CdnFox
-
Posts
29,745 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
310
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CdnFox
-
-
1 minute ago, Aristides said:
The Senate and House are dominated by Trump ass kissers, they haven't shown much interest in restraining him to date.
They're not. not that much. He's even lost one vote on the tariffs with Canada never mind war. Both houses would need to agree to it.
America could never win a war with Canada and the majority of them know it. It would make iraq and afghanistan look peaceful. And the vast majority of americans would be appalled at the idea of even trying. Even trump had to be sure to say he would not use military force on Canada.
not the same thing bud.
-
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:
I was hoping that at least one person would find a post from one of those guys that was some or all of the things I mentioned above.
I haven't seen that kind of unjustified optimism since the last time people thought the canucks might win the cup
QuoteBetween the ten of them they have tens of thousands of posts in the past two years. You'd think that there would be at least one post from one of them that could be honest about something.
well i remember eyeball saying he was hungry once. I have no reason to believe that was inaccurate. Other than he's the one who said it and that calls it into question just based on that.
In all seriousness and fairness rare tho it might be, i've seen Ex flyer on occasion make posts that had some sense to them. Unfortunately i'll respond with something like 'you're 99 percent correct but i'd possibly maybe think about questioning that 1 percent.... " And then it's 5 pages of childish freak outs and ass porn, which kind of nullifies the good points he made earlier
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Aristides said:
An article by someone who has lived this movie before.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-first-person-nino-antadze-1.7499239
Sure. Russia and America are pretty much the same thing. I mean it's not like America has a congress or senate or anything that might restrain the president from invading foreign nations
-
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:
What a perfect time to undermine the federal party lol. What a loser.
We were better off when the Fords were smoking crack.
I may just end up voting for the NDP yet 😂 Thank God I never bet anyone.
LOL
Well he's arguably the best option for ontario currently on the table, as is often the case sometimes you have to pick between less than ideal choices. But yeah, i'd work pretty hard to avoid letting this guy win the leadership and if he did i'd probably stay home voting day
-
1
-
-
Were you hoping for replies? I mean what else is there to say?
-
On 4/11/2025 at 2:34 AM, myata said:
Not making up anything, just looking. This plan:
"We have to increase our trade with America to build up the resources to stand to ... America".
Makes sense?
Wait but how we do that? To do more trade with America, these days, there's only one path: "bow your knee" and kiss his ring.
So we gonna do that only to "build up and so on"? That works, right? Makes full sense... or was it only the first part?
Is there any even remote possibility what this kind of word sh*t meal can be consumed by anyone short of severely damaged cognitive ability? - through a medical condition (understandable) or due to severe hemorrhaging by consumption of highly poisonous to a healthy brain maga propaganda? No such possibility. No way. Just doesn't exist in our sane reality.
If it relies on dumb, brainless lies, nastiness, division and hatred - there has to be a reason for that. It has no better, more decent ways to convey its message because there's none in it. This is what it means and it's entirely factual. So let's keep this junk and sh*t to the insane place far away from our homes.
You realize based on that the maple Maga would actually be the Liberals in Kearney?
-
2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
How is he working against Poilievre? I didn't see it, but I don't follow Ontario politics.
He sent his campaign manager out to basically attack the hell out of PP, saying in all of the papers and everywhere he could possibly get attention that Poilievre is utterly incompetent, and that he blew such a big lead because of campaign malpractice of the highest order and he's absolutely useless as a leader. He's claiming his recent Ontario win as proof that he's really great at politics and he knows a loser when he sees one and he thinks Poilievre is one. He's a little careful how he couches things but not much
Now it would be one thing for a conservative like Doug Ford to allow that kind of talk after an election. And in fact this guy has spoken up in the past after Erin's election and scheer's, the guy's been around a long time.
But to do it in the middle of a campaign? To do it while they still have a chance at victory? That's a deliberate attempt to sabotage a campaign.
But maybe he's acting alone, maybe he doesn't have ford's blessing right? So ford came out today and was asked about this guy's comments and basically said Poilievre should suck it up because the truth hurts.
When his own ministers were working with the CPC and door knocking he was fairly derivative about it. When it was pointed out that one of his people supported Poilievre he replied "Well good for her" in a dismissive way.
They're just isn't a lot of doubt. And insiders within his group who don't really approve of this have been leaking a little of the information. He went from city councilor to premier, and now he wants to go from premier to prime minister
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:
Wouldn’t Ford struggle to unite federal Tories behind him if he went for the post after this?
