Jump to content

Nefarious Banana

Member
  • Posts

    2,202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Nefarious Banana

  1. Youe assumptions are just that . . . assumptions.
  2. Or, better yet, move back to the third world sh!thole you came from . . .
  3. Or, Canadian Indians trying to light a railway bridge on fire . . . wondering if their bank accounts were frozen, or the Emergency Act was enacted. Oooops! The Emergency Act is just for loud honking . . . it must really suck to be a brainwashed liberal.
  4. You're there for the nature . . . and you're unhappy with Canada? Where could/would you go to find nature like Canada has, and be happy too?
  5. The questions /inquiries were ment for you. Just wondering why you continue to stay in north coast British Columbia if you're unhappy with Canada?
  6. Were you ever happy in Canada? Have Canadians lived up to your expectations and standards?
  7. No, you didn't have a job? How could you then support a working/self sufficient logger? Why would you want to?
  8. Did you actually have a job in Canada? Were you supported by Canadian taxpayers?
  9. You've threatened to move away/back to where you came from . . . what's holding you here?
  10. The 'Cloward-Piven Strategy' . . . from 1966, a strategy to overload the welfare system to cause a political crisis. Developed by a pair of American sociologists, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, to create crisis and disruption leading to collapse in the social fabric of the government(s). Is this 'strategy' or parts of it being implemented in governments now? WEF?
  11. The 'Cloward-Piven Strategy' . . . . from 1966, a strategy to overload the welfare system to cause a political crisis. Developed by a pair of American sociologists, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, to create crisis and disruption in the social fabric of government leading to collapse . . . Is this 'strategy' or parts of, being implemented on governments now?
  12. Pierre Poilievre seemed to have a one dimensionality in most of his exchanges with the Liberals . . . endless slogans, and a personal 'harshness' in his manner. This didn't change the fact that he would be a better policy maker than Trudeau (who had no policy other than to make himself look good) but, there was that harshness that turned many off. This was so very apparent in the taped interview where Pierre Poilievre eats his apple while a journalist tries to bait and trap him. Very arrogant, very disrespectful to any viewer of any stripe. Not the 'stuff' leaders are made of. I did hope the Conservatives would win this election . . .
  13. The Justin Trudeau Liberals & Jagmeet Singh have damaged Canada. Many on this site seem ok with that. Sad.
  14. Don't think many folks believe you, or can get over your obsession with yourself . . .
  15. Justin Trudeau was arguably the worst PM in Canada's history. Huge deficit, conflicts galore, etc., etc., etc. PM Carney was at that time a part of that poor government. Canadian voters endorsed Mark Carney, so in essence, Canadian voters are ok, and approve of all the antics of the Trudeau government, but they just grew weary of Justin Trudeau. PM Mark Carney has the voters approval to carry on with the lies and deception Justin Trudeau left as his legacy. Begs the question: Are the voting Canadian public just stupid?
  16. A Royal Commission run by the Liberals . . . ? Yeah, right . . .
  17. Insane and criminally insane are two different maladies . . .
  18. You're as deranged and sick as the subject of this thread . . .
  19. Essendale / Riverview shut down . . . mental health sufferers / druggies on the street. Not good. Ordinary citizens are often the victims of the drugged/deranged.
  20. CITIZEN_2015 . . . taking 'troll' lessons from ExcessiveFlatulence ?
×
×
  • Create New...