CdnFox
-
Posts
25,731 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
268
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CdnFox
-
-
46 minutes ago, Black Dog said:
Well no, a big part of it is the weapon, but again, you don't want to deal with the people either, f*ckhead.
None of it is the weapon, and I have repeated over and over and over again through several threads and several posts person that needs to be dealt with. And your little insult at the end shows me that you know you're wrong and that I'm right yet again and you're getting buthurt.
QuoteTrudeau's gun plan is supposed to cost something like $750 million,
Just like the registry was only going to cost $10 million until all of a sudden it was in the billions.
I've seen the independent estimates and I have a pretty good idea of the costs and it may come as no shock to anyone other than you that Trudeau is lying and the cost will be brutally higher
Quotedo you really think that's enough to solve the criminal justice system backlog that is causing so many offenders to be released as well as a comprehensive program to deal with mental health, addiction and homelessness?
Back logs aren't what is causing criminals to be released. What's causing them to be released is Trudeau's 2019 law requiring that all offenders including violent repeat offenders he released for bail immediately.
Under the end of the day if you feel it's not enough money great, let's grab it from the CBC and all of those useless foreign transgender inclusion projects we've got on the go. There's another couple billion
Your argument seems to be doing the right thing is expensive, so let's do the wrong thing because it's cheaper. That's kind of stupid
QuoteSee you can't even be honest for one minute which is why most people find you utterly repellent.
That was literally your proposition. Take money away from the police and ignore the violent criminal problem and put that money into mental health. Sorry if it seems stupid to you after the fact but I can't help that.
And once again I was voted Best poster of the year if you'll recall
Most people think I'm delightful. The ones who don't are the ones like you who make stupid statements That I blow out of the water regularly instead of learning to make good arguments
Quotelol why?
So what you're saying is you can't think of even one. Despite the dozens and dozens of firearms restrictions put in place over the years you can't mention even one that actually did any good when it came to fighting crime or violence.
Well me either.
So you've kind of backed yourself into a corner. Your idea that it's the tool not the person has been shot down, and you can't think of any gun laws in Canada that made a difference when it comes to crime or violence, and as we've shown there are other tools that are just as prevalent as firearms when it comes to violence, and your idea of defunding the jails To focus on mental health has been shown to be stupid......
Yet you still claim that generally you approve of firearms bands or restrictions. So all that's left is that you approve of this for ideological reasons. Gun owners tend to be conservative you hate conservatives you hate guns.
Well I think we're at the root of the gun control lobby thinking there. And I'm afraid that's just not a good reason for gun control
-
43 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:
You are so radicalised that you see the World as Black and White. Everything "left" is bad. Social security, healthcare, helping the poor, racial equality, etc. is "bad." I can't imagine spending my retirement years simping for billionaires.
So what you're saying is you couldn't answer that simple question so you decided to attack me because reasons
I don't recall saying I have a problem with the idea of canada's socialized Healthcare and I frequently say that of all the systems out there I think France got it most right. What I was responding to is your claim that the current healthcare system in the united states is making the rich richer. The current healthcare system in the states is Obamacare.
So your little mental freak out is because you realize that it's actually the democrats in this case that are making the rich richer.
So you don't have to imagine spending your years same thing for the billionaires, you're doing it right now.
It would seem to be the logical conclusion that if there are significant issues with health insurance in the states that obamacare needs to be scrapped and replaced with a system and regulations that work better. But god forbid anyone say that least they be cast as a right-wing simp for billionaires
-
On 12/9/2024 at 12:10 PM, eyeball said:
The True Definition of Woke? Only conservatives seem to know.
As for the depth of conservative knowledge...it's so shallow you couldn't get your feet wet wading through it if you tried.
It's been explained about a billion times. The left and can't define a woman just ignore it because it suits them to pretend
-
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:
I'll stop you right there as I'm pretty sure I've already mentioned I have no opinion on Trudeau's gun ban one way or another. I'm in favour of firearm restrictions broadly, but I honestly don't know enough about the latest one.
