Infidel Dog

Apparently, I may have spoken too soon in suggesting Seattle was the only city dumb enough to allow this. I forgot about Portland. Portland protesters barricade streets and declare new ‘autonomous zone’ outside mayor’s residence

The braintrust behind Occupy were neo-Marxists too. That's the real similarity. There are differences though. As far as I know Seattle is the only city dumb enough to allow Commies to set up a country in the middle of their city. And the people of Seattle are as much to blame for that as anybody. Your vote matters. These bogus riot-protesty thingies seem to be more a reaction to elections than what their claiming as cause. As that becomes so evident even the lying media can't hide it things will change.

Speaking of Marxist flavored, Democrat supporters like BLM creator Alicia Garza though, here's a guy who walked around CHAZ today (although I hear they want to call it CHOP now) talking to citizens of CHAZ/CHOP - the more radical wanting to tear down Western society. You know...like a neo-Marxist:

Promises, promises. Hope you're not one of these whiners who can't keep his word.

Here's another one:

1. Yes. Communists have been known to endorse the Democratic party. So I'm not sure what your point is. 2. Yes. Originally Trayvon Martin was pushed in the media as a fresh faced kid out for iced tea and skittles but a court case proved that a lie and a jury saw through it. What you're calling "the public" and what you believe they believe, I'm not sure of. 3. Groundswells begin with what many consider "strange extremist viewpoints," then the overton window shifts and it's mainstream. Currently the lie of "systemic racism" is shifting to mainstream support or so it might seem to many. Others talk about the silent majority. 4. I gave you examples of influencers, multiple anecdotal video evidence and articles showing Trump's black support increasing. Let's be honest it doesn't matter how much support I show you, you'll reject it. The Progressive agenda doesn't allow you to believe you're lying eyes. 5. I showed blacks arguing with Antifa and BLM on the streets, complaints about losses to their black community, observances of lies and hypocrisies like "why don't black lives matter in communities where blacks are killing other blacks" and so on. These are the kinds of things that show blacks are beginning to challenge the groupthink inculcated into their community by the Progressives since LBJ. Did you know that one time upon explaining his flip to accept the republican civil rights suggestions LBJ boasted "We'll have these n***ers voting Democrat for a hundred years" ? 6. I think the last presidential election showed how "superior" the sorts of polls you support are. They aren't. But polls in general would all depend on things like how the question is worded, who's being targeted, who's responding and how, specifically. Like that. But everybody has polls. I'm seeing more and more blacks starting to question the regressive left's groupthink. You're not. We'll both see in November, I guess. As I said previously though...get ready to scream at the sky again.

From the Washington Examiner link above: Yes, a groundswell of black support flipping over to Republican.

1. https://www.aim.org/special-report/reds-exploiting-blacks-the-roots-of-black-lives-matter/ 2. Trayvon Martin, you mean? No, nothing remarkable there. He was of African American heritage and as such, of use to the Prog to Commie race-baiters. Otherwise nobody would ever have heard of him. 3. I "keep talking about groundswells?" Buddy, the term was used in one post. But yes CL Bryant, Candace Owens, Jessie lee Owens, Kanye West their fans and followers represent as much a groundswell as what the communists were able to create in their formative years of race-baiting following the Trayvon Martin incident. And the progressive race-baiting movement had the mainstream media helping them out. It may take race realists longer. 4. You'd like me to cite for a prediction? Cite what? The fact that I'm predicting it? You've already quoted it. How else can I help you? 5. Yes, you cited 2 polls showing the commonly accepted fact Dems currently own the black vote. Nobody ever contended that wasn't the case currently. So, I don't know...congratulations, I guess. You proved a known fact. Would you like a banana or something? 6. Yes Trump needs 20% of the black vote increasing from the 8% he already has. and it's becoming more possible every day. https://pjmedia.com/election/matt-margolis/2020/06/05/rasmussen-black-voter-approval-for-trump-has-surged-to-over-40-percent-n499859 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/trump-approval-among-black-voters-near-20-poll

Black Lives Matter began when 3 communist women got together and decided they'd make a stink about Trayvon Martin. The beginning of the black anti Democrat groundswell on the other hand was already much bigger than that when this BLM,/Antifa push towards the November election began with the Floyd case. And as blacks see the self-destruction and hypocrisy if not outright lies happening at street level by the two commie groups the Blexodus movement grows. Go ahead though, don't believe your lying eyes. You'll be screaming at the sky again in November. Only 20% of the blacks currently on the Democrat voter plantation need to turn to guarantee Republican success at all levels of government in the November election.

And as I was looking for those I found this one. I have to show it to you,. It's fascinating. What happens to a black activist when he's put in a police training course dealing with life or death scenarios.

It begins as a groundswell. I gave you some examples of influencers. Here's some examples of the groundswell on the ground against the whites commies of antifa and even the far left of BLM. You might even eventually see BLM versus Antifa. Commies tend to eat their own.

