CdnFox

Ha! Jokes on you, she's into that shit

I'm telling the truth and i provided proof. And THAT'S why i'm "on ignore", even tho we both know you read my stuff. You're just afraid to reply most of the time. People like nationalist and westcanman just laugh and make fun of your stupidity so you put up with it, but i take the time to show EXACTLY why you're a brain dead lying lefty pantie smear. And you HATE that i'm right. LOL - i know you read this. But it's ok for you to crawl back in your hole and pretend you didn't and cry yourself to sleep if you have to. Everyone knows you don't have the balls to face someone who'll actually take the time to not only point out you're a twat, but exactly WHY you're a twat.

Kid, we ALL have sub replacement birth rates. They are doing better than either of our countries. And they've got far too many people as it is, so they've got a lot of room to p.ay with there The us is bigger and has about 400 million people ish and china has like 1.5 billion as i recall. The fact is for them reducing their population a little would actually improve things for them. But they're not 'going' anywhere. And the 1 child policy WAS what they had when their growth rate was too strong. It's not there any more. They got rid of that like 10 years ago. China's going to get stronger, not weaker. And russia could very well do the same, too soon to tell. Again, you're saying trump is a liar. is that what you believe? You seem somewhat afraid to address that.

Sorry but there's no indication that Russia were china are going away this century. In fact if anything there's some reason to believe that Chinese may be extremely resurgent in the not too distant future. Russia could definitely go either way. So I'm afraid you lost that one handily kiddo. Like I said, it's not nice to be calling trump a liar like that

They are absolutely a strategic threat. In fact that's trump's whole reason for one in Greenland. You're not telling me trump was lying are you?

Sure! Remember all those times you SWORE that just because charges or lawsuits had been filed the indictment or evidence charges were proof trump was guilty? Well..... Trump says he’s expanding defamation suit against New York Times after unfavorable poll | Donald Trump | The Guardian Trump Refiles $15 Billion Lawsuit Against The New York Times - The New York Times Gotcha little guy But nevertheless they have a long history of faked up stories. Remember when they posted the picture of the 'Starving Gaza Child" then had to admit it was fake and the kid had other medical conditions? NYT Appends Gazan Child Photo With Editors' Note - i24NEWS NYT building vandalized after Gaza story correction issued | The Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle One example of many. Sorry roboloser, you lost yet again This is why you're afraid to talk to me

And America has still benefited. That's why Donald Trump signed the deal in the first place. Remember when he called it the greatest trade deal ever? And America hasn't moved on, America still benefiting from Canada not having its own military industry. Sure they are. Why wouldn't they be. Russia is still a major threat and so is china. Kind of painted yourself into the corner there little guy

ummmm...... you're the one who claims he can't. I'm pointing out he did LOLOL holy shit kid did you forget what you were even arguing? Quick - is it rabbit season or duck season LOLOL!! You're such a tard! Leaders can and do meet with anyone they want to. However generally speaking it would be frowned on to meet with representatives who aren't part of the gov't about gov't matters as a matter of course. It happens but it's far less common. But it happens. Remember when danielle smith went to meet with trump to discuss federal trade issues? Yeah, me too I don't know where you get your weirdo ideas from but it's certainly proof you never worked for the gov't or military.

Sorry but that's not true. The Americans benefited tremendously under both of those things. The only things piggy back on was the military and to be blunt that's how America wanted it. Whenever candidate attempted to develop its own military technology America came up and shut it down. The most famous being the Avro Arrow where the president practically yelled at the prime minister and insisted to be scrapped So that's kind of on you. This is what you wanted and now you're complaining now that you've arrived to the benefits

That is absolutely not true. It's not considered to be a good idea because the leader of the opposition can't speak for the gov't, but there's nothing forbidding it and in fact it has happened many times. You'll remember Andrew Scheer when he was leader of the opposition meeting with Mike Pence, vice president at the time. . You're absolutely wrong as always. Why don't you look this stuff up beforehand? Why are you always this stupid? If you're so broke, why don't you sell yourself to strangers like your mother does? You obviously want older men to pay attention to you you talk about it 24 hours a day. If that's your thing why not make some money at it?