Well name a gun restriction in Canada that you do support then. There's a lot to choose from lets hear which one you feel actually made a difference and that you support.
-
1 minute ago, DUI_Offender said:
Trump only cares about the rich. It's so obvious by now.
But Obama care seems to be making the rich richer if the left is to be believed these days. SO much so they're shooting people. So isn't that the dems being the ones feeding the rich?
-
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:
1. 2. Ok, so you don't believe me. Don't talk to me if you think that I am a liar.
People are going to call you out on your lies whether you like it or not.
You always demand that people that disagree with you or don't believe what you say should not talk to you. But the reality is it is critical for people to call out liars for what they are, more so in this day and age than ever before.
So either learn to tell the truth or get used to it
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, User said:
They all run away from this question when I ask them this.
United Healthcare has the same issues any bureaucracy has, especially one that is sandwiched between the regulations they are and the healthcare system we have.
But they only make about 5% profit margin, which is not a lot. They are not getting rich off of trying to hurt people and there is zero evidence they are engaged in any illegal practices to deny people claims that are legitimate on any scale as is being alleged here.
There are legal remedies to resolve such disputes if they are.They're actually lower than that as i understand it. They're about 2 percent. And in fact that industry tends to be around 2-3 percent profit.
and again as I previously provided evidence for a massive number of Canadians die every single year because they didn't get care because care was delayed or not provided or some such nonsense. That doesn't make it okay to shoot the premiere of your Province.
I think most lefties would be quite upset if someone shot the NDP premier of British Columbia who has allowed a large number of people to die because of inadequate resources for healthcare. Yet they're fine with this guy being killed.
The left are nothing but hypocrites
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:
If that's the motivation then it would seem the solution is pretty obvious, but you're too stupid to see it lol.
Lock them up permanently?
He's not the one too dumb to see it.
-
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:
lol as I suspected all the handwriniging by you about stabbings was just a front. You don't give a shit, you aren't interested in solutions at any level.
So in other words you realize that your argument that it's the tool and not the person is completely stupid and you're trying to somehow figure out how it's my fault
As I said, the solution is dealing with the person not the tool. Although in your case the person is a bit of a tool
QuoteAs I pointed out in another thread, the left wanted to reallocate resources from the carceral system to mental health and other social service sand you right wing c*nts threw a hissy fit, so don't pretend you're remotely interested in actually doing anything about these problems. You're just trying to protect your little hobby.
Do both. Incarceration is a critical component of the system. As we have found out here in Canada, releasing people who are violent only creates more violence. This should surprise no one.
So if you want to take the money from somewhere collect it from the useless done grab programs and registries and lock up criminals and treat mental health patients. Treating mental health does no good if you then allow the criminals to go out on the street and commit more crimes. A finger in jail can't pull the trigger on a gun.
So of course sane people would disagree with your proposition that we ignore violent criminals. As robodope would say , "Duh!"
QuoteScience is when correlation equals causation lol.
That appears to be what liberals think so I'm not surprised to see you say it. Your entire argument is guns exist, therefore there is Violence and crime.
What the science says is that the tools don't commit the crimes, and the people who commit the crimes will find a tool one way or another. So the focus has to be on the people.
It's nice to see that even you are realizing your arguments were stupid. You can't solve violence by dealing with guns or knives or hammers or cars. You have to deal with the people. Lock up violent people, treat the mentally ill people, and you solve the vast majority of the problem
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
You know how to stop it...
Kid, once again i am NOT responsible for your actions
You're almost a big boy now and you're going to have to take responsibility for the choices YOU make. Every time you say that you sound a) like a 5 year old throwing a tantrum and b) like somehow I care what you do. I don't.
