[Far left judge tries to overrule the Supreme Court]

1 hour ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/georgia-judge-overturns-states-six-week-heartbeat-abortion-law-calls-unconstitutional

Vile scumbag. These Marxists need to be eradicated from the bench quickly before they do more damage to the US. 

It is judicial activism and that's a problem.  I happen to disagree with the heartbeat law as i feel the logic isn't good,  and i could see a judge saying that any law involving abortion is somehow unconstitutional under Georgia's constitution because "My body", although i disagree with that as well. 

But to argue that "its her body her choice"  because constitution of Georgia and THEN argue "BUT - i'ma go ahead and say it's NOT her right based on my personal interpretation of when someone becomes a human" is not only logically indefensible but also a completely arbitrary decision that the judge denied the state because their decision was a completely arbitrary one. 

either the state (and judges as a part of the state) have the legal right to determine when a fetus becomes a human and rights attached or they don't . The judge is an ass.

4 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

What are the legal flaws in the judge’s ruling?

His premise is that the woman has the right to choose and therefore cannot be constrained, and then explains how he's got the power to constrain her. 

Its entirely flawed.  Either the state has that right in which case it's body appointed to make laws does or they do not in which case the judge does not. 

This is legal activism.  Who appointed the judge is not relevant. 

[Trump will run US economy like his business]

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

The Obama economy was great before Trump took over too.  

 

 

The obama economy was decent. It wasn't bad that's for sure. But trumps pre covid was slightly better when you look at all the facts

And your numbers for deficit are just plain wrong. 

As can be seen here:

U.S. government - Budget surplus or deficit 2029 | Statista

the trump pre covid deficits total 2.32 trillion. 

The biden post covid budgets totalled 4.93 trillion. 

Even if we exclude 2022 it's still more than double trumps.  In fact, the 2023 and projected 2024 is more than trumps entire pre-covid in just those two years - 3.55 trillion to trump's 2.32 

 

So. Reality check.  Yes, obama was doing ok but trump did a LITTLE better until covid.  And with less deficit spending (tho it was still bad in my books). 

Biden's deficit spending was MASSIVELY higher than trumps post covid.  Massively. It's not even close. 

 

[Under the guise of pandemic preparedness, new liberal bill grants the government power to reduce your meat consumption in favor of plants]

21 minutes ago, PIK said:

Probably deer and moose before they are gone. Lol

Murderer   

[Just how far should the B.C. government go in trying to settle land claims and appease FNs?]

57 minutes ago, herbie said:

Far more intelligent than your posts.

LOL sorry but you're really not qualified to have an opinion on what 'intelligence' is  

 

Quote

Maybe THEY will come to the table when YOU PEOPLE stop acting like you da Boss

We did, they didn't.  Every time we reach our our hand they slap at it like a child. And they will scream about how everything wrong in their lives is the gov'ts fault and demand the gov't fix it.  Funny thing, when i see someone who's interfered negatively in my life that's the LAST person i want trying to fix it. 

Individually they're just people like anyone else but as a cultural group they're a failure who can't survive without the gov't holding their hand.  They really need to step up and take responsibility for their own circumstances in life. Some do, osoyoos for example, but most don't..  It just whitey's fault. 

[The Leftard Cultist Talking Point of the Century]

1 hour ago, User said:

No, just calling you the pr1ck you are. 

And you definitely are one. I know we still get to you because you have to go cry to the admin about it. 

The guy is one of the biggest hypocritical a$$holes on here. 

He will literally go on about chuds and such in one breath and in the next he will cry to the heavens about how we just can't seem to have civil discussions around here  

As i understand it he used to mod the place back in the day till there was a revolution and everyone told him to stuff it.

[The Leftard Cultist Talking Point of the Century]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Please define chuds and maniacs.

Anyone who disagrees with him with facts  

And what kind of !diot brags about his skills at sticking his head in the sand to avoid ideas he thinks is scary to hear?

[OT: Flash Flood TN]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

But survival of the fittest means that the best and brightest end up on top.

 

Such as Leon Musk.  

I think you're mixing up a few different concepts .

First off it's actually 'survival of the most fit', it's just misquoted. Which means those who ADAPT the best survive. The concept has nothing to do with rising to the top 

The various hierarchy models of human or animal interactions say that our species and most others operate on a hierarchal basis where those who are good at things that are valuable will rise to the top of their hierarchy's. 

