CdnFox

LOL Look at you fail "SHIT! He answered all my points and i can't refute a thing he said... how do i get out of this.... Umm... um... I KNOW! A GERBIL PICTURE WILL BE MUCH MORE PERSUASIVE THAN A COUNTER ARGUMENT!!!!" LOL aww kiddo. Next time try to be smarter than the gerbil

The path to hell is frequently paved with liberal good intentions

Kid - YOU were the one who came back and said "well don't ask the right, ask this person". I replied "i'm asking you, the other person isn't relevant". For fcuks sake go take a grade 3 course in english till you figure it out. You're an embar rassment. No, as pointed out i really shouldn't. You were just too stupid to a) come up with something on your own and b) to realize what he said is completely irrelevant. As we have seen carney is in fact NOT a competent leader and the liberals AND carney are corrupt as hell yet you kept them in, so no you didn't. LOL reduced to lies again i see. And your best argument is "err... ummm... ahh.,,, NO YOU!!!!" Pathetic. But I shouldn't expect someone who supports terrorists and the slaughter of innocent children as being acceptable because 1948 to support democracy.

Public service job cuts: 5,400 notices issued this weeks su So the us has 10 times our population approx . Trump and Musk with DOGE laid off 200,000 workers, some immediately and some over time And the left here lost their shit. Now carney is laying off 28,000. MORE than trump based on population. Bet the libs trip over themselves to explain: a) why it's SUCH a good idea when carney does it b) How it's the conservative's fault anyway c) why are we even talking about this? You're just trying to make liberals look bad.

To select qualified leaders who are presenting a reasonable and practical vision for the country that represents the thinking majority of the people within it, and who have the skills to carry that out, and also to remove those people from power who have proven to be corrupt or ineffective That last part is one of the most important btw. You know, the one you hate. In YOUR mind tho people shouldn't have that right, they should just accept your beloved liberal party which is why you get so angry every time someone suggests using voting to hold politicians to account

Sigh. " I'm asking you" literally word for word. I'm asking you. Instead you go to the quote BEFORE that because you don't know how english works. In addition at no time was i asking plato. Ahh yes, your traditional response when you know you've said something stupid and can't think of how to dig out I also asked: " Would it be possible to ask you to get your head out of your ass and have your own opinion?" I take it that's a yes from you LOL can't think for yourself but nice to see you admit it. And i notice you completely ran away when you realized you were wrong about 'democracies' too LOLOLOL Man, there's so many fails here on your part it's hard to keep track of them all

I said "i'm asking you". that means i'm asking you. I'm sorry that english is hard for you. Voting is precious to me because it allows us to select our representation. But that does not mean that we have a democratic government. Sigh. Is this going to be yet ANOTHER case where i have to explain how our gov't works to you? FFS did you not attend school AT ALL??? We have democratic representation but we do not have a democracy.

LOLOL!!!!!!!!!!

I'm asking you. If you don't know then you're basically admitting you're full of shit. Although that would make you the last person on this board to point it out all the rest having done so ages ago Utterly irrelevant. First off what we have isn't a democracy. So it's kind of a stupid thing to bring up. And secondly he had never seen anything remotely close to what we have. So his thoughts aren't directly relevant to what we're doing today. Would it be possible to ask you to get your head out of your ass and have your own opinion? Or are you only able to regurgitate irrelevant opinions that are 2,000 years out of date?

You don't know that.

I ger angry every time i see that - "expects". How did we give something up in writing that's specific and locked in and they gave us a "probably, you can expect it" with no future guarantees?

Then I guess we'll expand it elsewhere right? I mean it's what you want

If you mean I love a good laugh then sure But you're the only one with a compulsion here junior. You wake up every morning and search for my post to put little red arrows and all the other people that you don't like that are mean to you and then the moment you're proven to be wrong or somebody makes you look silly you freak out and do this little thing where you just post the word loser over and over again about a thousand times and accuse people of things that you yourself are guilty of. You're completely obsessed. And you start it every single time somebody shows that you're wrong. The entire forum laughs at you except for a tiny handful of people who are equally bitter about being made to look stupid. This is why nobody believes you're an adult. Adults just don't think like you do

Perhaps he reads your posts That's certainly has been your position for years Just like you and the left did. Probably, sooner or later the right has to ask itself if you don't respect democracy why should we?

You're thinking he's dismissed the car industry as probably beyond help right now and salvaging what he can in agriculture? I mean maybe, i don't know that our auto manufacturing will survive trump, that's true. And maybe carney decided not worth trying to save when he CAN reduce pain for farmers. but even still, this is still a horrible deal. It hasn't won ANY guarantees for farmers at all. There isn't even a guarantee of what the tariffs will be reduced to, never mind how long. China is going to all but own us, if we don't keep letting more and more of their cars in and next it'll be other products (or else we kill your farmer's business!! Ha ha stupid Gwei lo!!!) And I'm curious at the idea that's being kicked around that we're supposed to have some sort of sympathy because he's been dealt a bad hand. THE LIBERALS WERE THE ONES WHO DEALT THE HAND!!! And he was PART of that! It's like watching someone shoot themselves in the foot and then having someone else claim we can't be too mad that he can't run because it's hard to run with your foot shot. He said he can handle his crap. He said he would go out and get us good trade and get us trading with other countries. He said he could handle trump. He said he could deal with inter provincial trade. I have no mercy for the fact that he is lied about all of that

