CdnFox

But it's also to address regional issues. Let's not forget that true democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. You can face the tyranny of the majority. To prevent that a number of things were put in place, including certain rights and guarantees in the constitution to prevent governments from trampling people's rights even if it's popular, but also to ensure that certain regions didn't get completely overwhelmed by areas with higher population density. Even in Canada we have the riding system Which is the same sort of thing on a smaller level. And two of Trudeau's terms happened after he lost the popular vote but won the most seats. America has a democratic process built into its government systems but it is not a democracy nor would you want it to be a democracy. No system is perfect and I think that the Westminster system is a better model than the united states republic system but at the end of the day every single system is going to be a bit of a compromise between how the people have their say and efficient rule of government

But you did. I guess even you don't pay attention to what you're saying Oh look, you're agreeing with me again! Complaining about someone's spelling and then making a spelling error is definitely even stupider and makes you more of a loser So did you have anything intelligent to say about Canadian defense or did you just want to continue to derail the thread? I see others are starting to laugh at you already as well, surely you want to move on and not ruin the thread for the others? Or maybe you don't.

Exactly. Also, anything they do wrong is the conservatives fault and not their own, and (my favorite) elections are pointless, we should just let the liberals stay in power. And he can't understand why someone might think he's a liberal supporter

LOL if that were true you wouldn't need the internet, a mirror would do You LEAP to the defense of the liberals constantly and it's frequently commented on. Sorry kid, your own actions condemn you Oh i'm sure you'll remember if we wait 5 minutes. Your brain works like that. I say quite a bit more than that. But i'm sure considering how bad that usually makes you look you're happy to try to forget that . Awwww you tuckered out little guy? Some of those words WERE pretty big for you. It should, it's about your third bottle

I'm sure that seems to be the case when your comatose but you're the only one that actually understands you when you're like that

Oh I think we both know you're a true Liberal, you spend all day here defending them and blaming others for their failings. I'm sure you'd like to position yourself as being some sort of honest Progressive type of person but you're not. Most of your time here is spent being dishonest. You defend the liberals night and day. You blame Harper for Trudeau's bad actions. I could go on for some time. You're a big L all the way

So this would be another example of the dispassionate and reasoned debate and discussion that you're hoping to have and so disappointed that other people don't seem interested in? I think I may have identified your problem

Heyyy - inna U endo smarta guy, an' you no makka funnama language no more! - Robosmtih's italian uncle Robotony, probably.

LOL is the fact you're drunk why you're having such trouble communicating? Just like your logic apparently LOLOL Drunk Eyeball is often pretty funny but you're just being silly today

No kid I don't. I have a lot of years on this planet and I spend my days dealing with people. You can lie to yourself, you can lie to others, but you can't lie to me Then you would need to make an argument along those lines but what you said is that trump wants to turn America into Russia by following their authortarian model. You're changing your argument now because you realize the way you posed it wasn't a particularly rational or unbiased way, so you're trying to sound more reasonable. Was this your example of reasoned debate? I gave you a completely defensible position, facts, and a well reasoned argument and you retort with this. You could have said I was wrong or given an example of where trump is doing something unprecedented but instead your entire argument was this. I get that you're trying to do the my hardener game of "I'm so above all of you that I can't even respond reasonably to your sensible arguments and that's why I'm not actually countering anything you say", But it doesn't work for him either and he's better at it Seriously, any right you may have felt you had to complain about other people not having reasoned or rational debates or discussions went out the window with that reply Now are you going to make an actual argument, or do I need to just simply have your diapers changed?

