CdnFox

What you've shown me is that we didn't have an agreement. As I pointed out your own links and quotes make that crystal clear. Am I wrong? Can you point to documentation that says that the Chinese have agreed in writing not to raise tariffs on canola again? No? Can you point to an agreement that shows exactly what the tariff rate will be? No. So I'm right and you're wrong and now you're mad and you're pretending that somehow I'm not understanding something when in fact we both understand that you were completely incorrect

In other words you know I'm right and you can't refute it. Yeah it's about what I thought

I doubt he has the intellect of an educated adult hamster never mind an adult human, but he's still kind of fun to have around

Boy you sure do love that mirror don't youj

LOL Sure kid Sounds like you're having a bad day. Mommie tell you you're too old to breast feed again? Try paying her, that works for everyone else...

Nope. Absolutely false. If somebody walks up to you and Punches you in the face and takes your lunch money, and then says if you do my homework for me I won't punch you in the face again, That's not an equivalent exchange. That's you giving into a bully and getting nothing in return other than not being bullied Pretty simple. We gave access to an industry in market that they did not have before and all we got in exchange is that they reduced a small amount of our tariffs that they put on in order to pressure us into doing this. We didn't get anything. We didn't even get a promise that they wouldn't increase the tariffs again which would have at least been something. So if they want something tomorrow they can increase those tariffs again and demand that Carney got it wrong. Xi Did quite well. Read your own quotes, there's no agreement. Canada expects that they're going to do certain things, there's nothing to say that they're going to or that they can't undo that the next day We got nothing. And we sold out an auto industry in exchange for nothing. Once those cars start landing here there's no going back in practical terms, but they can re put those tariffs on in 2 seconds anytime they want

You don't discuss how many years you were at school, or gpa, or percentages, or the like? LOL See i KNEW this was going to be over your head Nice of you to confirm Fire the tutor, they're not getting the job done

Exactly. Not me but in front of me. And you are the one in front of me You really don't think these things through before you talk to you?

You certainly do but we appreciate you making us laugh with your efforts

I've never said it's an abomination. You would have to take that up with those who make that assertion. However it is worth noting that some behavior is still considered an abomination despite it's being prevalent in nature. That would include things such as murder, cannibalism, rape. All things we consider to be abhorrent based on our chosen moral values but which nature freely supports. So I'm not sure that your argument is in and of itself compelling. I would tend to agree with you that the fact that it occurs repetitively is evidence that it's not unnatural or the like, but humans have a weird way of choosing what they consider to be abhorrent were an abomination independent of strictly natural arguments

LOL whenever you get upset that you're losing your english goes to hell

Ahhh . still drunk. Fair enough. How many cows are in the room with you right now exactly? Asking for a friend.

Still Hungover from the weekend?

Well I would explain it to you but some of it involves math, so I'm not confident you'd be able to grasp it. How's that math tutoring coming along for you by the way?

If there's no chance of getting caught why wouldn't they?

Yes, it's not widely well known outside of people who really watch politics but The NDP is different from other parties. The federal conservative party has absolutely nothing to do with a provincial conservative party, other than they may have some similar supporters. But the NDP is specifically tied at the hip between the federal and provincial parties. They are essentially the same party and their constitution does not really allow for them to have differing views So Abby and his leave it in the ground policies are going to come into Stark collision with a number of provinces including Alberta British Columbia the maritimes when it comes to resource extraction and that will create problems for them in those provinces specifically This was just the wrong guy. He's divisive and he shortsighted and appeals to a narrow group of Canadians and repels others

LOL awww muffin, did you realize you were wrong again and now you're big mad I've told you before that your stupid isn't my fault

So you're my consultant now? But you're right, the weird sex stuff is definitely in front of me LOLOL (waives!)

Family photos? Well as you know a fact or opinion both does and does not exist at the same time in relation to whether or not they think it benefits their argument. They're imbeciles who think facts are fluid and superimposed. Schrodinger's twat.