[How stupid does one have to be to vote for Kamala Harris?]

46 minutes ago, herbie said:

Speaking of which you're stunned enough to support a 34 times convicted umpteen times indicted known fraud and dmander of total immunity rapist to enforce the Rule of Law.
You're even stupider than your posts.

You realize everybody who isn't a complete democrat drone realizes that there wasn't actually 34 convictions in real life, it was one conviction that they applied 34 times and the conviction was for felonious bookkeeping, Which nobody in the entire history of the united states has been convicted of previously.

It's a joke, everyone knows it's a joke, and of course it'll be overturned on appeal. The whole thing relied on the concept that a crime was committed as long as another crime which was never tried or proven happened. 

So when you try and pull it out like it's some sort of terrible thing that he's some sort of hardened criminal for having this conviction everybody who isn't a psychotically woke loser just laughs at you. That's why his popularity went up when he got convicted.

All it proves is the democrats are a complete banana republic organization and haven't got the qualities necessary to run a third world government never mind the united states.

[How stupid does one have to be to vote for Kamala Harris?]

1 hour ago, Perspektiv said:

🤡

Sure Kid 😊

🍿🍿🍿 [munch munch] 🍿🍿🍿

 

[The Marxist NDP introducing motion to deny freedom of speech]

1 hour ago, suds said:

I would say when the government amended the Indian Act that (in most cases) forced indigenous children to attend the residential schools. The reality was one of two cultures adverse in every possible respect where the dominant culture laid out plans for the total assimilation of the minority culture's children. And there's more to it than that. The government was warned repeatedly by senior Indian Affairs officials that the residential schools were not separating healthy children from those who contracted tuberculosis. And this supposedly went on for 40 years.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160827043602/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/natives-died-in-droves-as-ottawa-ignored-warnings/article4309756/?page=all

Dude that article is complete bullshit 

Native kids on reserves also died in droves.  Natives at the time were more than 3 times as likely to die from tuberculosis,  in fact to this very day they get it at about 40 times the rate of any other population group.  They are just very very susceptible to it. 

And the amount of time that the residential schools were actually mandatory and parents couldn't keep their children from it was extremely short. It was entirely voluntary to begin with and then for whatever reason truancy laws were passed involving all people not just natives. In fact many other immigrant groups complained that their children had to go to "Canadian" Schools.  

There's no genocide. It was believed that it was beneficial to these people to be able to speak English, read and write, and have a working understanding of what they considered to be in advanced culture. Genocide has the implied and explicit intent to end a culture or cultural group one way or another and that was never the intent.

If Canada had intended to wipe out the first nations or their culture they would have been able to do so fairly easily. There would have been no need for anything sneaky. The purpose of the residential schools were to make good on a commitment that had been made by the king and that was imposed on Canada as a result when it formed. The first nations had demanded access to education. This was how the government chose to address that.

The idea that it was some sinister plot hatched in some star chamber to slowly over hundreds of years assimilate the first nations is patently ridiculous.

 

Yeah that they died at any greater rate at these schools then they did in their own communities is absolutely false. Tuberculosis killed millions. It was an absolutely horrible and devastating thing in Canada. My mom used to speak about how they would come in and test people in her little village and there was no treatment until very recently other than keep the people outside and hope for the best.

[Under the guise of pandemic preparedness, new liberal bill grants the government power to reduce your meat consumption in favor of plants]

28 minutes ago, PIK said:

At least we are getting a quick start on raising grasshoppers.

Actually that's still an animal i think as far as this type is concerned.  you'll eat your soy and you'll like it young man

[Conservatives’ path to victory propelled by women, young voters, and a deep desire for change, say pollsters]

It's actually fascinating to watch. And these kids supported the liberals for 3 elections, and have now come to realize that they were betrayed and that the promises were false. 

I suspect many of them will never go back to the liberals again, especially if Poilievre can actually begin to make life better.

Likewise with the women. If they come to realize how hollow liberal promises are they will be reluctant to vote liberal in the future.

It is quite possible that the liberals will have done severe damage to their brand name for quite some time. It is even possible that if the ending he gets rid of jagmeet and he likes someone as leader who is genuinely appealing such as Layton was that the liberals could fall off the map as the "other" party and be relegated to third spot or lower. 

