Aristides

I'll refresh your 10 minute memory. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/06/supreme-court-justices-millions-dollars-gifts-clarence-thomas.html

But it seems to be fine for Supreme Court justices.

If you have a job, you pay into it. If you pay into it, you should be able to collect it.

The Trump cultists wanted to hang Pence for certifying the election and attacked the capital to stop having it certified. If I was a betting man, I'd bet that wasn't legal. The courts have agreed. Instead of being ashamed of yourself, you accuse someone else of behaviour you sanctioned.

Accuse the other side of what your side tried to do. Typical.

She didn't take Kennedy on because he is just a political opportunist who will use anyone he can to advance his own interests. Fits right in with the Trump crowd. Why would Harris take anyone on who had just been trying to do a deal with Trump.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4829150-robert-f-kennedy-jr-kamala-harris-cabinet-position-2024/

So why did he approach the Harris team first and only go to Trump after he was ignored?

What's missing here is that the government itself can't force workers back, they can only refer it to the CIRB with a request. The CIRB determines whether there is justification to force binding arbitration and makes the order. Which is what just happened.

5 day, 40 hr work week, sick pay, paid vacations, safer work places, equal pay for people in the same job category (particularly for women who are typically paid less in non union jobs), Maternity leave and job protection. A few of the things today's workers owe to unions. Does anyone really think those things would have happened if workers hadn't organized?

Trump re tweeted this, which could be another felony.

The problem this time was both rail lines getting shut down at the same time. This is the first time that has happened. This is what needs to be changed. If only one company is shut down, it risks losing business to the other line and the union has less leverage because the shutdown can last longer. more incentive to settle for both parties.

I don't see why Harris would want either of them.

Nothing wrong with Bush. Showing better judgement now than when he was president.

Trump and RFK. What a pair.🤣

Hate to say it but I think the government did the right thing by not interfering until they actually shut down. Companies have to realize that they can't stonewall then expect government to bail them out. After that, they had no real choice but to impose arbitration. Arbitration is full of unknowns for both parties, you can't predict what an arbitrator is going to impose.

There is going to be a lot more of this AI generated BS in the next three months, probably from both sides. Candidates can either run with the lies or denounce them as they should.

I think Trump cult are really worried about her.

Doesn't matter where it came from, the scumbag in chief embraced it like a lover.

Like I said, if he had any class or brains, he would have immediately disowned it, but he doesn’t. This will play very well to his base but just emphasize what a low class shmuck he is to those who aren’t. Obviously the Trump cult does.

“I accept” Donald Trump If he had any class (and brains) he would have disowned it immediately, but he doesn’t.

Actually it does. "Taylor wants you to vote for Donald Trump"

Things like this could p*ss her off enough to endorse Harris when she might not have. Oh, what tangled webs we weave.

No doubt there are but it specifically says Swift supports Trump. Don't blame CBC for what is posted on Truth Social and endorsed by Trump.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-taylor-swift-fake-endorsement-ai-artificial-intelligence-deepfake-1.7298845s Huge mistake. Up til now, Swift has declined to endorse anyone, this may just force her hand.