why I prefer to see a minority conservative government in the next election.
There are no cut and burn policies of the conservatives.
You're blind devotion to the liberals at the cost of Canadians is reprehensible. You would rather repeat the next 10 years to be the same as it was for the last 10 years which is exactly what will happen rather than be honest that the conservative time was actually vastly better than the liberal time for old people and poor people.
How do you even live with that level of hypocrisy?
-
2 hours ago, herbie said:
No, I would actually like to see someone try SMR out. Asides from China.
But even imagining design, all the approvals, construction and firing up one can be managed quickly is silly.The first ones come online in Canada in just a few years from now And it's expected the approval process will be streamlined once a few have been implemented.
And Poilievre is exactly the leader who will likely look at how to successfully streamline that so that approvals go quickly.
But we won't be seeing them in British Columbia. A year or two ago the NDP voted again to renew the band on all nuclear power and to make it illegal. You know, because they care so much for the environment.
-
1
-
-
Just now, SpankyMcFarland said:
A hundred minutes? Give me the Reader’s Digest version. Let’s hope PP is more PC than PPC when PM. I’m all for balanced federal budgets. Home ownership is a much tougher nut to crack - so many different factors to sort out. The nimbys will obstruct reform while denying they are doing precisely that.
LOL is our country and our democracy and it's one of the most important duties as a citzen... but 100 minutes is just too much
Short version is PP good justin bad, vote PP. There, back to your video game.
-
1 hour ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:
His first cabinet was half female.
That's not an achievement, that's just sexism.
QuoteI love it to see females in powerful positions as a punch into the face of those id*ots who may believe or claim women are not equal and cannot assume high positions (who I believe must be prevented from coming to Canada at the first place).
Didja love it when he punched jodi in the face? or all the other women he did, with freeland being the last?
The guy thinks women should be silent and do what their told or he fires them. THAT'S your 'feminist idol'?
QuoteI am not a fan of Trudeau or Liberals just that I am afraid of a conservative or religious right take over.
well you did bring up how much he did in the first term. Sooooo. As to he conservatives if you have "fears" over it that's a mental health issue. The conservatives have been in power before and there was no 'religious take over' or anything
QuoteThey may ban doctor-assisted suicide which Trudeau legalized it in his first term,
Probably not.
Quotefierce government cutbacks, social program cutbacks,
The only things that'll get cut back is useless programs like the 23 billion we spend in consultants that happened to be friends of the liberals right now each year. The conservatives have always supported in kept up core services like medicine transfers and the like. The CBC is getting cut, but honestly it had it coming
QuoteMail delivery changes (stopping home delivery is hard on seniors), raising retirement age
So you are honestly of the opinion that the conservatives are going to get into power and then cancel Canada Post so that there's no more postal service. That's your big fear here.
You're making crap up at random. When have the conservatives ever called for the end of mail?
Quotecutbacks to health and education in order to balance the budget.
They've never done that. Nor are they calling for it now. So again where is this coming from? You're making shit up
QuoteIn summary the most vulnerable (sick, elderly, the poor) will pay a high [rice for a conservative strong majority. They were planning to do all of above if elected in 2015.
Well that's a blatant lie. It weren't planning on doing any of that with the exception of raising the retirement age to 67. Harper increased healthcare funding and trudeau kept the exact same formula harper had for example.
Meanwhile, The liberals have doubled our debt. They have divided the country so badly that now again we're hearing about separatist talk. Our medical systems are in complete disarray and cannot handle the number of people we have in and are far worse than they were under harbor. Pretty poor and has hit the elderly and the poor the most. Many of them can no longer afford food or housing. Our quality of life is nose diving because of the GDP per capita plummeting, which will affect gov't services moving forward. And everyone has commented how poor gov't services are today vs in the past
And people are forced to go longer before retiring
Canadians are working past retirement, but not because they want to | CBC Radio
Oh and canada post says because of mismanagement they're looking at going to weekly service because they're losing so much.
So every single thing you said you were worried about under the CPC HAS ACTUALLY HAPPENED under the liberals.
So how do you justify your claims that the cpc will do these things when they didn't when they were in power and the liberals are?
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Legato said:
When that first came out the first line was...... Justin Trudeau finally breaks down......
Late again as usual
well the left can't think of their OWN jokes.... lets just say they're recycling and pass it off as being environmental
-
4 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:
😂
Must be why he brought a satellite phone
Amusingly right now a lot of the first nations are discussing the fact that Trudeau did exactly what you just suggested Poilievre did. How many times did he promise that he would ensure all first nations that clean drinking water and nothing has really happened.