Yes and no. First off you have to remember that leadership conventions are not the same as an election, there are many different rules and internal politics plays a heavier role. He certainly wouldn't be a shoe in but depending on how he managed things he could have a very strong chance. And if he feels he can always go back to being premier. There's no law that says he has to renounce that in order to run federally
QuotePlus many Tories don’t consider Ford a Conservative. It is weird to air such divisions in a campaign. One would expect silence from one’s enemies in the party if they can’t bring themselves to support the leader.
I'm sure the pitch will be obviously we need to move closer to the center and Doug ford is used to winning, the only way we have any chance of winning is doug ford who can bring us Ontario. Ontario is the world and if we don't win there nothing else matters so if you want to ever beat the liberals you have to go with Doug Ford.
And it's not without a tiny bit of truth. Ford is strong in Ontario and could probably mobilize a significant portion of it to vote for him especially right now after he's been fighting trump, despite the fact that he hasn't actually been beating trump. He's benefiting from the same glow carney is.
So he would also pick up a lot of right-leaning liberals. All those millions of liberals who swear to god they would have voted conservative if only we'd elected Mike Chong as leader (yeah right) will at least consider ford, or so the theory will go.
He cannot be seen too aggressively be working against Poilievre which is why he sent out his attack dog but the simple fact of the matter is it's pretty obvious to anybody who's watching that he is Itching to see Poilievre fail
-
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
What's he doing now?
He's working against Poilievre. He's trying to be sly about it so that it doesn't look like he's anti-conservative but it's very clear he wants Poilievre to fail
-
3 hours ago, herbie said:
Pointing out taking credit that's not due is not an indication of bias.
MOF the source doesn't even mention there is already approval as well to use LNG power should the hydro not be fully available by 2030.So it's like making an announcement he will make the sun rise in the mornings if he's elected.
If it's been approved, why hasn't it happened? You're such a liar
-
6 hours ago, myata said:
OK security of the land doesn't matter.
You certainly don't seem to think so. You keep wanting to muzzle the people that are demanding that the government act on the security concerns. Been working for china long?
-
4 hours ago, TreeBeard said:
Doug Ford defending Conservative Party critic now! Is Poilievre having to take on Doug Ford too?
There's no doubt. It's quite obvious that Doug Ford would like to see Poilievre fail and then hopefully he will be kicked out and Doug can run for the leader of the conservatives. That is pretty obvious
-
1 hour ago, robosmith said:
I'm still counting ZERO laughs except at your clownish behavior here..
That's because you've never learned to count with your mittens on
-
5 hours ago, BeaverFever said:
Who is “he,” what board of directors is “he” on and how much are rhey paying him?
Justin Trudeau a bunch of them you'll have to look it up yourself, and it's over 3 million a year at this point although those are just the ones we know about and they don't kick in till he's officially out of office.
That is how these things work for the libs and the left wing in various gov'ts (Clinton). If you are in charge you funnel money into either charities if you want someone to bribe you, you know like how the Chinese government suddenly poured a ton of money into Justin Trudeau's family charity which he will be director of again, or you hire companies or support other charities through single sourcing And then when you step away from politics they put you on their board of directors the big fat salary for doing nothing and introducing you to some of the contacts that you made while you were prime minister.
Let's get real. You don't really care. I could put down a note from god saying exactly how much and from who along with notes from all of those organizations saying the only reason they're doing this is he funneled money to them when they were in power and you would still excuse it and vote for it. Any level of corruption is to be tolerated as long as the conservatives get powned.
Carney will even be worse. He just said he was going to spend $25 billion on creating modular home building in Canada. And his company owns a major modular home construction wing. What do you think a lot of that $25 billion is going to end up? He did an interview just a couple years ago on how he makes money by talking governments into policies that he and his business happen to have already invested in so that they can step in and pick up the cash even if it's not good for the country. It's not like he's hiding this. He gave examples for god's sake
That's who you are. You're a person that will take corruption And watch Canadians suffer and the poor gets starved for resources based on your ideology.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, myata said:
I'll take this one because the rest is pretty much Poilievre hot air that he's been blowing for two decades on public dime without much real essence. So ask yourself: why would this supposedly "transparent" measure be targeted against one specific individual he's been losing to so badly - as opposed to being applied fairly and universally?
You are retarded. He IS proposing it for EVERYONE, he's just using Carney as one example of the kind of snake that takes advantage of the rules.
