CdnFox

Well then what you're saying is wrong. It's that simple. But regardless of what 'race' turns out to be, RACE-ism is when people are bigoted or prejudiced based on that. Not their religion or the like. When Americana Antifa makes a jewish slurr, she's not being 'racists'. She'd being anti semite. If she happens to make a degrading comment about some other group then she's being ethnophobic (anti semitism being a very specific example of that). If she hates ALL other groups other than her own then she's xenophobic. She's actually all three at various times - but i hope that at least clears that up for you.

then don't read what i write. Sigh. Let me guess. Day zero on the wagon again. Whatever kid.

That literally means she was approved. but she wasn't fat or any other reason. The reason was "we don't like your deicisons". As noted they are not based on medical science. Nothing does. I'm not aware of any research that suggests that the vax lasts any longer than natural. And she'll get it again either way, the vax doesn't prevent you GETTING omicron. It's political. They're letting a woman die, not because she did something but because she didn't agree with them on something that medically won't make a difference in her case. I'm sure that the people who locked up teh japanese sounded just like you. "This is TOTALLY reasonable and it's their fault". Lets face it - you'd just rather see another anti vaxxer die. Many on the 'must-vax side express a desire to see vax hesitant people perish for their beliefs.

Doesn't sound like a troll. I'll make this simple for you, and you can take it or leave it. I don't mind different opinions at all. Some are quite interesting. But - i have limited patience for stupid, and none at all for a dolt who cannot even articulate his position. Someone who comes here and says "THey screw up 100 percent" without saying who "they" are - and refuses to say even when asked - and acts like that consistently .... that asswipe deserves zero respect. It's insulting. They tend to get insulted back. I also don't have much patience for people who constantly lie or the like. They don't get a lot of respect either. Thats the way it is. Now if that upsets you a LOT, if you're PRO liars and that kind of person, then the easiest thing to do is simply not read my posts. If you DO read my posts then you have to live with that when you see me responding to a jerkwad. I get along just fine with people who make reasoned arguments even if i disagree. But liars and dolts who play the pronoun game (It's here! what is? "It!!!") are going to get talked to in a tone they don't like.

You know a polite troll?

She was already approved and meets the requirements, so they won't be wasted. She's proven medically that she's as protected as anyone with the jab. So how would they be wasted? This is political and vindictive, We've seen that the 'must vax' crowd is absolutely hate filled and intolerant and looks to hurt the vax hesitant any way they can frequently with no basis in science. This is really bad and every canadian should speak out against it.' Just like in the day they should have spoken out against the Japanese concentration camps, the sterlization of native women and the res schools, But they didn't. Do you really want to be on that side of history for this go around?

His honesty with his bosses seems to be a bit of a problem

Well that was my point with the lamp post. Anything else if someone claims they're a lamp post or a black person (if theyr'e white) or whatever - we say 'no you're not you dolt' and give them a picture of a lamp post and a mirror and tell them to work it out. But - Saying "i'm a girl" when you're a boy is encouraged. If someone walked into a gov't office and demanded their pension at age 30 because they 'identify' as 65 they would be laughed out of the room. And yet.... https://nypost.com/2023/04/25/trans-runner-glenique-frank-ripped-for-beating-14k-women-in-london-marathon/ Trans runner beat 14K women in London Marathon after running NYC as a man A two-time Olympian has ripped rules that allowed a transgender runner to beat nearly 14,000 women in the female category of the London Marathon. Mara Yamauchi — who finished sixth in the marathon at the 2008 Beijing Olympics — lashed out after trans racer Glenique Frank, 54, gushed to the BBC about using “girl power” to run the key UK race on Sunday. “Males in the [female] category is UNFAIR for females,” Yamauchi tweeted alongside a clip of the mid-race interview by the sports bra-wearing runner who also gushed about soon becoming “a gran.” “Nearly 14,000 actual females suffered a worse finish position [because] of” Frank, wrote Yamauchi — who said that even when she was “ranked second in the world” as a woman, “at least 1300 men ran faster than me.”

Why!?!? Why would you say that?? GODDAMIT - i've gotta sleep tonite at some point and i'd RATHER not wake up screaming...

Now now, lets not be bitter The REAL point is that this won't hang on him long. His rep and his aibility to draw a crowd will remain in tact and he'll be on to the next best thing providing infotainment for whatever bidder bids best and you can bet he's sifting through a bunch of them right now.

