CdnFox

Tonnes of people have said no to the aboriginals - including trudea (that's for the donation!!) ANd this is one of many such pieces. You can dislike lilley all you want - but that is an actual quote from the minister and the responses are actual responses from the premiers. Are you honestly saying you DON'T think the prarie provinces will react negatively to this? Don't make excuses for the liberals - this is bad. This is the kind of stuff that rips the country apart. And justin has NEVER had trouble saying no to the first nations before.

Sure kiddo

Sure. But two things come to mind in that respect. Well - three things really. 1 - Donbas was pretty much russian territory since day one of the war. That's not really anything new. 2 - There was a LOT of ukraine that was in russian hands 12 months ago ... that isn't now. The russians advanced and advanced and advanced... till suddenly they lost a craptonne of what they gained in a bloody and devistating defeat. 3 - Russia just had it's 'big offenseive' That was their big move. They gained a small amount of ground, literally km's, worth rather than tens of kms, and are bogged down. Ukraines offensive hasn't started yet. The germans were winning in russia right up until they were losing. Well lets take a look. THeir goal was to control Ukraine. Thats what their attack focused on in the early days and what their goal was. They are not going to take ukraine. They MIGHT hold on to a section of the donbas. I doubt much more. That's not a particularly productive area, they wanted to food producing capability. It's valuable and very strategic. So they might add donbas to the gamebag. What did they pay? Their military might has been crippled. Their supply of tanks and other critical vehicles is shot, and will take many years at current production to replace. And that will put a major strain on an already strained economy. Their population has taken a hit. YOu can't just lose 100 thousand young men like that and not have it felt in your country. not to mention all the shell shocked men who'll be returning home with little support. Vietnam had far fewer casualties and took a huge toll on america. Their economy has taken a hit. And they're starting to feel it. That's not only going to make it harder to replace that military hardware they just blew up, it's going to lead to civil dissatisfaction and other problems that will keep them out of the international sphere for some time. And everybody everywhere is looking at how NOT to buy Russian oil, except the chinese who will then own them as suka. They have lost MASSIVE international prestige as a 'superpower', who will want their protection or to buy their defective armaments now? THey have a new nato country right on their border. And ukraine will now wind up hating russia forever and the west will basically own them as an advanced tactical base which they'll load up with the best military gear and russia will now have a genuine threat on their border. Soooo - explain to me how russia is doing well here? There will be no need. Russia will be nicely crippled and won't be a major player in world affairs for quite some time, if ever. They will spend their money slowly replacing military gear that didnt' work well in the first place in actual battle, while the allies will be replacing the missiles and such with the latest generation of new smart weapons improved based on the actual war experiences and tactics they learned from, so their gear (which was already lethal to the russians) will get better while russia can't keep up. Nato already kneecapped russia, and it hardly cost anything. And it isn't even over yet - every day russia spends more money and loses more gear and more people. Perfect They won't need to go after them when it's done.

Well try presenting 'evidence' some time and we'll tell you It's just a personal tick of yours - when you feel you're losing or you don't have a point you go with pictures and vids Even time i see it I think "never play poker for money kid" You've got 'tells' a mile wide

They did drop badly during the 'woke' phase, but disney has actually fired a number of it's 'woke' people and is moving away from 'woke' as a corporate policy. Revenues are creeping back up. As to the article posted - it's crap DIsney has paid a price in florida for their interference in gov't affairs and will continue to do so. The left just likes to try to distort the truth to minimize it least other companies get scared of being too woke Ya get woke - ya go broke. Even disney learned that.

So you admit you're dodging the facts and ignoring my questions because you can't answer them. Why do you defend palestine when you admit you can't answer the questions? If you have to lie and ignore facts to make your point, is your point even valid? Are you driven to be dishonest about this because of a love of palestine? Or a hatred of the Jews? Why do you support palestine using their own people as human shields to jack up the civillian casualties for international sympathy? You sure like asking questions - now start answering some. Unless you're ready to admit you were a shill the whole time,

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/trudeau-libs-propose-ripping-up-constitution-on-oil-mining So basically the quick version is that in 1930 the gov't transferred control of natural resources to Alberta Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Now they're looking seriously at revoking that and taking control of natural resources away from those provinces. Western separation has never been a terribly serious threat, but it's gotten close to being so a few times. This however might very well end in an absolute crisis. You're going to tell alberta they don't get oil anymore? Or sask that it can't control it's potash? This guy is the absolute worst prime minister in our history. At a time when he should be looking to heal wounds, he's trying to drive a wedge and seperate Canadians and encourage them to fight each other so he can make the next election 'east vs west for the environment' and try to win based on support in ontario and quebec.

