Aristides

Biden's experience made him far more pragmatic so he got more done in 4 years than most presidents in 8, in a system where a president has much less real power than a prime minister.

https://www.thoughtco.com/zyklon-b-gas-chamber-poison-1779688 Zyclon B was in crystal form and didn't form a gas until exposed to air. Simply dump the crystals into a vent and slap a cover over it to keep the gas inside the chamber, job done.

Zyclon B You didn't even bother to read it, did you. You know you can't. Babi Yar

If you knew anything, you would know Zyclon B was just poured into the vents in the top of the gas chambers, there was no gas delivery system and all that was required was an empty room that could be sealed. Cremations only leave ashes, which are still there. Many thousands of remains have been found from SS Einsatzgruppen mass executions outside the camps which were also photographed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einsatzgruppen

Just a few thousand witnesses. Millions of shoes, tons of jewelry and gold fillings from teeth. I had a Polish grade 9 French teacher who was a camp survivor. He had the tattoo and a wonky eye because he was clubbed by a guard. He probably would have liked to whack an ignorant twit like you upside the head. Between 1.8 and 1.9 million ethic Poles were murdered by the Nazis, plus around 3 million Polish Jews. Poland lost 10% of its population in WW2.

The gas chambers at Auschwitz are still there, so are the ovens. I've personally seen the ones at Stutthof, concentration camp outside Gdansk. Not a death camp like Auschwitz Treblinka but 70,000 died there. Bergen Belsen was liberated by the Brits. 70,000 died there. Buchenwald was liberated by the Americans, 60,000 died there. What makes your claims absolute nonsense was the fact the Nazis kept very careful records of the number of people they killed. They were proud of it.

Republicans seem intent on getting rid of your checks and balances. You are about concentrating power under one person, not democracy. You complain about weaponizing the civil service and judiciary but want to make it easier.

Not really, Of course Harris is Biden's choice, he picked her to be his VP but that doesn't mean she will be the party's choice. Interesting times.

Far from it, all the anti Biden talking points are now history and there is no guarantee Harris will be their candidate and even if she is she will be more of a threat.. MAGA hats have good reason to be crapping themselves.

All this time the MAGA hats have been going on about Joe not being fit to serve and now the Dems are going to pick someone who is, they are shitting themselves. Too funny.

Biden withdrew for the good of his party and country, he didn’t have too. Trump does nothing that doesn’t benefit Trump.

Only one candidate has ever tried to stop certification of an election. President Bone Spurs, who’s followers are always projecting their own actions on others because they can’t justify them any other way.

This really does upset you, all of a sudden you aren’t so sure about a Trump win. Biden’s successor will be chosen at their convention. Rather than a coronation like the usual US conventions, it will actually be used to pick a candidate. All your claims about Biden’s condition have bit you in the ass. Now you are upset because a majority of Democrats agreed with you. The irony is delicious.

Trumps pardon history is a matter of record. I’m not the one making shit up about what hasn’t even been done. Your wish list isn’t reality.

Though you idi*ts were claiming it was antifa. Make up your tiny minds. https://www.npr.org/2024/07/14/nx-s1-5039234/examining-how-narratives-about-the-trump-assassination-attempt-are-resonating

MAGA hats should be the last ones making presidential pardons an issue. Trump pardoned everyone around him, including people who had never been charged, let alone found guilty.

All of a sudden the MAGA hats are getting nervous.

Accountability to who, their country or a single person who changes every 4 to 8 years? Concentrating all the power under a single person Is a dictatorship. Something the Democrats have never advocated.

You need continuity to run a government, not political hacks who have to start from zero learning their departments and jobs with every administration. Making civil servants beholden to a single person for their positions is not democracy, it is autocracy.

Civil servants work for the country regardless of the administration and remain the same regardless of changes in administration. You want to make them beholden to the person in the Oval Office and give a president the power to fire them all and put his own people in these positions. Continuity would go out the window as each president puts their political hacks in place. This is a fundamental change that makes the civil service a tool of the president rather than the servant of the people and constitution. You don't really believe in democracy and separation of powers if you agree with something like that. This is how autocracies function.

It's absolutely concentrating power by making the civil service a political tool. Kind of like when Hitler demanded an oath of loyalty to him personally, rather than to a constitution or country. You are intent of making a joke of the constitution you Americans love to crow about.

Well, what are you going on about?

How so? Any new leader would be chosen during the convention. You blather on about the Democrats circumventing democracy by changing their leader but blindly support the Republicans making thousands of civil servants political appointees beholden to dear leader for their positions.