The vaccine was arguably not bad at stopping transmission with the first variant, ok at best with delta, and is of no benefit in the slightest with omicron. There's plenty enough mainstream studies that show that. It looks like it helped prevent serious illness with omicron so it was valuable for that but honestly the latest version out there just isn't killing people much more than the flu does. Covid is over.

Ahhh - you lie to yourself in the mirror!!! Well. You''d almost HAVE to wouldn't you

Uh Oh. Coors lite trans backlash in 3..... 2.....1.....

They could. That's definitely not why they fired him. Apperently he tore a new one for the execs in a bunch of "colourful" tweets. They decided they didn't like that.

Carlson wasn't the problem. The internal stuff shows he was against continuing to promote stories that seemed ridiculous. As you noted, suing news media is very hard. It's not enough that their stories hurt you. Or that they turned out to be untrue. you have to demonstrate they knowingly and deliberately lied. Carlson pointing out in texts and emails that the story was clearly false put Fox in a position where they weren't successful just saying they were reporting the news or repeating others. But i doubt many other places will be dumb enough to keep records of that now.

(dude, stop saying that! Centrist is going to think you're hitting on him!)

It can happen either way as bud just found out but in this case it looks like they compounded one bad decision with another.

well that's your opinion And in fairness you mean nothing so i guess you've got a point....

I'd disagree with Carleson. His contract is being paid out so he's got almost a year's free wages and he's going to get shopped in an instant. With fox taking a 40 percent loss in viewership for his time slot he'll be able to negotiate a much better wage with other places right now. So this isn't going to cost HIM a thing. Fox just made a big loss a lot worse by firing him, Apparently he sent some extremely unflattering texts to the higher ups.

That's brutal. LIke = really brutal. A station like fox is only worth what it's viewership is, and that was a massive hit. That's going to cost a HELL of a lot more money than that pay out did if it continues and they don't recover

too bad for you that it's accurate Everyone knows when you capitalize "OPINION" you know you've lost

Look man ... i supported the gays. I accepted the trans. I even acknowledge that people like AAntifa have a right to their views. But ... the line for deviant behavior must be drawn somewhere!!!

So you're sticking with the idea that bud lite is beer?

Female dude, female! Don't misgender her/him/them/it/attackhelecopter! Although i suspect based on her posts she self identifies as a bit of a canine.

You literally agreed that biology is part of it like a minute ago. Now it isn't. Would you like me to wait 5 minutes till you agree with it again? As the actual research i posted to you earlier shows gender is not cultural. Expressions of gender can be but gender itself really isn't. External influences and perceptions certainly play a role but no, the statement 'gender is cultural' is wrong. Follow the science. No, biology is a huge factor not because of the role it plays in culture but because of the biology itself. Gender perception is largely biological with external influences making up the rest. I've posted research on this, there's a tonne of other research as well which says the same thing. you can't "raise" a person to be trans. You science deniers are pretty weird. Anyway now that we've confirmed you don't understand what trans people or gender is all about lets move on. Yeeeaaahhhh you need to call bullshit because it doesn't match with your fabricated reasoning. So - the church writes EVERYTHING down. You should have no problem finding me a bunch of examples where recognized church authorities say that tattoos are self mutilation. They did have a period where they felt it was desecrating the temple which is your body. But then many churches felt that way about make up and that washes off. Sure -because all surgeries are just cutting off body parts for kicks. That's a pretty honest reply right? You're arguing in good faith there right? That's right. And telling everyone they HAVE to agree to refer to that person as a street lamp and treat them as if they were a street lamp would be pretty stupid. NOBODY would think that was a good idea. but that's precisely what you claim makes total sense for trans people. And it's dishonest in the extreme to suggest that forcing people to lie is a totally reasonable request. We wouldn't do it for a street lamp. No. Words are defined by the people who use the words. That's how it works, that's how it always works. Corrupt societies and evil people try to control the meanings because words have power. But in teh end they tend to fail and history isn't kind to them. "final solution" sounds nice but it didn't age well Yeah - and i said i bet it's one of those thigns where they're not actually talking about a ban - and you posted a story where they're not actually talking about a ban. You absolutely lied. There was nothing in that story that said they were going to ban crossdressers. At all. They were suggesting shows woudln't be allowed in some areas. That is NOT a ban on cross dressing But as we've seen, all you can do to support your position is lie, My position doesn't need lies to be defended. You might want to think about that.