So you refuse to answer my questions. Why when you claimed that refusing to answer makes a person a liar, Are you admitting you are a liar? You were pretty quick to say i was for not answering every question you put out there, you haven't answered ANY of mine. Answer the questions.

Well that's a lie. You do it once it's a troll. You do it all the time, it's not a troll anymore. Sorry. And you were very explicit that you DID mean isreal and it's gov't were the nazis , Nobody believes the troll excuse - you brought up jews in a negative light before then out of the blue when nobody had mentioned them as well. Its like walking up to a black person and calling them a N----er again and again and then trying to claim you were just kidding! Honest! Ya big N---er! Ha! Just trolling ya! But you're a total N---er! Ooops fooled ya! It's not ok. Nobody normal does that. It's not trolling. Its you expressing what you believe and then trying to pretend you were just fooling knowing that it's ALWAYS wrong to do that. Repetatively and consistantly referring to jewish people as nazi's or saying they're 'the problem' or comparing them to the actions of germany in ww2 or suggesting that it's ok for them to be wiped out, all of those things are ALWAYS bad to say There is no such thing as 'trolling' with that. The left has always been anti-semetic for whatever reason (i've never understood why) but you're taking it WAY too far.

You realize every time you pull out pictures or videos we know you've realized you haven't got a point

actually that's pretty much never been the case in Canada. It's always been held that people have the right to their own body. I mean, this is why our legal system isn't eager to pass laws allowing or preventing abortion. So in the past "Manditory" vaccinations have almost ALWAYS had the right to opt out without penalty. In some cases you had to sign that you understood how bad it was to do that (basically) but you could always opt out for 'religious or moral' reasons, meaning if you thought it was against your religion or you thought it was a bad idea. This is about the first time the gov't has actually chosen to try to punish people for not having a vaccine especaily when other options were available. Now again - you and in fact a large hunk of the population might well make the argument that while it was a violation it was a necessary one and acceptable in light of the threat to the general public. And that's a debate that can be had. But in Canada at least people were deliberately coerced into it. They weren't shy about it either, and the prime minister went on television and said that those who were vaccine hesitant were bad people who were likely bigots and mysoginists and that they were a waste of space and Canada would have to decide if they should be tolerated. I'm sorry but when you deliberately try to hurt people and ruin their careers and turn their communities against them and limit their freedoms as punishment then it's "forcing people". Now - some people could avoid the shot if they didn't want it without TOO much consequence but for most it was bad and if you didn't comply you paid a very high price which was punitive, not medically or science driven. I got all my shots and boosters by choice, but i have to admit what they did to people was horrible and the division even in families that it caused was horrible. It's not even a slight exaggeration to say that canada was ripped apart in such a way that it may never really heal again.

Effective lobbying.

Just a point of order - they can leverage immigraiton to increase gdp, but immigration actually reduces GDP per capita overall as a rule. Although not as bad as some suggest.

Do some reading when you get time on the latest tech. It's pretty damn impressive. The waste from modern reactors can be reprocessed to produce new fuel so the amount of waste is reduced. The use of pellets instead of rods and other tech means that most of the waste is short term easy to deal with stuff, with one tenth of the waste of former methods that will need to be sealed away permanently. Bottom line - it's the only actual clean energy source we've got, even more so than hydro which is not even avaliable in large parts of the world. The tech is mature and safe. It's probably the best option we're going to have for the next 100 years so if we don't want to burn carbon that's what we're going to have to migrate to in areas with minimal hydro. Solar and wind might be able to help a little but they ain't gonna be replacing on demand generation anytime soon. So it's that or we burn oil and coal and natural gas. And no - a sodium fire isn't going to destroy the whole planet Lets try to keep it real.

