Infidel Dog

I was going to scold you for not reading the article linked on the previous page showing you how wrong you are about that. Then I tried it myself and realized I'd posted the link incorrectly. So, OK, I admit it. My bad. Here it is agan. This time posted correctly with a bit of an intro: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/24/europe-warns-of-need-for-vigilance-as-covid-19-cases-rise-sharply

I've broken my boycott of the mainstream nightly news lately to see what the legacy news is inculcating into the minds of the populace lately. I hear you're still being told these are simply "protestors" or "demonstrators," not looters and rioters under the control of neo and anarcho Marxist insurrectionists. Is there anybody out there who's still falling for nonsense like when they only select man on the street interview for their selected viewpoint or only talk to what they call "experts" supporting their side of the propaganda, and only show you bits to highlight what they want you to believe, treating all contradictory evidence as if it doesn't exist? Here are some recent stories for the progaganda-bots who might like to try to break free of their programming and catch up with reality. An injured Seattle police officer’s Facebook post shatters the left’s ‘protest’ narrative Here's some video evidence of how federal officers are actually controlling the rioters in Portland: EXCLUSIVE VIDEOS: Officers Make Quick Work Dispersing Portland’s ‘Unlawful Assembly,’ Multiple People Detained Rifle ammunition, Molotov cocktails found by Portland police responding to shooting Demonstrators target NYPD vehicles, light fires in chaotic city scene ANOTHER Armed “Protester” Pulls a Gun on Motorist Trapped by Mob of Black Lives Matter in Oregon Google Software Engineer Charged With Assault, Resisting Arrest in Portland Riots Protester Who Said "People Who Hate Us" Are "Too Big of P-ssies to Actually Do Anything About It" Gets Shot

I don't know why you keep smacking that frying pan outside your door. It's not even New Year's Eve. It's not just noise at this point. It's noise without raison d'etre. First you said it was only only Republican states with second wave covid cases. Then you were shown it was also the Democrat state of California. Then you said America was being shown up by Europe. But you were shown this was not the case with death rate. Also a second wave hit Europe. And Sweden never locked down, yet that wasn't where the second wave was hitting. As far as high caseloads go, you've been shown that is a result of increased testing. And if you'd like to continue with that unsupported hypothesis that only republican states got a second wave perhaps you missed this one: Washington state sounds alarm over rising coronavirus cases There's no shame in being wrong. Anybody can make a mistake. But to insist on continuing to be wrong when all doubt is removed as to how wrong you are...c'mon man. America under Trump and the Republican states compare just fine for China virus control with similar states and Europe.

You're a little mixed up. You're arguing the wrong post. My point you're replying to in that post went to the graphic below which you previously posted. With that you claimed trump was pushing for a separation of states from the federal fold. That would be either a mistake or a lie. You tell me which. Trump was just suggesting the states liberate themselves from the Democrat lockdown.

Possibly but that wasn't what you said. You inferred Trump was pushing for separation of states "Liberated" from the federal fold. That would be a lie. Either you wanted to make that point or you didn't. If you didn't, well good for you. If you did, it's a lie. So without misdirecting can you tell us which specific claim you are making?

Why? Did you want me to find reports calling those sorts of reports fraudulent? You've seen one. There have been many. But that wasn't the original challenge. What are you saying? You don't like my challenge of case against case so you would like to create a different challenge where you produce reports of twisted data from time frames you prefer and I spend all day finding the many critiques of such reports. Yeah...no thanks. There are tons of critiques of such data twisting reports from the left. They get buried off the mainstream and they're a pest to find. But if you ever feel up to the original challenge just start and I'll reply. I can have fun by learning actual, factual things from that one.

The ADL report is partisan left. The Times of Israel says this about it: The ADL Murder and Extremism Report is a fraud However if you really want to introduce a longer time frame into the challenge, I'll play. What time frame would you prefer?

You heard Trump supporting protesters who want the lockdowns to end in their states. In that sense "liberation" is about ending the China Virus lockdowns not separating from America. https://heavy.com/news/2020/04/trump-liberate-michigan-minnesota-virginia/

This one adds an interesting perspective on why current polling might not be giving an accurate picture of what the American public is really thinking politically: More Evidence That Trump’s Silent Majority Is Real New poll says moderates and conservatives are genuinely afraid to discuss their politics. A poll speaking against polls. That's fun. Oh and WestCanMan man, here's a suggestion. You might try what some on the classic liberal left call those who self-identify as something they call "Progressive." The Regressive Left.

However Eyeball, if what you asking is 'how do authorities decide which side would be be better to concentrate their attention on' I can help you with that one. It's a matter of deciding where is the most damage coming from in general - extremists damaging property and their fellow citizens from the left or from the right. I can show you the answer to that question with a simple challenge. I'll show you the damage being currently inflicted on people and property from the left. Feel free to try to match it with current stories of damage to people and property coming from extremists on the right. Demonstrators Attack Federal Buildings in L.A. in Solidarity with Portland Clip uncut by MSM showing violence from leftist extremists as shown at white House press briefing. Suspect In Custody After Fatal Shooting At Austin BLM Protest Seattle Riot: Police Arrest 45 After ‘Explosives’ Thrown at Officers Video Shows Portland Rioters Allegedly Attempting To Blind Federal Agents With Lasers Car Drives Through Mob of Protesters on Colorado Highway, Protester Shoots Fellow Protesters While Trying to Shoot Driver (VIDEO) Antifa Terrorists Randomly Attack Business Owners and Employees…Torch Buildings…Warn People Living Above Starbucks To Evacuate! [VIDEO]