Not just the Blaze YouTube account. I was first linked to the video on Twitter. I used the YouTube one because it will transfer here. But it isn't just the Blaze noticing the rising tide against neo and anarcho Marxist revised American history. Jesse Lee Peterson, Larry Elder, Kanye West, CL Bryant and many other black influencers are part of what Candace Owens calls the Blexodus or the black exodus from the democratic voter plantation. The far left claiming ownership over black issues will only speed up the process. That CHAZ video of the black preacher lady who knows the real history of the Democratic party is going viral. Watch CHAZ. I suspect you may start to see a black ignoring of BLM to oppose the far left whites of Antifa. Antifa may not be getting the war they're hoping for. If not in CHAZ someplace else soon. It may also surface in the November elections. The Dems may suffer for their Antifa support. They need the black vote to win. I heard if they lose 20% of their black vote, they lose the election.

I see this unholy alliance between the anarcho-communists of Antifa and the neo-Marxists of BLM ending soon. Try shutting this black preacher lady up commies of CHAZ. And she's not the only black person who remembers historical truth for whatever reasons. Slowly they're getting a platform. Cancelling them or getting them off the new platform you're giving them with this new mini revolution born out of a supposed black cause won't be easy. The movement is growing. And as it does Joe Biden loses black votes.

The first officer called for backup. I'm assuming when dispatch sent the message there's a code as to what's going on and how to handle it. For example if the suspect seems willing to or is resisting arrest the message might say something like "Blah blah blah, number and street. See Adam 12. Handle code 2." That's the way it's done on the TV show I watch anyway.

There are spots where Progressive Socialist or Progcom work. I've heard "progtard" but that's kind of cheap.

I get your point, and it seems accurate, but I'm not sure radical will do it. They'll just whistle and walk past it like "you can't be talking about me." I don't mind what classic Liberals like Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and Dave Rubin call them - 'The regressive left.' I personally like 'prog.' It's just a diminutive of progressive, of course, but used with judgement in the right spot it has power. First you have to get them used to being outed under the "progressive" label though.

The best and most illustrative edited and editorialized video of the Rayshard Brooks incident in my opinion is the one below from AIU starting about 24:50. It's the side you won't get from BLM supporters like the progressive media. But if you want to say you've heard both sides you should hear it:

And I'm going to hope you haven't passed out in a McDonald's drive-thru or stolen a cop's Taser then shot it at him lately.

Yeah, I know. That's the problem.

Not just white people but more white people are killed by cops. (And I would hope you would already know the counter if you want to talk about the unequal proportion of the 13% black demographic.) There is no systemic racism. And if there were we'd have to blame the systems in charge of policing in the areas where the proposed incidents of "systemic racism" causing black deaths by police occur. As you know by now those are pretty much all run by Progressives.

That assumes that almost identical incidents don't happen to non-black individuals that aren't given the same attention. I encourage you to look up the cases of Tony Timpa, Daniel Shaver and Justine Diamond for starters. i suggest the problem is more race baiting by special interests (including but not limited to media) than unequal treatment of any particular race.

OK so I'm reading your articles Boges and I'm struck immediately by what I perceive as problems. I think I see what you're calling "redefining police" though. As broad vague labels those might impress but you get into problems when you get into the nitty gritty of specifics. For starters some of that is done. Take "community policing" for example. Isn't that what the officers who were on the beat doing when they came across Eric Garner who was selling single cigarettes? Perhaps they had a certain amount of "cultural competency." Enough to know selling singles should have been an excusable misdemeanor of the culture of the mean streets of New York but the Socialists running New York at the time wanted their tobacco tax money. The officers had orders to step on anybody trying to avoid their taxes. Next thing you know poor obese Eric Garner is in a choke hold dying on the street. I'm not saying community policing or training for cultural competency is necessarily a bad thing. I'm saying presenting such in vague terms as a cure-all and suggesting it doesn't already exist in any form is probably a mistake. Another problem I have with your article is this one: As you may have noted myself and others consider the term "systemic racism" to be total BS. Then there's this one: That most likely is already happening but as, I believe Argus has already pointed out to you, police slackness like what happened in Baltimore in the aftermath of the Freddie Gray incident highlights the problem of getting too gung ho on that one. The big problem there was incompetent officials and race-baiting media causing a major problem before all the facts were in. I would hope that cities are already doing that. I hear the roadblock there comes from police unions. No unions in policing then? You might be able to talk me into that one. Now on this one: I'd like some specifics. My BS detector is starting to go off again though. Define "equally."

You could be right. The one I remember is that guy who shot the 5 cops at the Black Lives Matter rally. I heard that poor psycho was pushed over the ledge of reason by propaganda brain-training he'd gotten watching videos of The Young Turks. Not sure if social workers could have helped him with that one. For starters they would have had to disavow the progressive left.

Still reading but I'll drift a bit myself to ask you. What is it about the progressive mindset that they assume if somebody questions them they're offended. I'm not offended. If you can make sense of the nonsensical I'm intrigued. And if you can actually do it I'll give you a big thumbs up and an enthusiastic "good one." Still reading... If you want a spoiler you're not doing too well so far.

Hang on...I have to read your articles. Really interested in learning how "redefining the police" would have save Rayshard Brooks.