And we all remember the "thanks for your donations!" line as he chased them out of his fundraiser.
-
1 hour ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:
Close to full employment
He had that already. He inherited a booming economy.
Quoteand low inflation during 2015-2019
He had that already. The inflation rate was about the same as it had been for years before that.
Quoteand implementation of Liberal policies and feminist policies.
Like what.
Lord, even his fanboys can't think of anything he actually did that was positive
-
1 hour ago, blackbird said:
And he murdered two-thirds of the Jews in Europe in his gas chambers.
Uhhh... i didn't say that
You quoted the wrong person by accident just FYI
-
13 hours ago, BeaverFever said:
By whom? Not by him or any other conservative.
Really. Ok - produce a list of all conservatives and confirm none of them did.
You're being a dishonest twit again. Hell -I- discussed it with many people and guess what... i'm a conservative. And in those days i was active in the party.
It was raised and discussed wondering why so called liberals in canada loved obama but thought harper was satan when the two were similar on many points in their platforms. This is specifically 2008 when harper and obama Both had elections so the comparison was kind of in everyone's face.
And as i noted if you look it's all the LEFT WING papers and think tanks who wrote article after article at the time explaining why they were actually different.
Now go change your diapers kid.
Lets hustle through the rest.
no you've never said it to me and if you did you'd have gotten the same response. This has been discussed to death over the decades and isn't really all that contentious. Our conservatives are a little right of the dems but left of the republicans.
And yes not only i but many others have provided tonnes of proof. I"m not interested in your sealioning. It absolutely is a thing.
Whenever you're in over your head, you accuse others of being in over their head
It's amusing
We do have medical industries in canada. And the regulations are generally set by the health regions. Did you not know that?
So if you're an ogbyn you will still be subject to the specific regulations of the individual hospital (many have them) as well as the regional health district (sometimes called other things in various provinces) as well as the college.
Oooopsie
Now you just look stupid
And in canada the industry has regulated itself. Independant of gov't law they all cap abortions at 3 months for the most part.
Sorry kid. Now you look like a complete Tard
Like that was REALLY stupid
We're not talking about republicans or their interests, we're discussing why Canada doesn't have laws
And nobody gives a shit about what's going on with the states as far as this conversation goes, you are just trying to change the conversation because you so badly made an !diot of yourself already.
Let's recap. And it doesn't have abortion laws because the industry self-regulates. Yes we absolutely have a medical industry. Abortions in Canada are capped at 3 months without laws. So the governments have not felt the need to introduce them. This was in response to your claim that our laws were more relaxed than the states.
You're getting to that point in the discussion where you're making bad arguments which makes you angry which makes you make worse arguments and the cycle progresses. See if you can pull out of that nose dive before you crash and burn completely
-
-
2 minutes ago, Hodad said:
Hey, dumbfark, you literally posted a listicle story about some arsehole in Oregon who was jailed for capturing water without government permission it financing. Literally.
And then you complained about the law that would prohibit his doing so. Shouldn't be regulated!
And then you complained about what are, in your view, harmful water diversions and acknowledged capacity for external harm.
And then you said again that the law that prohibits people diverting water flow must be abolished.
You're fighting with yourself because you don't know your arse from a hole in the ground that collects runoff.
Try picking a position--any position. Jeebus.
Uh oh..... triggered disproven tribal leftie is triggered!
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:
Has it been acknowledged by Canadian Conservatives?
Yep. It was mentioned when harper was running.
QuoteThe rest of us always mention it but it seem conservatives don’t like to talking about it publicly and whenever I mention it in online forums like this one most of you will change the subject.
I suspect the rest of us is going to turn out to be the voices in your head and we can't actually hear those
And in fact if you take a look online or do a search comparing the two the massive results will be liberals warning that the conservatives are far to the right of democrats and liberals and are dangerous
QuoteBut it’s funny because in the rest of your post you then go on to completely undermine this statement with a diatribe about how left wing the democrats are .
But I don't. What i said was that in many cases democrat policies are similar to our conservative ones. MANY. Not all. not even most.
The ones that differ are the ones that push people to the republicans. And i gave examples.
So once again your back to your playing games with words instead of addressing the points.
QuoteFalse.
