CdnFox
-
Posts
21,652 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
227
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CdnFox
-
-
Just now, BeaverFever said:
Not if it is a non-viable fetus that has no chance of survival and as the soundbite conservatives keep misusing says in those extremely rare cases they do everything to make it comfortable until it passes.
So in other words it does happen but it's rare.
Nobody suggested it was common. And we both know it's not that the fetus has 'no chance' of survival.
But it shouldn't be the case at all. Especially if it was an abortion 'operation' that left it 'of questionable viability' in the first place. As if killing it 6 seconds earlier was fine but now that we screwed that up i guess we'll just wait here till it dies rather than try to save it. Oopsie.
Very very very very few people in the US agree with that. But it's what the dem's want the laws to allow.
If they don't, then what's the problem with passing laws that prevent it?
-
2 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:
Yes, his "I know you are, but what am I" shtick, is growing stale.
Aww kiddo
you Still butthurt?
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:Leftards just come into threads that they don't like to drag the convo down to their level. Chrissy was doing it yesterday, now it's Dirty B's turn.
LOL well when you're right you're right
Guess DUI's up now he's been drinking again and making a fool of himself in a few threads.
-
1 minute ago, robosmith said:
The dolts that don't understand the difference between withdrawing treatment for a fatally abnormal baby and actively killing it.
That is the PARENT'S DECISION and RIGHT
are you referring to the courts when you say 'dolts'? Because they have long held that a parent has a DUTY to provide the necessaries of life to infants and that neglecting a child and allowing it to die is murder. its murder in most civilized countries.
So while you might THINK the court is wrong it IS in fact murder to allow a baby to die by deliberate inaction.
-
7 hours ago, Rebound said:
Kamala Harris and Tim Walz are gun owners.
Donald Trump is not a gun owner.
Oh yes - i believe tim owns one of the same guns he carried in combat right?
Tim walz is rabidly anti gun.
Kamala has expressly stated she wants to ban everything she considers an "assault weapon'. Which at a MINIMUM is every semi auto gun ever made in her mind, and probably every pump and lever as well. (hey, the 30-30 was the gun that won the west right? Not only military but participated in racist colonial conquest).
They're both hard left gun grabbers.
-
2 hours ago, Black Dog said:
Except the pet-eating story was based on a mentally ill American woman eating a cat, so if you ignore the part where it was completely made up then year it was totally true. LOL, you dipshit.
A mentally ill immigrant woman.
So when he says that immigrants are coming up and eating pets that's not wrong. In at least one case that did happen.
You must be the 'special stupid' to admit that it did happen and claim that's proof it didn't happen
QuoteAs for the abortion thing, that's also a lie as much as we all wish it was true in your case.
That one's been proven true 1000 times over now. It's simple fact.
It's weird to watch the left hold on to crap like this when they know it's wrong. Like the 'blood in the streets if i lose' comment which they cling to like a drowning man holding on to driftwood when they know he said it about the auto industry.
I guess if you don't have any LEGIT critisizims of trump you have to make crap up.
-
Again, your entire argument is landlords are bad and it's really too terrible that some of them suffer horribly but if they lose money in order to guarantee that people have a place to live that they didn't pay for then so be it.
The fact that as you say tenants can screw the landlord around and not return keys or whatever is a perfect example of why they should do things like renovictions. Get rid of them before they interfere with the sale.
And basically you say that you can't only point it one side while simultaneously only pointing at one side. You suggest that it should be just expected that businesses should suck up the loss of income, even though a lot of those businesses are single people who are just trying to invest their money wisely and provide someone with a home.
Landlords have very few rights. And as a result there will be fewer and fewer landlords. Which means it gets more and more expensive for tenants.
And when suddenly people don't have a place to live in their living on the streets They will discover that in fact they do not have any right to have a home in Canada. You have to pay for it, and it has to be fair, and right now the system is radically unfair for those who wish to provide homes compared to those who wish to take homes. And those people can take their money and go somewhere else which is exactly what they're doing which is exactly why home starts are down again .