LOL only a true Liberal would be as proud of being a liar as you are But you do seem to enjoy it Me telling you that you're giving away the fact you lost and are mad about it is talking to myself? It's Tuesday bud, you're either 2 days too late or 3 days too early for drinking like that But i'm sure it's all harper's fault

Yeah nobody actually needs you to tell us that Take it to the bank. And? I didn't say you lost, I said that your comment was basically an admission of it. It's pretty obvious you know you lost I was just pointing out that when you behave like that you're basically telling the world that you know it LOL Swing and a miss kiddo I love that you're doubling down on the future crime angle Translation: "I, eyeball, can't excuse my behavior today so I'll create a fake event that has never happened and may never happened as justification" That's why you do the childish little fake quotes thing, why you do this little bizarre behavior, or why you try and play things off as a joke or the other usual telltale signs that clearly states as loud as possible that you know you've lost and your big mad about it We can always hire a liberal to teach us They'll do anything if you throw them enough money

You frequently get mad. And while I always approve of a good spot impression I'm afraid that you are frequently emotional here and if you thought otherwise you were sadly mistaken Here's a Hint by the way, people that aren't angry don't respond with the vitralic post flinging insults. Bit of a giveaway The topic was a little troll baity. Like I said you can't get mad at them for their response. I understand you probably intended to be more serious than people took it but at best it was an extreme reach and I have to say when they say they felt that it was intended to be trolling I can kind of see where they would come to that conclusion. No, he isn't. In fact literally everything he is doing has precedent. He often does it in a very flamboyant have flagrant manner but nothing he's doing is actually terribly new in and of itself. Hunting down and deporting illegals? Not new there. Tariffs? Not new at all. shooting up people you think are bad guys without evidence? Common practice. As was pointed out, even biden repressed the press quite a lot. People throw the word unprecedented around an awful lot without realizing what it actually means but as I said virtually everything he's doing has president. I'd agree he's changing America, that part is true but so has almost every president that has ever been. Kennedy certainly did, Reagan certainly did, clinton certainly did, bush did, who didn't?

Because you can't communicate?? oohhh kaaaay then..... we know what you support

Four. You forgot the first post. And the rest were making fun of that C'mon, you have to see what a stretch your post was. You can't be mad they're not taking it seriously

HEY!! Do NOT mock his Alma mater!!! The UNIVERSITY OF FACEBOOK is a well recognized and accessible learning institution almost!!

You support them both Just like you support hamas and Hamas Awww you mad bro? Hurts your feelings to get called on your bullshit does it? Not quite sure what that means but I told you many times that I prefer women and I'm afraid you just going to have to accept that You said you didn't' support them... so if you're lying then you do and we already knew that. You're lying about that too You are pretty consistent It's extremely easy for me because I don't have to lie. My opinions don't require lies to make them work, unlike yours. I don't have to lie to explain why I think killing people in an act of terrorism is bad. The truth works for me. Whereas you do have to lie to try and come up with a reason why you think it's okay

LOL So you agree with what I said you just don't like the spelling mistake You know, the only thing stupider than complaining about someone's spelling mistake would be doing so and then making your OWN spelling mistake. THAT would truly be stupid wouldn't it An dmaybe? Ooooopsie!! LOLOLOL

You said they could. So you were just being a LIEberal then? LOL Here's a hint, if you have to resort to cheesy lines that Herbie uses to make your point, you're admitting you lost right out of the gate LOL you're such a child As to the rest, I love that you're trying to excuse your own support of corruption and such by pretending somehow I would support the same corruption and therefore it's ok for you to do it ahead of time LOLOLOL

It does mean you're supporting the liberals. And there are other parties, people could vote NDP if they didn't want to vote conservative but let's face it at the end of the day what it means is that they support and love the liberals so much that they will tolerate extreme corruption. You yourself are no different and I've tried to defend Trudeau's corruption many times blaming harper for it And I love that your defense for the fact that you actively support the terrorists when called on it is "errrrr.... Nuh UH! YOU are!" LOL

They're in your posts actually At least you're not posting ass porn this time LOL 😆😆😆😆😆 And I see you're bound and determined to derail this threat as well with your childishness and weird sexual obsessive Behavior

Why do you always go to grade 3 level cheezy replies when you're losing? LOL I accept your admission of defeat

If That's the case then you lied earlier, which shocks no one. He said anyone can do it. However if it requires a constitutional change, you literally means that almost everyone has to do it or nobody can do it. Certainly no federal government could do it But it's nice to finally hear you admit that you were completely full of shit when you said that harper should have done it

Awww,,.. back to having weird fantasies again as i noted before. you really DO miss your dad don't you

I see you're at that mental breakdown stage where you start having weird sexual fantasies again Miss your dad do you?