You're absolutely amazing, you loser lefty communist types scream night and day about how the rich take advantage of the poor and should have to pay their fair share, and when somebody comes along and says I'll make them pay their fair share you're furious about it.
You made more sense when you made no sense
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, PIK said:
Anybody that keeps bringing up the security clearance,is not interested in the truth.
Or facts. He wouldn't have even been able to discuss carney's ties to political groups had he signed that. You'll notice that neither singh nor may could. If anything this election has vindicated his position
-
Those are all still pretty accurate and honest.
If the CBC was actually the same for the conservatives as they are now for the liberals the headlines would be more like:
Carney compared to stalin by experts as he tries to explain his dishonesty about his company's move to Trump's America
Carney calls bounty hunter mp's comments "teachable"
Carney's secret ties to Chinese group bent on taking over Canada exposed!
Carney's latest ralley attracts dozens. "Size matters" Claims 253 political experts we found.
-
1
-
1
-
-
WOAH! New mainstreet polling
And they're not alone, abacus has the cpc taking the lead and they've been tracking a steady upward trend, so they're not exactly outlier polls.
-
3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
Be honest: who axed the tax?
Nobody. All carney did was a shell game to move it out of sight so it wouldn't upset Canadians as much
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, SpankyMcFarland said:
Naughty, naughty:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-carney-liberals-conservative-buttons/
It does show where some Liberals think the Tories are vulnerable. Frankly, I think it is a vulnerability in the current political atmosphere.
Well I think that every liberal and every conservative thinks the conservatives are vulnerable. In this case specifically they felt he was vulnerable to lies. They need to craft an image that he is trump which he isn't. But everybody everywhere is vulnerable to misinformation if it's done right.
I think what is more interesting is they're worried that the truth isn't going to be enough to stop him. They feel he's enough of a risk despite their lead that they have to use these cheap kinds of tricks to try and win.
I wonder what kind of internal polling numbers they've been looking at? You don't pull this kind of nonsense when you're actually ahead
-
2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:
Uh no the Trump administration’s mismanagement of this issue outclasses Trudeau and the worst administrations of any western democracy by a country mile.
No it does not. That would still be your hatred and bigotry talking. And at this point in time Trudeau has done considerably more damage to Canada than trump has done to America.
Not to mention the fact that it is beyond childish to offer an argument that is basically I can support anybody who's bad as long as there's somebody who's slightly worse. It's the kind of argument you'd expect from a 12 year old. Even if it were true that trump was worse it doesn't change the fact that you already threw those principles in the garbage by supporting Trudeau
QuoteAs I already said this economic disaster isn’t simply a case of bad policy, poor planning, or poor policy implementation, all of which could be said about things Trudeau and other governments have done.
Trudeau did exactly what trump is doing now to his people I did so willingly and knowingly with the intent of siphoning money into private organizations who are now paying him to do nothing but sit on their board of directors and raking cash.
Trudeau is far worse than trump. He deliberately tanked his country and doubled the debt and then walked away with full knowledge of what he was doing and with the intent of lining his own pockets. You have zero credibility in this issue
QuoteTrump is unique in that his followers have anointed him to sit on a throne and make shit up as he goes day by day despite the fact that he clearly has no knowledge or understanding of what he’s doing and his actions contradict all understanding of economics and geopolitics. Even his own cabinet members don’t support what is happening have no idea what he’s doing or why and what will happen next, it’s government by whim of the emperor and it changes daily
Trudeau tried novel policies some of which didn’t work out as expected or were poorly executed but it wasn’t due to Trudeau alone making shit up every morning and changing his mind then changing it back again day after day because he’s in a bad mood.
And the fact that you try to downplay this completely self-inflicted economic and geopolitical disaster that has cost the economy trillions of dollars and the US its position as trusted global leader as some easily reversed minor misstep or hiccup is laughable. By all measures the economy was “firing on all cylinders” in 2024 under Biden and Trump has erased all of that. You have no basis to say it would have been worse under Kamala other than your own deep bias.
It hurt US agriculture badly and Trump provided bailouts
Sorry kiddo but that is all Justin Trudeau as well. Trudeau was anointed much like carney just was. His followers make up bullshit just like you do every single day to try and dismiss his horrible Behavior. Everything Justin did experts told him would not work and they were right just like trump.
But the big difference is trump is starting to listen to the people around him and correct. I'm not down playing anything, I said he did real damage. But it's also true that if he course corrects it will have no lasting impact. 2 years from now it will be a blip in the memory of most people. The damage Justin has done will be generational. Even if things go well from now on 10 years from now people will still be living a lower standard of life in Canada than they should have because of Justin Trudeau and the liberals who you desperately want to get back into power.