It was bare before then, now it's just bare and amusing 😆

Of course he can. But it would be very rare for the opposition to do that. Government has talked about it and has not ruled it out and the gov't propaganda arm, the cbc, is floating the idea as well. They point out that china would be the ones buying half the oil from a new pipeline, so it would be normal they'd want to be a major investor. In wake of new energy pact, could China invest in West Coast pipeline? | CBC News You always open your mouth before doing your research and you wind up looking like a tard

LOL yes we see you can't stop! You're obessed But... "his reading comprehension show now too"? LOLOL looks like i've upset you to the point where you're unable to use english properly yet again Maybe don't screw up and sound like you failed grade 3 english when you're commenting on other people's 'comprehension'? LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!

For a couple of decades now the term has been associated with various conspiracy theories. So it's not that they're not going to understand what it means, it's that you're deliberately leaving the door open to misinterpretation. It's a stupid thing to say. Especially in a mega creepy long drawn out way like that As google ai says, 'The phrase "New World Order" is often associated with conspiracy theories regarding a secretive, totalitarian world government, frequently linked to dictatorships or global elite control' That's not what you want your vision of the world to be associated with It would be like claiming your gov't was dedicated to a world of happyness where everyone is gay! Technically not inaccurate but dude! The word is associated with something else these days

Uhhh last election he was within 1.5 points of carney and is currently tied I see you're into the nyquil already this weekend

He did nothing wrong. Video tries desperately to skew the truth by claiming that he put himself in front of her vehicle but he wasn't in front of her vehicle till she backed up and turned. He's lying about what police officers are trying to do as well. The whole video is a propaganda attempt,that particular news source is well known for lying and doctoring footage.

Lib supporters these days...

Woah woah woah! You're POOR on top of it all!?!?! I thought your mom made descent money 'entertaining' men? You mean you're the son of a whore AND broke? Dude. No wonder you're so messed up. Here's 10 bucks, go buy yourself a real parent.

Nope, it's carney's for letting them in

Is that what your dad used to say to you? Or was it your mom when you complained about your dad? LOL either way you're one broken little boy aren't you

What's really funny is that when that happened she screams about how the judges are all corrupt and stupid

Yes yes, we see you, (waives) LOL i was wondering if you were going to be so emotionally butthurt you'd go back to the memes It's always fun watching you mentally crash

Which would be entirely relevant if the deal benefited all farmers. But it doesn't even come remotely close4 For canola: Direct/Indirect Contribution: While some estimates place the direct GDP contribution around $5 billion, the overall economic footprint (including processing, crushing, and exporting) is much higher, with $25 billion originating specifically from growing and developing canola. For automotive The Canadian automotive industry is a cornerstone of the national economy, directly contributing over $16 billion (CAD) to the GDP in 2024, with total economic activity, including related sectors and suppliers, reaching higher figures. It is one of Canada's largest manufacturing sectors, supporting over 125,000 direct jobs and roughly 427,000 in total. So comparing direct to direct it's 5 billion for canola vs 16 billion for automotive. Both generate substantial additional money in shipping, supplies etc. Even if we toss in lobsters it's not like canola and fish are a bigger deal. both are important. Both generate a lot of economic activity. But the number seem to indicate that we can't really afford to give up one for the other, no matter how you slice it that's a loss

Yes we can all see you, we know you're back And you're spouting the same old dribble and desperately desperately desperately looking for someone who will pay you some sort of sexual attention for some reason. You seem absolutely frantic to live out your weird pedophile fantasies where somebody is touching you inappropriately again. Seriously, just go find a boyfriend and the real world and come to grips with your sexuality.

I'm sure the republicans appreciate your efforts to make sure they stay in for another term Nothing turns people towards the republicans faster than a bunch of democrat lefties lying their asses off and looking like children