-
Posts
31,126 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
319
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by CdnFox
-
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Exactly! And you kept zooming in till it didn't look like there was so much blue Or like when you claimed a book was completely useless and when asked for evidence,,,, you could only find one small and meaningless error and couldnt' refute the rest And once again you lost a discussion in another thread and followed me around trying to make a random insult to make yourself feel better and lo and behold you've made yourself look stupid yet again really you'd think you'd learn, it's effing hilarious! -
you mean how he's been signing things and then holding them up to show his signature just like trump does? Yeah, what the hell is up with that? And you can bet that if a conservative did it they would be all over him about how he's just like trump. I'm getting the sense that the shine might come off of carney a lot faster than anyone thought. At this rate if the NDP can get their act together carney's first budget might very well wind up in his government falling when it finally comes out next year
-
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Dude you are wrong literally every time we talk this is the most recent example. Whether it's not knowing what a variable is, or insisting that nobody mentioned milk in a conversation about milk, or posting a study that proves i was right and the study i already posted was correct, or not being able to comprehend that 100 - 50 is 50. This is just the latest example. I'll probably bug you about it for a while About all we can say about you is that you may be wrong a lot but by god you're consistent -
We didn't for the better part of a century. And we don't need to now. There is a reason or more accurately a series of reasons why our housing always lags behind immigration and when you eliminate those reasons you eliminate the problem We have not even come up to the start line. Carney intends to continue with excessively High immigration. He has no plans to tie immigration to the number of houses actually built or anything like that and he's hired the head of the century foundation. So things aren't going to get better in that respect And his idea is to spend $25 billion dollars creating a manufactured home industry. Well you can't put manufactured homes in the cities where we need more building. And manufactured homes aren't really a very efficient way to increase housing. And he intends to do this by spending $25 billion dollars on this program alone. Guess who's company owns a modular home division that they bought a few years ago? So he's going to give his own company $25 billion dollars or at least a significant portion of it to set up factories in Canada for free essentially and we still won't resolve the housing issues. Defense can exert a lot of influence over building homes in several different ways, but the one thing that they have absolute control over is the number of immigrants. And it's the one thing that carney is not willing to exercise.
-
Yeah, and I don't really see that getting better. His own ministers are standing up and contradicting what he says. Right there we see his complete lack of experience in the political world showing. He hasn't even got control of his party at this point and there's already her feelings and things going on in the background. That means his ability to get things done slows to a crawl. And when he finally does release his first budget people are going to expect it to be perfect because he had a full year to prepare it. And I can already tell it's going to be a disappointment
-
One of the lowest population per square foot ratios in the entire universe, we're not full. And we do need an increasing population. It has a large number of benefits not to mention the least of which is we are not taken all that seriously as a market because we don't have that many people. The reason the US has so much clout on the world stage economically is because they've got 400,000 people that buy goods. We have a tenth of that even though our country is technically larger. As we expand our market base earning the right to do business with us becomes more and more important to other players and that's valuable. We also increase our own domestic market and it makes it more practical for businesses to start up and manufacture things to sell within Canada because there's more people to buy them. But while it is an obvious benefit the simple fact of the matter is we don't need to rush to it at light speed. Growing faster than we are capable of is even worse than not growing at all
-
well it looks like 'court' is how it's going to have to be The Bloc Québécois wants the courts to trigger a new election in Terrebonne Mildy disappointing that the Bloc is the one that has to take on the job of standing up for our democracy but there you go. Hopefully the judge will allow a byelection, which will make those misprints a fairly lostly mistake. Hope someone got fired over that.
