blackbird

Headline: Jagmeet Singh Backs Khalistan Independence, Brands Canada Racist July 15, 2022 by Brad Jagmeet Singh Backs Khalistan Independence, Brands Canada Racist (capforcanada.com) Why is he whining about Canada being racist when he was able to succeed in a profession and then become the leader of a major political party?

I have given the details to ExFlyer above and below to explain why it is not arbitrary "racism". Choosing who is allowed to come to Canada has direct consequences on the politics and political system, which effects laws, and how the country governs and how society functions. The third world immigrants in general may choose left wing Socialism and liberalism which has dire consequences for Canada. Every country has a right to choose. In fact the government makes the choice of who they will let in. Why do you not call that racism against Caucasian westerners?

The reasons why liberals, NDP, and left in general support multicultural immigration are nefarious and immoral. The reasons centre around gaining more votes and support for the left Socialist or liberal government. You use "love of neighbour" as a cover for your belief in third world immigration, while the Bible does not support that scheme. Of course as a heathen yourself, you welcome millions more to support your socialist political ideology. quote 14 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? 15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? 16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, 18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. unquote 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 King James Bible We are talking about immigration and who should be brought into Canada to become voting citizens. Every country in the world has the sovereign right to choose immigrants whom they think will have a good benefit to their country. I have given you reasons why multiculturalism is destructive to Canada. Multicultural immigration policies which specifically concentrate on the third world and reject the European immigration will help turn Canada into a heathen nation with many false gods and false religions. This has a negative influence on politics and society in general. People who do not believe the Bible and do not believe in the Christian faith will not understand this because they are in the same boat themselves. But many of these people will have no problem supporting anti-God, anti-Biblical policies simply because they do not have a Judeo-Christian heritage or belief system. People who believe the Bible will tend to be more conservative leaning. But their influence in politics and political parties will be small or negligible because they are outnumbered by secular humanists or non-Bible believing people. One of the things that many immigrants from the third world will support is more Socialism which means more government control of society, more social programs, increasing taxation to pay for it all, and less freedom. We see this particularly with the NDP which is focused on increasing social programs which will have to be paid for by increasing taxation. They often talk about making the rich and corporations pay "their fair share". These are key words that reveal their ideology, which opposes the sanctity of private property and private ownership. They lean heavily toward communal or public ownership of everything.

The bottom line is that Canada adopted multiculturalism back in around the 1960s as official policy. This meant that Canada prefers to take immigrants from the third world rather than from European nations where our founding people came from and where our semblance of Judeo-Christian heritage came from. Immigrants from the third world are more likely to support left-leaning parties and liberals. The consequence of taking in massive numbers of immigrants from the third world under the multicultural policy means Canada is taking in large numbers of people who worship false gods of heathen religions or secular humanism. This will help turn Canada into a heathen nation with many false gods and false religions. This has a negative influence on politics and society in general. People who do not believe the Bible and do not believe in the Christian faith will not understand this because they are in the same boat themselves. But many of these people will have no problem supporting anti-God, anti-Biblical policies simply because they do not have a Judeo-Christian heritage or belief system. People who believe the Bible will tend to be more conservative leaning. But their influence in politics and political parties will be small or negligible because they are outnumbered by secular humanists or non-Bible believing people. One of the things that many immigrants from the third world will support is more Socialism which means more government control of society, more social programs, increasing taxation to pay for it all, and less freedom. We see this particularly with the NDP which is focused on increasing social programs which will have to be paid for by increasing taxation. They often talk about making the rich and corporations pay "their fair share". These are key words that reveal their ideology, which opposes the sanctity of private property and private ownership. They lean heavily toward communal or public ownership of everything.

My last post referred to more historical behavior in third world countries in Africa and similar aboriginal locations. We can look at present day culture or religious beliefs and find that they are still unacceptable. India might be a good place to start. In India Hinduism has all kinds of abhorrent beliefs that western society would not consider as civilized. They believe animals are sacred for example and do not believe in eating meat. They allow cattle to roam the streets while people starve. At least one town allows monkeys to roam, over populate, and rule the town. They bathe in the heavily polluted Ganges river. They still believe in the caste system where some people are considered as untouchables. All these things are contrary to Judeo-Christian beliefs in western civilization. So again western society is superior even if you don't like to use the word. There is no other way to compare or describe it. India's Hinduism is just one example out of countless examples of inferior religious and cultural belief systems held in the third world.