QuoteThat was another of Trump’s unsubstantiated claims which resulted in Canada imposing counter-tariffs. Ultimately while it created a few thousand new US steel jobs, up to 75,000 US manufacturing jobs were lost as steel prices soared and certain specialized types of steel not made in the US but still tariffed by Trump became expensive and scarce.
Economists are fairly clear that it made no real impact to the American economy
I get that you have to lie to justify your emotions. It must take a lot of work. But I'm afraid that won't help you when you're talking to someone who actually is intelligent
Back to the issue at hand. You have absolutely zero rounds to criticize anybody who supports trump after your supporting the liberals for 10 years and continued support now. The liberals are the true maple magas. Beholden to a cult-like culture, absolutely resistant to every fact or truth that gets in the way of their talking points I'm willing to support an organization that has caused more destruction and pain to Canada than any before it. And it's fairly obvious that Kearney intends to be a bi of a dictator when he gets in, He clearly has no intention of listening to Canadians. He's just going to do what he thinks is best for him and Canada can go screw itself. So how was your worship of him any different than an Americans worship of trump?
Like what exactly? Be specific
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, myata said:
I do not support and certainly condemn any attempts at dishonest campaigning whichever side they are coming from.
You fully support it and in fact participate in it regularly. As long as it's your side doing it you're okay
-
4 hours ago, Barquentine said:
I can't decide if you're unable to read well, if you're just stupid, or completely ignorant by choice.
Without reading another word I knew you realized you were wrong and your buthurt about it
LOL
QuoteAll the clues I've given you and you're too dumb to figure it out.
If you ever go to court, for God's sake DON"T represent yourself!
Well there is what you say and then there is what you do. The two often conflict. Plus you're not all that interesting so I don't pay super close attention. But by your knowledge base and your ability to argue I would put you somewhere in the mid to late teens. By your claims you are older than that but frankly I don't think you're terribly trustworthy so it's hard to say
QuoteWhat's the point? I've cited reliable, bi-partisan sources before and you choose to ignore them because they refute your dogma.
You have done no such thing. And you and I both know it. Perhaps you think your grandstanding for others but you and I both know you're a liar
QuoteAs I keep saying: You are an amphigory:
Amphigory
Noun: a nonsense verse or composition : a rigmarole with apparent meaning which proves to be meaningless
Merriam-Webster
We all know what you're saying is that you know I'm right and you're angry so rather than try and make an argument you're just simply going to break down into tears and make the most painfully awkward insults I think I've ever seen in my life
This is what I mean when I say your level of knowledge and your behavior puts you in the mid ish teen age range.
So to recap. I made logical statements that I then backed up with a large body of facts and evidence to prove my point. You made baseless assumptions that you can't back up in any way shape or form nor can you refute any of the sources I provided
And now your big mad at the meanie who was so nasty to you by providing facts and proofs and all
LOLOLOL
Loving your salty tears kid
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, Dave L said:
Carney is still the PM and has more important things to do on occasion,
Absolute unmitigated bullshit. He's not doing anything of any value right now, when was the last time you saw or even heard of a prime minister pausing a campaign to go deal with emergencies? Never mind twice. There's absolutely nothing going on right now that requires any special attention that hasn't already been addressed.
If you have to lie that badly to try and cover for your guy then you need to think about whether or not you're backing the right guy.
And I love that you think that there's more important things for our leader to do then democracy. Tells us about everything we need to know about liberals
Quotethe country didn't stop operating when the election was called. PP wouldn't know how that feels, because he lacks any experience other than when he was a kid and had a paper route, his only job, outside of Politics.
Oh absolutely, 30 years of actual work doing the actual job of running the government would never give him any indication as to what was involved with running the government 🙄🙄
Just like you would never want your surgeon to have 30 years of experience, you'd have wanted him to be a plumber before he took up medicine 5 minutes ago.
The Americans chose someone with lots of business experience and limited political experience, how's that working out?
Hey. Kid. This is the 45th time canada has done an election. They have all kinds of systems in place to keep the gov't running while this is going on. We never have to 'pause" to "run" the gov't.
What a dishonest liar you are.
You Can't Find an Intelligent, Articulate, Factual, Objective Post in the Last 2 Years From a Single Poster on This List
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
Sigh. Still zero.