It'll be interesting to see. I think mark carney held a little bit of possible hope for the liberals but it is obvious that he is not all that excited about running for prime minister. And he's now tied his name in with justin as his new economic advisor and we'll wind up having to wear the liberal failures moving forward. Bad move

[Conservatives’ path to victory propelled by women, young voters, and a deep desire for change, say pollsters]

Conservatives' path to victory propelled by women, young voters, and a deep desire for change, say pollsters - The Hill Times

The Liberals don’t have the geographic or demographic base to build from right now, and they're losing in every province. Pierre Poilievre may not be 'everybody's cup of tea,' but it's about choice and change, and he's the only option, says pollster Darrell Bricker.

 

In an Abacus Data poll of 2,964 Canadians conducted earlier this month, 37 per cent of women said they would vote Conservative, compared to 23 per cent who plan to vote Liberal. 

Perhaps more surprisingly, 39 per cent of voters between the ages of 18 and 29, and 44 per cent of millennials (30 to 44 years old) said they plan to vote Conservative. The Liberals received 24 per cent and 14 per cent support from those once key demographics respectively in the survey, which also found that Poilievre “is far more popular among those under 30 than those over 60.” 

For Abacus Data founder, chair and CEO David Coletto, the results represent “the biggest story of Canadian politics in the last three years.”

Today’s millennials “were essential in giving the Liberals their majority in 2015,” and along with the younger cohort, “sustaining the Liberal wins in 2019 and 2021,” said Coletto.

[Under the guise of pandemic preparedness, new liberal bill grants the government power to reduce your meat consumption in favor of plants]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

A proposed bill, needs to go thorough 3 readings of parliament then on to the senate and then royal ascent....

All before the next election?? I think not.

well for sure before the next election if it goes through at all. Seriously, the next election is a year away. There's still all of this session and all of the next session. It doesn't take THAT long to pass a bill.  If they were motivated it could be done by xmas. 

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Your conspiracy theory and paranoia runs rampant in your head. I don't hardly agree with you and you surely do not need to agree with me. Don't have another meltdown though.

It's nice to see you getting your money's worth out of that mirror  

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Taking a opinion piece and running with it is all you  seem to be able to do. There are enough opinions on this forum to keep you occupied and you don't have to look for others LOL

Translation - "I get SOOOOO MAD whenever you point out the libs doing something bad!!!! Raawr!!!!"

The vast majority of articles i post are about things that have already happened.  And this is a political forum, and this is a bill that's going in front of the house right now.  There's no conspiracy - that's what the bill says.  

And if you REALLY thought it was conspiracy you'd talk about why the clause is in there in the first place to show why it's legit.... but you can't, so you just attack me for bringing it up. 

Show me another country who's emergency perparation plan includes "ability to control processing of meat and powers to make people eat soy or similar plant based protein".   NOBODY in their right mind thinks that's part of a real emergency plan. 

So:

1 - if you don't like the topics i post, then start to post your own that you feel are more relevant and we can discuss those. 

2 - this is a political forum and it's pretty normal to discuss actual bills in front of parliament on a political forum. Crying like a baby that someone posts political discussions on a political forum is just silly. 

3 - it is not my fault the liberals are such a messed up group right now. I  know they're the party of your preference but right now they are a dumpster fire and you can't get mad at people for pointing that out.  On a political forum. 

 

 

[How stupid does one have to be to vote for Kamala Harris?]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I'm not so sure he even remembers that.

Well, he did say just the other day that  "the conflict in the middle blababar is heversvtyet more pudding. And i cured the economy!

I mean, that's got to mean SOMETHING. 

[Housing affordability is a crisis in Canada]

2 hours ago, Mathieub said:

I would say that new housing receive financing of the state. I was talking about low class lodging.

I"m a firm believer in low cost housing where your rent is indexed to your income.  I've seen it work and it does good things.  BUT -  it exists with the premise that one day those people (or most of them) will build themselves up to earn enough to move out and on to something else.  Otherwise there's no room for the next person who's struggling. 

And right now that cant' happen. Rents are so high that they can never earn enough to move out.  Which is what many young people also face. 

The gov't cannot build enough 'low cost housing' to fix that. We are currently short over a million homes in canada and that's going up like a rocket every year, not down. 

it's not that your idea has zero merit but it's like trying to fix an amputation with a band aid.  THe patient isn't going to live very long if that's all we do. 