I answered many of your questions. Then you became dishonest. Sorry - everyone can see you're the liar here. Even the quotes you provided now reluctantly after dodging my questions and ignoring the facts only say these investigators from ONE group in ONE conflict that's KNOWN to be friendly to the palestinians didn't find evidece FOR it - but didn't find proof they didn't either, Meanwhile: https://nypost.com/2015/05/02/un-report-outlines-how-hamas-used-kids-as-human-shields/ https://munrkazmir.medium.com/yes-hamas-uses-the-palestinian-people-as-human-shields-6bb8decb7b25 https://www.algemeiner.com/2014/08/07/conclusive-proof-that-hamas-uses-palestinians-as-human-shields/ So how about you start answering a few of my questions now. Why did you feel the need to lie about hamas using people as human shields? Do you think it's ok that they do so? Why is hamas initiating violence when they know the retaliation will involve civillian casualties because of where they're firing from? Do you think hamas does this to gain international 'points' in its favor and create a false sense of pity? If palistine would like to see peace, why do they still maintain their "pay for slay" system? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_Authority_Martyrs_Fund I have no doubt there's faults on both sides but it's pretty clear that isreal would be open to peaceful settlements whereas palestinians will not rest until isreal is dead and gone. That would make them the problem here.

Sure - i complained just yesterday to the local gas station that they were 4 cents higher than in town according to gas buddy. He dropped the price to price match for me. In fairness i know the owner and have been buying gas there for some time. So there you go. Case closed. That was some seriously bad timing on your part And it's still dishonest. People can complain, gov'ts can do things, pretending otherwise is just cheezy as hell. So now that you've been proven wrong all across the board - are you ready to recant your position or do you intend to double down on retarded?

It has the ring of truth to it, but i do wonder what will happen over time as they reflect on the reasons they had to leave in the first place. I have no idea - but i'll be interested to see how it pans out next go around. Probably will depend a little on who the candidates are.

Me too. I mean, SOMEONE"S out to get me...

And also sigh. And the left wonders why we don't take them seriously.

That's really not the case anymore. The latest designs go dormant UNLESS someone is there to provide input, unlike the old ones which always were in danger of runaway. And the amount of waste they produce per year that can't be used is like the size of a grapefruit. Very easy to seal away until they settle down. The modern designs are nothing like the old school 3 mile island deals.

He.... attacked.... ALL... of..... ukraine. He's been driven out of most of it but that's what he did. Sooooo

Now now - it might not be his fault, maybe he made a mistake because he's just two tense!!! ??? BWAAAAHAHAHAHA! Hey - Leggo my keyboard! GIve it VOUG)SUT oww! BY((*AUTEU" Hey! SOGBUOUTO stop hitting me! BOUURE)U*_)BU)B

Interesting. I have zero data on that so i'll take your word for it, but it'll be interesting to see what happens next election and how this affects things.

Well not exactly. Remember you don't make money by giving things away for free. So that's not REALLY the main motivation. They want to see russia weak and the ukrainains are prepared to make that happen, and they want to test their equipment and get rid of old inventory and the ukranians are willing to put it to good use. But they also are betting on the fact that the russians won't be able to take over the whole country. They'll eventually leave with little or nothing. And at that point the allies will have MASSIVE political influence in the area and will be first in line to requip the military, rebuild the infrastructure, etc etc. And even if they don't allow them to join nato, it'll be like they have a nato base on the border. But in any case it's a win win win win for the US. Zelensky didn't drive any tanks across the border This is 100 percent putin. How many times did you have to practice that in front of the mirror before you could say it with a straight face ? I personally lol'd and i'm just reading it Putin is an evil scumbag who wants to expand his empire by military force and FORTUNATELY he absolutely sucks at it and is getting schooled by the ukraine of all people. I suspect he'll be gone soon. But in any case Russia has learned that i'ts not a good idea to go invading the neighbours for fun and profit. THAT is what leads to peace.

My bad - misread that. But the point still stands - WE know she's a she but others might not and may mistake the intent.