CdnFox

Yeah it is. The only difference is you want to pretend everyone today is ALSO a settler and a colonist so you can de-humanize them. You find it odd that I only agree with non-racists or truthful people? Tell the truth and don't be a racist-bigot and we probably won't have all that much to disagree about it's hilarious to me that you think i should be AGREEING with liars and racists

Ok. It's pretty much the same thing after all THat's why oj wasn't charged and didn't have to go to trial just like trump. Ohh.... wait.... Nope. Even said it clearly in the mueller report. And debunked just as many. Kid - you are WRONG. It's that simple. They did not find evidence of any kind of collusion or conspiracy or the like, nor did any later behavior during the campaign suggest there was. He didn't even get charged and they were clear that there was no evidence to charge him with. IF you ever wonder how a person can get so deluded that they can honestly believe the election was stolen and trump is actually president - go look in the mirror. You are every bit as delusional as they are and you should be deeply ashamed.

No, immigrants come from all over the world. but they're not settlers. The country has long been settled. the settlers who settled the land were vastly predominently white europeans, and mostly from england or france And when first nations people say settlers - that's pretty much what they mean. It's racist. This is where i came from. Sad to see you're a racist bigot tho , Good - go to mars and be home there seeing as you're home whereever you are. And traditionally earthlings are human. I'm not sure you' d qualify. Oh - right. No sense of humor. Sorry - i forgot that you're not a real little boy

Sooooo - wouldn't it have been trump's job too? So by your logic if he did collude with the russians he was just doing his job?

Ohhhhhhhh.... i had thought you were being amusing. Turns out y ou're just an !diot Some times those can look very similar

We should get rid of all the blacks in order to keep the blacks safe. It's the right thing to do morally.

So you're saying you're 'no one'

Not that simple. PP's metrics are rising personally. That's pretty big And that extra point or so of support is happening in ontario, That's where all the growth is - except for some in bc in liberal and ndp ridings. Which is why 338 already shows PP in a strong minority gov't even with those numbers. Another point up and another down for the libs and he's brushing up against majority. So his personal brand is growing much stronger, and the CPC is growing stronger where it needs to the most. If that continues he'll be polling up against majority territory as early as this time next year. But the op is correct - PP is working out kinks in his methods and style, improving his messaging, and building his base. All of this is possible because of the ndp deal. There's no real chance that deal will last to the next election, but even if it lasts to 2024 PP will be much more ready to put up a fight and will easily have the base so that if he runs a decent campaign he should pick up a majority.

Generally speaking, we're not very bright. It's best to keep it simple.

LOL - well i guess that'll teach me to admit a mistake At least when I make one it's rare enough that people comment. Yours are so frequent we just let them slide

I'm not sure they'll take that risk

LG has been very good to me.

"Settlers" is. White european. I honestly misread that as 'earthworm' for a second there. I was like "Dude - how do you type?!?!?! That's Ichthyophobic

Then the left should have voted in erin otoole. They did not. Now you get PP. So - there you go. The choice was given for moderate change - it was denied - now you get something a little more right. Not much - he's still just a right of center harper conservative, not a far right nutbar like Max - but definitely more right than you're going to like i suspect.

Nothing happened in concert. And given your constant lying so far i'm not inclined to believe your account of it Again - NOBODY got charged over trump "colluding" with the Russians to influence the election INCLUDING manafort. The fbi found NO evidence of it. The commission didn't. NOBODY did. You try to twist unrelated stuff INTO that but there just isn't anything there. 3 years of dozens of investigators and commissions and god knows what and ZERO charges relating to any collusion over the election. It's a lie. YOU are a lie. You should be DEEPLY ashamed of yourself for being so gullible. There is much you can say about trump but YOU CANNOT SAY HE COLLUDED WITH THE RUSSIANS TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION. That is a LIE.

I misread it - it looked like you were saying you accepted gays and HAD gay marrage.... but rereading it i can see what you mean is that we have it now. My bad.

