Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

ExFlyer

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,061

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by ExFlyer

  1. ExFlyer
    Who would he have met with??? There were at least 10 groups that all had different agendas and no one had any real organization to them. Name them. As was found out at the inquiry, the groups were at worst a clusterf#ck and at best a bunch of disorganized wannabes.
  2. ExFlyer
    Herbie, how do I know that? Herbie the question really is....where are the bodies? As I have mentioned and inked, even the indigenous are disengaging themselves from that narrative and are blaming media for making the claims of bodies. It seems to me Herbie, you are one that is having difficulty realizing there may have been gross over exaggeration of the entire issue.
  3. ExFlyer
    What is it about they could not get into the US that you don't understand??? The Americans would not let 8nvacinated trucker into the USA. So, they did not need ti quarantine because they were not in the US. Oh and, the US implemented the closed border first.
  4. ExFlyer
    The true fact is, they would not have had to quarantine for 14 days because they could not have crossed that imaginary line to get into the US. The US banned them from entering. Non comprehend. Just because you keep repeating it does no make it so. Meeting with who?? There were, by your comments many many protester groups. Which one would have had a meeting that would have satisfied all??
  5. ExFlyer
    A memorial for what? There are no bodies. I posted the link where the indigenous themselves are blaming the media for the claims. They are absolving themselves form the body count. Your Arizona comparison is false. In the case of the Arizona, There were bodies and hence, a Memorial was dedicated. FFS, read the article. The indigenous nor anyone else have never found any bodies...none, zero, zip, 0. A "ground disturbance" is not a body. FFS, "beamed away by aliens"??? Man, are you ever tryigfn to make something of nothing LOL. I deny because there is no proof of mass graves or any graves in fact. Prove it otherwise. The fact is, there is lack of proof at all sites. Even the indigenous themselves have come to that conclusion. Show me the article and proof. Also, if the boys ran away and died on a frozen lake, it is kinda hard to prove and makes it only a "story". How is one supposed to react? One is supposed to react to proof, verification and not stories. The indigenous have retracted and blame media now. You are on a very small bandwagon (which is getting smaller) and unless you can offer substantial proof, you are are spreading false information.
  6. ExFlyer
    The fact of the matter is that there is no proof of claims and now they indigenous themselves are backing away from their own accusations. I am not saying what you accuse did not happen but you or anyone does not have any proof. No court would accept your conjecture. Your analogy about the Arizona is complete without merit. They did in fact go down and find many bodies. They chose to make it a memorial and leave it as is. The mini sub, presuming you are talking about the recent incident, could not be recovered. It imploded and the pieces are too small and too deep and the bodies became fish food. If you are going to make an argument, make on without your emotional slant..
  7. ExFlyer
    Here you go again LOL
  8. ExFlyer
    I guess that is one problem I have with this greenbelt thing. The liberal government arbitrarily made a greenbelt and made lots of land basically worthless to the owner. Now that the conservatives released a bunch of land from the greenbelt, the folks that own the land made a lot of money (the developers will too ). Did we punish the landowners and now we allow them to profit from their own land and that is bad?? I suspect much of the land was dormant anyway, not farms , ]ust empty lots with trees on it. The tree huggers are OK with that but, the landowners looked at it as an investment with future profit. Now it is all in limbo again. Not sure whose side I am on here. The previous government, the present government, the actual landowners, the developers that want it buy it or ?
  9. ExFlyer
    Don't much care and care even less 2+ years away for election but hey, if it gives you an erection, enjoy it LOL
  10. ExFlyer
    So, "farmers, cottages, developers or whomever" made money from selling their property? Having their land put in the greenbelt stifled their opportunity to make money from their properties. I guess the upset people were really folks that had no stake in the land, just blowhards?
  11. ExFlyer
    Well, it is not election time. So, play in the pointless pool...um err poll LOL
  12. ExFlyer
    Not going to argue with you. The polls were months before the election. Point was, liberals won,
  13. ExFlyer
