CdnFox

This one is a little bit harder than good. Good was pretty cut and dry, even before all of the angles were out I could see she drove at the cop and hit him and that really is the end of that story. Drive your car at a cop, hit the cop, get shot. This one the video footage isn't quite as clear and it's not quite as clear exactly what was happening or triggered the shooting I think we're going to probably have to wait for more video to come out but from what I can tell and from the facts that seem undisputed the guy had a gun, the interacted with the cops and at first it was relatively peaceful but then he decided to get physically involved and he was taken to the ground and he was trying to resist when one of the officers discovered he had a gun. It looks like that officer removed that gun but as he was doing so another officer yelled gun gun gun and a different officer believed there was a threat and shot him. Now the really sad part is from what I can tell it sounds like he had already been disarmed but that was apparently unclear to the officer who fired. This appears to be legitimate, there was a gun, the guy was resisting, you can see him in one part of the video reaching behind his back for where the gun was just before the cop took it and in a split second you can have a miscommunication like that where the gun is secured but the other officers don't think it is That is why it is insanely dangerous to get involved in its one altercation with a police officer while you're wearing a gun. When they reached out for him he should have laid down on the ground and announce there was a gun in his back pocket we're back belt or wherever you carried it and let them arrest him without any fighting back or resisting. It's also been mentioned that he was carrying the gun unlawfully but I don't really honestly believe that's particularly relevant.

So how's that kind of thinking working out for this guy

Kearny is trying to take a bit of a Michael hardener approach and appear to both believe in something and not believe in something at the same time I mean it's true, we don't have a trade deal. That was my complaint minute one. We've given them a bunch of free crap that we've committed to that will benefit them strongly and we've gotten nothing in return in the way of assurances or agreements, They get to break into our car market, get access to our RCMP info, get to go back and forth without visas, their media gets more access while ours gets none over there, and we get a 'maybe' on canola with no guarantee they won't raise it the next day. So no deal. Claiming it's a 'free trade' deal is even more insane, we've given up everything and gotten next to nothing in the way of 'free trade'. At the same time it IS true that we've gotten closer to china and given them unprecedented access. So... trump's got a point and i get that he's mad china is making inroads and will probably have more and more ties with Canada and access to all kinds of goodies and such, but he's going to be waiting a long time if he's waiting for a 'deal' on paper to be signed i suspect that this will come to a bit of a head when the first chinese cars land in canada, but that's likely half a year away or more. They still have to go through safety testing and the like

Nobody's going to get that reference LOLOL I can totally hear the song in my head now

Ha! Jokes on you, she's into that shit

I'm telling the truth and i provided proof. And THAT'S why i'm "on ignore", even tho we both know you read my stuff. You're just afraid to reply most of the time. People like nationalist and westcanman just laugh and make fun of your stupidity so you put up with it, but i take the time to show EXACTLY why you're a brain dead lying lefty pantie smear. And you HATE that i'm right. LOL - i know you read this. But it's ok for you to crawl back in your hole and pretend you didn't and cry yourself to sleep if you have to. Everyone knows you don't have the balls to face someone who'll actually take the time to not only point out you're a twat, but exactly WHY you're a twat.

Kid, we ALL have sub replacement birth rates. They are doing better than either of our countries. And they've got far too many people as it is, so they've got a lot of room to p.ay with there The us is bigger and has about 400 million people ish and china has like 1.5 billion as i recall. The fact is for them reducing their population a little would actually improve things for them. But they're not 'going' anywhere. And the 1 child policy WAS what they had when their growth rate was too strong. It's not there any more. They got rid of that like 10 years ago. China's going to get stronger, not weaker. And russia could very well do the same, too soon to tell. Again, you're saying trump is a liar. is that what you believe? You seem somewhat afraid to address that.

Sorry but there's no indication that Russia were china are going away this century. In fact if anything there's some reason to believe that Chinese may be extremely resurgent in the not too distant future. Russia could definitely go either way. So I'm afraid you lost that one handily kiddo. Like I said, it's not nice to be calling trump a liar like that

They are absolutely a strategic threat. In fact that's trump's whole reason for one in Greenland. You're not telling me trump was lying are you?

