TreeBeard

It’s pretty embarrassing for Conservatives. https://www.policymagazine.ca/how-pierre-poilievre-just-avoided-an-election-and-why-he-wanted-to/ Suddenly, there were Mr. Scheer and Mr. Reid. They were behind the curtains in the Opposition Lobby. Each claimed they were trying to vote remotely but could not get their apps to work, even though they were just a few feet away, out of sight of the Clerk’s desk. From their desks, they each then asked to be recorded as voting “No” — which they were allowed to do. Scheer and Reid wanted to vote against the budget. But it appears they were also their leader’s insurance policy. If Pierre Poilievre had wanted to actually defeat the budget, they would not have been hiding behind the curtains. Once the coast was clear and the budget had passed, they rushed out with their excuse and their votes.

Not true. The Conservatives made sure it passed. They didn’t want to be seen supporting it, so they were sneaky in making sure it passed.

With the Conservatives scheming to help the Liberals, the either did enough in the budget to appease Conservatives. Or the Liberals didn’t have to work with anyone because the Conservatives were going to make sure it passed by hiding some MPs behind curtains. You sort of nailed it on the head here. The Conservatives are afraid they’d lose, so get that budget passed at all costs. But they’re afraid to say this, so they have to try and be sneaky supporters.

Not sure what you’re saying here. You’re forced into their “fantasy” just by their mere presence?

Why didn’t the Conservatives bring down the government if it’s so bad?

Even the National Post is calling out the Conservative theatrics! Conservatives conspired to pass Carney’s budget is the headline! Ouch. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/opposition-mps-conspire-to-pass-carneys-disastrous-budget At least Green Leader Elizabeth May traded her support for something she cares about, a promise to meet our Paris Agreement targets. I expect she’s been had, in that the Liberals couldn’t do it if they even tried. But it beats the pseudo-sophistication of His Majesty’s official lack of Opposition faking opposition to the budget while sliding it through, scorning what is good for the country based on principle for a convoluted attempt to gauge what might conceivably be good for the party based on voters’ hypothetical distaste for having to exercise their stinking ballot.

Cons help out the Libs. But lie about it. They hid behind a curtain! After it became apparent the budget was going to pass thanks to two NDP abstentions but also two other Conservatives sitting this one out, Scheer and Reid told the Speaker they wanted to vote against the budget but couldn't due to technology troubles inside Parliament. The Speaker allowed it. While diametrically opposed to the Liberal budget, sources say Conservative Party top brass don't want an election so soon after the last one — especially as polls suggest Carney is generally the preferred pick for prime minister over Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/conservatives-helped-pass-carney-budget-9.6983603

So you do understand that gender expression is not the same as biology. You were just pretending to make some weird point about your feelings.

It sounds like you failed. Confusing biological sex and gender expression is pretty basic. Are you doing this on purpose as a tactic, or are you really that stupid?

I don’t think they need the Emergencies Act to remove trucks blocking traffic. Just need cops willing to enforce the law.

Why was he not convicted of murder?

Nah. They’ll be arrested quickly this time.

You’re wrong. The Gripen has better range for longer patrols. The maintenance costs and maintenance time per flying hour is way down on the Gripen too. https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/compare-aircraft-results.php?form=form&aircraft1=23&aircraft2=67&Submit=Compare+Aircraft

Conservatives - “it’s always about race with the woke left”. Also conservatives - “The country should be white cuz that’s my skin colour”.

The Swedish jet has a better combat range than the F35. 1500km vs ~1100

Conservatives, when faced with an actual pedophile ring rather than a made up one in a pizza shop, try and change the definition of pedophile so their hero doesn’t look so bad. Or make the crazy claim that child sex trafficking would have been legal if they did it in Canada. You people really are just plain weird. I’ll have to remember that when someone says religion is a source of morality.

Trump supporter in the rightwing media says Epstein wasn’t a pedo. 15 year olds are “barely legal”. That’s a relief to conservatives, eh? Now they can feel better about their president’s penchant for young teens girls. Kelly continued: “This is this person’s view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls. And I realize this is disgusting. I’m definitely not trying to make an excuse for this. I’m just giving you facts, that he wasn’t into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby.”https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/11/megyn-kelly-epstein-pedophilia-russell-brand/ And this comes as a HUGE relief for Catholics. Now they can claim their priests weren’t pedophiles, they were just gay. I’m not entirely sure how this justifies the child exploitation though. Maybe a Catholic here can shed some light on it? Why does this matter to the Catholic League? For too long, the media and the chattering class have said that the Catholic Church clergy abuse scandal was due to “pedophile priests.” Wrong. The data clearly show that the vast majority of priestly victims were male (81 percent) and that 78 percent were postpubescent. Why is this important? Because it means the molesters were homosexuals. When males have sex with males who are postpubsecent, that’s called homosexuality, not pedophilia. https://www.catholicleague.org/megyn-kelly-is-right-about-epstein/

Why do you need more than a 5 round magazine?

He’s a pedo. We knew that all along, right? “There have previously been some vague insinuations that President Donald Trump is a pedophile and a sex criminal, like when several people credibly accused him of being a sex criminal, and when he was caught on tape saying, ‘I, Donald Trump, am a sex criminal,’” a CNN analyst said. “But this is the most intriguing evidence yet that the President might have possibly engaged in some behaviour that certain voters might consider dubious.” https://www.thebeaverton.com/2025/11/trump-is-a-pedophile-email-raises-questions-about-whether-trump-is-a-pedophile/

we also have laws specific to the tobacco industry as they are particularly bad faith. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/18/the-forgotten-oil-ads-that-told-us-climate-change-was-nothing https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/09/oil-companies-discourage-climate-action-study-says/ https://ricochet.media/media/media-3/the-disinformation-of-fossil-fuel-advertising-in-canada/

You think advertising has no effect? That corporations should be allowed to lie to people? Since when are fraudulent claims considered “free speech”?

You didn’t need to trot out lies to criticize what Angus was doing, but that’s what you did saying he is for jailing people who are pro oil industry. I liked the bill. It would’ve ended oil industry propaganda, just like there is a bill that prohibits tobacco companies from advertising their products. Are you pro tobacco advertising and propaganda?

The bible doesntspecify a tattoo, does it? That’s just your interpretation?