    I do not understand the politics of long ago but, if Canada was conquered, it was conquered in it's entirety. I do not get the part that BC had to sign treaties when it was not a province yet. Canada was but provinces were not. The treaties were for Canada. I am pretty sure that there were not as many "tribes" as there are now. The indigenous have found the formula....declare a tribe and send the bill to the government LOL
  14. ExFlyer
    You know assimilation was never going to happen as long as we gave everything. The indigenous are our "refugees". They have lived in camps for 300+ years, get everything handed to them. Never having to work for anything and then want more and we give more. This is a Canadian problem. Look at how well most American indigenous have done. A lot better assimilation and societal involvement than here in Canada. Canadian indigenous are our largest welfare cases and drain on our economy..
  15. ExFlyer
    2015 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2015_Canadian_federal_election 2019 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2019_Canadian_federal_election 2021 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2021_Canadian_federal_election So far ahead? Manipulate away LOL Beginning of blue wave or just a summer fling? Conservatives meet amid polling boost https://ca.news.yahoo.com/beginning-blue-wave-just-summer-080000198.html
  16. ExFlyer
    I responded to your post "Was it the colonialists who insisted on segregation, or the natives? " and said it does not matter and "In any conquest, one side loses. " That stands. I ignored what? What foundation? That the conqueror won? Who should have assimilated? The indigenous? The issue is that we have become apologists for everything this country has done in the past 300+ years.
  17. ExFlyer
    Doesn't matter. In any conquest, one side loses. Even in the wars between the tribes, one side lost and became slaves.
  18. ExFlyer
    Polls, more than 2 years out are pretty meaningless. Conservatives were way ahead in the last 3 elections too. The best we can hope for is that it actually sticks but....not much counts until election day.
  19. ExFlyer
    The greenbelt in the "golden horseshoe". Who actually owns it? In the Ottawa area, the "greenbelt" is owned by the National Capital Commission. Who owns all that property down there?? Farmers? Landowners? We are all crapping on the Ford government for "selling" it to developers but are they the actual owners??
  20. ExFlyer
    1. I never pivoted anything. he has an opinion , as was being discussed, and he has that right. 3. If "he shows up every day multiple times in my YouTube feed.", then you need to set your youtube parameters. He does not show up on my youtube 4. Issues can be discussed. On this forum you are fully aware that not all discussions are intelligent or " in the context of our Public Sphere". "Our Public Shere" is ours to choose so, mine will be different than yours. 6. Healthy dialogue does not need to be either edifying or constructive. It can be anything form pleasant to confrontational because opinions are as varied as the people expressing them.
  21. ExFlyer
    1. He is allowed his opinion. You don't have to like it but even you say everybody can have an opinion. 2...... 3. His opinions are "shared"? Meaning others are forwarding his opinions. As you say, he is allowed to have them and others are allowed to share them. 4. If you are waiting for "serious discussion need to be made between experts who make responsible arguments," you will have to wade through all the discussions. If you are waiting for agreement amongst them all, keep waiting. 5. ... 6. Yes, they are part of the public dialogue, but that certainly does not make them the truth.
  22. ExFlyer
    Yes, I know it is false, that is why I posted the article and said: "Oh listen....is that noise I hear a herd of backbpeddlars???? Can't find shit so....blame someone else for false claims?? Was it us that started the orange shirt campaign or the indigenous???"
  23. ExFlyer
    Was it really the media or was it the indigenous themselves? I read and saw quotes from the indigenous on "grave" sites as well as their leaders making comments and accusations. They started the orange shirt thing . It seems they jumped on what they thought could be beneficial for them and now, once there is no proof of the accusations are backpedalling and trying to blame someone else. The missing and murdered women thing is the same...the real reports are edited and/or withheld because perhaps it is the indigenous themselves that are murdering their women?
  24. ExFlyer
    You are correct. Sorry for my assertion. "The college ordered Peterson to undergo social media training on professionalism f" https://tnc.news/2023/08/23/peterson-appeal-tweets/
  25. ExFlyer
    Gosh, don't sympathize, I have no plight. Just FO with your cultist crap when you respond to me
×
×
  • Create New...