The leftist, progressive liberals calls anyone who believes in the Bible or is Christian a racist. That is old news. It means nothing. The country is not a "secular" country. Never has been. There are still millions of people with various religious beliefs and it is their right to believe what they choose. The liberal left want to turn the country to a heathen/pagan country as much as possible. But there are a few of us who are not buying it and we know it leads down a dark path.

You have admitted your lack of understanding in trying to equate western Judeo-Christian beliefs and culture with the heathenism in the jungles of Africa or Borneo or some place. I don't imply western Judeo-Christian culture is superior; I simply observe that it is superior. That is not racism and is nothing to be ashamed of. You have been brainwashed by the woke who have no understanding of the real world. If you think the heathen practices of scalping, offering human sacrifices, taking slaves, brutalizing slaves, treating women as inferior slaves, and all the rest of it is civilized and acceptable behavior, you have a problem. If you think putting a bone or ring through one's nose or lip and going around naked or covered in paint makes sense, what can I say. You would rather mock those who believe in the Bible and claim the heathen in the jungle have an equally admirable culture or Islam's teachings are equal to the Bible or Christianity, you have a big problem. Is this what they taught you in the Anglican religion? If that is the case, it has nothing to do with the Bible. The Bible is not allegorical or heavily edited. That is fiction.

You just had to throw "racism" into the discussion even though I said nothing against any race or skin colour. The books of the New Testament were determined by believers in the early centuries based on what the Scriptures actually said. Some other books were dismissed as heretical or false. Had nothing to do with wealth or privilege. The believers were led by God the Holy Spirit, just as people are today in determining what is true and what is false. The Old Testament was the Hebrew Bible that existed centuries before the Church age began 2,000 years ago. Again nothing to do with wealth or privilege. The fact is every religion cannot be true. There can only be one comprehensive truth which is what the Bible reveals and exposes the falseness of other religions. Belief in the truth of God's word has nothing at all to do with racism, but everything to do with what is truth. There are believers in the Bible in every country and among every race. If you have never really studied the Bible, you are not really in a position to criticize or comment on it.

One of the problems with so-called "multiculturalism" should be very simple to understand. Canada was founded on Judeo-Christian civilization originating in Europe. While there are many who have apostate or many false ideas, there were also people who held biblical beliefs down through history. Many principles came with the European settlers such as the dignity and worth of the individual and gradually resulted in enshrining concepts of human rights, democracy, religious freedom, and the western ideas of the rule of law applied equally to both genders, as well as the equality of the sexes. This is not the case in many third world countries. Unfortunately, these Judeo-Christian principles do not exist in many parts of the third world such as Asia, Africa, the middle east, central America. These are areas where today Christians are heavily persecuted and killed for their faith. Yet many European settlers who started Canada brought with them beliefs in freedoms and human rights for the individual. But here we are today having multiculturalism forced on us which results in bringing millions of people in from the third world who do not share the same belief systems where they came from. If anyone thinks this is not having a negative impact they should think again. Many of them simply do not understand these historic Judeo-Christian beliefs or why the original settlers held them. Many immigrants are quite willing to vote for Marxist or Socialist type governments, (NDP and left leaning liberals) and embrace secular humanist ideas that are contrary to Judeo-Christian beliefs. Some of them don't even understand our Constitutional Monarchy and want to get rid of it. What would they replace it with? A dictatorship such as where they came from in Africa, the middle east, or Asia? So yes, multiculturalism does have a negative influence on society in Canada.