1 hour ago, Dougie93 said:

but since the state is printing money to fund itself

any such expenditure is inflationary therein

driving the prices of things up, not down

That is also true. 

[Trump is a Conman and a Fraud]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

I know I was in the second grade, but I can’t tell you my first or last day of school that year. I’m sure a woman can remember being raped without being certain of the year.  

You have got to be joking. 

I can remember what time it was when i heard about 9/11, what year it was, and who told me and what they said. 

I can remember the year i started high school,  and the year i graduated.

Hell i remember the year I was old enough to be considered 'big enough' to try shooting a shot gun. 

And she went through this supposedly incredibly traumatic experience ... and can't remember the YEAR?  I mean we're not talking the date or time of day even but she can't remember the YEAR?

Bullshit. 

[The Leftard Cultist Talking Point of the Century]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

These twits have no idea what REAAAAAALLLLL socialism is.

These twits have no idea how to do multiplication without downloading an app. It's the world we live in. 

[How stupid does one have to be to vote for Kamala Harris?]

7 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

All politicians lie. Trumps level is unprecedented, stupid.

 

Nonsense.  He doesn't lie any more than BIden did or harris does.  And at least he's kind enough to say his lies in the same accent   

And try to say "my favorite politician is better because he only lies 83 percent of the time instaed of 84.5 like the other guy" is just silly. 

So you look at track record. Biden's is terrible .  Kamala's is largely non existant and where she WAS given tasks she failed. Her past track record was not great. She sucked her way to the top and then made a living locking up black people for minor drug offenses. Not much there recommends her for President. 

Trumps track record s decent. He presided over a decent economy, made decent improvements in foreign policy and kept wars from breaking out, did some middle east peace stuff which was impressive, etc. Nothing to get TOO excited about, not the best in history like he claims but decent. 

So. there you go. 

 

Quote

Any excuse to whine about leftists. 🤡

It's nice that they give so MANY opportunities to criticize/laugh at them    Thank you for your contributions   

[How stupid does one have to be to vote for Kamala Harris?]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

So you think Brandon knows anything about diplomacy? Or even that the USA has bombs?

I think he knows who his doners are and they ain't the ones who are about to be dropping the bombs  

 

[How stupid does one have to be to vote for Kamala Harris?]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Inflation

20 million illegals

Dead girls at the hands of illegals

Drug crisis

2 new wars

Yup...huge fail.

3 new wars. Israel is already bombing lebanon and is expected to go in on the ground shortly. 

We probably could have avoided this new one if the us leader had had the balls to say 'don't do it or get bombed" when they were firing rockets into isreal for the last year. 

[Canadians favour Harris over Trump by a landslide.]

13 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

There are plenty. Not all Canadians want to be negative and hate their country. 🤡

Well i don't think the kid is necessarily being Negative about canada but he's sure not being positive. As you say, so many good things about canada to be proud of, we don't need to be proud that we're 'Not americans' so to speak. 

Hopefully he'll take your hint. 

[How stupid does one have to be to vote for Kamala Harris?]

7 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Our government isn’t failing. 

Reality check 

Inflation has destroyed peoples' spending power, faith in the gov't is at an all time low, most economists think that the interest rates that were necessary to fight the inflation will now drive the economy into a recession, the gov'ts rehtoric has gotten their political rival shot at once and inspired a second attempt,  THe gov't weaponized the courts to attack a political rival sending a trusted lawyer to work with the da to make that happen,  wars are breaking out all over and the leader of the gov't was overthrown as the candidate in a putsch because he had dementia and is STILL RUNNING THE GOV"T.  

Not failing? Kid, humpty dumpty would look at this and say "Well THAT ain't going back together anytime soon..." 

[Trump is a Conman and a Fraud]

1 minute ago, Yakuda said:

What year did the supposed rape happen? Give us just the year. That should be too hard should it? And explain why state law was changed to the statute of limitations? Come on you can do it. I have faith in you. You can't possibly be as stupid as I imagine. Can you? 

Hopefully life so far has prepared you to cope with disappointment.    

[Just how far should the B.C. government go in trying to settle land claims and appease FNs?]

6 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

🤡

And yet another well thought out intelligent response   Gosh you sure do add to the board