-
Yes it is, and point and laugh at them Kid, i love that you've realized you're completely looking like a retarded dolt but you somehow want it to be my fault
-
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Not really. Just about every single gov't that has won power turned one in on time. As noted when harper won power for the first time he released a budget within 3 months, just 1 month after you'd normally expect to see it. And... HE WASN"T THE GOV"T BEFORE THAT. THE LIBERALS WERE. they have all the people, they know the budgets, they know the numbers, they were the gov't There MIGHT be an excuse if he was taking over from another party but there's no excuse for this. What happened to "I have a plan"? Fine, even if you wanted to be INSANELY generous, then he should be releasing his full budget in september when the house goes back. Instead, he's not going to release one this year at all and will do a basic 'economic update' which is useless without a budget SOMETIME in the fall, when he feels like it. We MIGHT get a budget the year after. No promises so far. Every single province has turned out a budget. It is NOT hard. You budget based on what you know and then you tell people the budget has some lee way built in for 'unpredictable' orange factors and IF things go off the rails THEN you do an economic update and you make corrections. It's not like Canadians won't forgive you for trump related weirdness. But he's been clear, no budget this year. that is completely indefensible. It creates uncertainty in our own markets, our businesses and investors will not like the uncertainty, it completely robs the opposition who would normally serve on committees looking at expenditures the ability to hold the gov't to account. The public does not know where the money is intended to be spent that they are required to give the gov't which is pretty horrible. And the opposition gets no opportunity to share their thoughts before the budget goes to vote so they get no say in the expendiures which is a pretty flagrant violation of democracy. This is kind of a big deal, and this is how they're starting out. With secrets and zero accountability. Even you are going to have to admit this is not how things should be. -
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Oh look, once again you're talking without knowing a thing about what you're talking about. As i just posted, 2006 Canadian federal budget - Wikipedia Harper delivered his budget within 3 months of winning office, 1 month after it would traditionally be presented in the house and that's not that uncommon. So. What were you saying about hyper partisans who just spout any old lie to prop up their tribal echo chamber? LOLOLOL It took you only one sentence to look like a loser that time -
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
What, so you're just out and out lying now? 2006 Canadian federal budget - Wikipedia The budget was presented ON MAY 2nd. The election was on JANUARY 23rd. So at MOST you could say he presented it THREE months after he was elected. .And only ONE month after when it's traditional to do so. You're such a lying sack of shit. -
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
The ndp ARE the liberals. Or have been for the last 4 years. -
I got the point dead on, you realize what you said was stupid, now you're embarrassed and trying to retcon a new meaning to what you said. Like I've said before I'm sure you slay them on the elementary school playgrounds at recess I have known many, some well, but anybody can learn their track record and their job performance. It's not radically complicated What you're saying is it's not difficult to know people. My god you're useless Twat
-
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Once again more than you. In fact i continued to read to the point where you said it doesn't matter to you. So again i was right, you don't care about accountability. Especially when it's liberal. You don't want transparency. Producing a budget and having the watchdog comment on it at the end of the year is transparency. It's one of the most important of all the transparancies - seeing whether the spending of public taxpayer money was done within accordance of a plan and whether it was successful. It's always fun pointing out what a hypocritical liar you are You literally just admitted transparancy "Doesn't affect your life" and you don't care about it. Ahhh ... you mean because all the left wing supporters voted for the liberals. Otherwise it would have been a cpc majority. Sure. You kept the liberals in this time, well done. But we knew you supported them all along. -
Your neighbor won't be setting your tax rate next week. Your neighbor won't be deciding whether or not to come seize your firearms. Your neighbor won't be restricting your freedoms on the internet with new speech laws. Your neighbor won't be burdening your grandchildren with new deficit spending which will once again double the national debt in a few years So it doesn't really matter that you don't know your neighbor. It does matter a lot that you don't know carney
-
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Impossible to say until he tables it. What if he's planning on increasing taxes 50%? that will have an impact on your life, assuming that you are not on pogey And of course there's something you can do about it. The public frequently applies political pressure to political parties when they do things that the people don't approve of. Happens all the time He's got a minority government. He cannot afford to be pissing people off to the point where they hold a grudge. If there were spending or cuts that you didn't approve of and other people agreed with you he would have to take that into account and reconsider his actions Once again we see that you actually don't care about accountability in the slightest, especially liberal accountability -
Carney, Master Economist, Refuses To Table A Budget This Year.
CdnFox replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Well for heaven's sake even governments with a majority put out a budget Again, a stupid thing to say. Especially for a guy who supposedly all about accountability. A budget is a plan of the fiscal responsibility and targets of a government over the next year and allows people to measure whether or not they met it told him to account if they don't Oh but it's a liberal government so you don't believe in holding them to account. I forgot. You'd only be angry about this if it was a conservative government -
You've been spending too much time with Myata The law is what the law is, and realistically speaking deportation should happen when people who are in the country cannot prove that they have a right to be there to the authorities. Dragging the issue to court is an effort to delay things unreasonably. Either you're here legally and you can produce documentation which says so or you're not. If they're not in the country legally then they should be out of the country. And too many illegals make use of the court systems to drag out their illegal stay in the country If the bad guys know they will be kicked out the moment they're found in the country and they know that there are going to be more problems getting into the country to begin with then fewer bad guys will try And that appears to be the goal of the trump government. A lot of Americans are completely on board with that goal and why wouldn't they be? So if this is the way to achieve it then so be it. If left-leaning people and democrats wanted it differently than they should have friday and effective rules when they were in charge. And they didn't. Even the ones they proposed wouldn't have solved any problems. They refused to solve the problem, so now trump is doing it the way he thinks is best. There's a lesson in there
-
It wasn't possible Decades ago. Which you would have known if you were intelligent well that's your liberal friends that prevented that from happening. In any case, now is all we've got to work with. And now we should be getting more pipelines built, and getting our products to as many markets as possible.