You said "What is wrong is that you think the scribblings and proclamations of a bunch of wealthy, privileged clerics and bureaucrats from 2000 years ago..." Actually that is not correct. The apostles and prophets were not wealthy or privileged clerics. In fact the authors of the Bible came from all walks of life. quote Ultimately, above the human authors, the Bible was written by God. Second Timothy 3:16 tells us that the Bible was “breathed out” by God. God superintended the human authors of the Bible so that, while using their own writing styles and personalities, they still recorded exactly what God intended. The Bible was not dictated by God, but it was perfectly guided and entirely inspired by Him. Humanly speaking, the Bible was written by approximately 40 men of diverse backgrounds over the course of 1500 years. Isaiah was a prophet, Ezra was a priest, Matthew was a tax-collector, John was a fisherman, Paul was a tentmaker, Moses was a shepherd, Luke was a physician. Despite being penned by different authors over 15 centuries, the Bible does not contradict itself and does not contain any errors. The authors all present different perspectives, but they all proclaim the same one true God, and the same one way of salvation—Jesus Christ (John 14:6; Acts 4:12). Few of the books of the Bible specifically name their author. Here are the books of the Bible along with the name of who is most assumed by biblical scholars to be the author, along with the approximate date of authorship: unquote Who were the authors of the books of the Bible? | GotQuestions.org Science tells us the universe is expanding. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume it had a beginning at some point in time. If a theological debate or whatever kind of debate you wish to call it is a waste of time, why are you on the forum debating anything at all. Why should anyone contradict you if you think it is a waste of time. Do you have a closed mind to everything? That is the only conclusion one could draw from your statement that a debate is a waste of time. I did not say my point of view is wiser than observable science or other views from other parts of the world. I gave you the reasons for my view and science supports what I have told you. I simply believe that science, logic, evidence of the creation proves that it was created by a superior intelligence. The argument for that point of view is based on science, what famous scientists believed, logic, and rational thinking, and the testimony of Holy Scriptures. You have put forward nothing to counter those arguments. On top of all the reasons I gave you, there is the simple philosophical reason and that is the question of why we are here. Dismissing God as the reason leaves the atheist with no explanation as to why we are here, for what purpose? If you accept that God is not involved, you must conclude that we are just an accident in the cosmos. That there is no ultimate purpose for our being. You must conclude we are here by nothing, for nothing. That makes no sense whosoever. If you believe we are just an accident then you would have to conclude we are just a bunch of chemicals that happened to come together to form a complex living organism. We have no purpose and our existence is meaningless. Take your choice. Atheist scientists cannot answer that one. Others with a little more faith can tell you there is more to it than what atheists say. They have no purpose or explanation for existence.

You said "If the universe needed a creator, then the creator would need a creator too. There's can't be nothing." This is the central fallacy of atheist thinking. They can't think beyond the material universe we are in. The answer to that is very simple really if you take the time to think. We are talking about a God who is not a material being. As the Bible reveals, God is a spirit and separate from the material universe. If he required a higher being to create him, he would not be God. Therefore, it stands to reason that God is eternal, omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. This is often referred to as a supernatural being and the subject is supernatural, that is, beyond what we normally think of as something material or tangible that you can see or touch. The Bible and logic tells us that this God is eternal or always existed. He therefore did not need a Creator or higher being. Many people may have trouble wrapping their mind around this because they tend to think of everything as part of the material universe which exists and can be seen or measured. But one must change their thinking about that. That requires broadening one's thinking. The evidence points to a supernatural, intelligent designer, or Creator, we call God. To summarize the evidence includes: 1. The immense complexity of the material universe. The vast amount of computer like data stored in a single cell. Darwinism or Evolution cannot produce new or that kind of information. The information had to have been placed in the cell when it was designed and created. 2. The laws of physics are so incredible, precise and again could not have happened by some kind of cosmic accident. The very existence of atoms, energy, molecules, gravity, etc. had to have had a beginning and a Creator. They required an intelligent designer. The solar system for example which is held in place by gravity and the motion of the planets around the sun required these laws of physics to be able to exist and operate. This gives us the seasons on earth and the weather, etc. Some of the greatest scientists that ever lived in the around the 17th century recognized this all required God. It is pure nonsense to think it could all have happened by some kind of cosmic accident. 3. The immense complexity of living things has vast amounts of computer like data stored in it and all operates in concert to function as they do. Again the theory of evolution cannot account for the information required because random chance processes does not produce information. The computer like data and systems that operate living things right down to the basic cell is so complex it is far beyond the most advanced computer systems man has built. In fact there are multiple systems operating in a cell. Information must be designed and created by an external being we call God. 4. Darwinism has been shown to be unsupported because if it were a fact, there would be millions of transitional fossils showing the evolution between the different species for example. They do not exist. Empirical science does not support evolutionism. The scientific method requires proof and claims must be substantiated. Darwinism or evolution is unsubstantiated and is a religion, not science. Yet in many quarters it is taught as a fact by atheists who cannot accept the simple logic that the universe required an intelligent designer creator. Beliefs like this are not "enforced". It is not possible to force someone to accept this understanding. It is an individual choice to some extent.