Hold out your arm We kind of wanted him to get a deal for us not the Chinese. And you're 100% wrong. We have not been screaming about deals we've been screaming about making things better. He said he'd make the situation with trump better, instead it's gotten considerably worse. He said he would make housing better but it's getting worse. He said he would make investment in Canada better and it's getting worse. He said he would increase trade with foreign nations and this deal does not do that, it makes us buy more from other people not them by more from us. The point was to make it so that we sold more products to others and he hasn't even gotten all of the tariffs off of our products. And we don't even have a deal for those tariffs, they can put them back on tomorrow we should have to let them sell cars I don't give a crap whether he does one deal or a million deals, I care about whether or not canadians are better off. Are we selling more product to other people, are we getting more jobs, is our economy growing, are we getting the kind of investment we need. And all you losers can do is pretend that somehow what canadians have been saying is "we want to see you do a deal even if it benefits someone else instead". Yeah - NOBODY said they wanted that

I think everything you said has validity, but I think it's still coming from a point of view where you are assuming that the interests he has in his mind are Canadian. I think he's trying to set up his relationships for after he leaves office which is where the real money starts. Remember that as part of Justin's trade mission he went to represent Canada but also negotiated a deal for brookfield for the loan of the $500 billion that elon musk used to buy twitter. That is a matter of public record, so we already have substantial business dealings with these people and I think he wants to be the guy that you call if you need a $500 billion dollar loan in the future from someone and he'll arrange it with a small 5% commission I do not believe that his current actions are intended to serve the interest of Canada. He has given access to Canada to the Chinese EV manufacturers basically for free. They have made no commitments, they have not promised to do anything and he has already stated that this is the"Initial " Round of cars with more to come. And we got our tariffs on food that they need reduced to a mere 15% which is still severely egregious, and no guarantee that they won't raise it the next day and if they do we still have to let them bring in their cars

So with that in mind why are you still supporting the liberals? The vast majority of liberals even today voted for this. They knew what they were doing was wrong let's not kid ourselves. Like you said I think he wanted to look tough like his Dad. So how can this be tolerated? If this goes unpunished then what happens to the next conservative government if they decide to come down on a protest they don't like? Will you complain then when you didn't complain before? Look at what's happening in the states and how many millions of times I have said to you that when the liberals were doing bad things in the states if you don't speak up then sooner or later the conservatives will do something you don't like and it's too late to convince anyone then. And then they got trump. You don't think that can happen here? I assume you're not that naive. So how will you hold the government to account for what they did when they stole the human rights of people unlawfully and knowlingly?

She hit him. The tape shows it, all parties involved including the left-wing parties agree to that fact. He was taken to the hospital and that is an agreed upon fact as well. And you can hear in the body cam footage from him from his voice that he was injured. If you don't know what pain in someone's voice sounds like he must be very young So how do you explain that the wheels were turned away from him if she hit him? You keep ignoring that simple fact like you're desperately holding on to a security blanket or your pacifier.

He was admitted into the hospital, that's on the record and they've acknowledged that. And this is what he was reported to be treated for. If these aren't the injuries he was treated for then what was he treated for? And regardless of what it was he still got hit hard enough to have to go to the hospital to be looked at. So the answer to your question is not quite as gullible as you. Biatch hit him with a car, injured him bad enough to be treated at a hospital, and she deserved to be shot as she was acting in a violent and irresponsible fashion against the instructions of police You do seem like the kind that laughs at the idea of a police officer being injured. I'm sure that she and her girlfriend felt the same way. Right up until she got a bullet in the head. But hey, glad you're finding it funny

Well politics is a funny beast. You may be right, of course that'll be up to the Americans. But the majority of seats that are up for grabs are republican and if things go badly for trump it is possible some could flip. Even Alaska is in play at the moment. Whether or not they can flip 15 seats or not I don't know, it's not going to be easy and honestly I cannot believe that the democrats are so badly damaged that they're going to struggle. This should be a cakewalk and somehow their popularity is very similar to trump's

Whether we mention anything bad or not it is the worst possible choice of words. You can see how moe reacts when he says it And the problem is rather than letting people watch it and decide from themselves the CBC new it would be harmful and chose to edit it out to protect him. Because they knew a lot of people would take it badly. Especially the ultra creepy way he said it So this isn't a story about him and his new world order, which we'll talk about some other time because it's creepy AF, This is a story about how he said something dumb that would hurt him and the CBC covered it up rather than showing it to the public Another proof on top of a pile the size of the empire state building to prove the CBC is propaganda for the liberals

LOL and you're reduced to crying like a baby and hurling grade 2 insults because you can't actually make a counter argument Sorry your heroes disappoint you kiddo.

Abd still no condemning of the deaths. The only thing obvious here kiddo is that you support the current gov't of iran and don't want to call them out for killing people. They fund hamas after all which supports your anti jew agenda. No sane person with any moral decency would refuse to call this out for what it is. This is horrible. But you're fine with it because you're okay with the Iranian regime as long as they keep opposing the Jews