CdnFox

Trans, yes, sure. That's actually a leftie tactic. Also - pretending that leftie tactics are righty tactics is a lefty tactic I'd be willing to listen to their arguments. If for the irony if nothing else. Deaf people desperately want to be non deaf. Trans people do NOT want to stop being trans for the most part. What they want is to be the other gender and they can't. They don't want to stop wanting that. The psychological research is pretty clear. Which makes sense - that's part of the whole gender disphoria thing. You crave to be the other sex. You don't crave not craving it. whereas deaf people crave hearing. I think if we could solve gender disphoria by magically turning boys into girls - they would think it's great. But a pill that solved their problem would be seen as 'destroying who they are'. Sorry kiddo - that was a better argument than most of your horribly lame assed bullcrap but no, it would be seen as genocide.

Well i think that much is obvious but even the liberal party doesn't care. Why would they? They've been in power just as long. It's not like we havent seen plenty of them break the laws as well. Different party. The liberal party in ontario is not connected to the federal party at all. They just share a name. And they died because they picked a horrible leader and had a horrible platform. Although it should be noted that whatever federal gov't there is - ontario has a habit of picking the other for it's provincial leadership. If the cpc is in federally, they tend to go liberal provincially. If the libs are in federally, they tend to go conservative provincially. Not always - but a lot.

no, this is 'if you read about what you're discussing you might have a clue ' It's not that we can't prove the paper doesn't exist - it does. Read it. Not if it's common knowledge. And not if the person is a sealion. Which you absolutely are. So that would mean it's up to you to determine why the new law ISN'T what they say it is. Finding the law is a half a second google search.

It is. Here you go. Mammalian Sex Determination In mammals, the sex of an individual is determined at conception. When a Y-bearing sperm fertilizes a X-bearing egg, the sex of the embryo is male while a X-bearing sperm will produce a female embryo. In the presence of the Y chromosome, specifically the sex-determining region Y (SRY) gene on this chromosome, the fetus develops testes, which in turn synthesize male sex hormones that are critical for further development of male phenotypic characteristics. In the absence of a Y chromosome, the fetus develops ovaries, synthesizes female sex hormones, important for the development of female phenotypes. https://laulab.ucsf.edu/how-sex-determined And there's dozens of medical papers out there - they all say the same thing. Ooopsie - you were wrong. Genetics determines sex - which then creates hormones to affect the body development. But sex is not determined by hormones. Swing and a miss kiddo. You got caught lying again. I was thinking this subject wasn't really worth discussing but here you've gone and shown that there IS still a lot of misinformation on the left that needs to be corrected by truth and facts.

Well i understand - educating yourself on the issues probably hurts worse than a 'brain freeze' for your type You're free to live in ignorance i suppose.

They are absolutely pretending gender disphoria is good. In fact, when it was mentioned that perhaps we could cure it one day a group called it 'attempted genocide'. They literally thought that we should consider this mental health issue to be a separate group of people and never fix it. So yeah - the whole point is to make it a 'good' thing. That's not what they're saying at all. that pretty much gets universal buy in. But you and your kind don't actually mean that, you go on to say that it's a great thing and it should be accepted and cherished, not cured. One of those things is possible. the other is only possible if all humans are dead. which admittedly would resolve the issue now that i think about it. Nope - if we even try it'll be called a genocide by the trans people. Not that they're not already claiming that there's a trans genocide going on. I guess it'll be the second trans genocide. And this is a common leftie tactic we see all the time. Downplay and downsize their actual agenda to make it sound reasonable, but in reality demand much more and agree to far less. If this were all about treatment then fine but it's not.

Yeah - they went and did it anyway without us. So we definitely do. They won, took him out, and really they don't look that foolish, nor do they care. So what's the point. Which side will who take? the iraqis? Well they'll wind up on the us side apparently. Ok.

Man you sure spend a lot of time fantasizing about me and my life I don't think about you at all. Not that i'm not flattered i guess, just not interested.