Thinking all religious beliefs is superstition is pretty dumb. How much thought have you really put into it? Very little it appears. Simple logic should tell you that the universe and everything in it including mankind did not just appear out of nowhere. Sound science tells us the universe is expanding. Logically that would mean it had a beginning at some point in time. Therefore, where did it come from? The law of cause and effect means the universe must have had a cause. The existence of the universe is an effect which had a cause. Since matter cannot create itself, it must have come from somewhere. That leaves only one conclusion that many scientists are admitting to: That it had to have been a supernatural cause. They are finding that even the simplest living cell is so incredibly complex that it simply could not have evolved. A cell has vast data banks of DNA information that carry out many functions. It has machinery built into it that operate according to the vast amount of information built into the cell. None of this could have happened by random chance processes as the discredited theory of evolution claimed. It is just too complex. It required an intelligent designer Creator. In fact if you consider the laws of physics that govern how the universe operates, the gravity that holds galaxies together, the gravity that holds the solar system together and keeps the earth in position so that we get the 24 hour days with sunshine to grow the agriculture and make life possible, the motion of the planet that gives us the four seasons, and on and on; you have to admit this all required a super intelligent designer Creator. So don't talk about "superstititon" which is complete nonsense. The universe had to have been created out of nothing by an infinitely powerful and knowledgeable Creator we call God. Now that doesn't mean all religions are worshiping the same God. There can be only truth about God, not countless different truths. The truth of God is revealed first in his creation all around us. Secondly, he has revealed himself to mankind in his written revelation, the Bible. Since God is a fact and without God , there would be nothing. Mankind has always had an inner sense that there is a God out there or in some beliefs, multiple gods. So your claim that secularism is the destiny is doubtful. Our liberal left government is trying to push the country in that direction and make it a kind of secular society, but not everyone is buying it. Since the beginning man has always believed in a God (or gods in false religion). Many may take up some false religions. Many may fall away from belief in the one true God, but it is doubtful that everyone will fall into the completely secular category.

But the feds and province allowing foreigners and people who live in China and Hong Kong to buy it did help drive the price up and caused a shortage in major cities like Vancouver. As part of the feds multicultural policy they give Canada's valuable real estate away to people in Hong Kong or China who are only using it to make money or secure their investment. The influences from the Chinese disapora in politics in Canada is huge.

Well thought out. There are endless problems which could arise out of a multicultural policy. Just one for example. Vancouver BC is now 28.8% Chinese and Richmond, BC is over 50% Chinese. Nothing wrong with most Chinese people. They are quite cordial and friendly. The problem in the greater Vancouver area is the cost of real estate for ordinary Canadians is out of sight. This problem has been exacerbated by a provincial and federal government who have allowed foreigners to buy up real estate in the major cities of Vancouver, Victoria, Toronto, etc. even if they don't live in them. Billions of dollars worth of real estate including multi-million dollar homes and high rises, apartments buildings etc. has been purchased by people who do not even reside in the city. There are 300,000 people living in Hong Kong who hold Canadian citizenship. Many people who become wealthy in China, want to secure their wealth so the Communist party cannot grab it; so they invest it in real estate in Vancouver BC or other major cities in Canada. This has driven the price of real estate upward until it is out of reach of ordinary Canadians. This is all part of the unthinking politician's multicultural ideology, but without protecting Canadians from the consequences of doling out citizenship to anyone and allowing anyone in the world to buy real estate in Canada. Real estate particularly in Vancouver, BC and other major cities has become a kind of security and investment holding for many Asians, many of whom don't even live in Canada. They know it is a very good investment, safe, and the Communists in their own country cannot touch it. Canada is also under constant political pressure from the Chinese disapora in Canada, which is huge, to treat China with kids gloves even though the Communist Party is very brutal with the Uiygurs and anyone else who questions anything or steps out of line. China is Canada's second largest trading partner. One must wonder how this could happen considering the lack of human rights in China. But the huge demographic in Canada also led to a Liberal minister of Defence to attend the 70th anniversary of the Communist revolution, a dinner put on in Vancouver by the benevolent society. Canada's government is very mixed up and multiculturalism is one possible cause.