As for me why would i want to stop it? It's freaking hilarious
It literally puts a smile on my face every day at this point 
Others seem to find it pretty amusing as well, so there you go
We're just here to watch you melt down
🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿
-
44 minutes ago, eyeball said:
“I think tariffs are the most beautiful word. I think they’re beautiful. It’s going to make us rich,” Trump said.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/12/08/trump-defends-tariff-proposal-00193182
He's probably not wrong. Trudeau is already tripping over himself trying to avoid them I will likely give up many concessions. Mexico too I think and probably some other countries.
It may cost them a little in the very short term but threatening and bullying other countries with them probably will mean lots of additional money for the us.
-
1 hour ago, Aristides said:
If Canadian provinces were states, Trump would have lost.
I would imagine that alone would make you want to join
-
Just now, DUI_Offender said:
Thanks Captain Obvious.
No problem Captian So Obvious That You Got It Wrong I Guess
2 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:However, the price of virtually everything will make inflation skyrocket, if Trump follows through with the tariffs.
No that's not how it works. What it might do is lower our dollar against the US dollar but even that's not certain, and even if it does it may not lower our dollar against other currencies.
3 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:As an added bonus, it's going to tank both our economies, and probably drive the World into a huge recession.
It would likely tank our economy, Which would be bad considering we're already in a recession. It would hurt the US economy but in and of itself it probably wouldn't tank it. But it sure won't help it, and it's questionable how long he could sustain a trade war with everybody before he started to look pretty bad.
-
You know what they think it means. Anything that they don't want to hear is misinformation or disinformation.
-
1 minute ago, Moonlight Graham said:
LOL you're a troll.
So you say something stupid, people call you on it, you backpedal like a maniac, but you think I"M the troll
Ok kiddo
QuoteTrump 2028!
Ok Kamala
Just now, Moonlight Graham said:A Trumpster. Someone who actively likes Donald Trump and enthusiastically wants him to be POTUS. Not just someone who has who major problems with the guy but votes for them as the least worst of 2 bad options.
Then why'd you suggest I was one.
I think your definition is anyone you don't like, and secretly you believe that if anybody who voted for trump
I think you sell yourself as a Centrist but really you're fairly far on the left.
And I think you get upset when people pointed out.
-
LOL
I love that you think anyone is going to take you seriously or anything more than a child when you can't even use the words cognitive dissonance properly
It's hilarious that you ever tried to sell yourself as someone who had a post-secondary education
-
2
-
-
21 minutes ago, herbie said:
Well maybe if it becamse the 51st, 52, 53,54,55,56,57,58,59th and 60th States. Which would mean 20 Senaroes and 3 more for the territories.
Don't forget French on your Corn Flake boxes, bilingualism. and at least one Supreme Court Jusge from Canada. Tack on gun licenses, legal marijuana and Univeral health care.
Stll want us to consider it?Yeah I'm pretty sure we'd have to do things they're way rather than them doing things our way
Which means no universal health care, it would be set by the provincesmost guns are legal and can be carried for self defense, penalty for the provinces that want it and way less taxes.
On the positive side robosmith can teach you how to buy cheap slave labor zucchini, so there's that
-
9 minutes ago, herbie said:
and you don't need gasoline either,
You need gasoline. Horses are expensive.
Quotebut you sure screamed over 3cOk if they redefine the litre as 800cc, raised the price 50c and make it 50% ethanol overnight?
What the hell are you talking about?
QuoteI mwan so long as it was all good old free enterprise and not Trudeau it would be okay then, eh?
Costs of goods is costs of goods. If someone's selling at an unreasonable price then someone else will come along and undercut them.
And people deserve to make money if they take the risks, put up the capital, do the work to develop and produce a product, etc. They're providing value for money, that's why capitalism works well.
Can't undercut the gov't. And they don't provide any value for their money.
-
1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:
If we think inflation is bad now, wait until Trump slaps on tariffs to Canada, Mexico, and China. Food prices will skyrocket.
They can't really slap tariffs to Canada, he slaps them from Canada. A tarrif is an import tax more than anything.
Which doesn't mean it won't hurt us indirectly of course, our dollar would likely weaken which means it'll cost more to buy foreign goods.
