CdnFox

Why? You're not demanding answers from people who did the cheering here. I assume your middle name really is 'hypocrisy'?

The world was here before the left and the world will be here after. The left destroys countries and cultures not the world. They certainly did a number on Canada in case you weren't paying attention I think you're too stupid to really explain this to. It would be like explaining quadratic equations to a chihuahua. You over exaggerate your lack of understanding to try and make it look like you're being sarcastic but in reality you just don't understand. And you say these things now because what you want to do down the road is play a little game where the government cuts GST and life gets easier for people and then you get to scream "but you promised that it would generate massive revenue as well!" when you were the only one who said that. Cutting certain taxes appropriately can indeed results in more revenues for governments. Our part certainly prove that. Excessive taxes can definitely reduce revenues for governments. Trudeau has proved that. It is entertaining to watch you pretend that you're very stupid to cover up the fact that you're fairly stupid

LOL i love that you're working so hard to lie about what various tax cuts are supposed to do so that when they're successful you can claim they were supposed to have a different effect

Not for you it isn't

It really was what he was doing and now you're getting called out by lots of people on your lies. Here's the deal kid. If you have to lie to make your point you don't have a very good point. And this whole way along you've had to lie and distort and twist what he said to try and fit a narrative. There's nothing wrong with Peterson. You may disagree with him but he's quite intelligent and makes valid points which is more than we can say for you, and if that weren't true you wouldn't have to lie to attack him. But the point again was you should be watching what PP says. We're only about 2 and a half months from an election. Might be a good idea to pay attention.

That's not the whole video at all. What, you think he walked out and those were his first words? That's a clip. You posted a clip and it doesn't say what you said he said. You have to twist and distort its meaning to get that. What he said was that if you're Hitler The Logical thing to do if all you cared about was winning would be to do this but he didn't therefore he cared for more than just winning. You tried to claim he's telling Hitler how to win the war he doesn't even say it would result in a win, just that if you're hitler and you are focused on winning this is what you do. You lied. You always do. I don't know why. I see you've also been called out on your lobster lie And all of this to avoid the fact that a rational adult voter would watch this interview to see what Poilievre has to say. If you could stop being a liberal fanboy for 2 seconds you'd realize that was true.

Sure because a protest and a wildfire are pretty much the same thing. 🙄 Like I said, most of the Lefty's here were cheering when the health executive was shot in the middle of the street. How do you circle that square?

Exactly. This poster specifically but leftists in general take what happened and try and twist it out of context. Trump says he'll be a dictator on the first day when it comes to two things. They say he promised to be a dictator starting day one. And so on. It is extremely clear from these clips he is not advising Hitler what to do nor is he saying that lobsters are people. But that is precisely how moonbox chose to frame it. And the reason he's doing that is because he wants to deflect from the point I made earlier that an intelligent reasonable voter will always listen to what all of the candidates have to say, not just the ones they like. He knows I'm right but he doesn't want to admit that people should be listening to the Jordan Peterson interview because of his tribalism. People should be listening to the interview, lobsters are not people, nobody is telling Hitler what he should have done.

ROFLMAO!!! Oh look, you're back to your old tricks of posting things which proved you lied You cut a clip out of context, and you KNOW that because you already are trying to make excuses for the fact people are going to point that out. What he said is that if you're being entirely logical THAT is the logical thing to do if all you want to do is win the war BUT that obviously hitler didn't do that which tells us.... and goes on. He's not saying 'that's how you win a war', he's saying if hitler's ONLY goal was to win the war instead of killing the jews you put them to work as slaves and kill them afterwards. So o So your suggestion that he was saying that this is what hitler SHOULD have done was a complete lie. Just like your 'lobster' thing, he did not say our brains work the same as lobsters. He said that both are 'sarotonistic' and there's similarities. And he didn't say hitler should have enslaved the jews he said "if all hitler wanted to do was win the war that's what he'd do. " In order to make the point that he didn't do that so therefore there's more to it. As always you have to lie and distort the truth. But thanks for posting the proof you were full of shit to save me the time

He thinks the stone age is where everyone has free dope. Slight misunderstanding there i think.

Well, remember that the same people that are complaining about that now are also the ones that were gleeful and excited about somebody being shot and gunned down in cold blood on the streets. So obviously our society has set the mocking of individuals for their suffering is being acceptable to one degree or another. As I said I don't approve of it in either case. But people are free to express their opinions whether I agree with them or not

You certainly don't. If a steaming turd could type it would be a more useful contributor here than you are.

