CdnFox

Businesses are wising up. The hockey league won't force players to wear pride jerseys. Of course - they said NO jerseys (cancer, etc) will be forced. But the left is butthurt over the pride stuff. But look at the comments - i doubt the nhl will suffer over this decision

Awww little guy Don't get mad just because you got called on your bullshit Translation - "I know what you actually said was correct and i can't fight that so i'll change what you said to be something i think i can argue with" ROFLMAO - man, the only thing 'perfectly clear' around here is you know i'm right and just can't cope Well lets look at ontario - this is the 'toned down' version of it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_sex_education_curriculum_controversy So - and remembering this curriculum was prepared by an actual convicted child sex offender - the elementary curriculum includes anal and oral sex, what your sexual orientation is, masturbation techiques, how to give consent to someoen else (and that sex is ok as long as you do). etc etc. Along with very explicit onine content showing sexual acts. All to kids under the age of 11. Because we all know 8 year olds REALLY need to understand anal sex. Anything else? Or are you done looking stupid for the day? Next time do a google search on your own - the stuff is everywhere.

LOL - here's your prize

LOL - like i've told you a million times - the moment you say "This is what you mean" or "so what you're REALLY saying is" and then go on to re-write what a person actually said - youv'e lost. Tell me you have no rational argument without telling me

Probably would have been easier just to kill kiefer sutherland but, whatever, it's handled. The us has all kinds of 'succession' rules in place. Remember - it was formed at a time when war, civil unrest and rebellion, plauge and sickness, and the occasional outbreak of witchcraft were all serious issues that were very present things and there was no 'secret service' really that had the tools to fight that. So they planned for pretty much everything. Saying 'what if trump was president after jan 6" is a little like the old game of 'what if germany and japan had won the war and taken over america' etc. Fun mental exercise i guess but it has no basis in reality as far as outcomes go.

That was explaining to me why he's wrong. If you can get HIM to understand it, THEN you get a prize

I suppose that's as good a way as any of saying you have comprehension problems and are running home with your tail between your legs You were dead wrong and now you're butthurt. Typical loser leftie - when someone points out the simple facts you freak out and have a hissy fit because they don't fit your pathetic echo chamber narrative. All i can say is with 4 billion years of evolution to work with we sure as hell should have been able to do better than you.

That would depend on the context. If they deliberately turned away a more competent white actor for the express purpose of hiring a black person instead - yes. If there's pretty much any other reason no

Oh i don't think we need look far to see lots and lots of examples of anti white racism. It's all over. And many claim that it's perfectly legit because it's NOT racism as long as it's directed to white people. The govt' even teaches that to it's people. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/only-white-people-can-be-racist-inside-global-affairs-anti-racism-course-materials Whites (especially males) are often not welcome to apply for various job postings, whites have been attacked by other groups such as first nations in obvious acts of racial hatred (Screaming that they hate white people, - pretty on the nose) and judges have refused to allow it to be considered a hate crime. It is perfectly fine to march with a sign that 'black lives matter" but if you do it with 'white lives matter" you're in trouble and you will be called out publically and shamed - hell even a sign that says 'its ok to be white' sent the US into a tizzy." I could go on for hours. I'm all for wiping out racism but you can't stop racism with more racism.

PFFFTT - quit patting yourself on the back, you're nothing special. EVERYBODY'S right about him being wrong. There's 5 year old kids out there who are right about him being wrong. The average house cat is right about him being wrong. He got outwitted last week by a dung beetle that really wasn't even paying attention. It's not exactly an achievement, it's a game the whole family can play! Trying to get him to UNDERSTAND why he's wrong... now THAT would be Nobel Prize material.

And? That's my point - we can keep them out of danger without getting into complex sexual issues. Exactly. It's normal and to be expected but it's not a big deal. But while they may be curious kids aren't "doing it doggy style" at age 10 How many 8 year olds would you say are masturbating to orgasm? Is that a big problem we're facing in our world today? Give me a break. You mean puberty? I think you need to go back and re-read my posts to you. There's nothing wrong with explaining what's happening to their bodies. Not that parents can't handle that themselves - the book that was all the range when i was i kid was "what's happening to me" and it did a brilliant job of teaching what's going on and why but it didn't even touch on sex itself. This isn't complex.

