Rebound

“If we can’t get away with committing wide scale fraud, we’ll commit it elsewhere!” Kevin O’Leery Who would invest his money in a guy who says he relies upon fraud to do business?

Trump’s collusion with Russia is self-evident with his absurd support for Vladimir Putin, going so far as to invite him to invade NATO nations.

I forgot, you’re one of those moroons who thinks reading is harmful. Facts of the case pertained to massive fines for Trump’s attorneys for bringing bogus election fraud lawsuits. There’s usually more to a story than the headline. To be clear: Three Republican-appointed Federal judges ruled that Trump’s election fraud lawsuit in Michigan was so full of lies and nonsense that the attorneys had to pay Michigan back their full legal costs, plus pay fines, plus get sanctioned by the bar association, plus get re-training in the law. And the U.S. Supreme Court said, “Yup, that’s right!” So Trump didn’t simply lose his election fraud lawsuit, his lawyers got their asses handed to them by Republican judges. So why do you still think the election was “stolen,” given all that? (It rhymes with “you’re cupid”)

Oh, I see! You’re one of those moroons who thinks that reading is harmful. TLDR: That’s why I’ve made lots of money in my career, and you probably flip burgers or drive a truck.

So you agree that Trump’s 2020 Election lawsuits were so bogus that it justified fining his lawyers a fortune.

Typical dipshlt, you judge The NY Times without even reading them.

Why don’t you read the article and learn something? “Since beginning his 2024 presidential campaign, Donald J. Trump has said the “termination” of the Constitution would have been justified to overturn the 2020 election, told followers “I am your retribution” and vowed to use the Justice Department to prosecute his adversaries — starting with President Biden and his family. If he wins another term, Mr. Trump has said he would use the Justice Department to have his adversaries investigated and charged with crimes, including saying in June that he would appoint “a real special prosecutor to go after” President Biden and his family. He later declared in an interview with Univision that he could, if someone challenged him politically, have that person indicted. Allies of Mr. Trump have also been developing an intellectual blueprint to cast aside the post-Watergate norm of Justice Department investigatory independence from White House political direction. Trump hints he may undercut NATO and retreat from Europe, but plans to use U.S. military force in Mexico. Mr. Trump has long made clear that he sees the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the country’s most important military alliance, not as a force multiplier with allies but as a drain on American resources by freeloaders. While in office, he repeatedly threatened to withdraw from NATO, and his campaign website says he plans to “finish” the process of “fundamentally re-evaluating NATO’s purpose and NATO’s mission.” He and his team have refused to elaborate on that cryptic line, fueling widespread anxiety that his return to power could mean ending or gutting the alliance. Trump wants to use U.S. troops on domestic soil. Mr. Trump could also deploy federal troops inside the United States. While it is generally illegal to use the military for domestic law enforcement purposes, a law called the Insurrection Act creates an exception. His top immigration adviser has said that in a second term, they would invoke the Insurrection Act at the southern border to use soldiers as immigration agents. After some anti-police-violence demonstrations in 2020 became riots, Mr. Trump had an order drafted to use troops to crack down on protesters in Washington. He never signed it. But the prospect of using federal troops to enforce order on domestic soil continues to entice him. Mr. Trump also suggested at a rally in Iowa this year that he intends to unilaterally send troops into Democratic-run cities. Trump allies want fewer checks to restrain him. Forces that somewhat contained Mr. Trump’s autocratic tendencies in his first term — staff members who saw their job as sometimes restraining him, a few congressional Republicans episodically willing to criticize or oppose him, a partisan balance on the Supreme Court that occasionally ruled against him — would all be weaker in a second term. As a result, his and his advisers’ more extreme policy plans would have a greater prospect of becoming reality.

So if somebody votes for Nikki Haley, they’re “far left”?

Why didn’t Trump defend himself? He’s too much of a **** to even take the witness stand to defend himself. Now there’s a retired Federal judge, selected by Trump, overseeing his finances and finding even more corruption and fraud. I f-ing get it, dude: You are on Team Criminal. Donald Trump is literally a criminal. We knew before the election of 2016 that he was a fraudster, that he didn’t pay his contractors and that he was a sexual predator. So it’s no surprise. You’re defending a criminal and he will be convicted. Even Trump appointed judges have been ruling against him.

Calling up the Georgia Secretary of State and telling him to find 11,000 votes is an act of election interference, bucko.

Okay! So, tell us: How should the U.S. and other nations reach agreements with other nations? Should we just tell Canada what to do or else we drop bombs on Ottawa? That’s one way. Peaceful negotiation is the other way.

What does that have to do with the charges of Trump interfering in the 2020 election? Uh… nothing, that’s what. The truth is that Donald Trump just lost $400 million in a fraud lawsuit, and $88.3 million in defamation lawsuits, and he’s charged with 91 felonies. If you care about the future of America (and, let’s face it… don’t), then you’d be racing to find and support a candidate who isn’t heading to prison.

Expert? All the man said is that the legal actions against Trump are not harming his political support. The author doesn’t say whether Trump is innocent or guilty, or whether he should be prosecuted or not.

What’s “far left” about Jack Smith? Was he “far left” when he prosecuted Democrat John Edwards?

You are Often FOS. Anything to defend Trump. Insane.

Wouldn’t you agree that hookers are not a tax deductible business expense?

You’re making up excuses. Putin imprisoned and killed his political rival. Nalvany committed no crimes at all.

Donald Trump is fatter, way sluttier, and more abusive. And he is on trial. For 91 felonies.

What does this have to do with Trump’s innocence or guilt?

Srsly? The guy didn’t break any laws to begin with, except for being an electoral challenge to Putin.

Trump hasn’t said a thing about Nalvany’s death. Trump’s probably kicking himself for not ordering Seal Team to assassinate his rival.

I did not say that. I did paste in a graphic from the DA’s office outlining the charges, which are 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Since your skull is about one foot thick, I will make this simple for you: It does not matter what Biden did. Trump broke laws, Trump goes on trial for it. Biden can shoot fifty people in cold blood; that won’t get Trump off the hook. If you get a speeding ticket, you can shout “Clinton!” all you want; you still get the ticket.