CdnFox

These aren't "new" rights - they're old rights that are interpreted and applied to things in a new way. Nobody added a new 'right' - the charter has said for more than 40 years now that people can't be discriminated against based on sex etc. It's just that it's now been 'discovered' or decided that this applies in this fashion to people who have this mental health issue. So while i appreciate the intent of your idea unfortunately it's not workable in the real world. That is the problem with our laws in a general sense - the law gets made twice. Once when the lawmaker makes it and once when the judges interpret it - and the law can wind up being VASTLY different than it originallyl was after the second one.

Oh noes!!! Someone's liberal buddies might get exposed! Can't have that. How childish. Inquiries regularly produce data that the house itself can't. That's why the liberals are so afraid of it. And much of that info can help the public decide if the gov't is doing the right thing or if they've been incompetent fools. So the 'sitting on a shelf' thing fools no one. But if that's how Jaggers thinks, and he doesn't believe an inquiry would be valuable - why'd he call for one? Why'd he say johnston should step down? Nah - the poor fools who voted ndp thinking it was a different party from the liberals were unfortunately sadly mistaken. I guess neither the liberals OR the ndp care too much for the democratic process.

Unfortunately that isn't an option at a lot of locations (there just isnt' the room) and on top of that the Trans say it makes them feel segregated because they're women just like other women so why are they forced to use a different bathroom than women. It would have been a reasonable solution in many places but the Trans people feel it's just another form of excluding them.

You always shoot first - you just miss a lot. Then when you wind up looking stupid you pout and try to ruin the thread posting like a child again and again. Its kind of your thing. ? Apparently you don't - you're happy to buy them bathrooms Or, sorry, maybe it was that you did have a problem and you just wanted boys to learn to publicly in front of girls? So Trans people shouldn't have to use boy's washrooms - EVERYONE should. Because Europe. Your ramblings are so garbled it's hard to say.

https://globalnews.ca/news/9742306/ndp-singh-election-foreign-interference-johnston/ NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh is defending his party’s decision not to include binding orders in its foreign interference motion, which called for David Johnston to step down as special rapporteur, and says an election does not “make sense” if the goal is protecting Canada’s democracy. Singh told The West Block’s Mercedes Stephenson in an interview that aired Sunday that he wants to get a better understanding of the full extent of allegations of foreign interference. Well if anyone needed any proof that Jagger's is nothing more than Justin's House boy, there you go. He has stated that a public enquiry is necessary, that Johnston isn't acceptable, and that our democracy is on the line..... but won't force the gov't to do anything about it. The ndp is now officially just a chapter house of the Liberals.

that seems HIGHLY unlikely. Of course it is. That's the only reason we're doing this. 99.99 percent of the population is fine with boys showering/going to the washroom with boys and girls with girls. A teeny tiny percent of the population really wants boys to go pee with girls and vice versa. And we're doing this to accommodate their wants. And once again - typical leftie, you failed to address the issue You obviously know i'm right and you're wrong. If you thought you were right you'd be able to make an argument. But ya can't.

It's the modern day equivalent of mass religious fervor.

when socialists lie it's fact. When conservatives tell the truth it's a lie. Yeah. We know how it works with you socialists.

Well here's the thing - it's not diversifying. We're talking about spending hundreds of millions across the country to satisfy a tiny little percent of the population, and one unlikely to grow. So - again, is this going to actually solve the problem for them? Or with this just lead to more demands where we spend hundreds of millions to make someone feel better? From you? i mean... there's so many to choose from....

That's not a point. That's a distraction from the discussion because you know you're wrong. And yet again - the left has to lie or change the channel - they can't deal with facts or issues.

Betrayal? I don't feel betrayed by you - a little disappointed maybe but it would be like feeling 'betrayed' that a puppy piddled on the carpet. You can't expect much from them. Did you need a seperate washroom for that? Dude - maybe come back when you can speak 'enrgrish' .

You didn't even come close. You didn't even mention it. And yet again the left must lie or avoid the issue. Only conservatives actually will address issues head on.

A full deck? I don't think she could be said to have even picked a card yet....