Freely given you mean, rather than free of cost. Well played

No, it is not. Normalizing the fact that people have a mental illness and that's not their fault is good, but not the illness itself. It's like saying we should normalize having cancer. No - we might normalize the fact some people do and may or may not be able to treat it but pretending cancer is a good and healthy thing is stupid.

Why would they? Most of their supporters won't punish them for their misdeeds and crimes so what's to stop them? Seriously even if justin loses the next election, look at everything he got away with. Within months of being elected he got bribed and got away with it, and he's gotten away with every corruption since as well as turning canadians against one another and trashing our finances. Why would he do anything different? He's been rewarded for his bad behavior.

Because that's racist.

They often do. Simple lifestyles and a litlte undocumented work on the side and you can do fairly well. I knew a guy who'd wash windows for businesses for cash and did fairly well at that and collected welfare. IT meant he didn't have to work much at all and he'd get by (pretty much not at all in winters. ) Really. So you didn't earn any unemployment insurance during that year? Whoooops... And sure, you may have to submit doctors reports every year. Oh noes, That takes WAY more time than working.

But even there - public medical care is just basically insurance. It's not 'free' really. It's manditory insurance with only one insurer and we can discuss wether that's a good idea or not but it's not even a 'hand out', in the course of your life you're just as likely to need that as much as anyone else and you pay into it accordingly, so it's no different than any other insurance. People who don't pay taxes kind of getting for free but lets get real - eveyrone pays SOME tax. Unemployment as well - it's hard to even think of it as a 'social program' really - its just gov't managed insurance based on the idea that the gov't is a better choice than the free market for that particular insurance. Education that's more of a social program i guess. It does make sense tho because thats where employers get their labour force from. But it's still a social program, there's no law that people have to take something that is marketable afterwards.

jezus. We;ve only been discussing it as a nation for 2 years now, and it just passed. Read a F**king paper you sealion. "do you have any evidence the sun rose in teh east this morning?" Quit being such a tard.

well science isn't a motive, it's just a method. You obviously felt the need to share the science with everyone and have a discussion about it. Whatever prompted that feeling and action would be the motive.

no, sorry. Hormones is what your body produces because of your sex, which is geneticly determined not hormonally determined. A person may have a deficiency where their body doesn't produce enough hormone or the like, but force feeding someone hormones doesn't make them intersexed any more than cutting off their penis makes them a female. The idea that it does is something those on the radical left are pushing because it would lend credence to the idea that trans women are real women, and not men. Which would then allow them to compete in womens' sports. And promotes the idea that these people are 'just like any other woman'. Or at the very least just as much a woman as a man. But it's just not accurate. just like cutting someones balls off doesn't mean they're not male anymore.

Would you say that to a black person? "Why are you so insecure that you need a 'black day' or 'black history month' as well as emancipation day?

There are no white germans? or french? no while ausrians? What colour are the russians again? Like - could we have a nelson mandella day and ignore all blacks who aren't from that part of the world?

And you're a classic rocks-for-brains so there's symmetry

There IS no NEED to LISTEN to ^^^THIS crazy OPNION without FACTS!!!

Considering you're the Top Dunce that's actually a bit of a compliment ? To say thanks you are now promoted to Head !diot well done LOL - these things never go well for you do they

So you'd say black heritage days or first nations heritage days etc would be equally foolish? I don't disagree entirely btw - but just being clear that you're against the concept across the board.

No, it's not a problem of where they come from. You just can't. It doesn't work. And then the borders get shut OR the guns come out. Well it is growth. When things grow out of control they tend to completely overtake their surroundings and wipe out available resources and then you have a mass starvation event. But we're not planning for our growth, we're deliberately forcing growth much faster than we can cope with. Well there are several ways, the super - short answers are efficiency and new products. But at the end of the day you can't grow either your economy or your population faster than you can provide for it, or you wind up with inflation and resource shortages (homes, schools, medicine etc).

And Justin is dragging his heels on producing such a registry. Think maybe he's hoping for a few more 'donations' before the next election?