Sure! Remember all those times you SWORE that just because charges or lawsuits had been filed the indictment or evidence charges were proof trump was guilty? Well..... Trump says he’s expanding defamation suit against New York Times after unfavorable poll | Donald Trump | The Guardian Trump Refiles $15 Billion Lawsuit Against The New York Times - The New York Times Gotcha little guy But nevertheless they have a long history of faked up stories. Remember when they posted the picture of the 'Starving Gaza Child" then had to admit it was fake and the kid had other medical conditions? NYT Appends Gazan Child Photo With Editors' Note - i24NEWS NYT building vandalized after Gaza story correction issued | The Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle One example of many. Sorry roboloser, you lost yet again This is why you're afraid to talk to me

And America has still benefited. That's why Donald Trump signed the deal in the first place. Remember when he called it the greatest trade deal ever? And America hasn't moved on, America still benefiting from Canada not having its own military industry. Sure they are. Why wouldn't they be. Russia is still a major threat and so is china. Kind of painted yourself into the corner there little guy

ummmm...... you're the one who claims he can't. I'm pointing out he did LOLOL holy shit kid did you forget what you were even arguing? Quick - is it rabbit season or duck season LOLOL!! You're such a tard! Leaders can and do meet with anyone they want to. However generally speaking it would be frowned on to meet with representatives who aren't part of the gov't about gov't matters as a matter of course. It happens but it's far less common. But it happens. Remember when danielle smith went to meet with trump to discuss federal trade issues? Yeah, me too I don't know where you get your weirdo ideas from but it's certainly proof you never worked for the gov't or military.

Sorry but that's not true. The Americans benefited tremendously under both of those things. The only things piggy back on was the military and to be blunt that's how America wanted it. Whenever candidate attempted to develop its own military technology America came up and shut it down. The most famous being the Avro Arrow where the president practically yelled at the prime minister and insisted to be scrapped So that's kind of on you. This is what you wanted and now you're complaining now that you've arrived to the benefits

That is absolutely not true. It's not considered to be a good idea because the leader of the opposition can't speak for the gov't, but there's nothing forbidding it and in fact it has happened many times. You'll remember Andrew Scheer when he was leader of the opposition meeting with Mike Pence, vice president at the time. . You're absolutely wrong as always. Why don't you look this stuff up beforehand? Why are you always this stupid? If you're so broke, why don't you sell yourself to strangers like your mother does? You obviously want older men to pay attention to you you talk about it 24 hours a day. If that's your thing why not make some money at it?

It was bare before then, now it's just bare and amusing 😆

Of course he can. But it would be very rare for the opposition to do that. Government has talked about it and has not ruled it out and the gov't propaganda arm, the cbc, is floating the idea as well. They point out that china would be the ones buying half the oil from a new pipeline, so it would be normal they'd want to be a major investor. In wake of new energy pact, could China invest in West Coast pipeline? | CBC News You always open your mouth before doing your research and you wind up looking like a tard

LOL yes we see you can't stop! You're obessed But... "his reading comprehension show now too"? LOLOL looks like i've upset you to the point where you're unable to use english properly yet again Maybe don't screw up and sound like you failed grade 3 english when you're commenting on other people's 'comprehension'? LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!

For a couple of decades now the term has been associated with various conspiracy theories. So it's not that they're not going to understand what it means, it's that you're deliberately leaving the door open to misinterpretation. It's a stupid thing to say. Especially in a mega creepy long drawn out way like that As google ai says, 'The phrase "New World Order" is often associated with conspiracy theories regarding a secretive, totalitarian world government, frequently linked to dictatorships or global elite control' That's not what you want your vision of the world to be associated with It would be like claiming your gov't was dedicated to a world of happyness where everyone is gay! Technically not inaccurate but dude! The word is associated with something else these days

Uhhh last election he was within 1.5 points of carney and is currently tied I see you're into the nyquil already this weekend

He did nothing wrong. Video tries desperately to skew the truth by claiming that he put himself in front of her vehicle but he wasn't in front of her vehicle till she backed up and turned. He's lying about what police officers are trying to do as well. The whole video is a propaganda attempt,that particular news source is well known for lying and doctoring footage.

Lib supporters these days...

Woah woah woah! You're POOR on top of it all!?!?! I thought your mom made descent money 'entertaining' men? You mean you're the son of a whore AND broke? Dude. No wonder you're so messed up. Here's 10 bucks, go buy yourself a real parent.

Nope, it's carney's for letting them in

Is that what your dad used to say to you? Or was it your mom when you complained about your dad? LOL either way you're one broken little boy aren't you

What's really funny is that when that happened she screams about how the judges are all corrupt and stupid