Infidel Dog

Here's a good one on why and how the Prog elite and their pet media want to convince you you're all gonna die as they open districts to activities they favor: The Anti-American Pattern Of Elites’ Coronavirus Restrictions

Here's somebody below who isn't as frightened as she thinks you should be though. Love the caption in the title of the story on this pic. Attempted murder? AOC removes face mask, blows bubbles at defenseless child:

Again...you say "lag indicator." Time magazine says "seesaw effect." Neither term impresses me much when I look at the graph that shows me death rate has plummeted. I imagine it is a little inconvenient that hospitals might get overcrowded in 2 states after the July 4th long weekend. I won't be pulling my hair out and peeing the bed as per the MSM's instructions though.

The original was far superior. I understood what he was saying and it rang of truth:

I heard about Texas and Florida: https://time.com/5863564/hospitals-capacity-coronavirus-surge/ Time magazine says "Seesaw effect". You say "Lag indicator." Meanwhile the death rate keeps plummeting. Sucks that the hospitals are approaching capacity in the 2 states. I heard a lot of that is due to people returning to hospitals to have elective surgeries done as covid restrictions relax. And apparently the MSM has you convinced that there's nothing to see there on the plummeting death rate. It's more "Lag indicator! Approaching capacity in Texas and Florida! OMG! All Americans are gonna die!!!" Cause, Trump, right?

People need to stop and ask themselves what the graph below is telling them that the mainstream media is not. But jobs are returning to America. The economy is bouncing back. That's also something the MSM doesn't want to tell you. Ever ask yourself why? Here's a hint - November.

I like the way the "think tanks" that do studies like that call themselves "Bipartisan" or moderate or independent or something like that. It always means the same thing. Progressives who might find a RINO or 2 to throw a few bucks at if he's ready to sell out.

Lot of entertaining hyperbole in the one below but the basic facts they spin from are worth knowing: CNN Admits Hydroxychloroquine Works…After Countless Needless Deaths

No sense in pretending this isn't partisan. It is and over on the right wing we hear this complaint all the time - "If this story had been happening the other way around it would be top of the news on all major media." There should be a place to archive these untold tales. What this phenomena says about the MSM being partisan to the left (I would say Marxists) should be made so clear it can't be denied. The story type that's being ignored lately (or at least that's what I'm noticing) are gun offences by the left (I would say Marxists.) Remember when there was a rally on the steps of Michigan's state building against Governor Half-Whitmer's excessive and hypocritical 'let them eat cake' covid controls? A collection of clowns from some gun group gathered with the protesters displaying their rifles. There was no violence. One got the feeling they did it just to show they could. Yet the MSM tore their hair out and peed their pants over that one. The story was everywhere. I'll wager you heard about it. Here's some you may not have heard about. Heavily Armed “Black Militia” Swarms Stone Mountain on Independence Day 8-year-old girl killed after shots fired into car, Atlanta police say Las Vegas officer shot at protest paralyzed from neck down Shootings in New York City up 205% since Socialist Bill de Blasio Took Over VIDEO: Rioter Shoots 60-Year-Old Motorist During Utah Anti-Police Protest Protesting Lawyer Shoots Innocent Motorist in Head During George Floyd Protest in Colorado There's more but that should be good enough for now. It's getting to be almost like the Marxists have declared a shooting war on the streets and we're not supposed to know about it. But that's just one category of the problem of stories the MSM won't let you know about. If the strange topic posting rules (unwritten but enforced) at this site allow it I'm going to archive more here.

The biggest problem with pouring money into mitigation though is it's money better spent on adaptation. Do you know who Dr. Bjorn Lomborg is? He's the most well known champion of adaptation over mitigation. But he may be talking about something like what you're talking about when he talks about adapting to climate change by financing research over alternatives that at present seem ineffective.

Show me an example of Mitigation working. I can show you all kinds of examples of Adaptation working. We can start with Holland if you like. With Mitigation - so far and most often - the cure seems worse than the disease. We can talk bat and rare bird choppers or friars and rare earth metal mining environmental disaster. wood fuel pollutants as alternative energy and so on...

Not exactly. The real debate would be on the idea that humans are causing an eventual catastrophe of warming. Also, even if you want to suggest a precautionary principle of doing something about possible crises of warming as an insurance policy what would the best way be to handle it - Mitigation or Adaptation? Pretty much all skeptics agree some warming has happened since the end of little ice age. Almost all agree humans could have some affect on climate. They don't agree that anybody knows how much or that models can predict this proposed catastrophe of warming. There is no scientific consensus on that. Fear of Warmageddon and the proposition of global management of a proposed problem that has yet to been shown to exist is political not scientific. It's not the warming it's the imagined apocalypse of nice weather that's the debate.

