CdnFox

ROFLMAO - isn't it you that says every accusation is an admission? They're not. Sorry. THat's how YOU define it but not others. Nope. Sorry but that's not how it's used by most people as it turns out. https://www.ezrainstitute.com/resource-library/articles/what-is-cultural-marxism/ Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky and V. I. Lenin saw the basis of all human existence as economic. This was the social and political philosophy of the old Soviet Union. It is called classical or economic Marxism. This form of Marxism is not nearly as popular today (except in North Korea). By contrast, you might have heard of Marxists like Antonio Gramsci, Georg Lukács, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Herbert Marcuse. They are among the first cultural Marxists. Their view of Marxism was designed to appeal to and succeed in Western societies. They knew that economic Marxism would likely not win in the West. (This is why it’s sometimes called Western Marxism.) For one thing, they doubted that the working class would rise up in violent revolution as they did in Russia in 1917; the workers in the West were mostly satisfied with life most of the time. To win in the West, you needed a Marxism suited to the West, one that took into account Western ways of thinking. Your first hint that something was wrong should have been that you claim it's a nazi thing - but your definition claims it's alt right, which didn't exist when the nazis were around. Sorry - wikipedia isn't always absolutely correct. Imagine that. Shocking. Nope. The left wing nutbars are redefining 'nazi' to promote their agenda of hatred and division in the hopes of forcing societal change. And that's not anything to do with nazis. They aren't. You just choose to redefine it to mean that when it doesn't/ Hell i don't even think you're dumb enough to believe the republicans are courting nazis. I think you'll do and say anything to try to justify your hatred and bigotry and promote your agenda even when you know it's false. ANd remember - you claimed that even jews are nazis. ANd that the gov't of isreal is. So ANYONE is a nazi and you change your definition on the fly as it suits. There's no nazis. but you need to promote the idea that there IS someone to hate.

Notice how she couldn't address the issue? It has happened quite a bit but that's not the issue that was being discussed.

And? two guys who are NOT professors. And i'll bet dollars to donuts their version of what cultural marxim is would be different than yours . YOu redefine everything to suit your needs. Only a nazi accepts a nazi. And what i have a problem with is you lying about the GOP courting nazis. Which you do. 24/7. Your definition of nazi seems to be either 1) jewish or 2) anyone who has used the word culture and marxism in the same paragraph. You have no idea what a nazi even is. You just know it sounds bad and you like to call people that. Yeah - none of that is true. So it would be more apt to say 'it really is amazing how history re-writes itself. "

It's the honest truth - which is why you are so eager to deny it. This very thread is proof The left lies about the discussion, the left tries to change the subject, the left tries to avoid the issues. It's only the right that actually addresses the facts. Did you want to actually take a crack at the issues raised or are you going to shoot for changing the channel as well? You're a while hetero male. YOu're not part of 'all' in her world. YOu're part of 'them'

the right's "concerns" are that this is going to cost a buttload of money and we're still going to have issues. And that's not hysterical in the slightest. As i say - the left has to lie or dodge the issues , they can't just address them. Thanks for proving the point yet again,

We know that's YOUR theory - but it's not anyone else's. Certainly that's not what people on the right believe, You just have to propagate the lie to justify your own bigotry and hide your anti jewish hatreds. Remember all those times in all those threads you said jews were nazi's and soros was the problem? I do.

I KNEW you didn't proof read your work.

https://archive.ph/lDS6l White, South Asian and East Asian students in Toronto seem to be a problem for Canada’s largest public school board. They crowd the merit-based specialty education programs offered by the district. The response from the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) to this overrepresentation has been to axe merit-based admissions and opt for a semi-random lottery system that discriminates based on race. Now, one-fifth of seats in Toronto’s public specialty programs are reserved for Black, Middle Eastern, Latin American and Indigenous students. Of TDSB’s 230,000-or-so students, at least some have been denied education opportunities due to their race, which would have been unthinkable in Canada 10 years ago. It should be unthinkable now, but between the rise of formal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and the general disinterest the public has in education, it’s creeped its way in. So this will probably end well and won't in any way increase racial tensions.

insanity i think. (don't really care just wanted my participation trophy Yay i'm helping! )

Humour is associated with intelligence, so sadly you won't be able to tell. Sigh. Yes, i'm the don quixote of toilets. What are you, the iron man of !diots? Well, no. The opposite is happening. That's the point. Are you getting dumber as we talk? it feels like you're getting dumber.

this is the thing. ANd they've painted themselves into a corner. Look at poor little exflyer here "WE DEMAND TRANS NOT HAVE TO USE MENS WASHROOMS. GET WITH THE PROGRAM". Ok - well we could change the washrooms so they're more unisex, but that's a lot of money "THERE"S NO NEED - MEN AND WOMEN CAN PEE IN FRONT OF EACH OTHER. THEY DO IT EVERYWHERE! GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!" "ok - but doesn't that mean the trans will still be using mens washrooms?" "OF COURSE, GET WITH TH... oh shit. "

Ya know - you make up the stupidest thing the left could say and they're ahead of you

ROFLMAO - tell me you're an !diot who just realized he's a retard without telling me Another first class logical argument from the left So is the city of burnaby 'so far behind it's scary' for spending this money then? Hmmm That would be left wing asses that are demanding this cash Conservatives were fine with the way it was And i'd point out that if you think i'ts fine for women to go to the washroom with men peeing in urinals, then the trans should have had no problem continuing to use those bathrooms without modification LOL - Gotcha You're too dumb for this

Are high schools run by starbucks now? Did you read the article? Ohhhh i forgot - your reading comprehension problem LOL You probably didn't make it to highschool so you don't realize what it's like

It really doesn't. But if lying about it helps you then i guess that's what you're going to do. But you go ahead and tell burnaby they're wasting their money and they should just be making the boys pee in front of the girls and they need to get out of their dank basements LOL - i'm good with saving the money

Is that the program where you're so petrified of discussing the issue you've got to use tacky phrases like 'get with the program'? So girls walking by a row of guys peeing in urinals is fine. So - as i noted before your big plan is public urination. Says the guy who's absolutely scared spitless of discussing the issue They didn't take the sign off the door did they. They spent 100's of thousands of dollars. So - are you now saying that they're wrong and the city should immediately put a stop to this and save the money?

don't have to have a liberal party to have liberals. And the left pretty much is communist these days. Right tovarish?

Still can't bring yourself to discuss the issue. Well - toilet humour is about all we can expect from the left these days. And the same people will complain that violence against gays and trans is going up. Well - it's what you want i guess.

The lie that the school bathrooms either before or after are anything like your ones at home. Or that it's about their function. Again - you have no answer for the actual issue so you just lie.

How would that work - so women just walk into a bathroom with guys peeing into uranals? So - your solution is public urination?

Sure - because it's the conservatives who demanded this Again - the left has to lie to make it's point. Well at least you're consistent.

Depends. IF the restaurant had to pay 100,000 dollars to renovate it that way then your meal would probably be more But it's very telling of the lefties here that they're pretending that the problem is the style of washroom rather than the cost and other issues. Once again the left has to lie in order to make or avoid the point - they can't just address it head on. I don't know why i'd expect different. Sure - hand over your credit card and i'm sure they'll be quite willing It's fine for new builds, but the costs of remodelling bathrooms such as this which exist is very high. But you knew that was the point. Just couldn't be honest enough to deal with it I guess. Well - that's the left for you.

The bathroom in their house probably didn't cost millions of taxpayer dollars

FIFY.

sounds reasonable. I'm sure there's a way. but i think that's what we're missing - a model and profiling combo that gives us an 'ideal' range and hard cap.