100 percent true. As long as you exclude the trudeaus. sorry to burst your bubble.
Quote1) Canadian Conservatives generally don’t support Republican-style gun policies and tens to mostly support Canadian gun control
Not really. They generally will support some form of training and certification requirement. The vast majority feel the current laws go way too far. And almost none believe the banning one type of gun or another is somehow going to make a difference in the world
Quote2) Republicans don’t support freedom of speech more than Democrats
They absolutely do
QuoteMeanwhile Canadian conservatives have shown they have no problem invoking the notwithstanding clause to bypass the charter of rights and freedoms for passing trivial issues and personal pet theories that don’t even pan out
No, wherever they've used it they've had a reason to use it and it was a pretty good reason as a rule. And there's very few cases of that. On the flip side the liberals actually declared the emergency act to unlawfully and without excuse squash people's rights to protest and a judge has ruled that to be the case
So you lose that one hard
QuoteBaloney most Democrat economic policies are similar to or even to the right of mainstream Canadian Conservatives like Harper.
Not really. For example was there policies that led to the entire subprime mortgage crash and even our liberals would never have done that. They're overspending for example as we saw under Biden his terribly insane and while Trudeau gave them a run for their money previous liberal and conservative governments would never have gone that far. Etc etc
QuoteThat’s an absolute lie as has been proven repeatedly.
I'm afraid it is you who are lying. It has been proven many times with specific examples down to dates and names that it has happened. So what happens when we have this discussion every single time is somebody like you or yourself make the ridiculous claim that it never happens and it's a lie. Then proof is provided. Then you switch your argument to " well i it doesn't' happen often at all, it's rare".
Yeah, rare still means it happens
QuoteBesides abortion in Canada even under conservatives is far more liberal than anything any Democrat has ever proposed.
No it isn't
QuoteIn Canada there is NO criminal law specifically restricting abortion at any stage
That is because the industry chose to self-regulate. But the fact that the industry chose to self regulate does not mean that there are no regulations, it just means that the government doesn't feel the need to add additional criminal regulations considering the existing system works.
But go try and get a second or third trimester abortion in Canada and see how it goes for you. If your life's not in danger it's not going to happen. The governments are aware of that, and they're happy with it. And that is far less liberal than what the liberals in the states are proposing
-
1 hour ago, herbie said:
Words go over your head. Your solutions drip off your chin.
So that would be a yes then
LOLOL
-
1 hour ago, herbie said:
Keep pretending.
Trump says vote for PP or else.Absolutely does not and the main reason is because there's absolutely no need to. Everybody knows Poilievre is going to win.
The question here is who will be facing him and whether or not the liberals will be completely wiped out or whether they can save at least some of the furniture
-
11 minutes ago, Radiorum said:
Non-answer
Yours you mean? Yes.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Scott75 said:
I guess. The sad thing is that by jumping to conclusions, they only discredit their own powers of observation. I've taken a look at some of your posts in other threads and I see that we don't agree on everything. I wonder how long it'll take CdnFox to realize? Time will tell I guess :-p.
You're honestly just making yourself look worse
-
1 minute ago, Radiorum said:
What specific right are you concerned about?
This has been gone over a million times. And considering that before even asking that question you already dismissed it as being invalid you've kind of closed the door to that conversation. Some would say that a thinking person would ask that before demanding that they're all invalid rather than after
You're a dishonest player kiddo. It's a shame that the trans community did not want to look for cooperative ways to work together to solve problems and instead prefers hostile relations rooted in hatred and dehumanization as you have demonstrated here.
But we can work with that too if that's how you want to play
-
18 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:
He managed the COVID crisis very well.
He gave our protective masks away to the Chinese. He also gave them a couple hundred million dollars and then they stiffed him on a vaccine which means we got the vaccines much later than everyone else. He also used the pandemic as an opportunity to spread hatred and division for political purposes to win an election. He literally said that anyone that didn't take the vaccine or had concerns about it was a bigot and a misogynist and a waste of space who probably shouldn't be tolerated.
He would have been hard-pressed to handle it worse. Anything good that happened came from the premieres
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Radiorum said:
But their concerns about transgender persons are invalid.
Saying that is about as bright as saying that transgenderism is just cosplay. And you prove again Where the hatred comes from. It comes from you, what you're seeing coming back is the reflection of that hatred
QuoteThis response seems to support my contention that it is a matter of "You can't tell me!"