I never said the number of people in each religion proved the number of people being persecuted. You just made that line up. The actual numbers of Christians persecuted and killed is what matters, not the number of people following a particular religion. Last year 5,898 Christians were murdered around the world for their faith. The countries with the worst record of persecution and murder are shown on the website below. The countries which conduct extreme persecution are listed as well. One should understand and take this seriously and not just dismiss it as nothing. You will stand before God one day and your dismissal of the persecution and murder of God's saints will be noted. Serving Persecuted Christians Worldwide - World Watch List 2021 - Open Doors UK & Ireland

Something worth examining is the Parliamentary Press Gallery. It is made up of mainstream media. These are the media broadcasters who have an inside access to Trudeau and the Liberals. But others who seriously question Trudeau and his close ally, the NDP, are excluded and not allowed to attend press conferences which only the insiders like CBC, CTV, etc. are allowed to attend. Does anyone seriously think they can be trusted to give unbiased reporting on Trudeau and the Liberals? So the question is do certain media get paid off by the Liberals? The answer is in this arrangement. If you are part of the Parliamentary Press Gallery, you are given special privileges to attend Trudeau and Liberal media scrums that outsider journalists cannot have access to. That certainly can be interpreted as a payment or special favour. "Parliamentary press gallery breaks rules for Russia, BANS Rebel News" Parliamentary press gallery breaks rules for Russia, BANS Rebel News - Rebel News The problem of a Liberal bias in the media is very real LILLEY: There's Liberal media bias on the Hill but Akin isn't problem | Toronto Sun

A frog will not realize when he boiled slowly in a pot.

We obviously can't communicate. Let's just give it up. I wish you the best in your life and hope you can find the truth.

What facts do you have to back up your claim that Christianity is no more or no less discriminated against than any other religion? Obviously just your biased opinion. quote Over the past year, I have written of the intolerance that Christians have shown to Muslims in the U.S. From Missouri to Murphreesboro, Christians have demonstrated both a lack of charity and a denial of the right to religious liberty by setting fire to old mosques and opposing new ones. But Christians in the U.S. are rank amateurs compared to the Muslim persecution of Christians in the Middle East. In early November, German Chancellor Angela Merkel declared that Christianity is "the most persecuted religion in the world." Although met with predictable criticism, Rupert Short's recent research report for Civitas UK confirms Merkel's claim -- we may not want to hear it, but Christianity is in peril, like no other religion. While this is a contest no one wants to win, Short shows that "Christians are targeted more than any other body of believers." Short is the author of the recently published Christianophobia: A Faith Under Attack. He is concerned that "200 million Christians (10 percent of the global total) are socially disadvantaged, harassed or actively oppressed for their beliefs." Christianity is facing elimination in its Biblical homeland. Between a half and two-thirds of Christians in the Middle East have departed or been killed over the past century. Short attributes the intolerance and violence towards Christians to the rising Islamicization of Middle Eastern countries. Some of the oppression is government sanctioned and some government permitted; most is government ignored. Short looks at the plight of Christians in the Middle East, country by country. When it comes to religious oppression, the devil, one might say, is in the details. unquote Continued at: The Most Persecuted Religion in the World | HuffPost The World Post

Discrimination against Jews is a world-wide fact and has been going on for 1,700 years culminating in the holocaust. The U.N. is anti-Jewish and passed many motions against Israel. Muslims are not discriminated against in Israel. They hold elected office and are the major workers in the construction and trucking industries. But it is a mistake to think followers of all religions are being persecuted to the extent of persecution against Jews and Christians around the world. I gave you the statistics but you simply ignore them. Muslims are not persecuted in western countries to any degree, but Christians are widely persecuted around the world.

