CdnFox

True. And this tends to lead to that well known cycle - the Liberals spend us into ruin to appeal to the people as 'saviors' and 'givers' and 'nurturers', and then the people freak out when they realize what's happening to the economy and they hire the conservatives who are willing to reduce spending, say "no" to special interest groups, and be the 'bad guy' till things improve. Once things get better again (eventually) then the liberals come back and say "wow - those guys never give you anything, hire us and we'll be your hero's again and give you all you want'. And thus the cycle repeats.

I doubt many people consider it their only factor. But it can be a pretty big barrier for a lot. And i think that's fair. You're attracted to whom your attracted to and i think that we shouldn't shame anyone for their personal tastes in that regard,

So you really don't understand english then. I kind of thought you were joking, But even if it's an opinion it would still be your responsibility to be able to explain your opinion. Most people learn that by highschool, i didn't realize you weren't up to that level yet, Ummmm - none of that shows how being unvaccinated "forces" the vaccinated to do anything. What did it force them to do specifically? It is precisely what we are discussing. I understand that you now realize you were wrong and are trying to change the subject, but remember where i quoted you saying the anti vaxx had "forced" other people to do things and I said "how?" - that's what we've been chasing ever since. ANd you're desperately trying to avoid that - and now you claim 'ohhhh we were neeeeverrr discussing that.... " LOL Kid - that is beyond pathetic, You made a statement - you claimed that the unvaxxed were FORCING the vaccinated to do things - What..... did.... they.... force... them... to ..... do .....specifically? Or are you just a lying sack of crap who blurted something dumb out and now don't want to admit it? Either you have an answer to that question or you don't and you were just making crap up.

You're calling Justin Trudeau a random guy? Soooo - in your opinion he's not telling people to borrow to spend money to stimulate the economy, he's explaining why the gov't borrowed to spend money to stimulate the economy. And suggesting that this is something that would be wise for them to do in similar circumstances because it makes sense. In other words he's telling them that it's a good idea to put home renovations on their credit card. Which is exactly what was said. There's something about today's liberals that they can't just admit a simple truth without lying and exercising in bizarre rhetorical gymnastics first. He's telling people it's a good idea to put money on their credit card to go to school or to improve their home... which is absolutely not true. The current interest rates are insane. Of course - as a liberal you may not be able to comprehend the idea that borrowing at excessively high interest is bad.

It is - but what's REALLY weird is he's telling people to borrow on their credit cards to fix their homes... meanwhile sussex STILL hasn't been fixed since he got the job and it's STILL unlivable Hey justin - give me your credit card number, we'll get the place fixed up for ya

What is it with you and weird fixations on men wearing soiled panties? Seems an odd thing for you to fantasize about. Is there something you'd like to tell the class? We're not here to judge.... In any case i'm pretty content with the war. I would have preferred no war but there was never any chance of that - sooner or later putin was going to take a swing at them. Do you actually twist your moustache when you laugh like that? Seriously dude that's creepy At this point it doesn't matter all that much who 'wins' - russia has lost either and that's good news for us. It would be nice if ukraine was a thorn in his side for a while longer, and was a threat after this war was done. Nope. Doesn't look like anyone's giving him much of anything. And that's going to be a problem. Because they're all dead now you mean? Sure - but they WERE screaming before they died for more artillery shells. Seriously dude- stop thinking so much about my butt and my underwear. I'm flattered but hell no.

Uhhh - the weird Japanese anime evil villain laugh is probably not helping your "i'm sane" case

10 years of harper. Not that it changes your point really

Sigh. Lets look at the quote: YOU said: "Anti-vaxxers forced everyone to take extra measures. " That is a claim. You are claiming that Anti-vaxxers forced everyone to take extra measures. Do you seriously not remember what you said earlier today? Is your short term memory that bad? Are you a goldfish? Wow - what you say is pretty retarded so i get that nobody ELSE remembers what you say, but surely YOU should? I don't understand how getting vaccinated causes the unvaccinated to force you to do something. Which is what we're discussing. Are you claiming the unvaccinated are forcing people to get vaccinated? Is english your 3rd or is it your 4th language btw. Asking for a friend.

Being more diligent how? They were already vaxxed - what were they 'coerced' into doing? You're really making yourself look thick at this point You really don't have anything do you I see - so if the unvaxxed had gotten vaxxed he'd have said "definitely catch this'? You're saying the unvaccinated forced you to not catch covid? What jerks!!! LOL!!! Holy shit kid... that's both hilarious and sad

It's not remotely self evident in the slightest. And apparently you're unable to explain it. And yes - you absolutely SHOULD have to explain what your statements mean that's how it works - if you make a claim you have to explain that claim It is beyond daft to think you don't. LOL - ok so just to be clear - you admit you didn't explain it because 'You shouldn't have to' - and this is proof that because i don't understand the thing you DIDN"T explain, i don't understand english Do you understand what a retard you look like right now LOLOLOL!!!!! So lets be honest - you've realized that you said something dumb and you don't want to admit it. That's what is happening here. And now you're trying everything you can to not have to admit it, which is why you refuse to explain how the antivaxed "Forced" the vaccinated to do anything. Well there you go - next time just admit you were wrong to begin with,

Imagine that. These people are corrupt as the day is long,

Well the answer was vague and nonsensical, so i guess that's kind of true your thinking is vague and nonsensical. As was mentioned, the english isn't the problem. This would go faster if you paid attention. The issue is you can't suggest any way that the unvaxxed forced people to do anything and still can't to this miniute. Convince you of what? You're the one who was trying to convince me of how these unvaxxed people were 'forcing' others to do things ... and you still can't! It's not a difficult question. HOW are they forcing anyone to do anything? It's beginning to look like you're the one with the comprehension problem.