The tax biden was considering was THE SAME AS CANADA'S - is Biden american? Yes? Oh gee - then you were WRONG. GOD DAMN are you dumb You can clearly see from examples around the world AND THE DEMOCRAT PROPOSED VERSION that what you' are saying is absolutely false. You might as well be arguing the world is flat, it takes about the same kind of brain power. It's unfortunate that the medical expertise available in your trailer park wasn't up to repairing the damage when you were dropped as a child. If stupid were jet fuel, you'd be supersonic.

Yes but it has both in the one job posting so it's very efficient.

Well all this pride stuff is sure bringing people and govt together. I honestly don't care if you're pro or anti gay - this stuff is bad. And there is NO REASON why it had to happen other than the Alphabet mafia had to push their agenda further than "lets be equal" and go after people's kids and demand it was uncanadian not to wear pride junk.

You mean from torontonians as they descend into the hellish landscape that awaits them year three? I doubt they'll be exaggerated

I think it's quite clear that traditionally the POTUS or those who are likely to run for POTUS are not subject to the same laws.

When 95% of conservatives are authortarian then they're actually liberals. Conservatives are anti authortarian. Democrats wanted people to be slaves. Checkmate.

PFFFFFT - you can't have in the SUMMER dimwit ... everyone's too tanned

You shouldn't have taken off your glasses - they never know about your alter ego as long as you don't take off your glasses.

Depends on how you show them. By example? No. By force? Yes.

Hey shit-for-brains if you hadn't pushed all those crayons up your nose you might have noticed the poster you were discussing this with specifically said "INTERNATIONAL'" when discussing carbon taxes AND if you had more than two neurons to work with you probably would have puzzled out that the carbon tax the dems considered was the same as Canada's. DAMN you're stupid. How can you have a "Universal truth" about something that doesn't exist - ESPECIALLY WHEN EVERYONE ELSE IN THE UNIVERSE DOES IT DIFFERENTLY!!!! DAMN you're stupid kid. Every time i think you said the dumbest thing you can you amaze me with your skill at stupid. And only the worst loser in the kingdom of losers doubles down on saying something as uneducated as you did with something WORSE.' You have NO clue about carbon taxes, the "universal truth' is that all the current ones in the world work differently than what you suggested and the dems proposed something the same as Canadas - right down to the 'rebate for lower income' song and dance. I'd tell you to go drown yourself in a bucket like the other rats but that would probably actually IMPROVE your intelligence. You seem to be into negative iq points as it is so zero would be a step up.

Nothing that's going to get them pregnant and unlikely to result in sexual disease. Sure they may have played a ilttle 'show me yours and i'll show you mine' but thats about it. They know there's differences and they're curious. But it's not really 'sexual' per se. And i don't think you'll find a lot of 10 year olds who are doing oral sex a lot. Sorry, but nothing you're saying is standing up as a reason to expose young children to serious discussions about sexuality. High school starts at 12 for most kids. You can talk about puberty with them a little before then, sure. You can also do some 'stranger danger' training and explain to them that it's not appropriate for anyone to be touching down there right now. But - kids are not sexually active in any way that's likely to lead to danger at age 10 or 11. As to the world - it's as easy as saying some things will have to wait till you're older to discuss. They may see things but they don't understand it and they're not supposed to. Just like moms tell their kids that babies "come from their tummy' when a 7 year old asks without having to discuss the benefits of doggy style vs missionary. Just let the freakin' kids be kids for a bit. There's plenty of time later to get into sexuality and complex human relations later on.

Oh you mean like the pictures from the pride parade i already posted? Or the ones i posted today - here's a link to that Me- "Here's proof" You - "ok - but i'll need proof". Sealioning is so last year

So... you think there's no reason to believe that texas has oil. Welp - there you go folks For those of you who thought he MIGHT at least be as smart as a rock.... nope.

First stage only. Girls are not interested in finding a sex partner at age 9 And that would mean a lot of them wouldn't even be in first stage puberty till after they hit high school. I mean seriously - what age did you start having sex at? I was younger than average and i was definitely in high school. Lets not pretend it's desperately important for 8 year olds to have a working understanding of sex in case their boyfriend wants to fool around. And as to their first period - yeah the 'puberty' talk might be valuable but they're not rushing out to have sex at age 12. Sorry, it's just not a thing. Not for consensual sex anyway. The vast majority won't have sex till after 16 (sometimes LONG after) and the remainder almost all start a 15. So fine - sex ed at 13 -14 when they're in high school might be approprate. They are a hell of a lot older and more able to deal with issues than they are when they're 7.