Luckily both groups are pretty small and any damage they may have done is limited. The top one goes back to days ago. They call themselves the NFAC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Fucking_Around_Coalition. They haven't been around long. We started hearing about them after the Breona Taylor incident. They haven't done much actual damage. Maybe stopped traffic in a national park while armed and threatened drivers. And 2 or 3 of the dummies shot each other in a confrontation with 3 percenters. The bottom pic goes back at least 3 years and may have been taken at at Charlottesville. They seem to be connected to a larger grouping sometimes called 3 percenters or boogaloo boys. Those might connect better with Antifa except they're usually more associated with the Libertarian right rather than neo or anarcho Marxist movements of the left. Wikipedia describes them as a loosely organized American far-right anti-government extremist movement. A couple months ago they were connected to "two ambush-style attacks [that] occurred against security personnel and law enforcement officers in California." I got the basic info on the 2 pics here: https://tineye.com/search/60687cf96714844027599b5cfc62f43c93a4a56c?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 https://travelwirenews.com/member-of-black-only-nfac-militia-reportedly-shoots-himself-by-mistake-at-louisville-rally-video-1829187/

BTW Boges did you catch this? Europe warns of need for vigilance as Covid-19 cases rise sharply So now what have you got? And how will you twist this new supposition in your imagination to reflect negatively on America's President? Enquiring minds want to know? Cause it's entertaining.

Yes. If you ignore it, the next thing you know you have Portland or one of the other soft left run cities who tolerated the soft leftist violence of vandalism down south and are now dealing with something different and more extreme. The hard left, Neo-Marxists are just testing the water up here so far.

Here's one for the 'see no evil' when it's their evil dummies saying there's no violence in Portland:

Why? Who said everything not lockstep with Trump is left wing? Nice dodge from the actual question though. The Trump Campaign's private polling also has him doing well in swing states, according to Trump. I didn't know about Rasmussen. Had to look it up. Approve versus disapprove appears to be tied up. Thanks for the tip.

There is debate about how accurate the polling companies Fox hires are too: https://www.salon.com/2020/07/24/fox-and-friends-host-brian-kilmeade-rejects-trump-officials-claim-that-fox-news-polls-are-fake_partner/ Why do you assume that anybody not on the left side of AOC and Bernie Sanders has to agree with everything Fox does?

Here's Trump's side of switching up Parscale and Stepien. Tell me why I should disregard it and prefer your TDS, confirmation biased negative reasoning. https://nypost.com/2020/07/15/trump-demotes-campaign-manager-brad-parscale-in-shakeup/

I didn't say he wasn't flexible or he wasn't capable of any of the nasty behaviour we've seen from LBJ to Obama. I said polling by progressives doesn't appear to affect his policy. Shaking up staff is a Trump business strategy that predates his presidential campaigns and continued after it. Did he demote Parscale or Promote Stepien. Pretending you know is just being attracted to the negative. And if Trump only wears a mask to pander to progressive polling why would he wear one, one day and not the next? That would give the Progressive media another opportunity to attack. Why would he do that? Why would he think that would increase his polling favorability with the Progs? Let me answer that for you. It wouldn't and he wouldn't.

I'd take your personal opinion on that more seriously if you could give me an example of Trump doing something similar in the last election when the Progressive Socialists' polls did not favor him. BTW he says his campaign also polls and according to them he's doing great. Particularly in the swing states.

To Trump it's a matter choice. States have a choice. Businesses have a choice. Individuals have a choice. Trump has a choice. I'm not sure why I have to keep explaining this. All I'm starting to hear now is...

Again, his press secretary explained this. Too bad you didn't watch it. In the beginning the experts were inconsistent on how effective, if at all, masks were. Recent studies changed the consensus on this so Trump chose to make the odd public example reflecting it. Again though, to Trump, it is still a matter of choice.

Oh, and when Kayleigh was specifically asked if the President would wear a mask more frequently she said, and I quote: "I'll leave that up to the President." So if you're calling somebody a liar this lie should happen someplace other than just in your Imagination. I'm guessing you didn't actually listen to what she actually said but instead read some fake news at The Hill. The Hill says Trump is required to always wear a mask or he's lying because of a Tweet he made. Below you'll see the actual Tweet from Trump. The Hill is lying or perhaps English is their second language or something, because Trump never made any kind of pledge to always wear a mask. He wore a mask either as an example of wearing a mask when you can't social distance or because it was required by the venue. Later he jokingly boasted about how doing so at that event made him patriotic. Again your Gotcha's gone Bud. Would like to avoid more vanishing 'Gotchas;? Just remember: context is your friend.

What is it about Trump telling people it's matter of choice to wear a mask that informs you she's lying when he decides to wear a mask or not wear one? He says people need to put a priority on social distancing for now then wear a mask if you can. Kayleigh says he's the most tested man in American but sometimes it necessary to be a good example because the most recent science says wearing a mask can be helpful in containing what he calls the China virus. So there are occasions where he will wear one as an example or if the rules of the venue request it. He doesn't have to though.