Me and the rest of the conservatives. Which is about 80 percent of the party. You clearly wouldn't know the difference. You aren't doing either. You're blathering like an 8 year old telling someone that for SURE santa is real. 2 Candice says she won't try to change the law So - does that mean candice isn't a conservative? Didn't think that through did you, Kid - you're not smart enough to tell me what colour the sky is never mind who is or is not a conservative. Crawl back under your PPC rock you troll.

Well as it turns out that's not true. You'd have to demonstrate that. Aside from the very beginning, the vaccine hasn't really done much for transmission, Unvaxxed people catch and transmit just as much. The vaccine only helps prevent serious illness. And secondly you would still have to explain how that 'forced' anyone to do anything Well be that as it may, you're doing a lot of dodging around the subject As far as forced goes as discussed coersion is legally recognized as force - a 'choice' where the choice is coerced is not generally considered an actual choice. And i'm sure you could see why. So - people were forced. That's pretty hard to dispute. You could argue that was appropriate given the circumstances if you want to but that's a different argument, So your lack of answer shows you don't really think that the unvaxxed "forced" anyone to do anything.

That's the thing. The left and groups like antifa like to excuse their violence and hatred by claiming that it's just normal and it's not EVERYBODY and what can you expect. But the reality is that if they DIDN'T support that violence they would disassociate themselves with those groups. ANd the violence is pretty prevalent. If a conservative type of person does something wrong the other conservatives say "That guy did wrong, lock him up we want nothing to do with him!!" When someeone on the left does it they literally say 'oh well, everybody's got some violent loons in their orgs" and start rounding up bail money for them. Sorry - but that makes them accomplices and enablers. Precisely.

Yep, him and me and the vast vast vast majority of the others. Well that's fine - that's two of you then But if you actually were a conservative you would realize that while that might be a personal value of yours it's not a CONSERVATIVE value. Even Candice has said clearly she won't push for changes to the abortion laws. You see - she is VERY different from you as a conservative - she understands good conservatives don't demand other people think the same way. I see you have no idea what it means to be conservative. You sound more like you belong on the left with that authoritarian bullshit. "I'm the only person in teh world who knows what it means to be conservative and anyone who disagrees with me is not!" Plleeeaaassee - your mommie might tell you that you're the most important thing in the universe but nobody else is going to. Why don't you go ask her for a cookie and then you can go back to the basement for a nap. You have nothing to teach anyone about being a conservative. You'd be more at home with the far left these days, they like telling people how to think too.

Well it is retarded of course. You say the unvaxxed affected the vaxxed - you are asked 'how' - and your response is "Duuhhh i use plane inglrish. U no use dictonery". Well... that doesn't say how, does it. Confusing the language that you used for the lack of information that language imparts is not particularly intelligent. Being insulting on top of being dumb really is what puts it over the edge to retarded And we already discussed why your tax example was dumb. \ So it's not based on my perception of you, it's based on the reality of your words. So - did you want to give another example that ISN'T dumb? Or explain how the anti vaxxed forced other people to do things? Or did you just want to stick with retarded? Nutbar's choice.

Me for one. And i'll bet money right now i've fought in more elections, served on more policy boards, and attended more conventions than you. Did you want another name? How about Pierre Pollievre. He's been VERY clear he supports abortion in Canada as it is now and will aggressively resist change. And i can tell you a hell of a lot of other conservatives feel the same. They believe in LIMITED abortion, they believe in LIMITED welfare. Most see no problem with first trimester abortions. Most believe there should be SOME saftey net for those who fall on hard times (just not free late's. ) If you believe differently then you are in the distinct minority. Not the majority. Which is fine. Nothing wrong with holding a minorty view as far as the right is concerned, only the left requires absolute obedience to the doctrine. But don't pretend it's otherwise.

Oh it's not that i coudln't understand what you were saying. It's that what you were saying is dumb. And vague. I thought you might like to try saying something that ISN"T retarded. But, y'know, if retarded is working for ya then go with that. You do you.

Which is the best kind of Fascist at the end of the day.

Those aren't really 'woke' Lots of conservatives are pro abortion and pro welfare in moderation.

Well lets think about that. You're suggesting that in essense nobody should have a right to their body. So it should be fine for an employer AFTER you've been hired to require you to undergo whatever medical proceedures they think are a good idea. So... what if after working there for a time you found out you got pregnant? And teh employer said "Well you have to have an abortion or be fired with no benefits or pension". I mean - there's a lot of scientific evidence to suggest single parenting is a cause of a lot of social issues. And of course you can't work effectively when you're dealing with a baby. And you've just insisted it's not pressure to do so and that if a boss puts those condiitons in after you're hired it's fair.... Sound pretty good so far does it? How about after you're hired he demands that you take birth control pills or get fired? Get 'vaccinated' against pregnancy? That'd be ok right? Forcing women to take hormones? Oh --- but of course it isn't 'forcing' is it. So what if a woman can't find a job and has to live in poverty , that's her choice right? Do you see how dumb what you're saying is? The moment we say that people don't have the right to make a free choice as to what happens with their bodies we step in to a VERY dangerous circumstance. Especially if it wasn't part of the conditions of employment to begin with. In canada every worker also pays into an unemployment insurance, in case they become suddenly unemployed due to the business having to shut down or a sudden illness or for some other reason they can't work anymore. ANd the gov't even went so far as to take that away from unvacinated people. Saying that if you lost your job because you were unvaccinated then you would not be allowed insurance that you paid for. Brand new rule for covid. You're in the wrong here. And if the same ideas are applied to women you're going to be very upset you didn't oppose that kind of thinking earlier,

sorry to hear that.

americana antifa could have told you,