herbie

Oh FFS my mother, my sister and I all use our 2nd names since birth. My kindergarten teacher didn't need permission from my parents to call me by the same name my classmates did. They certainly didn't need a LAW in 1959, and they don't need one now. Just like if my name was Lee Ching Fat they don't need a law and a note from home to call me "Tony" if I ask them to. Just like the very thought that if your 7yr old son wanted the teacher to call him "Shirley" that teacher wouldn't ask his parents why the first time they met. The whole argument for this so called movement is based on bullshit. Another conspiracy, plot, us and them paranoia based on the "I heard it happened once, so it happens all the time" claim. I can base on my own anectdotal experience that over 50% of the protesting parents never once attended Parent Teacher Night because the hockey game was on, FFS. The same parents were there and the same parents were missing at every one I ever attended. Just as the same one was at every school bard meet protesting sex ed.

It's ok to execute people. It's ok to go into a sovereign country and kill someone you consider an enemy It's ok to use extrajudicial assassinations as foreign policy. Torture is ok in the interest of national security. Talk about an argument for the slippery slope claim. Proof that people had more evolved morals back in the 1960s, perhaps lifetimes of watching NCIS, FBI international and Seal Team 6 has desensitized more people than ever thought possible. I hold these as further examples of why the USA is no longer holds any claim to leading the civilized world.

I know it came get confusing which they is them when there's more than one them in the same sentence but it must be near impossible to someone who can't even remember what side of the border the conversation is about.

because the last thing you want immigrants to do is integrate into normal society like the rest of us?

You're never going to convince these peopl that Judges are appointed for their legal prowess and not their politics. Just like you'll never convince them a Judge is a judge because they're smarter than their own dumb ass. They can't even figure out that if it violates the Constitution, it's wrong regardless of what they think.

What a shameful thing to brag about. Do you own a Proud To Be a Deplorable hat you wear in public?

Has dental care for seniors been implemented yet? Or are you so braindead you think the NDP would kowtow to f*cking Polliwog? If wishes were horses...

Nominating Scott Moe for Assh0le of the Month. The notwithstanding clause is exclusively for knowing something is wrong and doing it anyway.

Oh my... a Christian hypocrite at their finest.

No. It shows that most people don't like taxes, as I pointed out. Stating the obvious in any form doesn't constitute a poll worthy of significance. It draws it's own conclusion.

The same results would be had from a poll to reduce or eliminate the GST or Income Tax too. It doesn't mean anything.

Technically you are correct, there are other countries with the death penalty that claim to be civilized. But if you wish to go off on a branch over grammar and appear to join those calling for a return of the death penalty in 2023 the risk is yours to take. I admit I was wrong to use the word "ONLY" but that does not make an argument against barbaric practices a lie. I will state clearly with a quote from an actual civilized entity, the EU: Capital punishment violates the inalienable right to life and is incompatible with human dignity.

I have a brother in law that immediately cracks a "Dad" joke or pun after every comment made at the dinner table. You should meet him. My sister and nieces would love a day off.

I'm not obligated to help you out of your burning house, how dare you criticize me for posting you burn to death on TikTok

Bullshit to your pettiness, the lie is pretending to be civilized and still using the death penalty. So I get 100 replies of who still uses it as if THAT was the comment. So reread posts until it CLICKS in the mind instead of assuming it's something else entirely. The thread title suggests not only something that's not going to happen, but bringing it back for only certain victims implying they are more valuable than other citizens. You think a uniform makes you special, go salute your mailman or the kid at Wendys. What other suggestions from the past are you retrogrades going to come up with next? Return of stoning? Burning for witchcraft? Return of miscegeny laws? The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is too "woke"?

This weekend is Reconciliation Day. Let's hear the whining begin that natives are "shoving a day off" down your throat and that there's no statutory "White Man Day". If you're truly disgusted, go to work and refuse the overtime just to own the libs.

And some people simply refuse to comprehend the difference between a fetus and a child. So I pointed that out as bluntly and crudely as possible for their sake.

Such a disgusting attitude. Can't ever directly address a point, pretend a different point was made that you can address. Fall back on the entirely selfish why should "I" excuse of those who pretend to be totally self sufficient. To the extent of suggesting we let people die over cost/benefit reasons. Or the reasoning of the stupid that a study on A 'proves' something about B simply because two things exist simultaneously. They are not dying from 'safe supply' they are not dying at 'safe injection sites', that is the entire point of those things. To claim that is a lie is as stupid as claiming the Covid vax was to blame for how many people died of the disease. They are dying because the illicit supply is way more deadly than it was in the past, and there are way more illicit drug users than your narrow conservative beliefs can ever comprehend. That some people sold their scrips is moot. That some people can't help themselves is moot. That means we are obligated to try to help them. That you'd suggest criminal justice enforcements that failed for over a century are suddenly going to work is simply Id!otic. Assh0liness is not next to Godliness no matter how loudly you people claim it is.

So by your own admission, how the hell are you trying to tie the blame to safe supply and injection sites? The people ODing and dying are not due to either. are they? The only "Drug Policy" you can pin on the Trudeau Liberals is cannabis legalization.

The whole world saw him on video even shaking hands with Modi but he didn't attend the G20 as he was locked in his room on coke for 2 days. Shades of a Trump supporter, India has people like that too.

Was the 'animated video' a Simpson's episode?

No he won't bring you back some souvenir soap or a lampshade....

Oh look, Indian spammers can post on forums as well as call your landline phone 3x a day! The country really is advancing.

A; Safe drug sites are part of Health Services, provincial. Trudeau doesn't have dick shit to do with them. B: What does harm reduction and safe supply got to do with the increasing number of deaths from tainted drugs? Only an utter fool could conclude it is causing that. Obviously the street supply is increasingly toxic - spell that 'carfentanyl'. Given that. the sun rises in the East and communist countries were monstly in the Eastern Bloc, therefore we must conclude Communism is caused by the Sun. Trudeau is a son, therefore it's all his fault,

Tell them Hitler was too "leftist" for your liking and show us how many teeth you come back with....