-
19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
Leftards just come into threads that they don't like to drag the convo down to their level. Chrissy was doing it yesterday, now it's Dirty B's turn.
Well if they're going to take the time at least they could make it entertaining, something a little bit better than variations on their own sexual fantasies or poop jokes
Sigh. Lefties really can't meme
-
1
-
-
25 minutes ago, Black Dog said:
It's ironic that you're stuck at a schoolyard level of humour given you're legally not allowed within 100 metres of any school.
That was your example of good banter?
ROFLMAO, well, there you go kiddo
-
37 minutes ago, herbie said:
Why point out facts like that to people opposed to having evil communist social programs at all? They don't give a damn who benefits, it wasn't them.
Wasn't really anybody.
Meanwhile people can't afford food or housing. Almost one quarter of all canadians will use the food bank this fall. But sure - a few people got their teeth cleaned by the feds instead of the province so yaaaaaay trudeau! You lefites are so weird.
-
5 minutes ago, Black Dog said:
LOL you're absolutely shit at this banter thing,
Well that's what a guy who was losing at the banter thing would say
-
4 hours ago, Rebound said:
“Windmills cause cancer” is not an exaggeration, it is a lie.
“Immigrants eat pet dogs” is not an exaggeration, it is a lie.
“Doctors legally murder babies after they’re born” is not an exaggeration, it is a lie.
No, sorry, the last two turned out to be true.
Well... in fact it was only one immigrant that was actually accused of it, so the term immigrantS would presumably be a lie. Sort of.
But otherwise true.
-
6 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:
I am willing to bet that some prolific posters have been bought and paid for by the Kremlin,
In other words you can't emotionally cope with the fact that you're wrong and others prove it all the time, so you're crafting some bizarre narrative to suggest that the Kremlin is launching an attack on this tiny little site with about 30 regular posters in order to control politics in Canada and America.
LOL ! i think you should be more focused on THIS article mr white leftie liberal :
New Pew Study; White Liberals More Likely To Have Mental Problems (wbckfm.com)
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, herbie said:
seconded.
In Rustad's hometown Sunday you couldn't see your car in the lot from the front door of Timmies through the fire smoke.
Do tell us how the bug kill and forest fires and droughts have nothing to do with climate change. And the only thing built there instead of shut down since you won that riding was the McDonalds next door.
Tell it to your neighbours that just got laid off from Canfor Plateau mill shutting down.
Axe the Hacks, not the Tax.The ndp has been in power now for almost 10 years, and we've been paying our carbon tax for 16.
The ndp's anti business practices are why no businesses got built
It's hilarious that you think voting in the same people that are the cause of the problems you're mentioning and have been responsible for them for about a decade is somehow going to produce a different result and is a reason why we shouldn't have someone new
The NDP are the hacks. Axe the hacks AND the tax. Vote CPBC
-
5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:
And that is a valid point. In the end, she did not inform anyone as to what her policies are and that needed to be her number one goal. She also lost the flash polls on immigration and the economy. Aka the top 2 issues of the election.
Everyone should note there are virtually no Harris soundbites on social media or the news today. There are a few for Trump.
It's true but she did manage to look presidential, or at least more so than people have thought of her as, and she looked like she was 'standing up for herself' which was valuable.
I think over all she had some positive results but as you say she missed the big stuff, and that's probably going to hurt her as the campaign drags out.
-
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:
The Michael Jackson vibes here are off the chart and I'm not talking about dance moves.
Yikes. I realize that you're getting excited fantasizing about this but dude, you need to calm down. It's not ok for you to be public ally fantasizing about what mikey did to kids. Now just settle down and go change your shorts.
-
2 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:
It would be in the best interest of some forum members (i.e. CdnFox) to read this article.
Oh dear. Still living rent free in your head am i
I've read the article but sure, i'll bite: What in that article do you think it would be in my 'best interests' to read specifically?