There are a bunch but they would generally speaking fall into a broader catagory of 'voting related' lets say so i'll just ignore them. There are powers and rights granted to states .. but i suspect that's not what you're looking for so i wont 'cheat' and include any of those. However there are many that only apply to citizens. wherever the constitution uses the word "citizen" it only applies to actual citizens, born or naturalized. If it says "the people' it means everybody. So - consider the 14th amendment section one: Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Citizens have the right to live in the country for example - you can't pass a law which removes a citizen's right to do so. You can lock them up but you can't kick them out. That does NOT apply to anyone BUT citizens. However - the NEXT line says that you shall not deprive any PERSON -meaning ANYONE - of life liberty or property without due process of law. You see the difference. Now that 'privileges and immunites' thing shows up a few times and is a little vague and not fully spelled out in the constitution but has been deemed by several judges to basically mean that you have the right to enter and leave any state and to live there, you cannot be taxed differently than residents of that state, you must be granted 'all the benefits of citizenry that normally would be recognized by common use in countries' , ish. Those rights are not granted to non citizens. A non citizen CAN be forbidden to travel within the us or to and from it. They CAN be taxed differently. They DON"T enjoy the 'commonly accepted benefits of citizenship". which would include a variety of rights. There's not a LOT which is 'citizen specific' in teh constitution but there definitely is some,

well not really, And first off it was clear that there was no evidence conspiracy or 'russian collusion' that even could be charged. So lets get that out of the way - the report left no doubt that the 'russian collusion' narrative which ran for almost 4 years was a complete hoax. Didn't happen. But - he claimed that trump during the investigation behaved in a way that could be considered obstruction possibly and may be chargeable, but that he wasn't sure how that worked with a sitting president and that it would have to be a decision for the justice department. Who reviewed the info and said "Yeah - no. It's not obstruction. Mueller also noted that the 'obstruction' in no way hindered his investigation. There's so many legitimate critisizms of trump - it is simply pathetic to watch people hold on to THIS OBVIOUS LIE. There was no 'russian collusion'. Trump had people who had ties to russia - so did the dems. There is zero evidence that trump at any time tried to work with the russians to influence the election inappropriately. And - there's zero evidence of it from their efforts - their efforts didn't particularly support anything trump did.

Well not in 1970 it hand't been - we only got gay marriage in 2005 But i was in school in the 70's as well and for sure there was not only acceptance of gays but a very strong general principle of 'accept everyone' taught that basically suggested that everyone's got differences - find what you have in common and learn about the differences and we'll all be better off. You wouldn't call it 'colorblind' or 'genderblind' or anything - just more like 'ok - so you've got this thing about you that's different than me and that's cool, i'd like to learn how it affects your life but we can both agree that we should order a pizza and watch this movie right?

And he often is. Mulroney was better than the previous trudeau, harper was a billion light years better than paul martin (a used teabag was better than martin) and it's quite possible PP will be better than justin. Our problem isn't that we hope that the other guy is better - our problem is that we shouldn't be picking the worse guys in the first place.

Harper tightened bail laws. Justin relaxed them But sure- lie to yourself if it's easier than facing the truth. It's kind of your thing as a liberal.

Blah blah blah i hate trump blah blah blah. my conclusions are what the fbi arrived at, what the commission arrived at and what every sane person arrived at. There's no collusion, no conspiracy and nothing wrong done by trump. And the FBI ran a highly inappropriate and unprofessional and at times illegal investigation to DESPERATELY hang something on him and couldn't Here's a clue kid - if you can't tell what the russians used the data for - then they probably didn't use it for anything. It's as simple as that. If they did there'd be evidence, somethnig would have happened in concert with something else or they'd have done soemthing different than they'd been doing or something - but nope nothing. Your entire argument is that the information provided MUST have been used illegally or improperly or even at all. And there's no evidence of it, and in fact evidence that they didn't. You just can't give up 4 years of desperately believing that he was guilty of 'collusion' because cnn told you it was true and you wanted to believe it so bad you could taste it. Find something else to hate him for, god knows there's options. But stop lying about this. You're just making trump look sane.

It was noted that it was the muslims organizing it. Are you saying that all muslims are redneck arseholes? You're islamaphobic?

Go ask them if they want to be a seperate nation with no money from canada. Enjoy your swim back. Well a racist bigot would certainly say so.

Nope. Who has a say or ownership or interest in the land and it's use is open for discussion. Creating local gov'ts is open for discussion. But not a single native anywhere actualy wants soverignty. They'd have to come up with their own money, etc. They seem to recognize the cheques just fine Sorry - first nations are canadian and they don't get to be their own nation and they don't WANT to be their own nation. Imagine if they had NO say in the lands around them, got NO benefit cheques or access to any infrastructure or the like. They'd be dead in no time. The courts have been clear. NEITHER side is going away. first nations can't divorce themselves from canada and they'd starve if they did. In the meantime - i see both the pipelines that the provincial gov't allowed are proceeding and just about to finish. What were you saying about first nations being soverign?