ROFLMAO - isn't it you that says every accusation is an admission? They're not. Sorry. THat's how YOU define it but not others. Nope. Sorry but that's not how it's used by most people as it turns out. https://www.ezrainstitute.com/resource-library/articles/what-is-cultural-marxism/ Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky and V. I. Lenin saw the basis of all human existence as economic. This was the social and political philosophy of the old Soviet Union. It is called classical or economic Marxism. This form of Marxism is not nearly as popular today (except in North Korea). By contrast, you might have heard of Marxists like Antonio Gramsci, Georg Lukács, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Herbert Marcuse. They are among the first cultural Marxists. Their view of Marxism was designed to appeal to and succeed in Western societies. They knew that economic Marxism would likely not win in the West. (This is why it’s sometimes called Western Marxism.) For one thing, they doubted that the working class would rise up in violent revolution as they did in Russia in 1917; the workers in the West were mostly satisfied with life most of the time. To win in the West, you needed a Marxism suited to the West, one that took into account Western ways of thinking. Your first hint that something was wrong should have been that you claim it's a nazi thing - but your definition claims it's alt right, which didn't exist when the nazis were around. Sorry - wikipedia isn't always absolutely correct. Imagine that. Shocking. Nope. The left wing nutbars are redefining 'nazi' to promote their agenda of hatred and division in the hopes of forcing societal change. And that's not anything to do with nazis. They aren't. You just choose to redefine it to mean that when it doesn't/ Hell i don't even think you're dumb enough to believe the republicans are courting nazis. I think you'll do and say anything to try to justify your hatred and bigotry and promote your agenda even when you know it's false. ANd remember - you claimed that even jews are nazis. ANd that the gov't of isreal is. So ANYONE is a nazi and you change your definition on the fly as it suits. There's no nazis. but you need to promote the idea that there IS someone to hate.

Notice how she couldn't address the issue? It has happened quite a bit but that's not the issue that was being discussed.

And? two guys who are NOT professors. And i'll bet dollars to donuts their version of what cultural marxim is would be different than yours . YOu redefine everything to suit your needs. Only a nazi accepts a nazi. And what i have a problem with is you lying about the GOP courting nazis. Which you do. 24/7. Your definition of nazi seems to be either 1) jewish or 2) anyone who has used the word culture and marxism in the same paragraph. You have no idea what a nazi even is. You just know it sounds bad and you like to call people that. Yeah - none of that is true. So it would be more apt to say 'it really is amazing how history re-writes itself. "

It's the honest truth - which is why you are so eager to deny it. This very thread is proof The left lies about the discussion, the left tries to change the subject, the left tries to avoid the issues. It's only the right that actually addresses the facts. Did you want to actually take a crack at the issues raised or are you going to shoot for changing the channel as well? You're a while hetero male. YOu're not part of 'all' in her world. YOu're part of 'them'

the right's "concerns" are that this is going to cost a buttload of money and we're still going to have issues. And that's not hysterical in the slightest. As i say - the left has to lie or dodge the issues , they can't just address them. Thanks for proving the point yet again,

We know that's YOUR theory - but it's not anyone else's. Certainly that's not what people on the right believe, You just have to propagate the lie to justify your own bigotry and hide your anti jewish hatreds. Remember all those times in all those threads you said jews were nazi's and soros was the problem? I do.

I KNEW you didn't proof read your work.

https://archive.ph/lDS6l White, South Asian and East Asian students in Toronto seem to be a problem for Canada’s largest public school board. They crowd the merit-based specialty education programs offered by the district. The response from the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) to this overrepresentation has been to axe merit-based admissions and opt for a semi-random lottery system that discriminates based on race. Now, one-fifth of seats in Toronto’s public specialty programs are reserved for Black, Middle Eastern, Latin American and Indigenous students. Of TDSB’s 230,000-or-so students, at least some have been denied education opportunities due to their race, which would have been unthinkable in Canada 10 years ago. It should be unthinkable now, but between the rise of formal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and the general disinterest the public has in education, it’s creeped its way in. So this will probably end well and won't in any way increase racial tensions.

insanity i think. (don't really care just wanted my participation trophy Yay i'm helping! )

Humour is associated with intelligence, so sadly you won't be able to tell. Sigh. Yes, i'm the don quixote of toilets. What are you, the iron man of !diots? Well, no. The opposite is happening. That's the point. Are you getting dumber as we talk? it feels like you're getting dumber.

this is the thing. ANd they've painted themselves into a corner. Look at poor little exflyer here "WE DEMAND TRANS NOT HAVE TO USE MENS WASHROOMS. GET WITH THE PROGRAM". Ok - well we could change the washrooms so they're more unisex, but that's a lot of money "THERE"S NO NEED - MEN AND WOMEN CAN PEE IN FRONT OF EACH OTHER. THEY DO IT EVERYWHERE! GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!" "ok - but doesn't that mean the trans will still be using mens washrooms?" "OF COURSE, GET WITH TH... oh shit. "

Ya know - you make up the stupidest thing the left could say and they're ahead of you