You'd have to be seven different kind of stupid to come to that conclusion
QuoteThey are really scared that someone will put something over on them. What an anxious way to live.
No not really. They can see that there is an agenda and that it's a hate-filled bigoted agenda designed to take rights away from them to benefit others and they will take the appropriate steps to squash it. No anxiety at all.
8 minutes ago, Scott75 said:Apparently, this thinking that people have more accounts when they don't is fairly common amoung posters of a certain type. It reminds me of a post from an Admin in another forum who actually -allows- more than one account, in a thread where posters are trying to get rid of this feature. Quoting him:
**Just an FYI, there are fewer "sock" accounts than folks think there are.**
But some people just can't resist jumping to conclusions. Perhaps the best way to put it comes from a song I like:
"Some men, you just can't reach. So you get what we had here".
So it goes.
Apparently denying it when it's true is even more common than that
The left does love its liars. And what better way to lie than to show up with two accounts and agree with yourself a lot
-
1 hour ago, I am Groot said:
So the race is on! Who will choose our next PM? Russia? China? India?
Sort of. I don't know that I would call it a race, more of a friendly card game
QuoteThe idea that foreign students are allowed to vote when we have almost a million of them here, a hundred thousand of those from China, is just gobsmackingly retarded.
You've met the liberals, right?
QuoteLet's see how this plays out. A candidate promises that if elected, he/she will introduce a system to give citizenship to foreign workers and foreign students who have been here a couple of years. Suddenly, tens if not hundreds of thousands of foreign workers and students join the Liberals (for free) and vote for that candidate. When then becomes our prime minister.
Nothing wrong with that, right?
Not according to the liberals there isn't. And what we know from past investigations is a lot of those kids are going to suddenly find a whole whack of money in their pockets for donations
QuoteOr maybe a certain candidate makes private assurances to the Chinese that if they become PM they will turn foreign policy decidedly towards China. Now a hundred thousand Chinese troop obediently into the voting booth to vote for 'their' guy.
Well based on the investigations what seems to happen is the person will agree to take on a staff member for his office that is controlled by the Chinese government. That person will filter information and options to the candidate if he wins to make sure that his judgment is more likely to be favorable to Beijing.
QuoteThat okay with everyone? It's okay with Liberals.
And that is the million-dollar question
-
1 hour ago, herbie said:
I'd say we need to boost it to 10% of the budget now another country is actually threatening us.
Weren't you the one just a short while ago insisting that even 2% was ridiculous because there are no threats out there that we need to worry about?
You left these have the weirdest habit. When you find out you've been stupid about something for ages you believe the best way to correct it is to be stupid in exactly the opposite direction. The actual solution is to be smart
-
3 minutes ago, Radiorum said:
I only have one account, too. I've just read through your posts, and know that you are coming from a good place.
Sure you do
QuoteI'm trying to understand the hatred. It's some kind of primitive territorialism, I think.
Sometimes, we see threats that are not there.
You're not trying to understand it all. It's been spelled out so it's not terribly complicated. What you're doing is dismissing people's concerns as being invalid and suggesting it's some sort of mental defect or primal Instinct rather than reason
Which is what has fuel the hatred so far. This whole thing began as a very simple and straightforward exchange but your "side" (which seems to be mostly the same person with multiple accounts) has expressly demanded that it be hostile. And that's been pointed out.
You behave like a child, And constantly make these insulting dehumanizing statements and then our shocked! Absolutely shocked I say! The people insult you back
With every post you and your alter egos convince people more thoroughly that they should oppose trans rights at every turn.
-
33 minutes ago, suds said:
Actually it's a good time for Danielle Smith to go and state her (and Alberta's) case, because anyone worth knowing (politically) is going to be there. She will likely find common ground with more than a few U.S. politicians. If she did nothing it would be a dereliction of her duties as Premier. Of course there are always a few maroons amongst us who think otherwise.
And trump has talked about revisiting the pipeline and possibly getting that going again. That would be a huge Boon to Alberta. So hitting the ground running having some common discussions with regards to that is not the worst idea
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, herbie said:
Like I said, Danielle is Trump's Hock Tuah girl.
LOL Ahhh you lefties.... always so respectful of women
Trump says down with windmills. I agree. They are ugly.
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
Absolutely. That's why since Ontario and British Columbia have put some up there has been absolutely no forest fires since. It solved climate change
FACT SHEET: Climate change and wildfires in Canada 2023 was worst year ever for forest fires
oh. er.....