quote British multiculturalists are feeding Islamic fundamentalism. Muslims do not need to become the majority in the UK; they just need gradually to Islamize the most important cities. The change is already taking place. British personalities keep opening the door to introducing Islamic sharia law. One of the leading British judges, Sir James Munby, said that Christianity no longer influences the courts and these must be multicultural, which means more Islamic. Rowan Williams, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, and Chief Justice Lord Phillips, also suggested that the English law should "incorporate" elements of sharia law. British universities are also advancing Islamic law. The academic guidelines, "External speakers in higher education institutions", provide that "orthodox religious groups" may separate men and women during events. At the Queen Mary University of London, women have had to use a separate entrance and were forced to sit in a room without being able to ask questions or raise their hands, just as in Riyadh or Tehran. "London is more Islamic than many Muslim countries put together", according to Maulana Syed Raza Rizvi, one of the Islamic preachers who now lead "Londonistan", as the journalist Melanie Phillips has called the English capital. No, Rizvi is not a right-wing extremist. Wole Soyinka, a Nobel Laureate for Literature, was less generous; he called the UK "a cesspit for Islamists". "Terrorists can not stand London multiculturalism", London's mayor Sadiq Khan said after the recent deadly terror attack at Westminster. The opposite is true: British multiculturalists are feeding Islamic fundamentalism. Above all, Londonistan, with its new 423 mosques, is built on the sad ruins of English Christianity. The Hyatt United Church was bought by the Egyptian community to be converted to a mosque. St Peter's Church has been converted into the Madina Mosque. The Brick Lane Mosque was built on a former Methodist church. Not only buildings are converted, but also people. The number of converts to Islam has doubled; often they embrace radical Islam, as with Khalid Masood, the terrorist who struck Westminster. unquote Londonistan: 423 New Mosques; 500 Closed Churches :: Gatestone Institute Is this the destiny for Canada? CBC appears to be a strong advocate for Islam and Multiculturalism in the people they have hosting programs and pundits commenting on politics. Some immigrants in Canada have been on television recently during the Queen's death coverage and some saying we should get rid of the Constitutional monarchy even though they must have sworn allegiance to her majesty in order to obtain citizenship. Meanwhile the government continues to bring in immigrants who are not sincere about being loyal to our Constitutional monarchy.

Are you serious? Maybe you are one of the persecutors trying to justify yourself? Here is just one website about Trudeau's comment: Canada’s Justin Trudeau: Religious Christians “Worst Part Of Society” – Online Ministries (online-ministries.org) As for persecution of Christians in the world, it is widespread. 245 Million: In the top 50 World Watch List countries alone, 245 million Christians in the world experience high levels of persecution for their choice to follow Christ. 1 in 9: Christians worldwide experience high levels of persecution 14%: The rise in the number of Christians in the top 50 countries on the 2019 World Watch List (WWL) who experience high levels of persecution. (from the 2018 reporting period to 2019’s) 4,136: Christians killed for faith-related reasons in the top 50 WWL countries. 2,625: Christians detained without trial, arrested, sentenced and imprisoned in the top 50 WWL countries. 1,266: churches or Christian buildings attacked in the top 50 WWL countries. 7 out of 9: In seven of the countries in the World Watch List’s top 10, the primary cause of persecution is Islamic oppression. 11: countries scoring in the “extreme” level for their persecution of Christians. Five years ago, North Korea was the only one. 18: Consecutive years North Korea has ranked No. 1 as the world’s most dangerous place for Christians. Watch the 2019 World Watch List video below: Christian Persecution by the Numbers - Open Doors USA - Open Doors USA Every Month 105: churches attacked, burned or vandalized each month, in the top 50 WWL countries Every Day 11: Christians killed every day for their faith, in the top 50 WWL countries. By the Continent 1 out of 6: Christians in Africa that experience high levels of persecution. 1 out of 3: Christians in Asia that experience high levels of persecution. 1 out of 21: Christians in South America who experience high levels of persecution. Islam is legal in Canada and often Canada bends over backwards to accommodate them. There are mosques in many cities. Same in France, UK, and other countries in Europe. For the first time more people in England attend mosques than Anglicans attend churches. Just see what happens to Christians in Afghanistan, Pakistan and many other places.

What does the New Testament say about homosexuality? | GotQuestions.org

Truth is hate for those that hate the truth. Canada’s Justin Trudeau: Religious Christians “Worst Part Of Society” – Online Ministries (online-ministries.org)

Canada’s Justin Trudeau: Religious Christians “Worst Part Of Society” Judeo-Christianity built western civilization over the last 2,000 years and has developed human rights and democracy which is non-existent in much of the rest of the world, particularly Islamic countries, where Christians are persecuted. So I don't know where Trudeau is coming from. Canada’s Justin Trudeau: Religious Christians “Worst Part Of Society” – Online Ministries (online-ministries.org)