-
3 hours ago, Radiorum said:
No.
Well then you're not very good at communicating are you.
Or is the problem that when you do communicate and people comment on your communication you realize it's kind of dumb so you try and change it or deny that that's what you meant. As I recall your fond of changing definitions of words on the fly to match your arguments.
Here's the deal. The majority of Americans saw through the bull crap and realized that trump was a better choice than Kamala. They saw through the democrats lies, they disapproved of the democrats attempt to weaponize the courts, they hated the left-wing economy and what it had done to their standard of living, and they didn't appreciate the constant unjustified ridiculous attacks on trump and anyone who voted for him. Including the ones like the one above that you're trying desperately now to dodge.
And the democrats response has been to call the plurality of American voters stupid, racist, bigoted homophobes, evil dumb people who can't understand, and so on rather than take a long hard look at why they got shot down.
Keep going kid. With that attitude it'll be another 8 years of republicans after trump is done.
-
2 hours ago, herbie said:
Noticed the jump in house brand chocolate at the super.
Last months 2/$5 100g chocolate bars are now 'on sale' this week 3/$6 and are now only 80b.
Inflation and shrinkflation at the same time. Didn't compare ingredient lists, but no doubt shitification is also included.Never bought them, they were kind of like Hersheys. Vaguely cocoa and vomit flavoured candle wax.
Honestly you don't need the sugar.
-
4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
you are wasting time and effort.
ROFLMAO!!!
Holy shit kid
You've gone like 6 pages now with your hissy fit meltdown posting 'guffaw guffaw', can't answer simple questions, a half dozen people have dropped in to make fun of you and you can't even explain why you're doing it! And you think someone ELSE is wasting time and effort? LOLOLOLOLI'm here for the laughs and you provide plenty so it's not really a 'waste' for me I have no idea WHAT you think you're getting out of this other than laughed at
-
50 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:
Wow, it sounds like there's another poster on here who tries to to WIN debates and is TOXIC 😦, DUI...
People who discuss with me, on the other hand, can check to see that I LIKE almost every poster's posts from time to time.
Sounds weird but I actually don't hate anyone, see... 🤔
Except the chuds.
Mike nobody's accusing you of hatred per se. But you are extremely dishonest, 99.89 percent of your posts are exercises in prevarication and equivocation, I've never seen you start a single thread ever and yet i've seen you criticize people for the threads they start dozens of times.
You absolutely do not 'discuss' as a rule. Most of your posts are just snide attacks on others posts or vague dissatisfaction with something without offering much in the way of actual opinion and i'm not the only one who's told you this.
That is why people don't respect you or think poorly of you. You do NOT "discuss" things with people by and large.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Black Dog said:
OK let's ban carrying knives in public too. Your move, dipshit.
Why? They'll just start shooting people?
We get it. What you want is a nanny state. We don't. And people are obviously sick of your woke crap.
If you ban guns they use knives. If you been nice they use hammers. If you ban hammers they use vehicles. And so on and so forth
The actual answer is you address the people. Most of these guys doing the stabbing have been in jail for violent crimes before but we're released. Most of the criminals have no fear of the legal system and no they will be out in 5 minutes. And the ones with mental health issues (other than the liberals) are going without treatment.
But instead of spending three or four billion dollars on better mental health we're spending it on a gun by back which will not save a single life.
I realized that Lefties do not want to go after people for being criminals or deal with their mental health issues. For you it must seem like going after family.
But at the end of the day it's the only solution that has ever worked. Harper was tough on crime and soft on guns and crime and violence went down. Trudeau has been soft on crime and hard on guns And violent crime is through the roof.
Why can't you guys learn to follow the science?
Expect higher food prices as dollar continues its plunge after Trump's win (Trudeau does nothing)
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
Again kid I am not responsible for your actions
And look, it's upset you so bad you can't even type again.
For you this is painful. For me this is hilarious.
🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