The borders of the CHOP area are lined with police, and protesters who refused to leave were arrested. Investigators say 31 people were taken into custody, including a 29-year-old man who had a large pipe and kitchen knife, https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/seattle-mayor-issues-emergency-order-clear-chop-zone/RBYYWMGLRRHKXOQM3GENBCVNBA/ The mob made the mistake of marching on their Marxist-friendly mayor's house so that was the end of that nonsense. That's the trick to getting the Marxists under control, I think. Entice BLM and Antifa to march on Democrat safe-zones.

I know. Thank you white Christian west.

And in Canada the slave trade was abolished in 1793. And in America they fought a war. All kinds of reasons and methods everywhere it was being stopped. For Britain the West Africa Squadron captured 1,600 slave ships and freed 150,000 Africans between 1808 and 1860. For America Thomas Jefferson created the United States Marines and with France put a stop to the North African slave trade. (They were enslaving whites. Millions of them.) Since the beginning of civilization there have been slaves. Then it was for the most part stopped worldwide. Who was responsible? Hint: It wasn't the Muslims. You can lasso one of the many motivating factors as to why the abolishers of slavery might have done it if you like. Go ahead, blow that factor up and present it as the only thing that matters to you but it won't change the answer to the question. It was the white Christian West that brought an end to slavery after so many millenia.

Let's say you were a fly on the wall in the British parliamentary backrooms and the financial board rooms of the 19th century. Let's say as a mind-reading fly you read the minds of the movers and shakers of the British Empire. So now you know for a fact that after the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 all efforts to stop slavery were purely mercenary. That wouldn't explain the decades of effort by William Wilberforce and the other Christian abolitionists leading to the passage of the Act. So efforts of the white Christian west both altruistic and utilitarian led to the global abolition of slavery. I'd still be fine with that. Are you saying there's a problem?

What? You don't get evil impulses? Controlling them is the trick.

Well my first impulse is to insult you, of course, but that would make me the even bigger dick, so I read on. Overall you seem willing to be reasonable. Wish I was so rich that i wanted to pay more taxes to accomplish nothing though. Glad you agree that's what often happens. Now we just have to show why that's what happens with a carbon tax.

What's a supportable fact is the idea blacks are experiencing unequal treatment by a white governance derived out of, responsible for and still influenced by slavery is unsupportable. Just as the OP stated. Would you like me to prove it? Go ahead then. Put your "fairness" strawman to the side for now and try to support that actual premise disavowed by the OP.

Me? I'm vocal, even loud, against it. It's the priority of what I'm against. What language would you like me to speak to communicate that to you. If you're against it too, yipee. How can we stop it? Let's start by stopping the carbon tax. International conferences and accords to put a global governing body in charge of supposedly stopping the imagined apocalypse of nice weather are dumb, right? How about some pipelines, BCsapper?

That's not just a sane proposal it rises above the category of simple hypothesis into the more respected realm of theory. It's supportable by the scientific method. What isn't is if you leap from that to suggesting you know how large the effect is, that it necessitates a catastrophe that has to be stopped and you know how to stop it. Globalization and increased government control.

Interesting proposal: That as an invented term or definition of a term "Climate Change" is more reasonable than "Warmageddon." Doesn't have much to do with the larger debate but it does sound like fun. So as I remember it we used to call the issue "global warming." But the world wasn't warming at the rate it was supposed to, to authorize the scare. So they changed the name to "climate change." Then it was more like climate end times is coming but it doesn't really matter when, cause, you know, climate. Climate is slower. Here's the thing that those of us who dare to notice can't help noticing about the term "climate change" though. Climate is always changing. It's kind of what makes climate. The change. But the new definition infers a necessary fear of it. Kind of bogus if you ask me. "Warmageddon" on the other hand has no pretense. It is what the term suggests it is - a silly end-times slogan of almost religious fear perpetrated on the masses. Oh, and no, I didn't invent the term.

And And "Denier" is yours. Whatever you're calling this proposed coming of a global warming apocalypse if it actually is a concern the current proposed solutions would be useless against what's being hypothesized. The human species has had better luck adapting to the climate. We've never been better equipped to do so than we are presently with modern technology.

And again if all you've got is name-calling you've got nothing. If you actually have what you're calling a "preponderance of evidence" that warmagedon is coming and the only way to stop it is with increased government and global management, produce it. If that's not what you're arguing for then as MH says what are you arguing about? Because that's what I'm arguing against.

If all you got is an insult term, appeals to the authority of an imagined consensus, and the ignorance of science that challenges your hypotheses you've got nothing. Basically all you've got is what the side pushing the fear has always got. This: