Rebound

Yeah, I’m a fan of ACTUAL billionaires, not fraudsters. I’d love it if she wrote a song about Trump.

Did someone bash your head with a fire extinguisher? Cause you act like it.

“Haters gonna hate, hate, hate.” — Taylor Swift

Well, the WOKE US Supreme Court is not going to intervene in Trump’s favor in this case. You can be certain that they will not issue a ruling that Presidents can break laws.

Really? The Federal judge that Trump appointed is an “activist”?

Last time CBS interviewed Trump, he walked out mid-interview.

America’s response to Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were substantially greater than our response to Trump’s failed insurrection.

Blah, blah, blah, two Federal judges and two state judges and their respective grand juries ALL agreed there are sufficient facts to justify a total of 91 felony counts against criminal Trump. Sooner or later, he’s going to go to prison, unless his heart attack gets him first. And in a few days, New York State is going to clip his wings to the tune of half a billion dollars.

Trump chose to commit those 91 felonies.

Suspicion is not evidence. So I’ll go with the “you’re too dumb to have a fricking clue” answer. Yes, thank you for recognizing that term limits are the only thing that will end Biden’s Presidency.

Are you saying that because you are a vicious liar, or because you’re really dumb enough to believe the ridiculous things you say? Can you provide any evidence that mass voter fraud occurred in just one single precinct in any state in the U.S. in 2020? Just one itty bitty precinct?

Existing law gives the President no authority to close the border or to immediately return immigrants. This law does. Thus, it is an improvement. Why are you against making things better?

A federal appeals court has unanimously ruled that Donald Trump can be put on trial for trying to stay in power after losing the 2020 election, rejecting Trump’s sweeping claim of presidential immunity and moving the case one step closer to a jury. “For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant. But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution,” the panel of three judges wrote. “The interest in criminal accountability, held by both the public and the Executive Branch, outweighs the potential risks of chilling Presidential action and permitting vexatious litigation.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/06/trump-jan-6-immunity-appeal-denied/

The bill is a huge improvement over the system we have, better in every way, and your side is throwing all that away because they don’t think it’s perfect. Perhaps the 5,000 number is because the Constitution requires due process; I do not know, but perhaps they want to pass a Constitutional law. Trump says no law change is needed because he has promised to assume dictatorial power if he’s elected. How will that go? He violates the law, there’s a lawsuit, the SCOTUS tells him he must stop because he’s violating the law. Will he ignore the SCOTUS? Why not take the improvement we can get RIGHT NOW? There’s no downside to improving what we have.

Riiiight…. Because either you unquestionably support every single thing Trump believes in, or you’re a Communist Marxist Antifa Socialist Sociopath hell-bent on destroying the world. There can’t possibly be any other points of view.

FACT CHECK: No, the border deal won’t allow 5,000 unauthorized immigrants a day: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/05/us/politics/border-deal-immigration.html “The legislation, which links additional funding in military aid for Ukraine with immigration policy, would more aggressively tamp down on illegal crossings at the U.S. border with Mexico. The claim has become a popular talking point, reflecting broader pushback by Republicans who have seized on the border security provisions in the $118.3 billion bill and derided them as too lax. But the bill does not, in fact, authorize immigrants to cross the border illegally. Instead, among other provisions, it would give officials the authority to summarily remove migrants, with little recourse, after a certain number cross: an average of 5,000 encounters per day for a week, or 8,500 in a single day. The legislation seeks to make it harder for people to claim asylumand expedite that process; expand federal detention capacity; and provide funding for other border investments, including hiring asylum officers and border security agents, among other things. It does not say that 5,000 immigrants are allowed to illegally enter per day. Instead, the bill uses that number to help determine when a new, stringent emergency authority can take effect to more easily expel migrants, regardless of whether they intend to seek asylum.“

There are good people and bad people. There are smart people and not so smart people. Something new comes along, and bad people find a way to use it to harm not so smart people.

Guess what? That has nothing to do with a Federal Judge ordering Donald Trump to give Hillary Clinton $172,000.

I just never hear much in the way of specifics in these laws and bills. Lots of vague generalities and it’s difficult to know what’s what.

Wake the F up and realize that Republicanism has become a mass media frenzy of sensationalism. Whoever shocks and outrages the most gets the attention.

This, and Musk’s anti-Semitic rants, are why I don’t use Twitter at all. Canceled my account. Nobody should rely on an information source which is certifiably fake.

I think that proves that Republicans shouldn’t be put in charge of the FBI. We need Democrats running it. But of course your post is a deflection from the fact that Donald Trump gave Hillary Clinton $172,000! ROFLMAO!!!

From Politico: ”A Florida-based federal judge has ordered nearly $1 million in sanctions against Donald Trump and his attorney Alina Habba, calling the former president a “mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process.” In a blistering 46-page order, U.S. District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks said Trump’s sprawling lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and dozens of former Justice Department and FBI officials was an almost cartoonish abuse of the legal system. “Here, we are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose,” Middlebrooks wrote. “Mr. Trump is a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries. He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process, and he cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer.“ The judge ordered Trump and Habba to pay $938,000 to cover the legal costs for the 31 defendants Trump linked in his year-old lawsuit. It’s the second time Middlebrooks has sanctioned Habba in the Clinton lawsuit. The first time was a $50,000 order sought by a single defendant, Charles Dolan. The new round of sanctions was sought by the remaining defendants. In the new order, Hillary Clinton got the biggest award of fees for a single defendant: almost $172,000.“ https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/19/judge-sanctions-trump-habba-clinton-00078700

Ann Coulter didn’t mince words when she said that the best thing Donald Trump can do is die.