And yet the quality of services has gone down

So you're saying you're fine with the gov't censorship and it's all their fault because they've got more money than you?

Trump has never had any love for his opponents. And like most of his nonsense there's a few kernels of truth in there. They really did not do what they needed to do to prevent this even though they were warned it would be coming or at least a possibility. But having said that sometimes things like this just happened. This is why we have insurance. I think it's inappropriate for others to be taking Glee in the misfortune of others. I think that's relatively tacky and shouldn't be smiled upon at all. However I would point out that there were a large number of lefties on this board who are clapping and cheering when a man was gunned down in the streets and cold blood just because he worked for a company you guys didn't like. I didn't approve of the cheering then and I don't approve of the cheering now, but you guys are in less of a position to be making these claims

yet true. Where hasn't it been? sure, ok.

I'm often wondered. He pretty much never breaks character though so if it's an act he's very committed to the performance. But I get it it's hard to imagine anybody's that stupid and weird

...Which was part of the discussion of those two factors. If by that you mean they were too lazy to address proper forest management practices then absolutely I really see no evidence of climate change making it worse. For some always burnt down and we've always had our challenges and climate always changes but the practices we had 30 years ago are not as appropriate today as they were 30 years ago. Yet we still practice them. And I think more than anything that's what gets us into trouble. We think we can just keep doing the same things we've done for the last X number of years and that's fine without realizing that if the world changes we have to change with it. Once you're planning can account for that easy enough. If we have to thin the trees or look at doing things differently one way or another then there's always a solution. It's when we ignore things that we run into trouble No just crazy if you think that just talking was going to do anything. You can't have been that serious about it if all you did was talk. And we have ministries that are responsible for this stuff. Creating more bureaucracy is probably not the answer and certainly wasn't what was holding us back from taking appropriate action. We have always looked at fire mitigation. We've always looked at how to address flooding and other natural issues that are direct result of our environment. That is nothing new or revolutionary or even left wing, hell the hunters have paid for a absolute crap tonne of works through groups like ducks unlimited and the bear program in bc to preserve and protect and adapt various natural areas to weather and human activity and such. And that's going back damn near 100 years now. But we waste our time and resources screwing around with carbon taxes that do NOTHING instead, and that's where all the political discussion winds up.

well you should give it back seeing as you disagree with it so much Anywhoo, i'm sure those people will appreciate having the same opportunities as you to get wealthy.

AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHHA!!!!! LOLOL!! Well. I'm literally crying a bit i'm laughing so hard i mean after all the confirmed reports, after seeing it with our own eyes, after all that's happened can you imagine saying that

It was determined that we could compete in those areas and we did. We can compete with wheat as well but the idea of the marketing board was to allow the government to use wheat as a international political bargaining chip and control the flow, there was never a fear that we wouldn't produce it. There were a variety of reasons but eggs and chicken and milk products were not seen as being something that we could compete at without using methodologies that we weren't comfortable with. Right or wrong that was the thinking You're not the only one saying There are many who feel that the government has gotten too bog down into areas that are not as corresponsibilities and as a result the core responsibilities have suffered

Story was about trump tho. sooo yeah, it wouldn't be your side if you WERE a canadian They're not the ones doing the crying Oh you must be one of those evil terrible no good repressive 1 percenters who got rich off of everyone else's work then. I've been expressly told they're the only ones who benefit

Yup. You're brainless. Certified.

We did. Harper was 3/4 of the way through negotiating it and it was going well if not difficult and they were right at the end when justin took over. Unfortunately Freeland completely bought the deal and while we did sign something it did not take into account the EU propensity for excessive regulation which attempts to filter out foreign products and we didn't get an exemption for our products. The end result was that they started selling us more and we really didn't sell them anything that we weren't already selling them.

Yeah yeah except of course he never said any of that. And he's the one asking the questions, the person you're listening to is the one answering. And as I noted you are welcome to remain as ignorant as you like. There's no law that says you have to get involved in politics at all or educate yourself in the slightest. In fact i always kind of assumed that WAS the case with you. Some people just don't feel compelled to participate in democracy. But i believe that it's the responsibility of citizens and voters to listen and educate themselves and not rely on echo chambers or bias confirming news stories when picking a leader and exercising their democracy so that they can make informed and intelligent choices based on their own observations as well as the facts available. But it's just a belief, you're free to continue to believe that educating yourself is counter productive.