Or are you just being butthurt that i make you look bad so often? I get a fair bit of that around here
-
6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:
How are you so bad at jokes? Is it the autism? FASD?
They'll make sense when you're older.
QuoteOk pedo.
You wishing it was true doesn't make it true. Now go play with your lego.
10 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:Harris won the debate.
Probably not. She did better than trump but most people say 'no winner'.
QuoteDeal with it.
Awww muffin, you're the one who struggles with coping with reality
Sorry the truth hurts you so much
-
10 minutes ago, Moonbox said:
He didn't say it wasn't political. You clowned out in your first post on this thread. Well done. 🤡
Why can't you post without making yourself look like a donkey? See below:
CBC is the most corrupt broadcaster in the world people. You heard it here, from our resident genius. 🤣
Oh and let me save you some time:
"YOURRRR POST IS TOOOO LOOONNG, I CANT REAAAAD THAT MUCH".
"What you've said is correct but you post too frequently so that makes it not true right?""uhh i don't really have a rebuttal soooo... umm... TECHNICALLY THE WORD PERHAPS CAN MEAN DEFINITELY!!!! I say so!"
There, i just saved us 10 pages of you freaking out. You're welcome.
-
Just now, Moonbox said:
He didn't say it wasn't political. You clowned out in your first post on this thread. Well done. 🤡
What he said;
QuoteThere's no mention of any Democrats, Republicans, Conservatives, or Liberals
Not any politicians.
Just "influencers"
It specifically mentioned donald trump Is he not a politician?
And are you saying that there are no "far right" politicians? Who do they mean by "the far right".
So, yeah he did say it wasn't political, and that ONLY influencers were mentioned. And thats a lie
LOLOLOL what were you saying about "clowning out" on your first line.? LOL that took you less than 1 second to look stupid this time, well done
5 minutes ago, Moonbox said:Why can't you post without making yourself look like a donkey?
I like to write for my audience
(wow, this really isn't getting better for you You walked right into that one)
6 minutes ago, Moonbox said:38 minutes ago, CdnFox said:Perhaps ours is the most corrupt in the world. That certainly would explain it
CBC is the most corrupt broadcaster in the world people. You heard it here, from our resident genius.
LOL and again. I say perhaps something is true ... and with your poor reading skills you think it says DEFINITELY true
I guess that's your way of admitting your reading skills are at a grade 3 level
Lets recap
You claim he didn't say that politicians and politics weren't involved : Article definitely says politicians and politics was involved.
Your mad that i write better than you,
AAND finally you don't know what the word "perhaps" means
And you wonder why nobody respects you FFS kid, surely you can do better than THIS?
-
4 minutes ago, myata said:
Putin, Kim and the bunch are the enemies of the free world.
You shouldn't spend so much time sticking up for them then
-
9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:
1. I'm talking how I wouldn't touch Nationalist's old slapper wife with yours.
Huh? Ok there kiddo. We you get older we'll explain how sex works to you, there's obviously some confusion there..
Quote2. You're the one fantasizing about me being underage you f*cking pedo.
Facts aren't fantasies kiddo.
You trying to claim you post like you do and think as slowly as you do and you're NOT a kid?! C'mon.
-
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:
I know, don't play in the old-timers league.
"old timer' being anyone over the age of 18
QuoteOK pedo.
You're the one talking about older women sleeping with an underage guy
Don't involve me in your fantasies
-
1 minute ago, myata said:
Liar who regularly repeats enemy propaganda is more than just a liar. The cases are just too many. Can it be a coincidence?
No coincidence, you're very clearly a liar. So you're correct there
-
I don't think he has any intention of it, i think he would consider it a waste of his time and he has ohter things to worry about, i think he's always been happy to see it go to the states.
BUT.
If he decides it'll honk off the dems enough, he might just do it for revenge for all the crap they tried to pull
I could potentially see that.
Harris had Nothing but Empty Promises Tonight
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted
Oh look @Black Dog, here's a buddy who shares your weird fantasies!
He did recently come out of the closet, so you guys should have much to talk about 