We certainly are moving in that direction, and that's the problem. But we start opening our market without getting anything in return then that is basically throwing our doors open We didn't allow Chinese EVS 2 years ago. Find me a single one that was sold in Canada What about them? We never actually got an agreement there. They've lowered the tariff but there's absolutely nothing to stop them from raising that tariff the next day, and we still have massive tariffs on most of our products. We got some relief but even then we didn't go back to where we were. So they stabbed us in the gut with a knife and we're supposed to think that we're better off if they pull it out? That's not us getting something. Especially with no commitment not to raise it again in the future Sure we do. We sell to other people, and we start growing different crops, just as we did before we sold to them. And the fact of the matter is they do need certain amounts of that product and we're buying from us even with the tariffs. But I'd be more interested in saying that if you're going to tariff our food products that you absolutely can't live without. but are back to where we were 2 years ago. China is nobodies friend but are one of those 'casual buddies' you need to do business with. The auto agreement will provide affordable EV options for consumers, and definitely disagree we aren't getting anything....what about agriculture/canola and seafood agreements? Better question would be how do you replace it if we say 'no thanks' to auto's.... answer is you don't. But you're going to support it. You see the problem with that right? I don't recall us doing any of that. No. If the world is not the way you want it to be then you make changes to the world. If we accepted Carney's point of view we'd still be sitting around fires hoping they didn't go out because we had no way of restarting them Carney says if life hands you lemons you eat lemons. Intelligent people say you make lemonade We got absolutely nothing in exchange for opening our markets to eat these that are made through sports slave labor. That is a simple fact. That is not a win and that's why people are unhappy.

The psychological science of how your mind doesn't work is absolutely fascinating in my opinion

LOL no, you're making definitions up to suit your weird sex fantasies. A pedophile is someone who experiences sexual attraction to prepubescent kids (usually under 12). I have never in my entire life expressed any sexual attraction towards you and I have never claimed you are under the age of 12, although frequently your intelligence level appears to be These are just your weird sexual fantasies coming back to haunt you kid

I am 100% qualified. Certainly vastly more so than some child sitting in his mother's basement. That's not what's being sold. The specific claim is that currently in the 2025 year actual physical spending on the military was increased to match 2% of GDP That has nothing to do with future spending or any announcements that involves spending past 2025 His claim was that we have reached 2% of GDP in 2025 specifically in spending And the point is we absolutely did not. Simply renaming existing spending as military spending does not actually represent an increase in spending How are you not getting this? I realize you're probably only in high school but this is elementary school math. If I have $10 and I have another $10 and I put them together and say I have $20 instead of 10 and 10 I don't actually have any more money than when I started You very clearly did not realize that when you made your comment. I said it was good that they were getting a pay increase and you said they already get paid enough and offered those figures as an example But those figures are after the increase that was put forward. No, there aren't millions of would disagree with me. That's the problem; it was so low that it was almost impossible to recruit anybody into the military. As I noted, it's considerably less than what teachers get paid, or police. So if you're looking at a government job or career why would you go with the lowest paying job? Especially if it means getting shot at? Police officers in Canada, particularly in British Columbia, typically reach a 1st Class Constable rank within 4–5 years, earning between $115,000 and $134,000+. Why would you be a soldier instead of a cop? I know more than you kiddo. Living in your mommy's basement doesn't make you an expert ROFLMAO!!! So anyone who calls a kid a kid is a pedophile?!?! holy shit I don't even know what to say about that, but you've got some weird homosexual fantasies going on there

"If homosexuality isnt natural, why did god make gay animals?" Yeah, i'm pretty sure he just did it for the LOL's.

100% true. If they had told Biden not to run knowing as they did with 100% certainty that his mental health was beginning to fail, And held a properly leadership convention and selected even a moderately strong leader who would then have had time to prepare his campaign for an election there is an excellent chance they would have beaten trump But they destroyed the public trust when it became obvious that Biden wasn't the president for most of his term and they didn't know who was but that they were certain whoever it was had lied to them, and then we're forced to put forward Kamala Harris whose entire campaign was giggling and calling people Nazis I'm based on the fact that there aren't that many democrat supporters out there who are pointing out this obvious fact, it seems like they don't even realize that this is all their fault. Which strongly suggest they're going to make the same mistakes in the future. I suspect we are in for an additional four years of Vance, for no other reason than the dems still don't have a clue as to why they got their asses handed to them and will likely do so again